Musician claims 3 agents at Washington DC airport spoke Hindi: ‘H1B is a complete fraud'
A Florida man has claimed that he heard three gate agents at the Washington DC airport speaking in Hindi, and his social media post has sparked a wider conversation on US immigration. Sean Carpenter took to the social media platform X to ask why Indians were working at US airports when these jobs could be given to Americans instead.
His post has fuelled a broader debate around immigration and employment in the United States.
'Sitting in the DC airport, listening to three gate agents speaking Hindi behind me. Tell me why we need Indians to work the gates at airports again?' Carpenter wrote on X.
He ended his post with a sharp critique of the H1B visa, which allows high-skilled workers to live and work legally in the United States. 'H1B is a complete fraud,' wrote Carpenter, whose X bio states he is a Republican MAGA supporter.
Hindi is one of the most widely-spoken languages in India, a country whose nationals dominate the H1B programme. According to US Citizenship and Immigration Services data quoted by NDTV, Indian nationals received 72.3 per cent of all H1B visas issued by the US for the period October 2022 to September 2023.
The H1B programme has long been criticized for undercutting American jobs. However, the programme is only for skilled workers – like those in tech – and Carpenter's claims raise questions about airport gate agents possibly benefiting from the scheme.
The post divided opinion on X. Some suggested that Carpenter might have been mistaken in assuming the gate agents were Indians on H1B visas, and might instead be second-generation immigrants.
'That's quite the take. Has it ever occurred to you that a) they're citizens who are bilingual and b) that gate agent isn't a type of job you could get an H1B for?' asked one X user in the comments section.
'They're not the H1B workers, that's the chain migration that they bring over,' another said.
'Ask Trump, he said he knew this visa s** was a scam to take our jobs and our ability to earn a respectable income. Now he loves them, uses them himself to pour wine at his home. We lose our income, marriages fall apart with broken families. Depression then suicide,' a user added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project
LOS ANGELES — The Trump administration signaled Wednesday that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns, following the release of a scathing federal report that concluded there is 'no viable path' to complete even a partial section of the line. Voters first authorized $10 billion in borrowed funds in 2008 to cover about a third of the estimated cost, with a promise the train would be up and running by 2020. Five years beyond that deadline, no tracks have been laid and its estimated price tag has ballooned to over $100 billion. In a letter to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project, Federal Railroad Administration acting Administrator Drew Feeley wrote that what was envisioned as an 800-mile system connecting the state's major cities has been reduced to a blueprint for 'a 119-mile track to nowhere.' After a $4 billion federal investment, the California agency 'has conned the taxpayer ... with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Feeley wrote. State officials defended what's known as the nation's largest infrastructure project and said they remain committed to construction, though it's not clear what funding would replace the federal support if it's withdrawn. Feeley noted the FRA could seek repayment of the federal funds but is not proposing to claw back those dollars at this time. Carol Dahmen, the state authority's chief of strategic communications, said in a statement that the federal conclusions are misguided and 'do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California.' Dahmen noted that the majority of the funding for the line has been provided by the state and that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget proposal would extend at least $1 billion a year for 20 years to complete an initial segment of the line. State officials are focused on a stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced, which is set to be operating by 2033. The state agency has about a month to formally respond to the FRA, after which the grants could be terminated. State Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican from Huntington Beach who is vice chair of the Transportation Committee, said that 'commonsense has prevailed" and urged the Legislature's dominant Democrats to redirect the funds from the rail line to lowering gas prices or investing in viable construction projects. 'Let's stop wasting California's hard-earned taxpayer dollars,' Strickland said. There is no known source for the billions of dollars that would be needed to complete the line. California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri suggested in April that private investors could step in and fill the funding gap for the project that promised nonstop rail service between San Francisco and Los Angeles in under three hours. At the time, he acknowledged that even if funding is secured, it might take nearly two more decades to complete most of that segment. President Donald Trump said in May that his administration will not continue to fund the line. 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' Trump told reporters at the time, calling it "totally out of control.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
‘KILL the BILL': Elon Musk yet again explodes over Donald Trump's tax bill
lon Musk yet again launched a scathing attack on President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill on Wednesday (June 4), urging Americans to pressure their lawmakers to "kill" it. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL,' Musk wrote on X, formerly Twitter. In a previous post, Musk called for a complete rewrite of the bill: 'A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS.' 'This immense level of overspending will drive America into debt slavery!' In a post on June 4, Musk accused Republican House members of betraying fiscal conservatism and blamed the bill for expanding the national deficit. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' he posted. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote in a previous post. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' Elon Musk also on May 28 voiced strong criticism of the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' warning that it could worsen the federal deficit and undermine cost-cutting efforts led by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). In an interview with CBS, Musk said he was 'disappointed' by the tax and spending bill, which narrowly passed the House and is now pending a Senate vote. 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful. But I don't know if it could be both,' Musk remarked in a preview clip posted online. He added, 'It increases the budget deficit and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.' Despite Musk's sharp rebuke, President Trump remains firmly behind the legislation. 'Passing THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL is a Historic Opportunity to turn our Country around,' Trump said in a social media post earlier. He's pushing for the Senate to pass the measure before July 4. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt brushed off Musk's comments. 'The President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill and he's sticking to it,' she told reporters. The proposed bill, which has cleared the House and is now being debated in the Senate, includes major rollbacks to Biden-era subsidies for electric vehicles and clean energy — programs that benefit Tesla. It also slashes safety-net spending, while adding an estimated $2.5 trillion to the deficit over 10 years. Musk's vocal opposition comes just days after he ended his four-month stint leading DOGE, a Trump administration initiative to reduce federal spending. His brief tenure was marked by controversy and reportedly coincided with a dip in Tesla EV sales. On May 29, Musk officially confirmed his departure on X: 'As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending.' Trump hosted a farewell at the White House on May 30, publicly thanking Musk: 'He's done a fantastic job,' Trump said at a joint press conference. The tech billionaire, once seen as a key Trump ally, appears to be distancing himself from politics. Speaking at the Qatar Economic Forum on May 20, Musk said he planned to reduce his political spending. 'I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' he said.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"Surrender is in dictionary of Congress; in your DNA": JP Nadda slams Rahul Gandhi's Surrender" remark
New Delhi [India], June 5 (ANI): BJP National President and Union Health Minister JP Nadda on Wednesday slammed Congress MP and Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of insulting the Indian Army by terming the success of Operation Sindoor a 'surrender', noting that 'surrender' was in the dictionary of Congress and in Rahul Gandhi's DNA. In a series of posts on X, Nadda responded to Congress MP's 'Narender-Surrender' jibe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi while addressing a convention of Congress workers in Madhya Pradesh and alleged that PM Modi had surrendered to US pressure for a ceasefire with Pakistan. He listed historical instances like the Shimla Agreement, the Indus Waters Treaty, and the 1962 war, alleging that Congress consistently capitulated, including to the Muslim League during India's independence. 'Rahul Gandhi, you may have surrendered; your party may have surrendered; your leaders may have surrendered because your history has been like this but India never surrenders. Surrender is in the dictionary of your party Congress; it is in your DNA. Rahul Gandhi, you should remember the tenure of your party's governments and how you 'surrendered' in history. You surrendered to terrorism, surrendered in Sharm-al-Shekh, surrendered at the table in Shimla after winning the 1971 war, surrendered in the Indus Water Treaty, surrendered Haji Pir Pass, surrendered 160 km area of Chhamb sector, surrendered in the 1962 war, surrendered in 1948 and even surrendered to the Muslim League at the time of independence of the country,' Nadda stated. Nadda further condemned the Congress leader's remark as treasonous and highlighted that even Pakistan did not dare to make such a claim. 'Rahul Gandhi's calling the unmatched valour and courage of the Indian Army a 'surrender' is not only unfortunate but also a grave insult to the Indian Army, the nation and 140 crore Indians. If any Pakistani had said this, we would have laughed at them, but after the way Operation Sindoor wreaked havoc in Pakistan, no one from the people of Pakistan, its army and even its Prime Minister dared to say this, but Rahul Gandhi is saying this! This is nothing less than treason,' the BJP National President added. Nadda also detailed the success of Operation Sindoor, noting the Indian Army's deep penetration into Pakistan, destruction of airbases and terrorist camps, and the killing of over 150 terrorists, as validated by senior army officers. 'The Indian Army penetrated 300 km into Pakistan and destroyed 11 of its airbases, demolished 9 terrorist bases, killed more than 150 terrorists. Pakistan is crying and telling the world that the Indian Army attacked 18 places in Pakistan and destroyed everything and Rahul Gandhi is talking about the surrender of the country! Rahul Gandhi should know that the success of 'Operation Sindoor' was not announced by the government or any BJP spokesperson, but by senior officers of the Indian Army. 'Operation Sindoor' is a proclamation of the bravery, courage and valour of the Indian Army. In reality, those whose policies have been of surrender cannot think of anything beyond this - why, isn't it so with Rahul Gandhi?' he added. This comes after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi attacked the BJP-led government on Tuesday over allegations of mediation by the United States in Operation Sindoor. He alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'followed' Donald Trump following a call by the US leader and that the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi did not budge to the US in the 1971 war. Addressing a convention of Congress workers in Bhopal, LoP Rahul Gandhi said, 'Now, I understand RSS-BJP well. They run away out of fear if slight pressure is put on them. When Trump called Modiji- Modiji kya kar rahe ho, Narender-Surrender and with 'ji hazooor', Narenderji followed Trump. In the 1971 war, the Seventh Fleet (which came from the US), India Gandhi said I will do whatever I have to do. This is the difference. This is their character; all of them are like this. Since the Independence movement, they have had the habit of writing letters of surrender.' (ANI)
