Tommy Robinson back on streets after being released from prison
He is due back before the courts on a seperate matter next week
Robinson was filmed with longer hair and a bushy beard on his release from prison (@TRobinsonNewEra/X/PA)
Far-right activist Tommy Robinson has been released from prison just days after a high court judge ruled that his sentence could be cut by four months.
He was due for release on July 26th, but was spotted leaving HMP Woodhill in Milton Keynes this morning.
Images show Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, sporting a bushy beard, after he grew out his hair while behind bars.
Sporting wooden rosary beads around his neck, Robinson took to X to share a 27-minute-long video following his release.
Robinson was filmed with longer hair and a bushy beard on his release from prison (@TRobinsonNewEra/X/PA)
News in 90 Seconds - May 27th
In the video he told his supporters that he would organise a 'free speech festival' in London later this year.
He also thanked X founder Elon Musk adding: 'because without X, if we didn't have X, everyone would just think I lied. No one would have got any other narrative.
"These attempts at censorship, to silence, to cancel people, it hasn't worked. You've attempted to lock up the truth. And that truth has been echoed around the entire globe."
Trump's right-hand man, Elon Musk, previously called for the release of Robinson while accusing Keir Starmer of failing to prosecute child rapists in Oldham in Greater Manchester.
The president's billionaire pal previously pinned a message at the top of his X feed stating, 'Free Tommy Robinson!'
As well as a number of messages in support of Robinson, Musk posted several times about rape gangs in Rochdale and Oldham, while attacking the prime minister and the safeguarding minister, Jess Phillips, over their responses to the scandal.
Robinson is due to appear before Westminster Magistrates Court next Thursday on a separate matter after he was charged with harassment causing fear of violence against two men between August 5th and 7th, 2024.
He was jailed for 18 months last October after he admitted to breaching a court order on multiple occasions.
The injunction was made to prevent him from repeating false allegations against a Syrian refugee who sued him for liable.
Sentencing judge, Mr Justice Johnson said that the sentence was made up of a punitive element of 14 months and a coercive element of 4 months.
The court heard that the 4-month sentence would be reduced if he took steps to comply with the court order.
At a court hearing on Tuesday, legal counsel for Robinson said he had shown 'commitment' to complying with the order.
The judge told the court that while Robinson didn't show remorse, he had demonstrated a 'change in attitude' since he was first jailed
He added that the English Defence League founder has 'no intention' of breaching the order again, and is 'aware of the consequences' if he did so.
Robinson admitted to breaching the injunction, which was imposed after he was successfully sued by schoolboy Jamal Hijazi, a total of 10 times.
Robinson had falsely claimed that the then 15-year-old had attacked girls at his school in Huddersfield.
He was ordered to pay Hijazi £100,000 in damages as well as the boy's legal costs.
A judge then imposed the injunction to stop Robinson from repeating the false allegations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
10 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Cianan Brennan: How the far right tried to hijack Carlow shooting
Online information in 2025 moves at speed. But the tragic events in Carlow on Sunday, where a gunman opened fire in a shopping centre, appear to sum up the perils of unregulated social media discourse, and what State bodies like the gardaí can try to do to mitigate it. By 12.30pm on Monday, gardaí had put out four statements regarding the shooting incident at the Fairgreen Shopping Centre in Carlow Town. The second and fourth were most noteworthy. The second arrived at 9pm on Sunday night and followed a new but increasingly familiar trend – confirming the ethnicity and nationality (white and Irish) of the gunman who was dead at the scene. This is a calculated risk to take legally, one most recently employed during the incident in Liverpool where a car struck dozens of football fans on the street. The Merseyside Police quickly and publicly identified the driver as being both white and from Liverpool. It seeks to balance the potential negatives of being so specific so early regarding a suspect's personal details, versus the upside of nipping the misinformation and narratives spreading about the incident online firmly in the bud. The fourth garda update, at 12.30pm on Monday, was extraordinary. It set out in detail many of the specifics of what had happened – including the age and ethnicity of the dead man, the fact he had died by his own hand, and that no garda had fired a shot, while the only other injury recorded was a minor leg issue suffered by a young child while running away from what was happening. Contrast that wealth of corroborated, checked information, delivered just 18 hours after the traumatic incident had occurred, with the reams of misinformation which spread online, particularly on X (formerly Twitter), in the immediate aftermath of shots being fired at the shopping centre. To list just some of the claims being made: the gardaí had shot a person with a gun, a mass shooting had taken place, seven people had died, nine people had died, a nine-year-old child had been shot, the shooter had explosive objects strapped to his body. Many of these posts got thousands of views. Absolutely none of what they claimed was true. Gardaí near the scene at Fairgreen Shopping Centre in Carlow. By 12.30pm on Monday, gardaí had put out four statements regarding the shooting incident. Photo: Niall Carson/PA Tommy Robinson, the British hard right agitator, was one of those to pass comment. So too our own far-right ideologues and failed political candidates Derek Blighe and Philip Dwyer. None of them could possibly have known what had happened, because it takes time to sift evidence and be certain about what has transpired in chaotic circumstances. But that didn't stop them. After gardaí confirmed that the deceased man was white, Blighe even had the gall to claim that "skin colour is only important when it can be used against you" on X. His point being that if the shooter hadn't been white, the gardaí wouldn't have said so. Meanwhile, his own post stating that 'apparently 7 people including a child have been shot' - posted exactly an hour after the incident, is, of course, still up. It has 332,000 views at the time of writing. 'There is a rush by members of the far right to portray such incidents under their own ideological viewpoint,' said Ciaran O'Connor, senior analyst with the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. 'In doing so they are knowingly contributing to disinformation around this incident given there is simply no way for first responders to establish what facts are known at a scene in that timeframe, let alone people following viral Whatsapp and social media posts from a distance,' he said. Emergency services attended the scene at Fairgreen Shopping Centre, Carlow. Photo: Niall Carson/PA The trouble is that there are simply no consequences for people pushing these false narratives. The only response is for people to be vigilant and to take everything they see posted online by unverified or untrusted actors with a grain of salt. Unfortunately, despite the gardaí's unprecedented pushback on this occasion, the information war feels like a battle that is currently being lost, and comprehensively. Read More
Sunday World
a day ago
- Sunday World
Man avoids jail after poisoning partner by crushing Valium tablets into her sandwich
Man avoids jail for crushing up Valium tablets inside his 'stressed' partner's sandwich A man who poisoned his partner by crushing up two Valium tablets and placing them in her sandwich is back walking the streets after dodging a jail sentence after claiming he had been trying to help her 'relax'. Video recorded by the Sunday World shows Mark O'Neill (62) of Cois na Coille, Pollerton, Co Carlow standing outside court as he awaited sentencing for the shocking crime last week. He pleaded guilty to Section 12 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Persons Act, which is defined as 'intentionally or recklessly administering, or causing to be taken, a substance which he/she knows to be capable of interfering substantially with the other's bodily functions'. The court previously heard Mark O'Neill's partner, Helen Nolan, discovered Valium tablets in the sandwich that he had made for her last August and that after taking one bite, she didn't eat any more of it because it tasted 'metallic' and that she immediately went to sleep. At his sentencing hearing, defence barrister Ross Pratt O'Brien pleaded for leniency on behalf of his client. He told Judge Eugene O'Kelly the facts of the case were accepted but noted it was his client's defence his wife was 'extremely stressed' at the time and he had been trying to help her. He said he now accepted his actions were reckless and could have caused her serious harm but said he did not consider this at the time. He said his client was 62 years old and has no previous convictions. He said he had fully co-operated with the investigation and had made admissions. He said as a result of the incident, his relationship was gone and that O'Neill is now effectively homeless and living in temporary accommodation. O'Neill pictured outside court this week He said O'Neill had been socially dependent on his partner and as a result of the case his entire social structure had broken down. 'He is now isolated entirely,' he said. He asked the court to deal with O'Neill by way of a non-custodial sentence. Judge Eugene O'Kelly described O'Neill's actions as 'shocking'. 'It was a shocking incident particularly with a person whom he knew had shocking medical issues which required lots of medication, so he knew perfectly well what he was doing to his partner,' said Judge O'Kelly. 'I have read the victim impact statement. The Probation Welfare Report is positive. The accused currently does not have a strong support network and is of low risk of reoffending,' added Judge O'Kelly. Mark O'Neill is now 'isolated entirely' News in 90 Seconds - June 1st Judge O'Kelly said he would impose a sentence of one year and six months, which he would suspend in its entirety for a period of two years on the accused entering into a bond of €100. Speaking directly to O'Neill, Judge O'Kelly said: 'I can assure you, that you have used up every opportunity that is available from this court.' Approached for comment at her home later, a family member of Ms Nolan's said she was aware of the outcome of the case but didn't wish to comment. The court heard previously that O'Neill and Ms Nolan had been in a relationship for 30 years and that they lived together at an address in Pollerton. Judge O'Kelly heard that on the day of the offence, Ms Nolan was in her bedroom on the phone when she heard Mr O'Neill on the landing outside so she asked him to make a sandwich for her. He subsequently returned with a tomato and mayonnaise sandwich, gave it to her and left the bedroom. The court heard that when Ms Nolan took a bite out of it, it tasted metallic and didn't taste like it should have, so she put it down and didn't have any more. She then fell asleep, and when she woke up the following morning, she still felt tired, so tired that she didn't feel like she had slept at all. She was 'overwhelmingly tired' throughout the day when she went to Tullow so she returned home to go back to bed, the court heard. Judge O'Kelly was told that when she saw the sandwich still on her bedside locker, the bread had turned blue in places and, upon investigation, she saw blue tablets mixed into it. She went to her doctor, who said she was medically fine but advised her to go to the gardai about the matter.
Sunday World
2 days ago
- Sunday World
Mother of disabled woman who killed herself after benefits cut describes ‘long wait' for justice
Jodey Whiting, 42, from Stockton-on-Tees, died in February 2017 about two weeks after her disability benefit was stopped, when she did not attend a work capability assessment The mother of a housebound disabled woman who killed herself after a benefits cut has described the 'long wait' for justice, ahead of a second inquest into her daughter's death, following years of legal fights. Jodey Whiting, 42, from Stockton-on-Tees, died in February 2017 about two weeks after her disability benefit was stopped, when she did not attend a work capability assessment. Her mother, Joy Dove, fought for a new inquest to investigate the impact of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) ending Ms Whiting's benefits, after the first lasted only 37 minutes and heard no evidence relating to the DWP. Ms Dove told the BBC: 'It's been such a long wait. It's now come back to where it all began. 'The coroner has said it will be a full and thorough inquest and I'm hoping for the best, not just for Jodey's sake but for the whole family, especially the young ones, who don't really know what the past few years have been like. 'Hopefully, they'll understand it more.' She will give evidence at the hearing, and told the broadcaster: 'I'm anxious, but I just want justice for Jodey.' The fresh inquest will open at Teesside Magistrates' Court on Monday and will hear evidence from a DWP representative. The coroner at the original inquest in May 2017 recorded a verdict of suicide. In 2020, Ms Dove was given permission by the attorney general to apply to the High Court for a new inquest, an application that was eventually refused. Jodey Whiting (Family handout/PA) Ms Dove took her fight to the Court of Appeal, where in 2023 her lawyers said the first inquest did not investigate 'whether any acts or omissions of the DWP caused or contributed to Ms Whiting's death', and argued that the High Court judges reached the wrong conclusions. They said another inquest was necessary to consider fresh evidence of 'multiple, significant failings' by the DWP when it terminated Ms Whiting's employment and support allowance (ESA), which was not before the coroner at the time of the first inquest. Judges ruled there should be a new inquest, heard by a different coroner, saying the public have a 'legitimate interest' in knowing whether Ms Whiting's death was connected to the abrupt stopping of her benefits. Ms Whiting had received benefits for more than a decade because of serious, long-term physical and mental health issues, including severe pain and a history of self-harm. In late 2016, the DWP started to reassess Ms Whiting, who said she needed a house visit as she was housebound, had severe anxiety and was unable to walk more than a few steps. Joy Dove (Victoria Jones/PA) News in 90 Seconds - June 1st Ms Dove's lawyers argued at the High Court in 2021 that a house visit was not properly considered before the DWP terminated her disability benefit, which led to Ms Whiting's housing benefit and council tax benefit also being terminated. Ms Dove told the BBC about a letter her daughter received from the DWP before her death, asking 'why she hadn't attended a medical assessment, because it could affect her money'. 'But she'd been in hospital,' she said. 'We waited for another letter and I couldn't believe it. It said 'you're fit to work'. 'She looked at me and said 'Mam, what am I going to do? I can't walk out the door, I can't breathe, I can't sign on'.' The decision to terminate Ms Whiting's benefit was overturned on March 31, weeks after her death. The independent case examiner, which investigates complaints about the DWP, later found multiple breaches of department policy, significant errors by staff, and several 'missed opportunities' for the DWP to reconsider the claim.
