logo
Reeves as unpopular as Kwarteng at height of mini-Budget crisis

Reeves as unpopular as Kwarteng at height of mini-Budget crisis

Telegraph2 days ago

Rachel Reeves is now as unpopular as Kwasi Kwarteng during the height of the mini-Budget blow-up.
New polling shows that the Chancellor now inspires as little public confidence as Liz Truss's chancellor did during the fiscal crisis.
Some 51 per cent of voters think Ms Reeves is doing a 'bad job' at the Treasury, according to Ipsos. Just 16 per cent think she is doing a 'good job'.
In the aftermath of the mini-Budget in late September 2022, Ipsos found that 53 per cent of the public thought Mr Kwarteng was doing a 'bad job'.
He was sacked a fortnight later as Ms Truss scrambled to save her premiership.
Ms Truss's mini-Budget, a programme which included £45 billion in tax cuts, led to market chaos after it was announced by Mr Kwarteng in the House of Commons.
The resulting turmoil ended her stint in Downing Street after just 49 days.
Since she took office as Chancellor in July, Ms Reeves has been criticised for raising employer National Insurance contributions despite a manifesto pledge that National Insurance and income taxes would not rise under Labour.
Her early decision to remove the winter fuel payment from millions of pensioners after changing the eligibility criteria has also provoked public ire, with the Government now set to reverse the decision in the coming months.
Yet despite Ms Reeves's poor personal ratings, Labour remains the most trusted party on economic affairs.
A fifth of voters now say that Labour is the party they trust most to manage the nation's finances, with Reform in second place on 17 per cent.
The Conservatives are now ranked third on 16 per cent, despite the economy previously being an electoral strength for the party.
The new figures come as separate polling shows a large proportion of Labour voters support the two-child benefit cap despite the Government's plans to scrap it.
New figures from pollster Opinium show that 42 per cent of Labour voters, and 44 per cent of voters overall, are in favour of keeping the cap.
The Government is considering ending the cap, which prevents parents from claiming tax credits or Universal Credit for their third and any subsequent children.
It was introduced into law by the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition in 2013 but did not come into force until 2017.
Labour's Child Poverty Taskforce, set up to reduce levels of child poverty in Britain, is expected to recommend significant reforms or the total abolition of the cap later this year.
The Prime Minister is expected to implement any such recommendations. He has also reportedly committed in private to scrapping the two-child limit during this Parliament.
A large majority of Reform voters also support the cap despite Nigel Farage, the party leader, pledging to abolish it.
Some 59 per cent of Reform voters support the benefits cap.
Mr Farage repealing the cap, along with more tax breaks for married couples, is part of Reform's plan 'to encourage people to have children, to make it easier for them to have children'.
James Crouch, head of public affairs and policy at Opinium, said: 'While both Labour and Reform explore scrapping the two-child benefit cap, Opinium's latest polling shows their leadership could be out of step with many of their voters, who simply don't see it as affordable – whatever the rights or wrongs of the policy.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former PM Liz Truss helps notorious bare-knuckle fighter launch his new whiskey in bizarre promo video - just months after he was freed from jail
Former PM Liz Truss helps notorious bare-knuckle fighter launch his new whiskey in bizarre promo video - just months after he was freed from jail

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Former PM Liz Truss helps notorious bare-knuckle fighter launch his new whiskey in bizarre promo video - just months after he was freed from jail

Liz Truss joined a notorious bare-knuckle fighter as he launched his new whiskey brand in a bizarre promotional video. The former Prime Minister looked in great spirits as she waved a bottle of Dougie Joyce's booze towards the camera just months after he was freed from jail. After Joyce points to the lens and says, 'just remember Dougie Joyce loves ya', Ms Truss, who led the nation for 49 days in 2022, repeats his catchphrase, saying: 'Liz Truss loves you.' The ex Conservative leader offers an awkward laugh as the traveller boxer, who attacked a 78-year-old man in a bar in 2022, adds: 'Just remember that, people, we love you all.' Ms Truss, 49, could also be seen sitting down next to Joyce for a few drinks during the launch event, which took place at Scunthorpe United's stadium last month according to a post on the fighter's Instagram. A source told The Sun that the former PM had not been paid to attend the party. 'Liz Truss either doesn't understand the implications or doesn't care,' one source said. 'Either way this is a serious lapse. 'She's a former Prime Minister and has to be extremely careful who she associates herself with. 'You have to wonder if anyone did the due diligence.' Joyce, 36, said on Instagram: 'It was a great honour to have former Prime Minister as a special guest. 'Having her there truly meant a lot and added a distinguished touch to the occasion.' MailOnline has approached representatives of Ms Truss for comment. Joyce claims to have turned over a new leaf, insisting he is devoting himself to charity work, after being released from prison. The father-of-three, who once boasted he was 'the next Tyson Fury', was jailed for the second time in quick succession in May 2024 after finding himself involved in a violent brawl with a rival family at a wake. He and his brother Tom, then 27, were handed the sentences for violent disorder by Manchester Crown Court after a shocking incident unfolded in the Vine pub in Collyhurst, Manchester. Chaos erupted in the pub for about half-an-hour as members of the Joyce and Doherty family clashed in the latest episode of a long-running feud. The two families had attended the establishment as part of a wake following the death of two young men who were part of the traveller community on October 2, 2020. Two members of the Doherty family were taken to hospital with 'significant injuries', one of whom Tom had struck on the head with a smashed beer bottle. Prosecutors explained how trouble began at about 5pm, as footage from the pub showed signs of conflict and verbal rows before it turned violent about 20 minutes later, with two groups of about 10 young men forming distinct groups. At one point Tom grabbed a bottle of beer inside the pub and smashed it, before wielding it and striking a member of the Doherty family to the face with it in the pub car park, the court heard. The victim could be seen 'covered in copious amounts of blood', before Tom was then assaulted by others. Dougie also smashed a bottle in the build up, but did not use it and dropped it. Instead, he armed himself with a plastic pipe and threw it at another man, prosecutor Constance Halliwell said. The injured men were bundled into a car and taken to the Manchester Royal Infirmary. They refused to provide statements to police and were interviewed the following year, providing no comment to questions. Dougie was handed a 13-month jail term, while Tom was sentenced to 22 months in prison. The boxer, who turned down a role on reality TV show My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding, was already serving a 19-month sentence for causing grievous bodily harm after launching a sickening attack on a 78-year-old man in a pub. A shocking video of the attack showed the traveller and businessman knock the recently widowed elderly man off his chair with three savage blows, before flooring him again after he got to his feet. The injuries to the man's face were exacerbated by the large golden pyramid ring he was wearing. During his time behind bars, the thug smuggled in a phone to film himself chuckling in his cell. Ms Truss's name came up in a somewhat negative context on Thursday as Keir Starmer compared Reform leader Nigel Farage's economic plans to her infamous 2022 mini-Budget. Mr Farage has sought to woo working class Labour voters by leaning left with support for scrapping the two-child benefit cap and fully reinstating winter fuel payments. But he simultaneously backs a series of tax cuts, which left experts at the Institute for Fiscal Studies saying there could be an £85billion hole in the maths. Sir Keir further questioned his ability, pointing out that Mr Farage, the Clacton MP, is currently in Las Vegas to speak at a conference promoting bitcoin. Speaking in Warrington Sir Keir said: 'Can you trust him? Can you trust him with your future? Can you trust him with your jobs? Can you trust him with your mortgages, your pensions, your bills? 'And he gave the answer on Tuesday. A resounding no.' He added: 'Apparently (Mr Farage) is in Las Vegas today at a casino, and it's not a surprise, because he said that the Liz Truss budget in his view was the best since 1986. That shows his judgment.' Over the weekend, Ms Truss appeared alongside Hungarian PM Viktor Orban at a press conference.

Magnus Carlsen slams table after shock loss to Gukesh Dommaraju in Norway
Magnus Carlsen slams table after shock loss to Gukesh Dommaraju in Norway

The Guardian

time41 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Magnus Carlsen slams table after shock loss to Gukesh Dommaraju in Norway

World champion Gukesh Dommaraju earned his first classical victory over Magnus Carlsen on Sunday at the Norway Chess tournament in Stavanger, toppling the longtime world No 1 in dramatic fashion and prompting the Norwegian to punch the table in frustration before storming out of the venue. The win in round six of the double round-robin event marked a milestone moment in Gukesh's young career, not for its stakes but for who it came against. Under pressure for much of the contest, the 19-year-old Indian grandmaster turned the tables in the final phase, capitalizing on a rare Carlsen blunder in time trouble to steal the point and shake up the standings in Stavanger. 'Right now, what means the most to me is that I didn't lose the game,' Gukesh said after the game. 'But yes, beating Magnus in any form is special.' Magnus Carlsen punches the table in frustration after losing to world champion Gukesh Dommaraju for the first time in a classical game at #NorwayChess today. Carlsen had outplayed Gukesh with ease in their first-round meeting and looked poised to do so again, pressing from a superior position through the middlegame. But with both players operating on a 10-second increment, Carlsen faltered ( Gukesh defended doggedly and pounced when the Norwegian miscalculated, flipping the position with a precise counterattack. The 34-year-old resigned shortly after then slammed his fist on the table, sending pieces rattling. It was an uncharacteristic display from the typically composed five-time world champion, who then left the hall immediately and skipped all media duties. This article includes content hosted on We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as the provider may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'. 'Well, we could say it was lucky,' said Gukesh's coach Grzegorz Gajewski. 'But we have to give a lot of credit to Guki for his stubbornness and for his resourcefulness.' The result not only evened their head-to-head in this tournament but delivered a quiet rebuke to Carlsen's recent criticism of Gukesh's classical performances. After winning their earlier encounter, Carlsen had posted 'You come at the king, you best not miss' on social media, an old Baltimore proverb that seemed to reinforce his aura as the game's enduring alpha. On Sunday, it was the teenager whose aim was true. Gukesh, who became the youngest ever undisputed world champion in December and celebrated his 19th birthday last Thursday, has struggled for consistency since claiming the crown. He came into Sunday's round six with just one win in the tournament. The comeback against Carlsen could prove a needed confidence jolt heading into the closing rounds. The win lifts Gukesh to 8½ points, one behind Carlsen and the American Fabiano Caruana, with four rounds still to play. It also continues a trend of Indian breakthroughs in Stavanger: last year, R Praggnanandhaa became the first Indian to beat Carlsen in classical play at this event. Now Gukesh has followed and arguably gone one better.

Military veteran has 'burning fire' to correct pension 'robbery'
Military veteran has 'burning fire' to correct pension 'robbery'

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Military veteran has 'burning fire' to correct pension 'robbery'

Time has not dimmed Ernest Williams' sense of being 90 years of age, the former Royal Navy veteran says he still has a "burning fire" inside believes he was "robbed" of the military pension he deserved and has been fighting to have it corrected since the 1980s."I'm coming up to 91 and I haven't got long to go," Mr Williams said. "I'm doing it for my wife." It wasn't until Mr Williams had a chance conversation with his brother-in-law Ronald Oswell, that he says he realised what had two men had almost identical service records and both applied for redundancy when the UK armed forces looked to reduce numbers in while Mr Williams, who lives in King's Stanley, Gloucestershire, was given a discharge date in 1970, his brother-in-law was allocated one in 1972."He said 'What do you think of the pension, Ernie?'," Mr Williams told BBC West Investigations."I said, 'Well £440 a year is not very good, is it?'"And he said 'No it's £880 a year'." It transpired that during the intervening two years, military pension rules had changed and had Mr Williams been given the later discharge date he would have got a much better Ministry of Defence said it cannot comment on individual cases, but during his time campaigning Mr Williams has been told that his pension reflected his "full and correct entitlement".Mr Williams enlisted in the navy aged 18 in 1952, eventually becoming a Chief Petty Officer. He served many years overseas, including on aircraft carriers in the far as the UK armed forces looked to reduce numbers, he was offered redundancy under a navy programme known as DCI 1187/ navy agreed to add time to his service record so that he received a military pension in addition to the state crucially, Mr Williams says he was not given a say in when he left the armed forces, and rather was told he would leave the navy on 28 November who applied at the same time were given a discharge date in 1972."You're told when you're going. [Your discharge date] was not disclosed until some time later. There was nothing I could do about it," Mr Williams said. Mr Williams and his wife Wendy believe about 400 men were discharged in the same 'first wave' as him, with about 2,600 going in the 'second wave' in 1972, receiving a substantially improved Williams said: "What did this 400 do that was so wrong they had to be discriminated against financially?"She added that the extra money would have made a "vast difference" to their couple launched a series of appeals to various official bodies once they realised what had May 1984, Mr Williams was told by the MOD that both his and his brother-in-law's pension "are correct" and the disparity was due to "a pay rise for CPO's [Chief Petty Officers] in the intervening two years which is reflected in the basic pension awarded".He continued to fight his case throughout the 1980s, 1990s and 1998, the Armed Forces Personnel Administration Agency told Mr Williams that in the period between the two phases, "changes were made [to the military pension] but these changes were not retrospective" and that his pension reflected his "full and correct entitlement". Over the years Mr Williams has been supported by some of Stroud's 2019, Labour MP David Drew wrote to Penny Mordaunt, the Defence Secretary at the time, to highlight Mr Williams' case, believing he was the victim of "an injustice" and had been "unfairly treated".Mr Drew argued that comments made by senior politicians in the late 1960s about intended improvements to military pay meant that possible differences in pensions should have been describes Mr Williams' case as "shocking" and that "both the process and the documentation surrounding the volunteer redundancies were ethically flawed".But ultimately, Mr Williams received the same answer from everybody he asked to look at his case – that his pension was correct based on the rules at the Williams still maintains that before he left, he never had the effect of different discharge dates explained to him – and that he would never have accepted redundancy on the earlier date had he known an extra two years would have effectively doubled his pension. Mr Williams' case has similarities to a fight waged by other military veterans over their Monaghan was involved with the Equality for Veterans Association (EfVA) which also campaigned against pension decisions in the rules before April 1975 meant that in most circumstances, servicemen had to serve 22 years to be eligible for an armed forces pension in addition to the state Monaghan left the RAF at the end of 1974, having accrued 14 years' service, including in Singapore and the middle he left a few months later, he would have received a military pension. The rule change in 1975, like rules on pensions generally, were not retrospective. The issue was debated in parliament in 2015, with then-Defence Minister Anna Soubry saying making changes to pension policy retrospective would break an "essential principle" and "would lead to widespread, long-term and unmanageable consequences for both this government and future governments".Mr Monaghan believes communication from the MOD was not good enough."Everyone was kept in the dark," he said."They knew nothing about [pensions] when they were young."We never had a brief on pensions. We were never given any insight and probably we didn't have any interest because I was a young man."The Equalities for Veterans Association was disbanded a few years ago – because of a lack of success and the dwindling number of surviving veterans from that period. Mr Williams says he feels "very bitter" about his experience but hopes that by speaking out publicly for the first time, he can bring more attention to his also hopes any other servicemen still alive and affected by the same issue will come added he intends to continue his campaign by contacting the current Stroud MP, Labour's Simon Opher, in the hope he will take up the Williams said: "I'm just a stubborn old sod and I'm not going to give in. I would appreciate it if anybody said to me 'you were right and we were wrong'."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store