14-month wait for US Visa? Your visa interview might be in 2026 but here's how you can beat the queue
Planning to visit the United States? Be prepared for a long wait for an interview appointments for B1/B2 visas as queue at some Indian consulates is over an year. However, if you are in a hurry choosing the right city becomes crucial as some have much shorter wait times.
The US Department of State on May 25, 2025 updated its global visa appointment wait time estimates and it shows both avarage wait time in each consulate and estimated time until the next available appointment.
Most B-1 (business), B-2 (tourism), or B-1/B-2 (combined) visa applicants must attend an in-person interview unless eligible for a waiver. Wait times vary by city, staffing, and demand.
Next available interview appointment:
The wait time is calculated in months in 30-day increments and half months in 15-day increments. This includes weekends and holidays when embassies close, as per the US Department of State. However, the average wait time do not guarantee a visa applicant will get an appointment within a specific time.
Also, embassies and consulates release additional appointment slots regularly. Applicants who want an earlier appointment slot after initially scheduling their interview should check back regularly and move their appointment to another available slot.
US Department of State, in its website mentioned, 'We now provide additional information on the average time non-immigrant visa applicants waited for an interview in the previous month. We also continue to provide the estimated wait time until the next available interview appointment for visitor visas.'
The B1 visa is meant for business trips like meetings, conferences, or contract talks. The B2 visa is for tourism, visiting family, medical care, or social events—without paid work. Most people receive a combined B1/B2 visa, allowing both business and leisure during their stay.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Little Caesars enters India with first outlet in Delhi-NCR this month
Little Caesars, a Detroit, Michigan-based world's third largest pizza chain, is entering the Indian market. India -- one of the fastest growing quick service restaurant markets -- will be the 30th market for Little Caesars, which is also the world's largest family-owned pizza chain, for which it has roped in Harnessing Harvest as its franchise partner. It has planned to open its first outlet in Delhi-NCR in this month, with plans for additional locations to follow, according to a statement from the company. "Launching in India marks an exciting milestone for Little Caesars as we expand into our 30th country. With our delicious pizzas and unbeatable value, we're eagerly anticipating introducing a unique menu that we believe will captivate India," said Paula Vissing, President, Global Retail, Little Caesars Pizza. Its entry into India market reflects the brand's commitment to global growth, bringing its signature menu and exceptional value to a new market, it said. Recently, Little Caesars has launched in markets such as Cambodia and Kuwait as part of its global expansion. Little Caesars, was founded by Mike and Marian Ilitch as a single, family-owned restaurant in 1959 and is headquartered in downtown Detroit, Michigan. The brand is known for its 'hot-n-ready' pizza, crazy puffs, and famed crazy bread in the US market. Its franchise partner, Harnessing Harvest, has nearly nine decades of operations in the Indian food and hospitality industry. According to a report from IMARC Group, the Indian pizza market size reached USD 5.3 billion in 2024. Looking forward, it expects the market to reach USD 11.8 billion by 2033, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 9.24 per cent during 2025-2033. The Indian pizza market is led by global QSR brands as Domino's, Pizza Hut operated by their local franchise partners. Besides, several home-grown brands such as La Pino'z, Brik Oven, BOCS Pizza, etc, are also key players in the market.
Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Middle-class' man's post on India's top 1% lifestyle sparks buzz: ‘Each car worth ₹50 lakh'
A Reddit post describing a birthday party hosted by a wealthy Indian man has claimed to open a rare window into the world of India's top 1%. Taking to Reddit, an anonymous user shared the story of a lavish gathering at the home of a lawyer, revealing just how differently the country's richest live. Posting in the r/AskIndia subreddit, the user, who described himself as middle-class, wrote: 'I recently went to a birthday party of a lawyer's son. Being from a middle-class family, I was never exposed to this much luxury. The 1% world is really different.' He described the experience as one drenched in opulence: posh, dust-free, tree-lined neighbourhoods, valet parking for guests, and a fleet of luxury vehicles. 'He resides in a posh area without dust and full of greenery, valets for guest parking, five cars each worth upwards of ₹50 lakh, businessmen, politicians bringing gifts, and a very different Hindi accent,' the post continued. He ended by asking others to share their brushes with India's wealthiest. The post quickly gained traction, with many chiming in with their own jaw-dropping experiences. 'I managed to study in one of the top NCR schools. Befriended a guy since a young age, went to his house for a night stay when I was like 10 — he lives in a mansion in South Delhi with eight cars in his driveway. Had around 10 butlers catering to the joint family living across those 4–5 floors,' shared one user. Another remarked on how skewed income inequality has become in India: 'I think most people don't realise that if you have a good home, a vehicle to travel in, and regular meals, you're already very close to the top 1% in India. What you saw was probably the top 0.01%.' A third user described the extravagant lifestyles of their 'super duper rich' friends: 'I have many friends who are super duper rich. They travel abroad every fourth week and have exuberant weddings every year, at least 5–7 destination weddings, with at least one celebrity performance mandatory. They gift friends and family items worth at least ₹50,000 to ₹1 lakh. They spend at least ₹2–3 lakh per month on basic lifestyle expenses like food, parties, and hanging out. Shopping alone costs another ₹2–3 lakh a month. They buy new bags every few months, starting from ₹2 lakh and going up to ₹5–6 lakh... some even ₹20–30 lakh. They keep hosting expensive parties every other week at their home or farmhouse for no reason. Most have 5–10 staff at home, but some I know have 20–30 helpers. Salaries for household staff alone come to ₹2–3 lakh monthly.'
Scroll.in
34 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Slighted by Trump, India must rejig foreign policy paradigm
Indians were shocked by US President Donald Trump asking American CEOs and industrialists to not base their manufacturing facilities in India. Trump reportedly told Apple CEO Tim Cook that he does not want him to manufacture iPhones in India. He threatened Apple with 25% tariffs if they did so. This is not the first time that Trump directed major industry leaders not to manufacture in India. Earlier, in February, he had told Elon Musk not to set up a Tesla factory in India as that would be 'unfair' to the US. This directive came just after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met the US President and the Tesla CEO on February 13 with the hope that Tesla would build in India. These provocative actions have sorely disappointed Indians who were expecting to be beneficiaries of Trump's benevolence as US companies moved out of China. In addition, Indians were shocked at the way illegal migrants from the country were degraded, criminalised and transported back to India in fetters on a military aircraft. And now, Indian students are not getting visas or their visas are being cancelled disrupting their studies at US universities. Indians recovering from shock Trump's comeback electoral win of November 2024 was welcomed in India as he was seen by the establishment virtually as 'Our man in Washington'. This perception was bolstered by the hyped chemistry between him and Modi. However, public opinion has started shifting in the opposite direction. Trump's core foreign policy objectives rest on trade, tariffs, transactions and targets. He chose to target India as a ' very high tariff nation ' in his very first address to the joint session of the US Congress on March 7 when he implied that India imposed the most unfair tariffs on the US. Trump called India a 'tariff king' and a 'big abuser'. The US trade deficit of US$100 billion with India irked Trump. Now, he is pushing for an almost zero tariff on US goods, especially cars – now that Tesla is ready to enter the Indian market. However, Trump wants the opening of markets for free and easy entry of US goods – irrespective of whether they are in demand in India or not; for example, he seeks to replace Scotch with American bourbon whiskey. The US is targeting both China and India. Others in the Global South are likely to be targeted next. Trump's 'Make America Great Again' policy seems to be about cutting the bottom out of any potential manufacturing adversary. Trump equates India and Pakistan As if the economic hit was not hard enough, the Trump team has gone after India's strategic interests in the light of the ghastly terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, on April 22, which India believes was Pakistan-sponsored, and the Indian retribution that followed. Trump called the terror attack a 'bad one', without naming Pakistan, but turned it into an even-handed India-Pakistan conflict, stating incorrectly that the two had been ' fighting for 1,500 years '. As usual, Trump put the focus on himself as he said he was 'close to both countries', and the two would ' figure it out one way or another ', distancing himself from any special relation with India that Indian strategic analysts used to boast about. As India carried out military strikes against Pakistan, named Operation Sindoor, the US Presidential team reiterated 'good relations with both' countries and Trump said that if he could 'help I will be there'. In the two days of the military operations that followed, the US Secretary of State repeatedly said that they were speaking to both sides, which subsequently agreed to an immediate ceasefire and start talks. He claimed that the ' US stopped nuclear conflict '. Trump further said he would 'soon' give trade access to India-Pakistan, a claim that the US Commerce Secretary put on record. India took pains to claim that while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio did speak to Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, the military operation was halted after the Pakistani Director General of Military Operations asked for a halt; ie, the ceasefire was reached bilaterally. India upset with US Why did India feel slighted by the alleged US role? The US hyphenated India-Pakistan, something that India does not like. It has sought to de-hyphenate itself with Pakistan by improving relations with the US for years. India perhaps also saw the US infantilising both countries with its rhetoric that only a politically mature US could stop the two squabbling neighbours. US claims also demonstrated its ability to intervene in South Asian affairs and underlined that the US remains a hegemon in this region. India also saw in the US statements a challenge to its strategic autonomy. It was seen by India as siding with Pakistan's nuclear blackmail and threat, as it helped demonstrate that the US had saved the world from a possible nuclear escalation. Lastly and most importantly, by pointing to Kashmir as the root cause of the war, the US was seen as internationalising an issue that India sees as an internal issue. It is quite possible that now, US think tanks will do their bit to showcase the US role and heighten this agenda. What India needs to do What can India conclude about the US behaviour? First, that the US has no permanent friends or enemies – only permanent interests. Second, that the US has a hub and spokes policy towards all – the US is the central hub and all other countries are spokes of different sizes that the US can manipulate and manage. Third, that the US military-industrial technology complex will seek to derive the greatest benefits from both countries and across the region. India will, therefore, have to rejig both its thinking and paradigm in foreign policy at the global, regional and bilateral levels as also in its domestic debates. India must also be wary of US interests drowning Indian interests – the US has always been a predatory power and embeds itself in regional conflicts and gains from these. India has been committed to multi-polarity, BRICS and other such forums and should stick with and enhance this. India must continue with self-reliance and its traditional time-tested partners. It also needs to curb the domestic war rhetoric as that does not help the interest of peace or show India as a sane voice of the Global South.
