NATO chief says Ukraine remains vital at summit despite Zelenskyy's absence from leaders' meeting
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte insisted Monday Ukraine would remain a vital topic at an alliance summit this week despite President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's absence from a leaders' meeting aiming to seal an agreement to boost military spending.
'You will see important language about Ukraine, including connecting the defense spending up to 2035 to Ukraine, and the need for Ukraine to stay in the fight,' Rutte told reporters on the eve of the two-day summit. 'This is a clear commitment by allies.'
But the Ukrainian leader hasn't yet publicly confirmed he'll attend a dinner laid on for leaders attending the NATO summit, where his country has had a diplomatic downgrade from previous alliance meetings, even as leaders stress that their militaries need to muscle up to counter the threat of Russia.
It's a big change since the summit in Washington last year, when the military alliance's weighty communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country 'on its irreversible path' to NATO membership.
But with Zelenskyy's relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump still strained since a testy Oval Office meeting earlier this year, finding a place for the Ukrainian leader at NATO's top table has proved a bridge too far.
There are other meetings scheduled for Zelenskyy at the summit, but the doors remain shut to the leaders' working meeting Wednesday, even as Rutte acknowledged how heavily the war weighs on the leaders.
'Of course, the most significant and direct threat facing this alliance remains the Russian Federation," he said. "Moscow continues to wage war against Ukraine with the support of North Korea, Iran and China, as well as Belarus.'
European allies and Canada, 'will provide over €35 billion of additional security assistance to Ukraine for the year ahead,' he said. 'So in a couple of months, we went from €20 billion to €35 billion. And I think that is great news.'
Meanwhile, Moscow bombarded Ukraine with 352 drones and decoys, as well as 11 ballistic missiles and five cruise missiles overnight Monday, Ukraine's air force said, killing at least 14 people and injuring several dozen others.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court allows Trump to restart swift deportation of migrants away from their home countries
WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations. The high court majority did not detail its reasoning in the brief order, as is typical on its emergency docket. All three liberal justices dissented from the order. It came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan in May. U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found that violated his court order giving people a chance to argue they could be in danger of torture if sent away from their home countries. The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. and immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries. After Murphy stepped in, authorities landed the plane at a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the migrants were housed in a converted shipping container and the officers guarding them faced rough conditions even as immigration attorneys waited for word from their clients. The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Republican President Donald Trump's administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. Since some countries do not accept U.S. deportations, the administration has reached agreements with other countries, including Panama and Costa Rica, to house them. South Sudan, meanwhile, has endured repeated waves of violence since gaining independence in 2011. Murphy's order doesn't prohibit deportations to third countries. But it says migrants must have a real chance to argue they could be in serious danger of torture if sent to another country. In a scathing 19-page dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the court's action exposes 'thousands to the risk of torture or death.' 'The government has made clear in word and deed that it feels itself unconstrained by law, free to deport anyone anywhere without notice or an opportunity to be heard,' she wrote in the dissent joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. The justices have confronted a similar issue in Trump's effort to send Venezuelans accused of being gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador with little chance to challenge the deportations in court. In that case, the court said migrants must get a 'reasonable time' to file a court challenge before being removed, and the majority blocked the administration from resuming the deportations while lower courts worked out exactly how long they should get. The conservative-majority court has sided with Trump in other immigration cases, however, clearing the way for his administration to end temporary legal protections affecting a total of nearly a million immigrants. The third-country deportation case has been one of several legal flashpoints as the administration rails against judges whose rulings have slowed the president's policies. Another order from Murphy, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, resulted in the Trump administration returning a gay Guatemalan man who had been wrongly deported to Mexico, where he says he had been raped and extorted. The man, identified in court papers as O.C.G, was the first person known to have been returned to U.S. custody after deportation since the start of Trump's second term.
San Francisco Chronicle
19 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Democratic Arkansas state senator announces bid for governor
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Arkansas state Sen. Fred Love announced Monday he's seeking the Democratic nomination to challenge Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders next year. Love, who represents a Little Rock district, said he was running 'because I believe Arkansas works best when it works for all of us.' Love has served in the state Senate since 2023 and before that had served six terms in the state House. As part of his announcement, Love said he will campaign on an economic development plan that included expanded access to startup capital, infrastructure, and grants for small businesses. 'We must stop measuring progress only by what happens in a few cities,' Love said in a statement. 'Prosperity should be visible in our Delta towns, our Ozark communities, and our Main Streets—not just in spreadsheets.' Sanders, who served as White House press secretary during President Donald Trump's first term, was first elected governor in 2022. Sanders has more than $3.7 million in the bank for her reelection bid, and her campaign launched a TV ad in January. Republicans hold all statewide partisan seats in Arkansas and a majority in both chambers of the Legislature. The state's primary election is held on March 3.
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump signals readiness to de-escalate after Iran's largely symbolic attack
The White House is signaling it is open to de-escalation in the Middle East after Iran's retaliatory strikes Monday appeared to be largely symbolic and did not cause any casualties. Iran fired more than a dozen missiles at the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, a response to U.S. strikes over the weekend that targeted three Iranian nuclear facilities. But Iran provided advance notice of the strike, a signal that Tehran was not looking to provoke additional American military action. 'I am pleased to report that NO Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done. Most importantly, they've gotten it all out of their 'system,' and there will, hopefully, be no further HATE,' President Trump posted on Truth Social. 'I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured,' Trump added. 'Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same.' Trump met with members of his national security team in the Situation Room on Monday as the White House monitored the Iranian strikes on the base. The president's response came just hours before he is expected to leave for the NATO summit, where he will meet with allies in The Hague. 'Congratulations world, it's time for peace!' Trump posted on Truth Social. The Department of Defense said the attacks were from short-range and medium-range ballistic missiles. Roughly 10,000 U.S. troops are stationed at the base, which Trump visited last month during a trip to the Middle East. A spokesperson for the Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that Qatari air defenses 'thwarted the attack and successfully intercepted the Iranian missiles.' Qatari officials had closed the nation's airspace in anticipation of the strikes, citing 'concern for the safety of citizens, residents, and visitors.' The U.S. Embassy in Qatar had also advised U.S. citizens in the country to 'shelter in place until further notice,' saying the alert was issued 'out of an abundance of caution.' Iran's actions Monday came at a precarious moment in the Middle East, and it puts the spotlight back on Trump and his appetite for engaging militarily in the region. It has become a rare subject of division among some of Trump's supporters, and the president himself has sent mixed signals in recent days. While Trump has touted Saturday's operation targeting three Iranian nuclear facilities as a success, others in the administration have been more circumspect about whether Iran's nuclear facilities were fully destroyed. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan 'Razin' Caine told reporters Sunday. Since Saturday, Trump has left the door open to future strikes if Iran retaliates, and he mused Sunday about the idea of regime change in Iran in a social media post. 'If the Iranian regime refuses to give up their nuclear program or engage in talks … why shouldn't the Iranian people rise up against this brutal, terrorist regime?' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Monday. 'That's a question the president raised last night. But as far as our military posture, it hasn't changed.' Trump also boasted in a post Monday about the U.S. nuclear arsenal in response to comments from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev about supplying nuclear warheads to Iran. Some officials who have worked with Trump argued his instinct would be to avoid further escalating the conflict, however. 'He's not going to get involved in regime change or boots on the ground. He's going to stop at stopping this nuclear program,' said one official who served in Trump's first administration. Taylor Budowich, a senior White House official, suggested in a post on the social platform X that Trump had eliminated an obstacle to diplomacy by targeting Iran's nuclear program with a military strike. 'Their manic pursuit of nukes was the kryptonite to making a deal, because the leaders just couldn't bring themselves to giving them up,' Budowich wrote. 'Thankfully the regime has been released from that burden—there is no better time than now for peace.' The president has in recent weeks been subject to lobbying publicly and privately from advisers and allies over how to handle the conflict between Iran and Israel, which sparked up nearly two weeks ago when Israeli forces attacked Iranian nuclear sites and killed top military officials. Some allies had urged Trump to take decisive, targeted action against Iran, arguing it was a leading sponsor of terror groups and that its pursuit of a nuclear weapon risked national security. Other fervent Trump supporters, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), had argued engaging directly in the Middle East would contradict the president's pledge to avoid new foreign conflicts. 'He's made the case, and I think just about all of his MAGA followers are behind him, that the Iranian nuclear program posed a significant threat to U.S. national security,' the former Trump administration official said. 'Stopping Iran from getting the bomb is part of 'America First.' Most people in the MAGA movement are standing with him on this.' Members of Congress will be able to probe the administration about next steps on Iran on Tuesday. Officials will hold a classified briefing at 3 p.m. EDT for the House, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) announced, adding, 'Hopefully, they will present it in a manner that's comprehensive. It will be probed, it will be tested, it will be aggressively pushed back against, and then we'll see what the outcome is.' Meanwhile, markets are bracing for the possibility Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz. The president called on everyone to 'keep oil prices down' Monday morning, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also warned against shutting down the strait, calling on China, Iran's most crucial oil customer, to help keep it open. About 20 million barrels, or 20 percent of global consumption, flowed through the strait in 2024, and markets in China, India, Japan and South Korea would likely be the most impacted by a closure. 'I can assure you the administration is actively and closely monitoring the situation in the Strait of Hormuz, and the Iranian regime would be foolish to make that decision,' Leavitt said Monday.
