Sona Mahendra asks: am I the right founder for this business?
Across these pieces, a founder wrestles with structure versus intuition, received wisdom against lived reality.
Image: Photo by Kevin Turcios on Unsplash.
I've had a front-row seat to Sona Mahendra's latest entrepreneurial chapter, watching her transition from backing founders at 54 Collective to building her own startup.
The transformation has been fascinating: seeing how lessons learnt while supporting other people's ventures now play out in her own.
After her initial TechTides Africa column hijack, African Tech's Next Big Challenge: Matching Venture Capital to Realistic Outcomes, I've been tracking how she navigates the founder's chair with fresh perspective from the other side.
Her four-part Sona's Field Notes email capsule series offers a window into this evolution, both psychological and practical.
The first instalment tackled that haunting question keeping African founders awake: "But is it VC-backable, though?"
Mahendra pushed back. Why pre-filter ideas through investor lenses when most founders are too early for VC conversations anyway?
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Freedom from market-size obsession, she argued, actually speeds up learning.
March brought The Market Size Misconception, challenging founders who abandon promising ideas over perceived total addressable market limitations.
Drawing from Y Combinator wisdom, she called out the "VC toolkit" mentality that kills viable businesses before they prove themselves.
In Africa's problem-rich environment, she reasoned, any substantial challenge pursued long enough will grow into real opportunity.
April's Principles Over Playbooks cited Cedric Chin's demolition of the "Idea Maze" concept and Peter Thiel's first principles thinking.
Mahendra questioned Africa's dependence on imported playbooks. Successful companies, she concluded, emerge from deeply personal journeys that resist cookie-cutter approaches.
Across these pieces, a founder wrestles with structure versus intuition, received wisdom against lived reality.
Now, in the last in this series of public reflections, Mahendra turns the microscope on herself rather sharply, confronting a question that pervades every entrepreneur's quiet moments.
Here's what's on Mahendra's mind, in her words:
"Am I the right founder to build this business?" is a recurring question I ask myself.
I don't ask this just because the constant curveballs result in inevitable imposter syndrome, but because evaluating any venture requires honestly assessing whether the founder, even if it's you, has what it takes to win in that market.
There's a lot of content about "founder archetypes" and "strong founders" across LinkedIn thought pieces. Most of it boils down to lukewarm labels like "execution-focused" or "visionary," which don't actually explain why some people succeed and others don't. By those definitions, nearly anyone passionate enough is a "good" builder until they're not.
What does it even mean to be a "strong founder" when markets are this brutal? That question led me down a rabbit hole, with ChatGPT as my thinking partner, to explore common types and how they perform across different markets and business models.
While archetypes are inherently limiting (venture capital, after all, is about spotting outliers before they're obvious), they're still a helpful lens for understanding founder-market-model alignment, and for reflecting on your own strengths, values, and context.
Here's what I discovered:
Different business models demand different people
The type of business you want to build determines the kind of person it needs to build it. For example:
If you want to build a hyper-scale technology startup, the dominant type that succeeds is a hybrid of the Visionary/Sales and Product builder. These people understand or can build the product but lead with strong vision and optimism about the future. They're great at pitching, which is crucial for raising capital, recruiting early teams, and driving initial traction. However, they might struggle to operationalise as the business scales.
On the other hand, execution-heavy ventures (like franchises or infrastructure plays) thrive under Operator types. These are people who are process-driven, detail-oriented, and consistent. They build strong companies based on fundamentals that are ready for scale, but they don't naturally gravitate to startup ideas that align with venture capital's high-growth demands. Different markets reward different people
We often look at founder-market fit through the lens of whether the person suits the market. But we should also ask: does the market suit the person? Different industries reward different skill sets:
Healthcare rewards operators and domain experts who bring trust and credibility.
Deep tech favours highly technical people who can navigate complexity and build deeply technical products.
Consumer and innovation-led sectors often reward visionary sellers who can successfully fundraise. People who can tell compelling stories are able to rally teams and attract capital, all of which is needed to get customers to move away from the status quo.
What I'm seeing more of is people becoming more deliberate about the kind of business model that suits their industry and reflects their values. Market readiness beats ability
'When a great team meets a lousy market, market wins. When a lousy team meets a great market, market wins. When a great team meets a great market, something special happens.' — Andy Rachleff (Co-founder, Benchmark Capital)
Formidable people in a weak market are as good as weak people in a strong market. Turns out, the average person can be great too, as long as the market accepts their solution and its needs are met. Markets are not meritocratic. There are no rewards for process and presentation, only solutions. Play to your strengths
These types aren't fixed. Great people evolve from builder to CEO, from sales to product leader. Especially in Africa's young, resource-constrained startup scene, people often wear multiple hats early on. But knowing your default operating mode helps understand where you can stretch yourself and where you realistically can't.
People who know their core strengths (builder, operator, visionary) can make smarter hires, find complementary co-partners, and grow more effectively. Assessing a startup's survivability often comes down to evaluating the founding team, not just the individual founder.
In a market where it can take up to three years to get a big client, we're all going to need the best teams and partners to improve our chances of success. We do that by understanding the kind of companies that are uniquely suited to what you enjoy doing and are good at.
"What are you? Whatever you are, that's how you find success. If you're a salesman, you sell your way to success. If you're a politician, you politic your way to success. If you're a fighter, you fight your way to success. You can't find success by being something you're not" — Alan Knott-Craig (Founder, Fibertime) Success is the only metric that matters
In reality, strong people are only recognised in hindsight, after they've succeeded. If you browse LinkedIn bios of high-profile company builders, you'll see a wide variety of backgrounds: music majors, ex-corporates, serial entrepreneurs.
There is no formula, and that's the point. People are rewarded for solving problems and investors are rewarded not for the "obvious" bets, but for having a differentiated thesis about what kind of person wins in that particular market and opportunity.
Anyone can be a business builder. At the end of the day, success (carving out room for yourself in a market) is the only metric that matters that can truly determine if you're a 'strong' builder.
I'm wrapping up this share while grappling with a lot about what it means to build a business from scratch in real time while also navigating a few significant life changes. I'm struck by how much there is still to learn—about markets, about timing, about myself as a builder.
Cheers to every founder out there building and learning in public, and here's to sharing what's working, what isn't, and why, as we all figure this out together.
Andile Masuku is Co-founder and Executive Producer at African Tech Roundup. Connect and engage with Andile on X (@MasukuAndile) and via LinkedIn.
Sona Mahendra - from founder to venture builder and back again. Fresh from helping to transform promising founders' visions into venture-backable businesses at 54 Collective, she's now fleshing out her own alternative healthcare financing venture concept with newly minted venture support expertise and a souped-up connectivity profile to match.
Andile Masuku is Co-founder and Executive Producer at African Tech Roundup. Connect and engage with Andile on X (@MasukuAndile) and via LinkedIn.
Image: File.
Sona Mahendra - Venture Building and Investing in Africa.
Image: Supplied.
BUSINESS REPORT
Visit: www.businessreport.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Built for export, boxed in at home — SA vehicle sector calls for decisive action
While May brought a surge in local car sales according to the National Automobile Dealers Association's latest reporting, a sharp contraction in exports and rising global tariff tensions have pushed South Africa's automotive industry to a crossroads. South Africa's automotive industry may have enjoyed a high-revving May in local markets, but the road ahead is looking increasingly precarious. Local vehicle sales surged 22% year-on-year, according to the latest Automotive Business Council (Naamsa) data, yet exports dropped 14.6% overall, with passenger vehicle exports plummeting by nearly 35%. The African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), a long-standing US trade programme that allows duty-free access for eligible African exports – including South African vehicles – faces renewed uncertainty under the Trump administration. With the White House pushing for reciprocal tariffs and stricter eligibility reviews, South Africa's preferential access could be one executive decision away from suspension. Speaking to Daily Maverick, Nada's vice-chairperson Thembinkosi Pantsi painted a picture of both resilience and distress. 'We're adapting, we're consolidating, and we're innovating to survive,' he said, referring to the shift toward multi-brand dealerships and used vehicle expansion. 'But make no mistake – we are nearing a cliff edge.'The automotive sector value chain in its entirety supports around 110,000 jobs, according to data from Naamsa, Stats SA and trade union data, with countless families relying on those employed in the sector to put food on the table. The industry – if you include both manufacturing and sales – contributed 5.3% to our GDP in 2023, and is the single largest manufacturing sector. Local sales surge, but export markets faltering While May saw strong domestic demand – driven partly by an influx of East Asian vehicle imports – it also underscored a growing contradiction: consumers want affordability, but the domestic industrial base relies on export volume to remain viable. 'We are seeing more Chinese brands enter the market with cost-effective models,' said Pantsi. 'This is good for consumer access, but doesn't help the thousands employed in export-geared manufacturing.' Volkswagen SA chairperson and managing director Martina Biene echoed the sentiment during her keynote address at Nada Connect in March of this year. 'Sometimes, as a local manufacturer, we don't feel as valued as we should be,' she said. 'There's a lot of investment here – jobs, skills, community development – but little relief from systemic pressures.' Biene disclosed that VW SA had spent more than R130-million on diesel generators to cope with load shedding. 'Every day I run them, it's R1.6-million in cost. That goes straight into the vehicle price,' she said. Add port congestion, road freight insecurity and policy drift, and 'you get a toxic mix,' she warned. What this means for you If global trade shocks persist and local manufacturing continues to contract, thousands of jobs across the auto value chain could be lost. Consumers may benefit from cheaper import options, but the broader consequences – shrinking local industry, fewer employment opportunities and weakened export competitiveness – pose a long-term economic risk. The off-and-on again Trumpian promise – tariffs Trump's revived steel and aluminium tariffs have reignited fears of a protectionist spiral. Pantsi warned that such moves could 'compound local challenges' and further disrupt trade patterns. 'Tariffs don't only raise costs. They erode investor and consumer confidence,' he said. 'We need urgent interventions – rebates, subsidies and export duty relief.' Biene concurred, calling for incentives over protectionism. 'We contribute massively to GDP and jobs. But sometimes it feels like the government is dazzled by short-term imports at the expense of long-term industrial strategy.' She said Agoa's uncertainty was more than symbolic. 'Agoa isn't a given,' Biene warned. 'If we lose that access, it's not just a dent in our balance sheets – it's a question of whether we keep local production viable.' Pricing inaction For every vehicle exported, dozens of suppliers – from tyre producers to seat manufacturers – depend on consistent output. A dip in export volumes, Pantsi noted, ripples across the entire automotive value chain. 'The automotive industry is the second-largest contributor to GDP after mining. If we allow it to shrink, the consequences will be systemic,' he said. Beyond the 110,000 people the sector employs directly, it supports hundreds of thousands more through components, logistics and retail. Both Pantsi and Biene urged the government to move past platitudes. 'We need a granular, not generic, state response,' said Pantsi. 'Targeted logistics reform. Decisive Agoa diplomacy. Training institutions revived. It's the details that matter now.' The sector at a T-junction Despite strong local sales buoyed by competitively priced imports, the export decline is a red flag. 'We have the infrastructure, the people, the expertise,' Pantsi said. 'What we lack is policy certainty and logistical coherence.' Biene was blunter: 'We're here for the long haul. But we can't keep pouring money into diesel and delays. The government needs to decide if it wants this sector to thrive – or merely survive.' DM.
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
The enigma of Markus Jooste's death
There is still no vital information regarding the death of former Steinhoff CEO Markus Jooste. Image: Aemand Hough More than a year has passed since the mysterious death of former Steinhoff CEO Markus Jooste, yet crucial details surrounding the incident remain elusive. A police source has revealed that vital information regarding his death is unaccounted for. Jooste, who was ordered to pay a R475 million fine for accounting fraud by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), allegedly shot himself after police notified him that an arrest warrant had been issued against him. It was reported that he succumbed to a gunshot wound at his Cape Town residence in Hermanus. However, questions surrounding the circumstances of his death remain unanswered. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The source said there is still no post-mortem and morgue number in the inquest docket and there is no proof of the weapon he allegedly used. The Western Cape police on Tuesday said these allegations were unfounded as a post-mortem had been conducted and the post-mortem report had been filed in the docket for court purposes. 'The investigation into the death of the late Mr Jooste had been concluded and the docket was submitted to the NPA to be placed on the court role where a formal inquest will be conducted. "The firearm used during the incident was subjected to ballistic tests and thereafter returned to the executor as the weapon was registered in the name of the deceased. A report of the ballistic test is filed in the docket for court purposes. The result of both reports will only be disclosed during the formal inquest hearing in court. The date is yet to be determined.' The FCSA said Jooste had played a role in the publishing of misleading financial statements about Steinhoff International Holdings. Fake transactions worth $6.5bn were made by Steinhoff executives in order to inflate profits, an audit by PwC found. Close to 98% of Steinhoff's share value was wiped out in 2017 when the accounting scandal first broke. Jooste resigned as chief executive but denied any knowledge of accounting fraud. He was also later fined for insider trading in 2020. Last week, a social justice movement, the Progressive Civics Congress (PCC) told IOL that the public deserves transparency and accountability over the scandal, adding that the silence from authorities raises suspicion. 'Jooste was involved in compromising the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) funds, amounting to R200 billion belonging to the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF)." "The Steinhoff scandal was a national issue, yet we have no answers about what happened to those pension funds. The public deserves transparency and accountability—and the silence from authorities raises suspicion.' The organisation further criticised the silence of labor unions, which traditionally advocate for workers' rights and oversight in such matters, saying their inaction may have contributed to the ongoing economic crisis, asserting that the loss of investment confidence and subsequent budget deficits have directly impacted ordinary citizens. Crime expert and violence monitor, Mary de Haas, also pointed out the broader issues of accountability and the integrity of investigations. She told IOL that provincial police commissioners have the authority to expedite inquiries but have seemingly done little to resolve the case or uncover the truth. 'Questions about whether Jooste truly died by suicide or was murdered remain unanswered,' de Haas said. 'The only way to find out is through the post-mortem report, but access to such crucial documents is often denied or delayed. Without it, we are left to speculate.' De Haas also highlighted the broader pattern of disappearances and unexplained deaths linked to political and financial scandals in South Africa, raising fears that some cases might be deliberately obscured to protect powerful interests. Cape Argus
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Court orders wife to adjust her lavish lifestyle amid divorce proceedings
The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, told a divorcing woman to tighten her belt as she made financial demands from her husband pending their divorce Image: File An elderly woman who is in the process of divorcing her husband was advised by the court to tighten her belt as she can no longer live the lavish life she is used to since she and her husband had parted ways. The woman turned to the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, in a bid for her husband to increase the monthly maintenance he is paying her, pending their divorce. Apart from the nearly R54,000 a month she is demanding from him, she also insisted that he pay all her other expenses, such as her gym membership and furnishing her new home. The husband said his company mostly paid for her luxuries in the past, but the now cash-strapped company had been sold, and the money had dried up. He suggested that the wife curb her expenses and tone down her lavish spending, which the court agreed with. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The applicant (wife) and the respondent (husband) were married to each other in community of property in 2012, but the wife instituted divorce proceedings last year. Both are in their late 60s. The wife asked for an order forcing her husband to pay her R53,800 per month, and that, additionally, he should continue to pay all her direct expenses. These included R6,800 a month for the domestic worker, the wife's medical aid premiums, her car's premiums and maintenance, as well as her gym membership. Apart from this, she wants him to pay for the monthly lease of a townhouse selected by her, as well as a one-off contribution towards appliances and related household items to furnish her home in the sum of R193,000. Finally, she wants R1 million from him towards her legal costs in the divorce proceedings. The respondent contends that he does not have the means to pay the exorbitant amounts claimed from him by the applicant, who, according to the respondent, is living beyond her means. The applicant, so the respondent contends, is insisting on a lifestyle that was sustained by his company, which in recent times had fallen on hard times, making it necessary for them, as a family, to tighten the proverbial belt. The respondent tendered a cash payment of R28,700 per month, to include the applicant's Audi A3 instalment and its maintenance limited to R4,000 per month. He also agrees to pay for the domestic worker as well as to pay the R1,500 a month towards her gym membership. The claim by the applicant for payment of R193,000 for household accessories is also rejected by the respondent, who made it clear he also cannot afford to pay for her monthly rental.
