Outdated fertiliser rules favour imports over domestic production: Industry
The government's "outdated"
fertiliser regulations
are creating an uneven playing field, favouring Chinese imports over domestic manufacturers and undermining the "Make in India" initiative, industry bodies said on Tuesday. The fertiliser control framework's concurrent nature-governed by both central and state authorities-has led to numerous amendments but has struggled to keep pace with evolving domestic needs and global developments, gradually coming to be seen as a relic of the legacy "Inspector Raj" and "License Raj", they said.
The industry bodies called for comprehensive reforms including implementing "One Nation, One Licence" policies, ensuring regulatory parity between domestic and foreign manufacturers, and capping inspector numbers to two per unit.
The
Soluble Fertilizer Industry Association
(SFIA), in a statement, said a major public sector enterprise recently issued tenders for
soluble fertilisers
that explicitly excluded "Made in India" products, highlighting how current regulatory frameworks discourage local production while facilitating imports.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Mountain Gear for Extreme Conditions
Trek Kit India
Learn More
Undo
Under India's
Fertilizer Control Order
(FCO), domestic startups must obtain multiple licences, maintain offices and establish warehouses in every state where their products will be distributed. In contrast, foreign suppliers face minimal compliance requirements, needing only basic import formalities to sell across all Indian states.
The FCO, established under the Essential Commodities Act of 1955, was designed to ensure fertiliser quality and monitor distribution during a period when India relied heavily on imports.
Live Events
"However, the framework has struggled to adapt to modern
domestic production
capabilities," the statement added.
Suhash Buddhe, mentor at IIM Nagpur Incubation Cell, said India's production of 112.62 million tonnes of fruits and vegetables relies heavily on 5 lakh tonnes of imported, non-subsidised fertilisers.
"A single manufacturing unit is monitored by as minimum as 32 FCO inspectors, leading to excessive scrutiny and harassment under the guise of regulation. This overregulation deters startup growth and pushes India further into
import dependence
, instead of nurturing domestic
innovation
," Buddhe said.
Jayantibhai Kumbhani, President of the Chamber For Agri Input Protection (CAIP), Ahmedabad, said no other industry, including pharmaceuticals, faces such intense level of inspector oversight.
"In some cases, a single district can have many inspectors monitoring one fertiliser unit, creating undue pressure on Indian entrepreneurs," he said, emphasising the urgent need for FCO reforms to foster self-reliance in the non-subsidised fertiliser sector.
This view is echoed by Vijay Thakur, President of grassroots agri-entrepreneur association OAMA, Maharashtra, who shares similar concerns and advocates for urgent policy intervention.
The regulatory burden particularly affects soluble fertilizers, which are critical for horticulture growth. Unlike sectors such as electronics, pharmaceuticals and defence where the Central government's "Import Substitution" and "Make in India" initiatives have gained significant traction, the fertilizer sector has seen little progress.
"Grassroots innovation in manufacturing these vital compounds continues to struggle due to a lack of market access, constrained by the outdated and rigid provisions of the Fertilizer Control Order," according to the statement.
The high cost of setting up offices, warehouses, and securing licenses in each state-combined with the need for market partners to duplicate these efforts-erodes any competitive edge Indian manufacturers might have, it added.
SFIA National Secretary Vinod Goyal said, "A practical path forward includes implementing 'One Nation, One Licence,' ensuring parity with foreign manufacturers by allowing marketers to add sourcing in one state and market across all operational states for Indian sources, capping inspector numbers to two per unit, and ultimately enacting a new law for non-subsidised fertilizers outside the Essential Commodities Act to realise the vision of
Atmanirbhar Bharat
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Wayne Gretzky sparks controversy by accusing Florida Panthers of buying success with tax loopholes
Wayne Gretzky sparked debate by highlighting financial disparities in the NHL (Getty Images) Wayne Gretzky, the face of hockey greatness, has ignited a fierce debate that goes beyond the ice rink—one that's raising eyebrows across NHL circles and beyond. While appearing on The Pat McAfee Show, "The Great One" opened up about the financial disparities in the league, taking subtle aim at how no-state-income-tax franchises like the Florida Panthers might be gaining an upper hand in the talent war. Wayne Gretzky says NHL players face a 'business decision' between culture and cash Speaking candidly, Wayne Gretzky stated, 'Obviously Florida and Tampa Bay is a unique situation…from a financial point of view, if that's what a player's thinking about, obviously, but if a player's thinking, you know, what I want to play in a hockey culture, like playing and living in the city of Edmonton, I loved it for 10 years.' Wayne Gretzky Breaks Down The Stanley Cup Finals, Keys To His Success, & His Terrible Golf Game Gretzky's words struck a chord—highlighting the growing tension between market-driven decisions and hockey's traditional roots. While Florida teams like the Panthers can offer higher take-home pay due to their tax structure, cities like Edmonton offer something money can't buy: fan intensity and legacy. Florida's financial edge sparks fairness concerns across the NHL The Panthers' on-ice success, including multiple Stanley Cup Final runs, has coincided with the state's tax-friendly policies, allowing the team to recruit and retain talent without overspending. That advantage, though legal, raises a question of fairness. Could this be undermining the NHL's competitive balance? Gretzky didn't directly accuse teams of exploiting the tax loophole—but his tone was clear. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The new hoseless mobile air conditioner does not require installation (search now) Air Condition | Search Ads Search Now Undo When discussing Edmonton, he reflected, 'You leave the arena in Edmonton, you know you've been in a hockey game…1.3 million have watched that game and the other 200,000…the only reason they didn't is because they were working.' Panthers coach pushes back with a collaborative vision for South Florida sports ECF Game 3 Reaction vs Carolina | 5.24.25 In response to the buzz, Panthers head coach Paul Maurice emphasized the area's growing sports culture and praised efforts to build community over competition. 'I think there's room for all of us down here…So how about we just share it? We share the spotlight,' he said. Maurice also lauded GM Bill Zito's cross-sport cooperation with the Dolphins and Marlins, saying, 'Bill's been kind of involved. Best practices…our team services people get together, right, to scout out the best of things when we travel.' Also Read: 'It took a toll': Wayne Gretzky's daughter Paulina Gretzky opens up about parenting struggles, body image In the end, Gretzky's comments have lit a fuse—pitting hockey tradition against market innovation. Will the NHL respond, or will this "business decision" divide only grow wider?
Hans India
36 minutes ago
- Hans India
Tata-Dassault fuselage deal will boost manufacturing in general
The signing of four Production Transfer Agreements by Dassault Aviation and Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL) to manufacture the Rafale fighter fuselage in India is a big fillip to not just defence production in the country but also manufacturing in general. The French plane-maker rightly said that it marks 'a significant step forward in strengthening the country's aerospace manufacturing capabilities and supporting global supply chains.' The fuselage of an aircraft is its central body portion, excluding the engines, tail, and wings. It houses the cockpit, avionics, fuel, and payload—essentially serving as the backbone of the aircraft. In the case of Rafale, a multirole fighter jet renowned for its agility, advanced avionics, and combat effectiveness, manufacturing the fuselage involves high-precision engineering, advanced composites, and tight tolerances. Bringing such a sophisticated process to Indian soil reflects the maturity of the country's aerospace manufacturing environment and the trust global original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are increasingly placing in Indian firms. In recent years, numerous Indian companies have emerged as key players in the defence manufacturing sector, contributing to the country's vision of self-reliance under the Atmanirbhar Bharat programme. Major public sector undertakings like Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Bharat Electronics Limited, and Bharat Dynamics Limited have long been at the forefront of producing aircraft, radars, missiles, and other critical defence systems. Alongside them, private sector giants such as TASL, Larsen & Toubro (L&T), Mahindra Defence Systems, and Bharat Forge have significantly expanded their footprint in defence production. These companies manufacture a wide range of equipment, including artillery systems, armoured vehicles, UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), and missile components. Their growing capabilities are further boosted by partnerships with global defence firms, enabling technology transfer and joint ventures. This robust participation from both public and private sectors is crucial for reducing import dependence and building a strong, indigenous defence industrial base. The Dassault-TASL partnership is a testament to the vision of the Make in India initiative, which has been pushing for increased localisation in defence procurement. By transferring production capabilities to India, Dassault is enabling Indian companies to climb up the value chain—from low-end assembly to high-end design and production. The collaboration with TASL, a company already experienced in aerospace production, enhances India's ability to build a complex, high-performance defence product and helps cultivate a local ecosystem of skilled workers, advanced suppliers, and engineering talent. Furthermore, this move significantly reduces India's reliance on imports for critical defence hardware, contributing to strategic autonomy. Over the decades, India has been one of the world's largest arms importers. While importing advanced weapon systems has been necessary to meet immediate defence requirements, long-term sustainability lies in indigenisation. The Rafale fuselage manufacturing agreement is, therefore, more than a business deal—it is a step toward building a sustainable and technologically advanced defence industrial base within India. The economic implications of this development are equally profound. High-technology manufacturing generates employment across the value chain—from technicians and engineers to logistics and quality assurance personnel. The joint venture will not only create direct employment but also foster ancillary industries, leading to the development of an aerospace manufacturing cluster with potential spillover benefits to the civilian aviation sector. The infrastructure and capabilities established through this programme can later be leveraged for commercial aerospace production, such as passenger aircraft components, thereby further integrating India into the global aerospace supply chain.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Social Security privacy concerns mount as US Supreme Court authorises DOGE's access to data of millions of Americans
The US Supreme Court on Friday sided with the Trump administration in two critical decisions involving the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The rulings allow DOGE broad access to personal records held by the Social Security Administration (SSA) and delay enforcement of transparency rules sought by a government watchdog group. By a 6-3 vote, the conservative-majority court granted DOGE permission to access sensitive SSA databases containing the personal details of millions of Americans. This includes financial, educational and medical data. The court also paused a lower court's ruling requiring DOGE to comply with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), allowing the administration to withhold internal documents about DOGE's operations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Belly Fat Removal Without Surgery in Algeria: The Price Might Surprise You Belly Fat Removal | Search Ads Undo Rising concerns over privacy and oversight Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented sharply, writing: 'This court has now greenlit unfettered data access to DOGE regardless—despite its failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards, and all before we know for sure whether federal law countenances such access.' Her concerns were echoed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Together, they warned that the court's action posed 'grave privacy risks' to millions of Americans. Live Events The SSA holds data on anyone with a Social Security number, Medicare, or Supplemental Security Income. It administers $1.5 trillion in federal payments annually, distributing benefits to over 70 million recipients. Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works , said, 'There is no way to overstate how serious a breach this is. And my understanding is that it has already occurred.' Fallout after Musk's departure from DOGE Elon Musk, who once led DOGE, formally cut ties with the agency on 30 May. His split with President Trump became public shortly after, igniting tensions on social media. The two previously worked closely, with Trump assigning DOGE and Musk to investigate fraud within SSA. In February, SSA's acting commissioner Michelle King resigned after refusing to provide DOGE staff access to personal records. She stepped down after 30 years in government service, citing concerns over data misuse. A day later, the White House said it had appointed a temporary 'anti-fraud expert' to oversee SSA. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated, 'They haven't dug into the books yet, but they suspect that there are tens of millions of deceased people who are receiving fraudulent Social Security payments.' Leavitt added the mission was to, 'Number one, to identify duplicate payments and to end them. Number two, to identify payments that are going to deceased people who are no longer living and should no longer be receiving that money. And number three, to protect the integrity of the system for hardworking Americans who have been paying into it their entire lives.' Legal battle over Government transparency In a separate ruling, the court also halted an order from Judge Christopher Cooper, who had instructed DOGE to comply with FOIA requests. The suit, filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), sought records about DOGE's internal decision-making, particularly its role in mass federal layoffs and restructuring. CREW argues that DOGE functions as a de facto government agency and must follow federal transparency laws. The administration insists DOGE is merely an advisory body and is therefore exempt. Judge Cooper previously concluded that DOGE likely exercises 'substantial independent authority' and ordered a deposition of DOGE official Amy Gleason. The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit refused to block his order, prompting the administration to appeal to the Supreme Court. In its unsigned opinion, the court noted that Judge Cooper's orders 'are not appropriately tailored' and stressed that 'judicial deference and restraint' were required in reviewing internal executive branch communications. CREW responded in court filings that if the administration prevails, presidents could 'create new entities that would functionally wield substantial independent authority but are exempt from critical transparency laws.' DOGE has become a key tool in Trump's broader plan to cut government spending and reduce federal workforce numbers. It has also faced mounting legal challenges from labour unions and advocacy groups. Solicitor General D. John Sauer called earlier judicial rulings an 'overreach' into executive power. However, critics argue that unchecked access and lack of oversight could result in lasting harm to public trust and data security . Maryland District Judge Ellen Hollander, whose SSA data access restriction was overturned, earlier warned that DOGE's search for fraud was a 'fishing expedition.' Her order allowed only limited access to anonymised data unless DOGE could demonstrate a specific need. Despite Friday's rulings, the future of DOGE remains uncertain. With Musk gone and legal scrutiny intensifying, its role in reshaping federal oversight continues to spark debate over accountability, privacy, and the limits of executive power.
