Democracy? Autocracy? Oligarchy? Which do you prefer for your family?
(gguy44/iStock Images)
Historically, there has been the proverbial argument about whether the United States is a democracy or republic. The answer is the United States is both. But that question pales in comparison to the one looming over Americans today.
Will America remain a democracy, a democratic republic?
You might become indignant at the very question.
Given the political direction and actions taking place today, it is becoming more difficult to recognize the democratic republic you were taught about in school and have assumed you were living under.
How would you characterize the behavior of those occupying the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government? Is America slipping from a democracy to an autocracy, an oligarchy or some combination?
We need not dig too deeply in the annals of history to see how and what happens when a democracy slips into an autocracy.
Germany was a democracy until Adolf Hitler turned in into an autocracy.
It only took him 53 days, less than two months.
Germany, like the United Sates, prior to World War II, was a democratic republic governed by a constitution. Hitler went about destroying a constitutional government by systematically disabling and then dismantling the country's democratic structures and processes.
It became known as one of the most astonishing governmental transformation in history and its impact on the world order was defining.
More recently, one has only to look at the political changes in Russia following the dissolution of the Soviet Empire in 1991. Russia adopted democratic reforms and practices, which lasted until Vadimir Putin came into power.
Putin systematically dismantled democratic institutions and organizations, replaced individuals with loyalists, attacked and seized control of the media to solidify Russia becoming an autocracy, ruled by oligarchs. Putin, remaining chief among them.
We have seen Hungary's democracy changed to an autocracy under the leadership of President Viktor Orban; and Turkey's democracy changed to an autocracy under the leadership of its president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
All of these leaders have one thing in common: They dismantled their democratic government from within.
How were they able to do it?
Because the majority of the people ignored the signs, sat back and did nothing.
Are we willing to do the same and forfeit our way of life?
It behooves every American citizen to look into how democracies are destroyed from within. There are valuable lessons to be learned.
What about living under an oligarchy?
An oligarchy is a government that is controlled by the wealthy few, wielding power and influence because of their financial, social, or political status. There are many variations of an oligarchy. An aristocracy (ruled by the noble) and plutocracy (ruled by the rich), for example.
Some political scientists and researchers have debated whether the United States is a kind of oligarchy given the influence and impact of large corporations and large financial contributions of the wealthy on policymaking, which often is much more than that of ordinary citizens.
The rich and powerful are also given access to elected officials, often unfettered.
Ask the disenfranchised and underprivileged or just ordinary citizens whether America is becoming an oligarchy, and we might not be surprised at their answer. They may say America has always been controlled by the rich and powerful. That the ordinary citizen's well-being has been at the mercy, decency, fairness, and in no small measure the benevolence of which rich or powerful leader is in charge.
Even within those nations that are openly and unabashedly ruled by autocrats, oligarchs or kings, the well-being of the masses is dependent on what type of ruler he/she is.
However, the threats and actions against democracy that are occurring on the global stage and here at home cannot be dismissed or ignored.
America has long been regarded as the strongest democracy in the world — at least in its core doctrines, and for the most part in much of its day-to-day practices.
It must be acknowledged that throughout America's history, many of its citizens have not enjoyed the tenets of what a real democracy purports to be. This has left them vulnerable and susceptible to believing in anyone who promises to pay attention to their needs, redress their grievances, and pave the way for greater things to come.
These citizens become easy prey for an autocratic leader who portrays strength and charisma while brandishing and being a master of delivering the right demagogic messages — true or not — against whomever or whatever the disenfranchised deems the enemy.
Autocrats are also masters at bringing together disparate and unlikely groups of people who in the course of everyday life may never associate, be aligned or concerned about the same issues.
An annual report, just released, about the global state of democracy shows how democracy in the United States is at serious risk.
Do we get involved in keeping our democratic way of life, or do we ignore the signs, sit back and do nothing as it devolves into an oppressive autocratic oligarchy?
That is the question. Only we can determine the answer.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's border czar defends decision to deploy hundreds of Marines to quell LA protests
President Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan argued Monday that it was necessary to deploy hundreds of Marines to Los Angeles to quell immigration protests that are happening in the city – despite local officials saying it's unclear why they are there or what they are doing. 'Yes, it all depends on the activities of these protesters – I mean, they make the decisions. I keep hearing reports that they're rioting because President Trump sent National Guard here, it's just ridiculous,' Homan told CNN's Kaitlan Collins. 'We don't know what's going to happen tonight – it seems like at night, the crowds get bigger, the violence peaks. So, we want to be ahead of the game. We'll be well prepared for the military here to protect government property and protect officers' lives,' he said. Homan declined to say what standard the Trump administration was using to decide if mobilizing the Marines would be necessary. 'They're not reinforcing immigration law – we're doing that, we're immigration officers,' Homan said. 'Their job is protection of property and protection of our agents and their lives and their wellbeing, along with the public's wellbeing.' Over the weekend, Trump became the first president in decades to call in the National Guard without a request from a governor – doing so without invoking the Insurrection Act, the 1807 law that allows the president to deploy American soldiers to police US streets in extreme circumstances. Trump ordered the Department of Defense to deploy an additional 2,000 California National Guard members to the Los Angeles area on Monday evening, according to the Pentagon. On Monday, the administration mobilized more than 700 Marines based out of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in California to respond to the protests in Los Angeles. Homan said that there are conversations 'every day' within the administration about deploying military domestically, but he said he has not been personally involved in conversations about invoking the Insurrection Act, which would allow for the use active-duty military to quell protests. 'No – again, I'm here running a Title 8 immigration operation, I was – I'm not involved in discussions, but I do know every day a conversation happens with the leadership of DOJ, DHS, and DOD on a decision going forward,' he said. 'I think decisions on deployment of the National Guard and any other deployment of DOD is a decision being made by the White House, along with the Department of Justice, DOD – I know those calls are happening every day.' But pressed if Americans should expect to see military deployed to other US cities where protests against ICE operations pop up, the border czar said, 'I hope not.' 'I hope it's not the new normal – I hope people go out there and protest peacefully, but to attack law enforcement officers who are simply enforcing the laws that Congress enacted,' he said. 'So, if you want to hate, you want to protest, go to Congress and protest them. ICE is just doing their job.' Homan also acknowledged that Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has not done anything to warrant arrest after Trump said if he were Homan, he would have him arrested. 'Governor Newsom has not done anything to warrant an arrest in your view right now, correct?' Collins asked. 'Not at this time – absolutely not,' he said. Homan told CNN that Immigration and Customs Enforcement will continue operations in Los Angeles – and across the country – to enforce immigration law. 'They'll continue every day, not only in California, Los Angeles, they're gonna continue every city across the country – we have teams throughout the country that are out there looking for those in the country,' Homan said. 'We're in every city and country, and ICE is going to be out every single day and will continue to be there regardless what's happening in LA.'

Miami Herald
41 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Scott Galloway has bold prediction on Social Security, US economy
As workers in the United States approach retirement, it's natural for them to worry about Social Security and how it will support their financial well-being in their post-career lives. Notable entrepreneur Scott Galloway, the popular podcaster and New York University professor, offers his views on the future of Social Security - and another looming threat that serves as a growing problem for the U.S. economy. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Recent reductions in staffing appear to have caused inefficiencies in the federal program, leading to issues such as extended wait times for phone assistance, raising concerns among both current and future Social Security beneficiaries. An even greater worry is long-term financial stability. Without intervention from lawmakers, Social Security's trust funds are projected to be depleted by 2033. If this happens, monthly payments may be cut to roughly 80% of what recipients currently anticipate. Related: Scott Galloway sends blunt message to Elon Musk The Social Security Administration reports that the average monthly payment stands at $1,976 - amounting to around $23,712 per year - which falls short of the financial security many retirees seek. Adjustments for the cost of living (COLA), designed to increase Social Security payments, do not always keep pace with inflation. Additionally, economic uncertainty - especially during market downturns or recessions - can heighten concerns that individuals may rely on Social Security more than they originally planned. Galloway discusses Social Security solvency and increasing worries about the U.S. national debt - particularly regarding the political stalemate that fuels inaction on solving the problem. As we discussed, action from Congress is needed to avoid Social Security recipients losing out on about 20% of the expected value of their monthly paychecks. But in his book, "The Algebra of Wealth," Galloway explains that he does not believe that is likely to happen. That is because he believes politicians on Capitol Hill are very well aware of the fact that people nearing retirement or already receiving Social Security benefits are more likely to participate in elections than those of other age ranges. "Old people keep living longer, and they vote, so we're more likely to get rid of schools, the space program, and half the Navy before we fail to fund Social Security," he wrote. More on retirement: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Galloway also addressed another looming crisis for the U.S. economy: the national debt. And the future of this growing concern is in the hands of legislators right now. Related: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social Security The ambitious "Big, Beautiful Bill" currently working its way through Congress faces pushback from multiple fronts. After narrowly clearing the House, the debate in the Senate is becoming increasingly tense, driven by opposition from Republicans, influential tech figures, and policy experts. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the national deficit over the next decade. Beyond fiscal concerns, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and Yale have cautioned that reductions in Medicaid and nursing home funding proposed in the bill could result in an additional 51,000 deaths annually, according to Galloway's Prof G Markets newsletter. The bill's threat to the national debt is not surprising, Galloway explained, citing his understanding that it increased by $8 trillion during President Donald Trump's first term. Galloway credits Elon Musk with drawing attention to the conversation about the deficit. "Still, no one in this so-called deficit debate is talking about raising revenues," Galloway wrote. "If we want to reduce the deficit in any meaningful way, we have to be honest about the trade-offs. That means raising taxes on the wealthy, or cutting back on large-scale programs like defense and Social Security." "But no one wants to say that out loud," Galloway continued. "So, instead, we get this sideshow - rage tweets, personal feuds, and performative austerity - instead of a serious conversation about how we fund the government." Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary sends strong message on Social Security The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China carefully assembling a deep-sea mining strategy
In a world hungry for crucial resources, China may not be poised to start deep-sea mining but it is planting seeds for such operations in a meticulously planned economic and geopolitical strategy. The world's oceans, both international waters and those under national jurisdiction, are rich in minerals and metals, like cobalt, nickel and copper. These are important for building electric car batteries, for instance, and other technologies as countries try to transition away from fossil fuels. China "is an energy-thirsty country. It will look for resources everywhere," including the deep sea, said Julia Xue of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. But she said China is not particularly anxious over the issue, although recent developments -- one company is itching to be the first to start mining the sea bed -- may put more pressure on Beijing. A Canadian firm, The Metals Company, has filed an application with the United States to begin undersea mining in international waters. Using its American subsidiary, it acted after President Donald Trump, bypassing international negotiations, signed an executive order in April to speed up the permit-issuing process for such mining in US and international waters. Trump cited an obscure 1980 US law that says American citizens can explore for and recover deep sea minerals in areas beyond the country's jurisdiction. Environmental groups are outraged by Trump's order, arguing that a wild hunt for the potato-sized, metal-containing nodules could harm fragile undersea ecosystems. The Canadian company initially said it would submit its request to the International Seabed Authority (ISA), a body which has jurisdiction over the ocean floor in international waters. The Metals Company says it ignored this authority because of its slow pace in talks on adopting a mining code that establishes rules for exploiting seabed resources. The United States is not an ISA member. A long-time observer of those talks who spoke on condition of anonymity said China is not particularly worried about who starts mining first. "For them it's more about dominance, staying competitive in the game, and giving the impression that you can't mess with us," the observer said. With that goal in mind "they're definitely developing the technology and putting the strategic agreements in place," Alex Gilbert, a researcher at the Payne Institute for Public Policy at Colorado School of Mines, told AFP. For instance, China has reached an agreement with the Cook Islands to explore for minerals in that Pacific country's waters. Another tiny Pacific nation, Kiribati, also says it is exploring a deep-sea mining partnership with China. This approach is "more geopolitical than economic," said Emmanuel Hache of the French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs, noting Beijing is using undersea mining as a lure to cement greater diplomatic support as it exerts power. China holds five contracts handed out by the ISA to look for resources in the Pacific and Indian Ocean sea beds and these contracts cover all types of undersea mineral resources. China's is the largest number of the 22 contracts the organization has granted. - Years behind - "From a research perspective, we have been continuously getting closer. And from a technical perspective, we have been continuously improving," said Chen Xuguang, a researcher at Ocean University of China. In 2024 a Chinese prototype deep-sea mining vehicle called Pioneer II, developed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University, set a national record by operating at a depth of more than 4,000 meters (13,100 feet). State-owned Beijing Pioneer Hi-Tech Development Corporation told AFP that later this year it plans a seabed nodule collection test. Still, China is not as advanced technologically as The Metals Company, experts say. "I would characterize China as being two to four years behind them in terms of their technology," said Gilbert in Colorado. Hache, the French expert, put the gap at five years. But China has an advantage over firms like the Canadian one in recovering and processing nodules: its companies are supported by the state and China has infrastructure for processing metals. The observer of the international seabed talks said China does not need seabed mining for metal supply, "but maybe geopolitically, in the context of maintaining their control over the commodities market." China wants to keep its options open, this person said. And while it supports an international mining code, China does not need one now and "they're not going to put pressure until they've decided strategically that they're ready," said Gilbert. abd/dw/mlm