logo
Nuclear breakthrough: China's experimental reactor refuels WITHOUT shutting down - taking the world closer towards limitless clean energy

Nuclear breakthrough: China's experimental reactor refuels WITHOUT shutting down - taking the world closer towards limitless clean energy

Daily Mail​30-04-2025

In the quest to safely generate limitless clean energy, China has just taken a giant step closer.
Scientists in Gansu province in the country's west have achieved the milestone of reloading fuel to an operational nuclear fission reactor while it was running.
The achievement shows fission reactors can run and be refueled continuously – potentially offering a constant source of power generation.
Drawing upon declassified US research, Chinese engineers began constructing the experimental machine – a thorium molten salt reactor (MSR) – back in 2018.
Thorium MSRs are a type of advanced nuclear technology that use liquid fuels, typically molten salts, as both a fuel and a coolant – and are generally safer than existing fission reactors which use uranium.
It marks the first long-term, stable operation of the technology, reports South China Morning Post (SCMP), citing Chinese communist party newspaper Guangming Daily.
Xu Hongjie, the project's chief scientist, said China 'now leads the global frontier' in the energy revolution, following decades of intensive research.
Xu said: 'The US left its research publicly available, waiting for the right successor. We were that successor.'
The world-first was announced by Mr Xu during a meeting at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing on April 8.
In a cheeky dig, Xu referred to America's research into molten salt reactors in the 1960s and 1970s, eventually abandoned in favour of uranium-based systems.
'In the nuclear game, there are no quick wins,' he was quoted as saying. 'You need to have strategic stamina, focusing on doing just one thing for 20, 30 years.'
In reference to Aesop's famous fable, he said: 'Rabbits sometimes make mistakes or grow lazy. That's when the tortoise seizes its chance.'
His team at the CAS Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics spent years dissecting declassified American documents and bettering their experiments, SCMP reports.
'We mastered every technique in the literature – then pushed further,' Xu added.
This experimental reactor is hidden away in the Gobi Desert city of Wuwei in Gansu province and can generate two megawatts (2MW) of energy – enough to power 2,000 households.
Only reaching full-power operation in June last year, it is the only operational thorium reactor in the world.
What is thorium?
Thorium is a naturally-occurring, slightly radioactive metal discovered in 1828 by Swedish chemist Jons Jakob Berzelius.
More abundant in nature than uranium, thorium can be used as a fuel source for nuclear energy, but not directly.
Thorium itself is not a nuclear fuel, although it can be used to create such a fuel (in conjunction with a fissile material such as recycled plutonium).
But a much bigger thorium molten salt reactor now being built is set to achieve its first sustained nuclear chain reaction by 2030.
Estimated to be 500 times more abundant than the uranium-232 used in conventional nuclear reactors, thorium has been hailed as a potential solution to the demand for nuclear power.
Nuclear reactors already in operation around the world create energy by forcing radioactive elements to undergo a process called fission.
During this process, the element breaks down into smaller, more stable elements and releases heat which can be used to drive steam turbines, in turn producing electricity.
Thorium on its own is not fissile, meaning it cannot be used for fission, but it can provide the basis for a fission reaction.
This is because thorium is 'fertile', meaning it can transmute into uranium-233 (U-233) when bombarded with neutrons.
In a molten-salt reactor, thorium is mixed with a chemical called lithium fluoride and heated to about 1400°C (2550°F).
This mixture is then bombarded with neutrons until some of the thorium starts to transform into uranium-232, which then decays in a fission reaction.
Nuclear fusion vs. nuclear fission
Nuclear fusion and fission are nuclear processes; they involve nuclear forces to change the nucleus of atoms.
Fusion joins two light elements (low atomic mass number), forming a heavier element. For fusion to occur, hydrogen atoms are put under high heat & pressure so they fuse together.
Meanwhile, fission splits a heavy element (with a high atomic mass number) into fragments.
In both cases, energy is freed because mass of the remaining nucleus is smaller than mass of reacting nuclei.
Both reactions release energy which, in a power plant, can boil water to drive a steam generator, making electricity.
Source: International Atomic Energy Agency
As it decays, this uranium then produces more neutrons which convert additional thorium into fuel. In theory, this reactor design could turn the extremely abundant element into a nearly limitless source of power.
Molten-salt reactors also produce significantly less nuclear waste and remove the risk of dangerous nuclear meltdown by keeping the levels of fissile material relatively low.
What's more, China has a thorium source that could supply enough fuel to power the country for 60,000 years, geologists in Beijing have claimed.
The Bayan Obo mining complex in Inner Mongolia, an autonomous region of northern China, could contain enough thorium to supply China's household energy demands 'almost forever', a national survey reportedly found.
It identified 233 thorium-rich zones across the country and, if accurate, suggests that thorium reserves in China significantly exceed previous estimates.
The Wuwei experimental reactor is different from the 'Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak' (EAST), a fusion reactor located in Hefei in Anhui province.
Known as China's artificial sun, it set the record for running for as hot and as long as possible – for 1,066 seconds at 180million°F (100million°C) – seven times hotter than the sun's core.
EAST could be a precursor to the first ever fusion power plants that supply power directly to the grid and electricity to people's homes.
These power plants could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the power-generation sector by diverting away from the use of fossil fuels like coal and gas.
Meanwhile, the SPARC nuclear fusion reactor, a US project involving MIT, is currently in development in Devens, Massachusetts and scheduled to start operations in 2026.
South Korea also has its own 'artificial sun', the Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR), which has run at 180million°F (100million°C) for 48 seconds.
And Japan's reactor, called JT-60SA and switched on in Naka north of Tokyo late 2023, is a six-storey-high machine measuring 50 feet high and 44 feet wide.
Built and operated jointly by Europe and Japan, JT-60SA will be the world's largest fusion reactor until the completion of the the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) in France, set to begin delivering power in 2035.
How could thorium be used to produce limitless energy?
Thorium is a relatively abundant, slightly radioactive element which is commonly produced as a byproduct of mining rare-earth metals.
On its own, thorium isn't fissile, which means it doesn't decay into any other isotopes. That means it can't be used in a standard nuclear reactor like uranium-232.
However, thorium could be used to make a new type of reactor called a molten-salt reactor.
Thorium is 'fertile', which means that an atom of thorium can be transformed into an atom of uranium-232 when it is bombarded with neutrons.
In a molten-salt reactor, thorium is dissolved in hot liquid salt and used to 'breed' uranium which then undergoes fission to produce heat.
This liquid is then circulated through a heat exchange to remove excess energy and fission materials, leaving behind the thorium to start the reaction again.
Molten-salt reactors have a number of benefits but the main advantage is they can be small, produce little radioactive waste, and avoid the risk of a meltdown.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Britain can poach America's top scientists
How Britain can poach America's top scientists

Spectator

time15 hours ago

  • Spectator

How Britain can poach America's top scientists

From the time of Newton, Britain led the world in science. That began to change in 1940, when, with the Battle of Britain raging, Winston Churchill sent the scientist Henry Tizard on a secret mission to America. His objective was to secure financial and industrial help in the fight against Hitler. His currency was British military technology, in particular the cavity magnetron, a device that made it possible to locate the enemy with radar. This wowed the Americans and achieved his objective. According to one historian, it was 'the most valuable cargo ever brought to [America's] shores.' While this was a hand-over of scientific power, it catalysed the Anglo-American scientific alliance, which has seen a flow of talent ever since between our two nations. At times there have been concerns that this might be one-way traffic: from us to them.

Lord Sainsbury: Give Glasgow greater devolved powers
Lord Sainsbury: Give Glasgow greater devolved powers

The Herald Scotland

time16 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Lord Sainsbury: Give Glasgow greater devolved powers

"A major challenge which government faces if it wants to increase Scotland's rate of growth is a way to find and support such clusters," he said. "All the evidence from other countries suggests that the only way to effectively support clusters is to do so at a city region level. Read more: "I appreciate in Scotland, unlike in England, metro mayors have not yet been introduced, but if you want to support high-tech clusters, this is something I think you should seriously consider, with Greater Glasgow being given powers similar to those devolved to Greater Manchester and the West Midlands." Lord Sainsbury was speaking at the Creating the Jobs of Tomorrow conference organised by Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, where he was introduced to the stage by former Labour chancellor and prime minister Gordon Brown. Mr Brown said growth and productivity have been perennial problems in the UK and Scotland, with innovation the key to boosting performance. A new study by economist Dan Turner, head of research at the Centre for Progressive Policy, has suggested this could unlock the creation of hundreds of thousands of high-value jobs. "There are huge sources of innovation and inventiveness in Scotland, just as has been traditional in our history," he said. "The question is can we turn that into scalable companies that stay in Scotland, invest in Scotland, create jobs in Scotland, and Dan's study suggests we could create 300,000 jobs in the next 10 years. "That's 300,000 well-paying jobs, 120,000 in the new industries, the spin-offs in terms of the service sector another 180,000 - that is a possibility if we invest in the infrastructure, the skills, and the development necessary to achieve that." Lord David Sainsbury (Image: Nate Cleary) Lord Sainsbury is a Labour peer and served as minister for science and innovation under Mr Brown and his prime ministerial predecessor, Tony Blair, between 1998 and 2006. He was appointed a life peer in 1997. Lord Sainsbury said there are new opportunities for employment and growth in sectors such as quantum computing, artificial intelligence and biotechnology. "There are economists that will argue that it is investment that is the engine of economic growth, but we have to realise today that capital flows easily around the world, and it flows as it has always done, to where the best investment opportunities are created by innovation," Lord Sainsbury said. "You can sit in London today and you can invest in Silicon Valley, you can invest in practically any country - until recently you could even invest in Chinese venture capital - because that is what modern communication enables you to do. That is why investment is not the real driver of the economy, it's innovation." Among the other speakers was Michael Spence, who won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2001 for his work in the analysis of markets with information imbalances. Read more: "There are two things that [people] associate with Adam Smith correctly," Mr Spence said. "One the 'invisible hand', which is the market system is a reasonably efficient tool for decentralising and allocating resources. "That actually is not the most important thing that Adam Smith said, but it's the one that neo-conservatives remember because they elevate market systems to the status of a religion, rather than a way of accomplishing economic and social goals. The most important one for our purposes is specialisation. "Adam Smith meant specialisation within an economy, when of course everything that David Sainsbury talked about in the global economy is just the Adam Smith insight writ large, and of course it is the ultimate source of growth. "Without specialisation you don't get scale of spread your activity over too much territory, and you don't get innovation. You get nothing if everybody has to do everything. "The fundamental message I want to deliver today is that's still true, and that growth is fundamentally about specialisation and structural change."

Japanese rover smashes into moon in fresh disaster for embattled space company
Japanese rover smashes into moon in fresh disaster for embattled space company

Daily Mirror

timea day ago

  • Daily Mirror

Japanese rover smashes into moon in fresh disaster for embattled space company

Japanese company ispace has declared a second failure in a bid for its lunar lander to touchdown on the moon after communication was lost less than two minutes before the scheduled grounding A lunar lander from a Japanese company crashed while attempting a touchdown on the moon in the latest casualty in the commercial rush to the moon and the second failure for the same company. The Tokyo-based company ispace declared the mission a failure several hours after communication was lost with the lander. Flight controllers scrambled to gain contact, but were met with only silence and said they were concluding the mission. Communications ceased less than two minutes before the spacecraft's scheduled landing on the moon with a mini rover. Until then, the descent from lunar orbit seemed to be going well. ‌ ‌ CEO and founder Takeshi Hakamada apologized to everyone who contributed to the mission, the second lunar strikeout for ispace. Two years ago, the company's first moonshot ended in a crash landing, giving rise to the name 'Resilience' for its successor lander. Resilience carried a rover with a shovel to gather lunar dirt as well as a Swedish artist's toy-size red house for placement on the moon's dusty surface. Company officials said it was too soon to know whether the same problem doomed both missions. This is the second time that we were not able to land. So we really have to take it very seriously,' Hakamada told reporters. He stressed that the company would press ahead with more lunar missions. A preliminary analysis indicates the laser system for measuring the altitude did not work as planned, and the lander descended too fast, officials said. 'Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface,' the company said in a written statement. Moon missions had previously been the preserve of governments but it became a target of private outfits in 2019, with more flops than wins along the way. Launched in January from Florida on a long, roundabout journey, Resilience entered lunar orbit last month. ‌ It shared a SpaceX ride with Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost, which reached the moon faster and became the first private entity to successfully land there in March. Another US company, Intuitive Machines, arrived at the moon a few days after Firefly. But the tall, spindly lander face-planted in a crater near the moon's south pole and was declared dead within hours. Resilience was targeting the top of the moon, a less treacherous place than the shadowy bottom. The ispace team chose a flat area with few boulders in Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a long and narrow region full of craters and ancient lava flows that stretches across the near side's northern tier. ‌ Plans had called for the 7.5-feet Resilience to beam back pictures within hours and for the lander to lower the piggybacking rover onto the lunar surface this weekend. Made of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic with four wheels, ispace's European-built rover — named Tenacious — sported a high-definition camera to scout out the area and a shovel to scoop up some lunar dirt for NASA. The rover, weighing just 5kgs, was going to stick close to the lander, going in circles at a speed of less than two centimetres per second. It was capable of venturing up to two-thirds of a mile from the lander and should be operational throughout the two-week mission, the period of daylight. Besides science and tech experiments, there was an artistic touch. The rover held a tiny, Swedish-style red cottage with white trim and a green door, dubbed the Moonhouse by creator Mikael Genberg, for placement on the lunar surface. ‌ Minutes before the attempted landing, Hakamada assured everyone that ispace had learned from its first failed mission. 'Engineers did everything they possibly could' to ensure success this time, he said. He considered the latest moonshot 'merely a steppingstone' to its bigger lander launching by 2027 with NASA involvement. Ispace, like other businesses, does not have 'infinite funds' and cannot afford repeated failures, Jeremy Fix, chief engineer for ispace's US subsidiary, said at a conference last month. While not divulging the cost of the current mission, company officials said it's less than the first one which exceeded £74million. Two other US companies are aiming for moon landings by year's end: Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin and Astrobotic Technology. Astrobotic's first lunar lander missed the moon altogether in 2024 and came crashing back through Earth's atmosphere. For decades, governments competed to get to the moon. Only five countries have pulled off successful robotic lunar landings: Russia, the US, China, India and Japan. Of those, only the US has landed people on the moon: 12 NASA astronauts from 1969 through 1972. NASA expects to send four astronauts around the moon next year. That would be followed a year or more later by the first lunar landing by a crew in more than a half-century, with SpaceX's Starship providing the lift from lunar orbit all the way down to the surface. China also has moon landing plans for its own astronauts by 2030.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store