Hamas official says Gaza mediators intensifying ceasefire efforts
A senior Hamas official has told the BBC that mediators have intensified their efforts to broker a new ceasefire and hostage release deal in Gaza, but that negotiations with Israel remain stalled.The comments came as US President Donald Trump said "great progress" was being made since Israel and Iran ended their 12-day war on Tuesday, and that his envoy Steve Witkoff thought an agreement between Israel and Hamas was "very close".Israeli attacks across Gaza on Wednesday killed at least 45 Palestinians, including some who were seeking aid, the Hamas-run health ministry said.Meanwhile, the Israeli military announced that seven soldiers were killed in a bomb attack on Tuesday claimed by Hamas.
"I think great progress is being made on Gaza, I think because of this attack that we made," President Trump told reporters in Brussels on Wednesday, referring to the US air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities carried out at the weekend amid the conflict between Israel and Iran."I think we're going to have some very good news. I was talking to Steve Witkoff... [and] he did tell me that Gaza's very close," he added.Shortly after Trump spoke, the senior Hamas official told the BBC that mediators were "engaged in intensive contacts aimed at reaching a ceasefire agreement".However, he added that the group had "not received any new proposal so far".An Israeli official also told the Haaretz newspaper that there has been no progress in the negotiations, and that major disagreements remained unresolved.
Efforts by the US, Qatar and Egypt to broker a deal stalled at the end of May, when Witkoff said Hamas had sought "totally unacceptable" amendments to a US proposal backed by Israel for a 60-day truce, during which half the living Israeli hostages and half of those who have died would be released.Israel resumed its military offensive in Gaza on 18 March, collapsing a two-month ceasefire. It said it wanted to put pressure on Hamas to release its hostages. Fifty are still in Gaza, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive.Israel also imposed a total blockade on humanitarian aid deliveries to Gaza at the start of March, which it partially eased after 11 weeks following pressure from US allies and warnings from global experts that half a million people were facing starvation.At the same time, Israel and the US backed the establishment of a new aid distribution mechanism run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which is intended to bypass the UN as the main supplier of aid to Palestinians. They said the GHF's system would prevent aid being stolen by Hamas, which the group denies doing.
The GHF, which uses US private security contractors, says it has distributed food packages containing more than 44 million meals since it began operating on 26 May, with more than 2.4 million handed out at three sites on Wednesday.However, the UN and other aid groups have refused to co-operate with the GHF, accusing it of co-operating with Israel's goals in a way that violates fundamental humanitarian principles.They have also expressed alarm at the near-daily reports of Palestinians being killed near the group's sites, which are inside Israeli military zones.According to Gaza's health ministry, at least 549 people have been killed and 4,000 injured while trying to collect aid since the GHF began distributing aid on 26 May.On Wednesday morning, a spokesman for the Hamas-run Civil Defence agency said six people were killed when Israeli forces opened fire at crowds waiting near one of the GHF's food distribution centre in central Gaza.Three others were killed near a GHF site in the southern city of Rafah, he added.However, the Israeli military said it was "not aware of any incidents with casualties in those areas", while the GHF said the reports of any such incidents near its sites were false.In Gaza City, funerals were held for some of the 33 people who the health ministry said had been killed over the previous day while waiting for aid."I say and repeat a million times," Abu Mohammed told Reuters news agency. "These aid points are not aid points, these are death points."Unicef spokesman James Elder, who has just visited Gaza, said: "So long as a population is denied food, people are being offered this lethal choice and, unfortunately, because it's in a combat zone, it cannot improve."The Civil Defence spokesman also said another six people, including a child, were killed in an air strike on a house early on Wednesday in Nuseirat refugee camp, in central Gaza.Five others were killed when homes in the nearby town of Deir al-Balah, he said.
More than 860 Palestinians were reported killed by Israeli forces in Gaza during the Israel-Iran conflict, which began when Israel launched an air campaign targeting Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes. Iran launched barrages of missiles towards Israel in response.People in Gaza were divided in their assessments of what the ceasefire meant for the territory.Some viewed the weakening of Iran, Hamas's key regional backer, as a potentially positive step towards achieving a truce in Gaza because it might force the group to ease its demands.Others, however, feared the end of the conflict would allow Israel to redirect its military focus back on Gaza and intensify its air and ground operations.One man in Khan Younis, Nader Ramadan, told the BBC that it felt like "everything got worse" in Gaza during the conflict."The [Israeli] bombing intensified, the damage increased, and the incursion expanded in certain areas… We only felt the destruction," he said.Adel Abu Reda said the most difficult thing was the lack of access to aid. He said items were being looted and sold for inflated prices, and civilians were coming under Israeli fire when trying to get food."What are we supposed to do?" he asked. "We feel the shooting and the killing all the time."
In Israel, the military announced that seven of its soldiers had been killed in combat in southern Gaza on Tuesday - the deadliest such incident since the ceasefire collapsed.Spokesman Brig-Gen Effie Defrin said an explosive device was attached to an armoured vehicle in the Khan Younis area, and that the blast caused the vehicle to catch fire. Helicopters and rescue forces made several unsuccessful attempts to rescue them, he added.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said it was "a difficult day for the people of Israel".The deaths renewed pressure on Netanyahu to agree a ceasefire, with the leader of an ultra-Orthodox Jewish party in his governing coalition saying Israel should end the war and bring home all the hostages."I don't understand what we're fighting for and for what purpose... when soldiers are being killed all the time?" Moshe Gafni of United Torah Judaism told the Israeli parliament.The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to Hamas's 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.At least 56,157 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry.Additional reporting by Alice Cuddy in Jerusalem
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Gulf allies believe Israel is out of control after ‘reckless' war
Israel's attack on Iran risks triggering a lasting rupture with its Middle Eastern allies, Gulf Arab officials have warned. Once seen as the region's chief guarantor against the Iranian nuclear threat, Israel is now increasingly viewed as its most destabilising force after entering conflict with Tehran, which one Arab diplomat characterised as 'unforgivably reckless'. Although some officials admitted that they hoped Israel had succeeded in destroying Iran's nuclear facilities, representatives of three Gulf states have expressed alarm about its growing military dominance and Benjamin Netanyahu's willingness to wield it. Speaking on condition of anonymity, one official said: 'He appears to be beyond restraint – in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and now Iran. 'Unchecked, uncontrollable power is no longer an asset for us. It is a problem.' Growing concern about Israel's 'destabilising' role threatens the legacy of the Abraham Accords, the series of agreements under which the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan normalised relations with Israel. Hailed as a landmark moment for Israel's integration into the Arab world after decades of hostility, the accords were Donald Trump 's signature foreign policy achievement in his first term. US officials had hoped Saudi Arabia would eventually follow suit but expectations have dwindled since Israel's war in Gaza, which drew sharp denunciations from Riyadh. Gulf states were drawn to the accords partly because they enabled them to forge a united front against Iran. Tehran's nuclear ambitions, missile development and sponsorship of proxy militias were seen as the region's primary threat. The accords also facilitated intelligence sharing and military cooperation at a time when Washington seemed to be disengaging from the region. That Israel now risks replacing Iran as the chief source of instability is an irony. It reflects rising anxiety over what Gulf states, which have preferred to seek a diplomatic solution with Iran, increasingly see as Israel's boundless military ambition.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump will look at giving Ukraine more Patriot missiles as he calls on Putin to end war
Donald Trump said he is considering sending more Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, as he renewed calls on Russian leader Vladimir Putin to end the war. The president added that he isn't ruling out a new defense assistance package, when he spoke to reporters at the Nato summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday. Trump, who has surrounded himself with isolationist-minded advisers who've publicly opposed continued support for Kyiv, responded, 'We'll see what happens' when asked whether the U.S. would contribute anything on top of the $8 billion pledged by NATO allies as part of the 32-member bloc's continued support for Ukraine's war effort. Click here for the latest updates on the war in Ukraine Speaking at a press conference on the heels of a closed-door sit-down with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, Mr. Trump said there has been 'a lot of spirit' in Ukraine's fight against the invasion Putin ordered in February 2022. Trump also appeared to shift blame for the continuation and escalation of the war to Putin, marking a dramatic reversal from how he characterized the situation during a contentious Oval Office meeting with Zelensky earlier this year. 'Vladimir Putin really has to end that war,' the president said. 'People are dying at levels that people haven't seen before for a long time.' He recounted to reporters how he'd rebuked Putin during a recent phone call after the Russian leader offered to mediate an end to hostilities between Israel and Iran, stressing he would rather he brought an end to the conflict in Ukraine. He later added that Putin has been 'more difficult' than Zelensky, with whom Trump has had a contentious relationship dating back to his first term, when a phone call with the Ukrainian leader launched a scandal that led to the first of his two impeachment trials in the Senate. Trump's relationship with Putin has long been far friendlier, but even that has appeared to sour in recent months as the Russian dictator has continued to pound civilian targets in Ukraine with drones and missiles, killing thousands and complicating efforts by Trump to cajole both sides to the negotiating table. In April, he became so irate over Putin's attacks on civilians that he took to Truth Social to exhort the Russian leader to halt the attacks and get to the negotiating table, writing: 'Vladimir, STOP! 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!' Since then, he has floated the possibility of imposing harsh new sanctions on Moscow if Putin refuses to cooperate in the U.S.-led efforts to bring about a settlement in the three-year-old conflict. The president's changed view of the war and Putin's culpability also became evident when he had an emotional exchange with a reporter for the BBC's Ukrainian service, who asked whether the U.S. was prepared to sell more Patriot anti-air missiles to Ukraine. Last year, the Biden administration announced they would prioritize deliveries of Patriot interceptors to Ukraine on account of Russia's accelerated pace of aerial attacks against civilians and infrastructure, but Kyiv has had to expand their use of the missiles and has been running low on them. Trump asked the reporter if she was currently living in Ukraine, at which point she replied that she was based in Warsaw with her children while her husband has remained in Ukraine. The president responded: 'That's rough stuff.' He asked the journalist again to confirm that she was living outside of Ukraine and working as a reporter, replying 'good' when she answered in the affirmative. 'Let me just tell you, they [Ukraine] do want to have the anti-missile missiles, as they call them, the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available,' he said. Trump added that such weapons were 'very hard to get' and 'very effective', while admitting that the U.S. had been prioritizing supplies for Israel amid that country's ongoing wars. 'They do want that more than any other thing, as you probably know,' he said before praising her 'very good question' and telling her to 'say hello' to her husband for him. Trump's apparent openness to sending more American aid to Ukraine comes as NATO's 32 member nations pledged to 'reaffirm' what they described as 'enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine,' calling Ukrainian security efforts a contribution to NATO's own security. The alliance also pledged to include 'direct contributions to Ukraine defense' as part of efforts to have each country meet a threshold of spending five percent of gross domestic product on defense.
Scotsman
37 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why UK needs to pander to Trump but should not necessarily believe him
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Following the US attack on Iran, Donald Trump said its nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'completely and fully obliterated', setting back the tyrannical regime's plans by 'decades'. However, according to a leaked preliminary assessment by the Pentagon, the missile strikes only caused a delay of a few months. Amid the ensuing uproar over these very different takes, the US President attacked the media for reporting the classified document's findings, saying they were "scum" and "disgusting", while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused those behind the leak of being "professional stabbers". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But, clearly, what matters is what has actually happened. If Iran still has the ability to quickly develop nuclear weapons, the world needs to be alive to that threat. With the situation still unclear, it would be far better to err on the side of caution. Keir Starmer speaks to US President Donald Trump at the Nato summit in The Hague (Picture: Kin Cheung/pool) | Getty Images Axis of Autocracies Where Trump deserves credit is that the US attack has demonstrated to Iran's leaders how vulnerable they are, and this may have a deterring effect on a regime, widely despised by its own people, which poses a very real threat to world peace. It is a member of what former Nato Secretary-General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, has described as the 'Axis of Autocracies', along with Russia, China and North Korea. The combined threat these dictatorships pose is the reason why the world needs a much stronger Nato. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And that means European leaders must sometimes swallow their pride and be rather sycophantic towards Trump, even as he continues to cast doubt on his commitment to the Nato treaty which states an attack on one will be treated as an attack on all. The UK and Europe have no choice but to spend more on defence – commensurate with the increased threats facing the world and also, again erring on the side of caution, in case Trump decides to withdraw from the alliance, formally or not.
