logo
Disasters are worsening and volunteer numbers are dwindling

Disasters are worsening and volunteer numbers are dwindling

The Advertiser23-05-2025

As NSW communities are again experiencing a record-breaking disaster event unfold, it's the committed emergency service volunteers who consistently show up during times of disaster that keeps impacted residents safe.
Recently, it was National Volunteer Week, a time to acknowledge and value the efforts of the 400,000 emergency service volunteers across Australia.
Volunteers who are out in force in NSW where the Manning River at Taree exceeded its previous almost 100-year-old record, reaching a height expected on average only once every 500 years.
They evacuated, sandbagged, rescued people and provided comfort across the Mid North Coast where hundreds of properties were flooded, and thousands of people were impacted. Some of these communities experienced major flooding as recently as 2021.
We live in a time of worsening natural hazard risk. Major disasters once considered rare are becoming more frequent as we warm our climate and choose to live in areas prone to flood and bushfire. Disasters are not natural. They are the consequence of our decisions.
Increasingly frequent disasters place a enormous strain on volunteers when broader demographic, technology and work trends are influencing the current and future disaster management workforce.
The recent Senate select committee on Australia's disaster resilience highlighted challenges in recruiting and retaining emergency service volunteers, with one estimate that volunteer numbers have decreased by more than 20,000 in the last decade nationally.
This is occurring at a time of increasing geopolitical stress, meaning we can't just call in the Army to support response and recovery efforts. Our troops now considered a last resort to support state and territory-based emergency services.
Ensuring adequate resources to meet the demands of future disasters requires urgent attention and action. After previous disasters, calls were made for federally funded emergency response initiatives such as a national firefighting force, but these duplicate existing structures and are expensive. While no one strategy will be a panacea, action is needed now to ensure a volunteer disaster workforce is prepared for tomorrow and beyond.
Five evidence-informed strategies merit attention:
1. Make it easier for people to volunteer through streamlined recruitment and onboarding of volunteers, recognising existing skills. Ensuring the required infrastructure is provided, including facilities, vehicles, equipment and volunteer support staff. Opportunities exist to be more inclusive and engage with a more diverse range of volunteers by providing more flexible volunteering models that are tailored to personal preferences and time pressures.
2. Address volunteer workloads, with volunteers often burdened by mounting administrative demands. Cost of living pressures also impacts volunteering and could be mitigated through legislated employment and financial incentives for volunteers.
3. Ensure emergency service agencies' disaster plans incorporate engagement and coordination with new volunteer groups emerging during disasters, such as the "tinny army" during the 2022 Lismore floods. Accelerated learning techniques could rapidly skill individuals to perform critical tasks and support traditional emergency response and recovery volunteers during critical times.
4. Mobilise often underutilised business, not-for-profits and First Nations ranger groups skills and resources. There is significant benefit in exploring deeper partnerships between government agencies and these groups in the development of disaster plans.
5. Trialling, investing and adapting new technologies to reduce workforce demands and augment the existing workforce, while also considering how future technologies will reshape the skill sets required to manage future disasters.
Autonomous robots and vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors, AI and communication technologies, represent a potential leap forward in disaster response capabilities.
Combined with predictive analytics, autonomous assets could be deployed with minimal human intervention to areas of greatest need.
READ MORE:
These assets could be co-ordinated to perform a variety of tasks, from firefighting and search and rescue operations to rapid impact assessment and the delivery of emergency relief.
Ultimately, we must focus on reducing disaster risks and avoiding future development in at-risk areas. Without addressing the fundamentals that reduce disaster risks our communities will only experience further suffering, increasing demands on volunteers and other government services.
Ultimately, we will all pay.
Let's recognise and celebrate our volunteers but not wait until the next disaster to invest in actions to strengthen critical capabilities.
As NSW communities are again experiencing a record-breaking disaster event unfold, it's the committed emergency service volunteers who consistently show up during times of disaster that keeps impacted residents safe.
Recently, it was National Volunteer Week, a time to acknowledge and value the efforts of the 400,000 emergency service volunteers across Australia.
Volunteers who are out in force in NSW where the Manning River at Taree exceeded its previous almost 100-year-old record, reaching a height expected on average only once every 500 years.
They evacuated, sandbagged, rescued people and provided comfort across the Mid North Coast where hundreds of properties were flooded, and thousands of people were impacted. Some of these communities experienced major flooding as recently as 2021.
We live in a time of worsening natural hazard risk. Major disasters once considered rare are becoming more frequent as we warm our climate and choose to live in areas prone to flood and bushfire. Disasters are not natural. They are the consequence of our decisions.
Increasingly frequent disasters place a enormous strain on volunteers when broader demographic, technology and work trends are influencing the current and future disaster management workforce.
The recent Senate select committee on Australia's disaster resilience highlighted challenges in recruiting and retaining emergency service volunteers, with one estimate that volunteer numbers have decreased by more than 20,000 in the last decade nationally.
This is occurring at a time of increasing geopolitical stress, meaning we can't just call in the Army to support response and recovery efforts. Our troops now considered a last resort to support state and territory-based emergency services.
Ensuring adequate resources to meet the demands of future disasters requires urgent attention and action. After previous disasters, calls were made for federally funded emergency response initiatives such as a national firefighting force, but these duplicate existing structures and are expensive. While no one strategy will be a panacea, action is needed now to ensure a volunteer disaster workforce is prepared for tomorrow and beyond.
Five evidence-informed strategies merit attention:
1. Make it easier for people to volunteer through streamlined recruitment and onboarding of volunteers, recognising existing skills. Ensuring the required infrastructure is provided, including facilities, vehicles, equipment and volunteer support staff. Opportunities exist to be more inclusive and engage with a more diverse range of volunteers by providing more flexible volunteering models that are tailored to personal preferences and time pressures.
2. Address volunteer workloads, with volunteers often burdened by mounting administrative demands. Cost of living pressures also impacts volunteering and could be mitigated through legislated employment and financial incentives for volunteers.
3. Ensure emergency service agencies' disaster plans incorporate engagement and coordination with new volunteer groups emerging during disasters, such as the "tinny army" during the 2022 Lismore floods. Accelerated learning techniques could rapidly skill individuals to perform critical tasks and support traditional emergency response and recovery volunteers during critical times.
4. Mobilise often underutilised business, not-for-profits and First Nations ranger groups skills and resources. There is significant benefit in exploring deeper partnerships between government agencies and these groups in the development of disaster plans.
5. Trialling, investing and adapting new technologies to reduce workforce demands and augment the existing workforce, while also considering how future technologies will reshape the skill sets required to manage future disasters.
Autonomous robots and vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors, AI and communication technologies, represent a potential leap forward in disaster response capabilities.
Combined with predictive analytics, autonomous assets could be deployed with minimal human intervention to areas of greatest need.
READ MORE:
These assets could be co-ordinated to perform a variety of tasks, from firefighting and search and rescue operations to rapid impact assessment and the delivery of emergency relief.
Ultimately, we must focus on reducing disaster risks and avoiding future development in at-risk areas. Without addressing the fundamentals that reduce disaster risks our communities will only experience further suffering, increasing demands on volunteers and other government services.
Ultimately, we will all pay.
Let's recognise and celebrate our volunteers but not wait until the next disaster to invest in actions to strengthen critical capabilities.
As NSW communities are again experiencing a record-breaking disaster event unfold, it's the committed emergency service volunteers who consistently show up during times of disaster that keeps impacted residents safe.
Recently, it was National Volunteer Week, a time to acknowledge and value the efforts of the 400,000 emergency service volunteers across Australia.
Volunteers who are out in force in NSW where the Manning River at Taree exceeded its previous almost 100-year-old record, reaching a height expected on average only once every 500 years.
They evacuated, sandbagged, rescued people and provided comfort across the Mid North Coast where hundreds of properties were flooded, and thousands of people were impacted. Some of these communities experienced major flooding as recently as 2021.
We live in a time of worsening natural hazard risk. Major disasters once considered rare are becoming more frequent as we warm our climate and choose to live in areas prone to flood and bushfire. Disasters are not natural. They are the consequence of our decisions.
Increasingly frequent disasters place a enormous strain on volunteers when broader demographic, technology and work trends are influencing the current and future disaster management workforce.
The recent Senate select committee on Australia's disaster resilience highlighted challenges in recruiting and retaining emergency service volunteers, with one estimate that volunteer numbers have decreased by more than 20,000 in the last decade nationally.
This is occurring at a time of increasing geopolitical stress, meaning we can't just call in the Army to support response and recovery efforts. Our troops now considered a last resort to support state and territory-based emergency services.
Ensuring adequate resources to meet the demands of future disasters requires urgent attention and action. After previous disasters, calls were made for federally funded emergency response initiatives such as a national firefighting force, but these duplicate existing structures and are expensive. While no one strategy will be a panacea, action is needed now to ensure a volunteer disaster workforce is prepared for tomorrow and beyond.
Five evidence-informed strategies merit attention:
1. Make it easier for people to volunteer through streamlined recruitment and onboarding of volunteers, recognising existing skills. Ensuring the required infrastructure is provided, including facilities, vehicles, equipment and volunteer support staff. Opportunities exist to be more inclusive and engage with a more diverse range of volunteers by providing more flexible volunteering models that are tailored to personal preferences and time pressures.
2. Address volunteer workloads, with volunteers often burdened by mounting administrative demands. Cost of living pressures also impacts volunteering and could be mitigated through legislated employment and financial incentives for volunteers.
3. Ensure emergency service agencies' disaster plans incorporate engagement and coordination with new volunteer groups emerging during disasters, such as the "tinny army" during the 2022 Lismore floods. Accelerated learning techniques could rapidly skill individuals to perform critical tasks and support traditional emergency response and recovery volunteers during critical times.
4. Mobilise often underutilised business, not-for-profits and First Nations ranger groups skills and resources. There is significant benefit in exploring deeper partnerships between government agencies and these groups in the development of disaster plans.
5. Trialling, investing and adapting new technologies to reduce workforce demands and augment the existing workforce, while also considering how future technologies will reshape the skill sets required to manage future disasters.
Autonomous robots and vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors, AI and communication technologies, represent a potential leap forward in disaster response capabilities.
Combined with predictive analytics, autonomous assets could be deployed with minimal human intervention to areas of greatest need.
READ MORE:
These assets could be co-ordinated to perform a variety of tasks, from firefighting and search and rescue operations to rapid impact assessment and the delivery of emergency relief.
Ultimately, we must focus on reducing disaster risks and avoiding future development in at-risk areas. Without addressing the fundamentals that reduce disaster risks our communities will only experience further suffering, increasing demands on volunteers and other government services.
Ultimately, we will all pay.
Let's recognise and celebrate our volunteers but not wait until the next disaster to invest in actions to strengthen critical capabilities.
As NSW communities are again experiencing a record-breaking disaster event unfold, it's the committed emergency service volunteers who consistently show up during times of disaster that keeps impacted residents safe.
Recently, it was National Volunteer Week, a time to acknowledge and value the efforts of the 400,000 emergency service volunteers across Australia.
Volunteers who are out in force in NSW where the Manning River at Taree exceeded its previous almost 100-year-old record, reaching a height expected on average only once every 500 years.
They evacuated, sandbagged, rescued people and provided comfort across the Mid North Coast where hundreds of properties were flooded, and thousands of people were impacted. Some of these communities experienced major flooding as recently as 2021.
We live in a time of worsening natural hazard risk. Major disasters once considered rare are becoming more frequent as we warm our climate and choose to live in areas prone to flood and bushfire. Disasters are not natural. They are the consequence of our decisions.
Increasingly frequent disasters place a enormous strain on volunteers when broader demographic, technology and work trends are influencing the current and future disaster management workforce.
The recent Senate select committee on Australia's disaster resilience highlighted challenges in recruiting and retaining emergency service volunteers, with one estimate that volunteer numbers have decreased by more than 20,000 in the last decade nationally.
This is occurring at a time of increasing geopolitical stress, meaning we can't just call in the Army to support response and recovery efforts. Our troops now considered a last resort to support state and territory-based emergency services.
Ensuring adequate resources to meet the demands of future disasters requires urgent attention and action. After previous disasters, calls were made for federally funded emergency response initiatives such as a national firefighting force, but these duplicate existing structures and are expensive. While no one strategy will be a panacea, action is needed now to ensure a volunteer disaster workforce is prepared for tomorrow and beyond.
Five evidence-informed strategies merit attention:
1. Make it easier for people to volunteer through streamlined recruitment and onboarding of volunteers, recognising existing skills. Ensuring the required infrastructure is provided, including facilities, vehicles, equipment and volunteer support staff. Opportunities exist to be more inclusive and engage with a more diverse range of volunteers by providing more flexible volunteering models that are tailored to personal preferences and time pressures.
2. Address volunteer workloads, with volunteers often burdened by mounting administrative demands. Cost of living pressures also impacts volunteering and could be mitigated through legislated employment and financial incentives for volunteers.
3. Ensure emergency service agencies' disaster plans incorporate engagement and coordination with new volunteer groups emerging during disasters, such as the "tinny army" during the 2022 Lismore floods. Accelerated learning techniques could rapidly skill individuals to perform critical tasks and support traditional emergency response and recovery volunteers during critical times.
4. Mobilise often underutilised business, not-for-profits and First Nations ranger groups skills and resources. There is significant benefit in exploring deeper partnerships between government agencies and these groups in the development of disaster plans.
5. Trialling, investing and adapting new technologies to reduce workforce demands and augment the existing workforce, while also considering how future technologies will reshape the skill sets required to manage future disasters.
Autonomous robots and vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors, AI and communication technologies, represent a potential leap forward in disaster response capabilities.
Combined with predictive analytics, autonomous assets could be deployed with minimal human intervention to areas of greatest need.
READ MORE:
These assets could be co-ordinated to perform a variety of tasks, from firefighting and search and rescue operations to rapid impact assessment and the delivery of emergency relief.
Ultimately, we must focus on reducing disaster risks and avoiding future development in at-risk areas. Without addressing the fundamentals that reduce disaster risks our communities will only experience further suffering, increasing demands on volunteers and other government services.
Ultimately, we will all pay.
Let's recognise and celebrate our volunteers but not wait until the next disaster to invest in actions to strengthen critical capabilities.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump flags Russian retaliation, plays down peace talks after Putin call
Trump flags Russian retaliation, plays down peace talks after Putin call

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Trump flags Russian retaliation, plays down peace talks after Putin call

On Wednesday, shortly before Trump posted about his call with Putin, Zelensky said he was ready to meet with Putin, as well as Trump and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to discuss a potential memorandum – as opposed to what he characterised as a Russian 'ultimatum' for a ceasefire issued on Monday (Tuesday AEST). 'Russians are behaving like thimble-riggers. They do not want deescalation or an end to the war. They pretend to be constructive, but their games are only aimed at delaying US sanctions,' Zelensky said in a statement on X. He proposed a meeting starting as soon as Monday, at any workable location, and a concurrent ceasefire, and said he would be grateful if Trump supported the idea. 'When we meet it will become clear if there is will for deescalation. If no, the ceasefire will end on the same day,' Zelensky said. Putin, however, showed no willingness to meet with Zelensky, expressing anger Wednesday about what he said were Ukraine's recent 'terrorist acts' on Russian rail lines in the Kursk and Bryansk regions on the countries' border. 'How can any such meetings be conducted in such circumstances? What shall we talk about?' Putin asked in a video call with top Russian officials. Trump gave no explicit indication in the account of his phone call with Putin as to whether they had discussed such a meeting, or a similar initiative. Their conversation came as Congress grows increasingly impatient to impose additional sanctions on Russia, including 500 per cent tariffs on US trading partners who buy Russian oil. Legislation to that effect has the support of at least 82 members of the 100-seat US Senate. Loading A Ukrainian delegation was due to meet senators on Wednesday, local time, to discuss the sanctions bill. 'It's a pivotal moment in Ukraine and crunch time for the Senate on this bill,' Democratic senator and bill co-sponsor Richard Blumenthal told Politico. Eddie Fishman, a senior research scholar at Columbia University's School of International Affairs, argued in a new essay for Foreign Affairs that Trump's Russia policy was 'at a dead end' and it was time to pull the trigger on sanctions. Rather than extreme tariffs on third countries, Fishman proposed sanctions enabling them to gradually reduce imports of Russian oil and pay the money into escrow accounts that could only be used for humanitarian goods. This was based on a sanctions regime Barack Obama used against Iran.

Trump flags Russian retaliation, plays down peace talks after Putin call
Trump flags Russian retaliation, plays down peace talks after Putin call

The Age

time2 days ago

  • The Age

Trump flags Russian retaliation, plays down peace talks after Putin call

On Wednesday, shortly before Trump posted about his call with Putin, Zelensky said he was ready to meet with Putin, as well as Trump and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to discuss a potential memorandum – as opposed to what he characterised as a Russian 'ultimatum' for a ceasefire issued on Monday (Tuesday AEST). 'Russians are behaving like thimble-riggers. They do not want deescalation or an end to the war. They pretend to be constructive, but their games are only aimed at delaying US sanctions,' Zelensky said in a statement on X. He proposed a meeting starting as soon as Monday, at any workable location, and a concurrent ceasefire, and said he would be grateful if Trump supported the idea. 'When we meet it will become clear if there is will for deescalation. If no, the ceasefire will end on the same day,' Zelensky said. Putin, however, showed no willingness to meet with Zelensky, expressing anger Wednesday about what he said were Ukraine's recent 'terrorist acts' on Russian rail lines in the Kursk and Bryansk regions on the countries' border. 'How can any such meetings be conducted in such circumstances? What shall we talk about?' Putin asked in a video call with top Russian officials. Trump gave no explicit indication in the account of his phone call with Putin as to whether they had discussed such a meeting, or a similar initiative. Their conversation came as Congress grows increasingly impatient to impose additional sanctions on Russia, including 500 per cent tariffs on US trading partners who buy Russian oil. Legislation to that effect has the support of at least 82 members of the 100-seat US Senate. Loading A Ukrainian delegation was due to meet senators on Wednesday, local time, to discuss the sanctions bill. 'It's a pivotal moment in Ukraine and crunch time for the Senate on this bill,' Democratic senator and bill co-sponsor Richard Blumenthal told Politico. Eddie Fishman, a senior research scholar at Columbia University's School of International Affairs, argued in a new essay for Foreign Affairs that Trump's Russia policy was 'at a dead end' and it was time to pull the trigger on sanctions. Rather than extreme tariffs on third countries, Fishman proposed sanctions enabling them to gradually reduce imports of Russian oil and pay the money into escrow accounts that could only be used for humanitarian goods. This was based on a sanctions regime Barack Obama used against Iran.

Parties should act to stop the Senate being a launch pad for deserters
Parties should act to stop the Senate being a launch pad for deserters

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Parties should act to stop the Senate being a launch pad for deserters

Pauline Hanson and Cheryl Kernot may give the lie to the truism that turncoats rarely prosper. But Labor's newest chum, Dorinda Cox, lacks Hanson's outraging populism and Kernot's high political achievements with the Australian Democrats, talents that allowed them to whitewash the stain of ratting on their political parties. The Western Australian Senator has deserted the Greens for Labor, handing Prime Minister Anthony Albanese an extra vote in the Senate and a black eye to former minor party colleagues already reeling after their May 3 election rout. But Cox's own actions and the leaks against her since her desertion will make it hard to put her past behind and be little more than a yes vote. A former WA police officer, Cox filled a casual vacancy in 2021 after the retirement of veteran Greens senator Rachel Siewert. Last October, the Herald 's James Massola revealed she had churned through her small parliamentary staff like a meat grinder: 20 resigned and investigations followed with Cox censured by fellow Greens. She also apologised. But they never really kissed and made up. Beaten to the Greens' deputy leadership by Mehreen Faruqi after the party's dismal election result, Cox defected to Labor. She's been there before, and had been a member of the ALP. 'I was let down by what I found to be a patronising attitude towards women and people of colour,' she said on her 2020 Greens' application form, one of many leaks against her since she jumped ship. Another leak claimed Cox signed a candidate agreement saying she would resign from parliament if she left the Greens in recognition of the effort, money and support party members donated to get her elected. She also was shown to have an obscene opinion of Hanson. Cox's term finishes next election but unlike other recent party defectors, Lidia Thorpe and Fatima Payman, Cox's prospects of retaining a Senate seat have been slightly enhanced by joining Labor. Not much though, but miles better than if she stayed a Green. Political defections are nothing new, but there does seem a rash of them lately. The phenomenon kicked off in 1996 when Hanson was preselected by the Liberals only to be dumped for her remarks about race – she won the seat of Oxley as an independent. The following year Kernot was ushered into Labor courtesy of a friendship with Hawke minister Gareth Evans, but only held Dickson for three years before voters decided for Peter Dutton. The parade of desertions continued this century. Bob Katter quit the Queensland Nationals to husband a 24-year career as an independent. Clive Palmer started funding hopefuls as disenchantment with major parties increased: Jacqui Lambie is his enduring achievement, although she, too, ratted on him.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store