Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis visits Ohio in support of congressional term limits
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis dropped by the Ohio Statehouse Tuesday to lend his support to imposing congressional term limits. The effort would require a constitutional amendment, and Ohio's resolution calls for a convention of the states to draft it. The approach has never been tried before and presents several unknowns — brushed aside by the Florida governor and Ohio lawmakers.
Ohio's proposal isn't even the only convention for which DeSantis is beating the drum. He was in Idaho about six weeks ago calling for a balanced budget amendment.
Desantis' visit comes amid a growing feud with Republicans in the Florida legislature. The governor and state legislative leaders both want to cut taxes, but the governor wants to focus on property tax cuts while House Speaker Daniel Perez is eyeing the state sales tax. Florida is one of nine states with no income tax.
Perez criticized DeSantis for hopping on a private plane 'paid for taxpayers by the way' when he could be hammering out a budget deal with Florida lawmakers.
'If he were to spend more time here in this Capitol having conversations with myself and other members of the House he'd understand my position — why we are in that position,' Perez said. 'And if he's able to convince us otherwise and have us move in another direction, maybe his direction, he has every opportunity to do so.'
Fear and grievance in the Mahoning Valley
He added the Florida House is ready for 'tough conversations' while the governor is not.
'There's no difference between him and any seventh grader in Miami-Dade County right now who tweets,' Perez said.
The last time DeSantis stopped by Ohio he was campaigning for then-U.S. Senate candidate J.D. Vance while not-so-subtly laying track for his own 2024 presidential campaign. On Tuesday, he insisted his visit 'has nothing to do with running for anything.'
Freshman state Rep. Heidi Workman, R-Rootstown, is sponsoring the Ohio House Joint Resolution calling for a constitutional convention.
'Voters are tired of Washington politicians spending decades in office disconnected from the people they're elected to serve,' Workman said. 'They want change, and they're looking for that change right now.'
DeSantis served three terms in Congress before running for governor, and said that experience left a mark.
'The incentives to do really good policy are just skewed away from that,' he said. 'People get up there and basically, they're told, 'You got to pay your dues.''
Workman pointed to polling — notably, conducted by the pro-term limits organization U.S. Term Limits — indicating 78% of Ohioans want to set a ceiling on congressional service.
'This is not a partisan issue — it is a people issue,' Workman argued. 'Across Ohio and across the country, the demand for congressional term limits is strong and bipartisan.'
Twelve states that have so far advanced a joint resolution calling for a convention. Every single one of them is controlled by Republicans.
The problem with hosting a constitutional convention is that there's little to restrain what the convention's members decide to do. Article V of the U.S. Constitution is explicit on how you call a convention, but silent on what happens once delegates start debating.
Harsh penalties and gag orders: Lawmakers discuss plans for long-shot constitutional convention
To fill that void, two Ohio Republicans floated potential felony charges and a gag order to keep debates on track, as they considered a different constitutional convention proposal last year.
DeSantis dismissed concerns about a 'runway' convention, putting his faith in the ratification process that would follow.
'It is the same no matter if Congress or the state proposes (an amendment),' DeSantis said. 'It requires three-quarters of the states of this country, 38 states, to ratify an amendment to the Constitution. I don't think 38 states are going to ratify the work of a, quote, runaway convention.'
He added there's nothing stopping Ohio from allowing the governor to recall delegates or place other requirements on their activity.
Still, with DeSantis himself backing convention efforts for term limits and a balanced budget, it's not hard to imagine a convention exceeding its initial mandate. Asked about those different interests DeSantis argued both ideas could clear the required 34-state threshold before backtracking and suggesting Congress would likely step in to draft it's own amendment if states got close.
'I do anticipate, in both instances, that you would likely force Congress to act prior to getting the 34 states — I just think practically that will happen,' DeSantis said. 'But I'm also not somebody that believes somehow the states aren't capable of proposing an amendment.'
Florida Phoenix reporter Christine Sexton contributed to this story.
Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump orders colleges to release data proving they don't consider race in admissions
Colleges will be required to submit data to prove they do not consider race in admissions under a new policy ordered Thursday by President Donald Trump. In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled against the use of affirmative action in admissions but said colleges may still consider how race has shaped students' lives if applicants share that information in their admissions essays. Trump is accusing colleges of using personal statements and other proxies to consider race, which conservatives view as illegal discrimination. 3 President Donald Trump is requiring colleges across the nation to prove they are not using race as a factor in upcoming admissions. arrowsmith2 – The role of race in admissions has featured in the Trump administration's battle against some of the nation's most elite colleges — viewed by Republicans as liberal hotbeds. For example, the new policy is similar to parts of recent settlement agreements the government negotiated with Brown University and Columbia University, restoring their federal research money. The universities agreed to give the government data on the race, grade point average and standardized test scores of applicants, admitted students and enrolled students. The schools also agreed to be audited by the government and to release admissions statistics to the public. Trump says colleges may be skirting SCOTUS ruling Conservatives have argued that despite the Supreme Court ruling, colleges have continued to consider race. 'The persistent lack of available data — paired with the rampant use of 'diversity statements' and other overt and hidden racial proxies — continues to raise concerns about whether race is actually used in admissions decisions in practice,' says the memorandum signed by Trump. The memo directs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to require colleges to report more data 'to provide adequate transparency into admissions.' The National Center for Education Statistics will collect new data, including the race and sex of colleges' applicants, admitted students and enrolled students, the Education Department said in a statement. If colleges fail to submit timely, complete and accurate data, McMahon can take action under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, which outlines requirements for colleges receiving federal financial aid for students, according to the memo. It is unclear what practical impact the executive order will have on colleges. Current understanding of federal law prohibits them from collecting information on race as part of admissions, said Jon Fansmith, senior vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, an association of college presidents. 'Ultimately, will it mean anything? Probably not,' Fansmith said. 'But it does continue this rhetoric from the administration that some students are being preferenced in the admission process at the expense of other students.' Because of the Supreme Court ruling, colleges have been barred from asking the race of students who are applying, Fansmith said. Once students enroll, the schools can ask about race, but students must be told they have a right not to answer. 3 Despite the Supreme Court ruling against affirmative action in 2023, collegiate institutions could still consider race as a determining factor in their admissions process. AP In this political climate, many students won't report their race, Fansmith said. So when schools release data on student demographics, the figures often give only a partial picture of the campus makeup. Diversity changed at some colleges — but not all The first year of admissions data after the Supreme Court ruling showed no clear pattern in how colleges' diversity changed. Results varied dramatically from one campus to the next. Some schools, such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Amherst College, saw steep drops in the percentage of Black students in their incoming classes. But at other elite, selective schools such as Yale, Princeton and the University of Virginia, the changes were less than a percentage point year to year. Some colleges have added more essays or personal statements to their admissions process to get a better picture of an applicant's background, a strategy the Supreme Court invited in its ruling. 'Nothing prohibits universities from considering an applicant's discussion of how race affected the applicant's life, so long as that discussion is concretely tied to a quality of character or unique ability that the particular applicant can contribute to the university,' Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in 2023 for the court's conservative majority. As an alternative to affirmative action, colleges for years have tried a range of strategies to achieve the diversity they say is essential to their campuses. Many have given greater preference to low-income families. Others started admitting top students from every community in their state. Prior to the ruling, nine states had banned affirmative action, starting with California in 1996. The University of California saw enrollment change after the statewide ban in 1996. 3 Conservatives say using race as a factor in the college admissions process is illegal discrimination. AP Within two years, Black and Hispanic enrollments fell by half at the system's two most selective campuses — Berkeley and UCLA. The system would go on to spend more than $500 million on programs aimed at low-income and first-generation college students. The 10-campus University of California system also started a program that promises admission to the top 9% of students in each high school across the state, an attempt to reach strong students from all backgrounds. A similar promise in Texas has been credited for expanding racial diversity, and opponents of affirmative action cite it as a successful model. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters In California, the promise drew students from a wider geographic area but did little to expand racial diversity, the system said in a brief to the Supreme Court. It had almost no impact at Berkeley and UCLA, where students compete against tens of thousands of other applicants. Today at UCLA and Berkeley, Hispanic students make up 20% of undergraduates, higher than in 1996 but lower than their 53% share among California's high school graduates. Black students, meanwhile, have a smaller presence than they did in 1996, accounting for 4% of undergraduates at Berkeley. After Michigan voters rejected affirmative action in 2006, the University of Michigan shifted attention to low-income students. The school sent graduates to work as counselors in low-income high schools and started offering college prep in Detroit and Grand Rapids. It offered full scholarships for low-income Michigan residents and, more recently, started accepting fewer early admission applications, which are more likely to come from white students. Despite the University of Michigan's efforts, the share of Black and Hispanic undergraduates hasn't fully rebounded from a falloff after 2006. And while Hispanic enrollments have been increasing, Black enrollments continued to slide, going from 8% of undergraduates in 2006 to 4% in 2025.
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
'I am outraged at this' - Hundreds protest outside of Indiana Governor's Residence
Hundreds of critics gathered outside the Indiana Governor's Residence on Aug. 7 to show their disapproval with national Republican leadership, who have discussed the idea of holding a special session to redistrict Indiana. Many of those outside of the residence had previously protested Vice President JD Vance's visit to the Statehouse earlier in the day, where he held a meeting with Governor Mike Braun behind closed doors. Braun told reporters as he left the meeting that it went "pretty good" and "covered a wide array of topics." He said redistricting was a topic of conversation, but when asked if any agreement had been reached, he only said, "We listened." But those waving signs outside the Governor's Residence in north Indianapolis felt differently about the meeting. 'The purpose of (Vance's) visit was to make sure that there are no democratic seats in the 2026 election, and that Donald Trump is assured of election because he's rigged it already,' said Lamont Hulse, an organizer with Indivisible Central Indiana. By 5:30 p.m., about 300 people lined Meridian Street, many holding signs like 'save our seats,' 'stop the steal,' and 'no votes for sale.' Close to 100 people have gathered outside of the Indiana Governor's Mansion to protest the state government, who floated the idea of redistricting the state in favor of Republican Republicans already hold 7 of the state's 9 US. House seats.@indystar Hulse believed it was important for Hoosiers to share their voices about this issue. 'I am outraged at this. These are not the Hoosier values I was brought up with," Hulse said. 'The Hoosier values of fairness, of equity, of letting people's voice count, respecting your neighbors, and of not running over people's rights.' More: What Gov. Mike Braun said about redistricting in Indiana following meeting with JD Vance As lifelong Hoosiers, Susan Bettis and Mike Cabat felt embarrassed when they learned intentions of redrawing congressional boundaries had surfaced in Indiana. Traditionally, in Indiana, state leaders don't consider redistricting efforts until the U.S. Census Bureau collects its data at the start of the decade. "It's a blatant power grab that's happening right in the middle of the decade," Bettis said. Bettis and Cabat remembered a time in Indiana when it felt like both state Democrats and Republicans could work together and create legislation that benefited "all Hoosiers and not just the ones that voted for them." While dozens of adults were holding up signs and chanting, Slone Young, 6, and her younger sister were playing hide and seek around the trees at the edge of the governor's residence. An Indiana State Police officer took notice of the two girls playing in the yard and began to walk toward the children, before turning his attention to scold some adults who walked onto the property. When the officer stopped paying attention to them, Young knelt in front of a tree and began to pray. After completing her prayer, she turned to the Governor's Residence and made the sign of the cross toward the building. She then ran to her mother, holding her sister's hands. When asked what she prayed for, Young said, "That's between God and me."
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Redistricting desperation is going viral ahead of 2026
Look anywhere right now, and politicians are joining the calls to rig the 2026 midterms in their party's favor. Why it matters: Republicans started it. But both parties are behaving as if winning the House majority next year is an existential fight. What's at stake: If Dems take the House, they can end President Trump's partisan budget cuts, gain control of the House's oversight powers and ... very likely ... impeach the president. Neither House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) nor House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is in control of redistricting, which is a state-by-state issue. But Jeffries said Thursday that Democrats can't "unilaterally disarm," and Johnson has spoken positively about the push in Texas. In just the last 23 days: July 15: Trump pushed Texas Republicans for a mid-decade redistricting explicitly to add five GOP seats. Just three weeks ago, this was considered an extraordinary gambit. July 16: Gov. Gavin Newsom threatened to retaliate by adding five Democratic seats, despite California's state Constitution forbidding mid-decade redraws. He'll likely try to change the Constitution in November by calling a special election. Sunday: Texas Democrats fled the state to deny quorum for a special session that would include a vote on redistricting. Monday: Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul teased a constitutional amendment to bypass the redistricting commission in New York after the midterms. Tuesday: Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) asked the FBI to help track down the Texas Democrats. Thursday: Trump called for a new census that wouldn't count undocumented immigrants. This seems extremely unlikely. The Supreme Court blocked Trump from not counting undocumented people in the 2020 census. Thursday: Cornyn said the FBI has agreed to help track down the Texas Democrats.
