
Trump Says Harvard Should Limit Acceptance of International Students
President Trump on Wednesday said Harvard should cap the number of international students it admits to create more spots for Americans, undercutting his administration's argument that merit alone should guide admissions practices as it escalates its fight with the elite university.
Mr. Trump's comments came in response to a question about the Department of Homeland Security's recent move to revoke the school's ability to enroll foreign students. The college immediately challenged that decision in court, and a federal judge has temporarily blocked the policy.
Still, the State Department has since halted interviews abroad with foreign citizens applying for student and exchange visas as the government expands its scrutiny of applicants' social media posts. The shift follows efforts to crack down on universities, including Harvard, over what the administration has said is a failure to address antisemitism on campus. Mr. Trump's has also attacked policies aimed at supporting diversity, equity and inclusion in an attempt to bring academia more in line with his views that white men and those with traditional views of gender are being discriminated against.
Harvard has so far resisted considerable pressure from the government to enact changes sought by Mr. Trump to its curriculum, hiring and admissions practices. But the government could potentially limit the number of international students allowed to study in the United States on the whole, an idea Mr. Trump alluded to on Wednesday.
Mr. Trump expressed outrage that about one-fourth of Harvard's student body is made up of international students, up from about one-fifth in 2010, according to university data. (Mr. Trump said the figure was 31 percent this year, which appeared to be incorrect.)
'Why would a number so big? I think they should have a cap of maybe around 15 percent,' he said. 'We have people want to go to Harvard and other schools, they can't get in because we have foreign students there. But I want to make sure that the foreign students are people that can love our country.'
The White House declined to comment on whether Mr. Trump's remarks represented a new policy. The State Department did not respond to a request for comment.
For months, the Trump administration has targeted noncitizen students who have been involved in campus protests related to the war in Gaza for arrest and removal from the country. Many of those students have challenged their detention on First Amendment grounds.
Mr. Trump and his allies have repeatedly used the protests to target international students, connecting those complaints to his broader campaign against Harvard.
In a social media post on April 24, Mr. Trump said the university had accepted students 'from all over the World that want to rip our Country apart.' In a cabinet meeting on April 30, Mr. Trump criticized Harvard and asked his team, 'And students — where are these people coming from?'
'The students they have, the professors they have, the attitude they have, is not American,' Mr. Trump said.
Applications to four-year colleges increased 5 percent this year, driven mainly by Latino and Black applicants, according to Common App, the nonprofit group that streamlines the application process for more than 1,000 universities. For the first time since 2019, the rate of growth among international students trailed growth among domestic applicants.
Universities could face significant financial costs if they face new restrictions on enrolling international students, who are more likely to pay larger shares of education costs. Harvard said its application process does not consider a student's need for financial assistance, regardless of nationality.
Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump continued to sow doubts about foreign students by incorrectly asserting there were open questions about who had been previously allowed into the country to study. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement uses automated screening programs and intelligence operations to vet all visa applications, including those for students.
'We want to know where those students come,' Mr. Trump said. 'Are they troublemakers? What countries do they come? And we're not going to — if somebody is coming from a certain country and they are 100 percent fine, which I hope most of them are, but many of them won't be. You're going to see some very radical people.'
In an interview this month, Linda McMahon, the education secretary, said it was time for American students to rethink whether degrees from four-year universities were necessary, save for those pursuing legal or medical professions.
She also said that the administration wanted to learn more about whether potential international students were 'activists' and 'going to be more involved in rabble-rousing.'
Asked whether the administration wanted to preserve more slots in college for U.S. citizens, Ms. McMahon said that 'universities can determine that process.'
'We don't want to see quotas,' Ms. McMahon said, referring to a Supreme Court case that rejected the use of affirmative in college admissions. 'That was discrimination, and the Supreme Court said that is absolutely not fair. So we want to make sure that people who come in are coming in on merit.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Budget Drops Protections For State Medical Cannabis Programs
The White House budget request for 2026 omits language that has protected state-regulated medical ... More cannabis operators from federal prosecution for more than decade. The Trump administration's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year drops provisions that have protected state medical cannabis programs for more than a decade, online cannabis news outlet Marijuana Moment reported on Monday. The budget provision has blocked federal law enforcement agencies from spending resources to investigate or prosecute businesses operating in compliance with state-authorized medical cannabis programs, despite the continued prohibition of marijuana under federal law. 'This provision, which has been in place since 2014, protects patients, caregivers, and medical cannabis providers in the 39 states that have legalized medical access from federal interference or criminal prosecution,' the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) wrote in a statement. 'Prior to the passage of this protection, federal prosecutors routinely took actions against patients and dispensaries in legal states.' The budget restriction was first adopted by Congress in 2014 and has been included in the federal budget every year since. But the Trump administration's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year released last week does not include the language. Similarly, the budget requests for each of the four years of President Donald Trump's first term omitted the protections for state-regulated medical cannabis operators. The administration of President Barack Obama also left the language prohibiting federal interference with regulated medical marijuana businesses out its budget requests following the initial adoption of the provisions. By contrast, the administration budget requests for all fours years of Joseph Biden's presidency included the protections for state-legal medical marijuana businesses. While the budget request illustrates the Trump administration's spending policies and priorities, Congress has the constitutional responsibility and authority for appropriations legislation. The congressional budget has included the language every year since 2014, despite attempts by both Democratic and Republican administrations to drop the provision. 'Today, more than half the country, including 36 states and Washington, D.C., have embraced medical marijuana, and for the past 10 years, the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment has prevented the Department of Justice from using federal funds to stop states from implementing their medical marijuana programs,' Laura A. Bianchi, co-founding partner of the cannabis and psychedelics law firm Bianchi and Brandt, writes in an email. 'Rolling back these protections would mark a significant setback for marijuana reform. Ultimately, Congress will have the final say, and the industry remains hopeful that they will uphold these vital safeguards.' When Trump signed previous appropriations bill including the protections for medical cannabis operators after requesting they be removed, his administration issued a statement that it 'will treat this provision consistent with the President's constitutional responsibility to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.' The statement, which was issued on three separate occasions, was widely interpreted to suggest that the Trump administration might ignore the budget restriction. The omission of the protections for state-legal medical cannabis programs in the Trump administration's 2026 budget request is likely to disappoint supporters of cannabis policy reform who were encouraged by the president's apparent support for decriminalizing marijuana during the 2024 election campaign. In September, Trump suggested he supported reclassifying marijuana under federal drug laws and that he would back state efforts to legalize recreational cannabis. 'As President, we will continue to focus on research to unlock the medical uses of marijuana to a Schedule 3 drug, and work with Congress to pass common sense laws, including safe banking for state authorized companies, and supporting states rights to pass marijuana laws, like in Florida, that work so well for their citizens,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, according to a report from Marijuana Moment.


Bloomberg
10 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China In Wait and See Mode: Cameron Johnson
US-China trade talks do not appear to be progressing as President Trump said via social media, China's leader Xi Jinping is "extremely hard to a deal with." Tidalwave Solutions Senior Partner Cameron Johnson has more on the story. (Source: Bloomberg)


CNN
10 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration returns migrant hastily deported to Mexico back to the US
A Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico last month is back in the United States, his legal team told CNN, in what appears to mark the first time the Trump administration has brought back a migrant after a judge ordered the administration to facilitate their return. OCG, a pseudonym the migrant is using in the case, landed in the United States on Wednesday and made contact with a member of the litigation team challenging the Trump administration's moves to send migrants to countries where they have no ties, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. The team expects he will be taken into the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, though it's unclear where he'll be detained, Realmuto told CNN. This is a developing story and will be updated.