
The EU's favorite war: the one Israel starts
Israel flew over to Iran with fighter jets and has since gone totally ballistic — literally and figuratively. So what does the European Union's insane clown posse have to say about it? Get yourself some popcorn. The Eurojokers are doing their best stand-up comedy again without even realizing it.
First up: French President Emmanuel Macron, who took to social media to declare that 'peace and security for all in the region must remain our guiding principle.' Aww, how sweet. Calling for peace while holding your buddy's coat as he storms into the bar to punch someone on the face. So after Israel unilaterally launched its hundred-target missile tantrum across Tehran – complete with residential hits and assassinations – maybe some strong words against that kind of thing are in order?
'France has repeatedly condemned Iran's ongoing nuclear program and has taken all appropriate diplomatic measures in response. In this context, France reaffirms Israel's right to defend itself and ensure its security,' Macron posted as the conflict kicked off.
Classic French parenting: ignore the kid setting the house on fire and scold the one who looked at him funny.
Next up, Germany. Surely the new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, can inject some sober logic into the conversation about who just broke the fragile regional peace everyone's pretending to care about.
'Iran has subsequently threatened to accelerate uranium enrichment again. This nuclear programme violates the provisions of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and poses a serious threat to the entire region, especially to the State of Israel. We reaffirm that Israel has the right to defend its existence and the security of its citizens. We call on both sides to refrain from steps that could lead to further escalation and destabilise the entire region,' wrote Merz.
Oh, so now that Israel has attacked Iran, it's time for restraint? Not before. Not during. After. Like a guy who throws the first punch in a bar fight and then shouts, 'Hey! Let's all calm down!'
Both Macron and Merz say that Iran brought this on itself by enriching uranium. That's like this: you've got a neighbor who lifts weights in his home gym. You see him through the window with a squat rack, bench press, treadmill – getting jacked. And you're like, 'Wow, he's getting so ripped I'm afraid he might beat me up someday. So I better go over there now and beat him up while I still can.'
That's basically what Israel did with its 'preemptive' strike. And Macron and Merz are cheering it on like, 'Totally! That guy was getting too buff. Definitely deserved a missile to the face.'
Then Merz added from the G7 summit in Canada: 'This is the dirty work that Israel is doing for all of us. We are also victims of this regime.'
Oh, sorry – didn't realize the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had hired Israel as a global bouncer. And remind us, Friedrich: where exactly did Iran touch Germany on the map? Because Europe is far more likely to be 'victimized' by waves of immigration facilitated by its own lax policies, and sparked by its own support for regime change wars – like this one is shaping up to be – than by any distant centrifuge.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the EU's de facto queen, is now cosplaying as global playground monitor, sending all the boys to their corners.
'Europe urges all parties to exercise maximum restraint, de-escalate immediately and refrain from retaliation. A diplomatic resolution is now more urgent than ever, for the sake of the region's stability and global security,' she wrote.
Maximum restraint? That's rich – especially coming from someone who's usually all about blowing €800 billion on weapons in bulk like a redneck doomsday cult stocking up for when Russian tanks finally roll up to the McDonald's drive thru in Warsaw – five years from now, around 2030, she and the rest of the Eurojokers keep saying.
'Of course I think a negotiated solution is, in the long term, the best solution,' she later said.
Sure – as long as peace doesn't get in the way of endless proxy war in Ukraine, right?
So, is anyone in Europe offering a perspective that doesn't sound like a hostage video scripted by Netanyahu's PR team? Not really. The Wall Street Journal summed it up bluntly: 'Europe backs Israel against Iran despite anger over Gaza.'
For actual dissent, you have to look just outside the EU.
'Israel's attacks on our neighbor Iran are a clear provocation that disregards international law. These attacks, which come at a time when negotiations on Iran's nuclear program are intensifying and international pressure is increasing against inhumane actions targeting Gaza, demonstrate Israel's rule-breaking mentality. The Netanyahu administration is trying to drag our region and the entire world into disaster with its reckless, aggressive and lawless actions,' wrote Turkish President Recep Erdoğan from right next door to the EU clown tent.
Türkiye has been waiting to join the EU since 1999 – like an Amazon package left on the doorstep, permanently. Gee, wonder why. You'd think that when things get this hot, Europe might welcome some diverse opinions – if only to avoid sounding like a chorus line of brain-dead sock puppets mouthing press releases from the Israeli defense ministry.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Top Iranian diplomat expects ‘critical' talks with Putin
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is expecting to hold a 'crucial' meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin during his pre-arranged visit to Moscow, which coincided with US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend. Israel launched an attack on Iran last week, claiming Tehran was on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon. Iranian officials rejected the accusation and responded with retaliatory strikes. On Sunday, the United States followed with what it described as 'massive precision strikes' on nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The attacks were widely condemned as violations of international law. International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi said the strikes caused 'a sharp degradation in nuclear safety and security.' Speaking to reporters on Monday morning after arriving in Moscow, Araghchi said the situation demanded urgent coordination. 'Given the current exceptional circumstances in the region, it is essential that Iran and Russia engage in closer, more precise, and more serious consultations,' he stated. 'Naturally, our talks this time will be more serious and cover broader dimensions. We will have important and serious discussions with President Putin, and I am confident that the outcomes will benefit both countries.' The Kremlin has yet to confirm a meeting between Putin and Araghchi. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated that Iran has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. In media appearances during the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) last week, he emphasized that resolving the conflict should include mutual security guarantees – protecting both Iran's right to peaceful nuclear development and Israel's right to security. Araghchi described Russia as a strategic ally and said the two countries have maintained regular dialogue on regional issues. He also noted that during recent nuclear negotiations with the US, Tehran 'continuously consulted with our Russian friends, sharing every step of the progress with them.' Russia has strongly condemned the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, calling them a flagrant breach of international law. In a statement on Saturday, the Russian Foreign Ministry described the attacks as 'a reckless decision' and 'a blatant violation of the UN Charter and relevant Security Council resolutions.' It warned that the strikes – carried out by a permanent member of the Security Council – could have caused a nuclear disaster and had 'drastically increased the likelihood of a larger conflict in the Middle East.'


Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Vance explains how Iran bombing is ‘different' from other US wars
Vice President J.D. Vance has pushed back against comparisons between US airstrikes on Iran and previous American wars in the Middle East, claiming that this time Washington's actions are truly limited and rooted in national security objectives – not a drive for regime change. In an interview with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Vance emphasized that 'we're not at war with Iran – we're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' describing the overnight strike as 'a very precise, very surgical' operation that allegedly dismantled Tehran's nuclear capabilities. Responding to concerns that the United States could be drawn into another prolonged conflict, Vance said the difference lies in leadership. 'I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East,' he said. But the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents, and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives. 'We have no interest in a protracted conflict. We have no interest in boots on the ground,' he added. Vance further insisted that the United States is not seeking to topple the Iranian government. 'Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change,' he said. 'We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out.' However, President Trump appeared to leave the door open to regime change in Tehran in a post on Truth Social later in the day. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a regime change??? MIGA!!!' he wrote. Vance also echoed Trump's repeated warnings to Tehran against retaliation in any form, calling it 'the stupidest thing in the world,' and reaffirming that the US would respond with 'overwhelming force' if American personnel were targeted. Trump has faced criticism from lawmakers over the lack of congressional authorization, but Vance defended the legality of the strike, arguing that the president has the authority to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Moscow has criticized the Iranian WMD claim, drawing comparisons to the justification used by then-US Secretary of State Colin Powell in the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq War. 'Many today feel a strong sense of déjà vu,' Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia told the UN Security Council on Sunday. 'The current situation is essentially no different: we are once again being urged to believe in fairy tales in order to once again bring suffering to millions of people living in the Middle East.'


Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Iran accuses US of violating nuclear treaty with airstrikes
Iran has accused the US of violating international law and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) following overnight airstrikes on three of its key nuclear facilities. However, Tehran says preliminary inspections have found no signs of radioactive contamination. In a statement issued early on Sunday, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) confirmed that US strikes targeted its nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The operation, conducted in coordination with Israel, was condemned by the Iranian authorities as an illegal and 'brutal' act. 'This act of aggression was carried out under the shadow of international indifference, and with the apparent support or silence of the International Atomic Energy Agency,' the AEOI said. Iran's Center for the National Nuclear Safety System reported that emergency inspections had been completed at all three locations. 'No signs of contamination have been recorded,' the agency said, adding that there is 'no danger to residents living near the affected sites.' Iran vowed that its nuclear program will not be derailed. 'We will not allow this national industry – built through the sacrifices of our nuclear martyrs – to be stopped by evil conspiracies,' the AEOI said, promising legal action over the strikes. Washington has not formally responded to the accusations of NPT violations. President Donald Trump, who confirmed US involvement in the attacks, warned Iran against retaliating, saying further strikes would follow any response. The strikes mark a dramatic escalation in the already volatile tensions between Iran and Israel. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) described the joint offensive as targeting Iran's missile and nuclear infrastructure. Iranian officials maintain that its nuclear program is entirely peaceful and under the oversight of international inspectors. The International Atomic Energy Agency has not reported any current evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program. The incident has sparked fears of further regional instability, with Iran accusing the US of undermining global non-proliferation norms. As of Sunday afternoon, Tehran had not announced any military response.