NHS unveils new plan for robots to carry out millions more hospital surgeries
Robots are going to help carry out millions more hospital surgeries in a ten-year plan to increase their role in the NHS. Machine-assisted surgery is currently used for 70,000 of the more complex procedures each year at specialist UK hospitals - but the new boss of the NHS says the number will increase to half a million by 2035.
Nine in ten of all keyhole surgeries - such as the removal of certain organs affected by cancer - will be delivered using robots in the next 10 years - up from one in five today. It is a generational shift away from the idea of a man with a scalpel and means robotic surgery will become the default for many operations.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who had robot-assisted surgery when he had treatment for kidney cancer in 2021, said that innovative technologies will "transform the NHS".
NHS chief executive Sir Jim Mackey said: 'The NHS has pledged to return to shorter elective waiting times by 2029 and we are using every tool at our disposal to ensure patients get the best possible treatment.
Expanding the use of new and exciting tech such as robotic surgery will play a huge part in this. Not only does it speed up the number of procedures the NHS can do, but it also means better outcomes, a faster recovery and shorter hospital stays for patients.'
Sir Jim will announce the shift towards robotic surgery at the NHS ConfedExpo conference in Manchester on Wednesday. Compared to traditional keyhole surgery, robotic surgery allows greater dexterity and precision. They are controlled by a surgeon at a console using a 3D camera. In some robot procedures the robot is programmed to perform elements of the procedure.
Wes Streeting said: 'Innovative treatments and technologies that help fast track better outcomes for patients is how we transform our NHS and make it fit for the future. I know myself how important this is, when the NHS saved my life from kidney cancer with an operation led by a world-class surgeon being helped by a robot.'
It comes after the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) announced in April it has conditionally approved use of 11 new surgery robot systems in England.
The robotic arm systems costing between £500,000 and £1.5 million are mainly starting to be used for common procedures such as hernia repair, knee and hip replacements.
John McGrath, consultant surgeon at North Bristol NHS Trust and chair of the NHSE Steering Committee for Robotic Assisted Surgery, added: "Robot-assisted surgery is a perfect example of innovation improving patients' care and transforming the way the NHS works - the number of procedures being carried is set to rapidly grow over the next 10 years according to our analysis."
Nichola Collins of Thornton-Cleveleys, had a hysterectomy at Chorley and South Ribble Hospital in Lancashire, and was home within 24 hours. She said: 'I only knew about the old way of doing a hysterectomy, and that often meant two to four days in hospital – sometimes even a week.
"One of the main reasons I opted for the robotic procedure was because I've got young children, four in all. I didn't want a long recuperation afterwards, so it was a big benefit.
'My recovery has been significantly quicker than I would have thought. I followed the advice I was given and took it easy, mostly resting. But from about week two, I was up and about more, moving around, even going downstairs. T
"he procedure went perfectly. It's made a huge difference to my quality of life. I had been dealing with ongoing issues, and since the surgery, things have improved a lot.'
She added: 'I was amazed at how they could do something so intricate using robotic arms, I found it incredible. I just felt really lucky to have been offered that option, especially with my family circumstances.
"The better recovery meant I could get back on my feet much sooner and carry on with everyday life, so I just think it's amazing that they can do it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
NHS waiting lists fall to lowest level in two years...but number of patients waiting over a year on the rise
The tide may be turning on lengthy NHS waiting lists for routine operations like hip replacements, as latest figures revealed today show the number of patients waiting has fallen to its lowest in two years. An estimated 6.23 million people were awaiting treatments at the end of April–down from 6.25 million in March and the lowest figure since April 2023. Overall, the average time patients had been waiting fell to its lowest level since July 2022—13.3 weeks. But the data, released by NHS England, showed drawbacks in other areas–as the number of patients waiting for more than a year for hospital treatmenth has increased. Some 1,361 patients in England had been waiting more than 18 months to start routine treatment at the end of April, up from 1,164 in March. And 9,258 patients had been waiting more than 14 months to start treatment, up from 7,381 the previous month. In total, 190,068 people in England had been waiting more than a year for specialist treatment for conditions like arthritis and reproductive problems, as well as common operations like hysterectomies. This figure is up from 180,242 at the end of March. This is the first time year-long delays have risen in ten months, the data show. Some 2.6 per cent of patients had been waiting more than a year—more than double the target of one per cent set by The Government for March 2026. The latest figures also showed ministers' target for cancer is continuing to slip away. As per a Government target set for March 2026, 80 per cent of all urgent cancer referrals should be either diagnosed or ruled out within 28 days. But the latest figures show this is true for 76.7 per cent of patients—down from 78.9 per cent in March. The latest figures also revealed the Government and NHS England are falling short of their target for A&E waiting times. The target for March 2026 is 78 per cent of patients who attend A&E must be admitted, discharged or transferred within four hours. The latest figure stands at 75.4 per cent, just below the target. Meanwhile, nearly 43,000 people received so-called corridor care in May, meaning they had to wait longer than 12-hours in A&E departments before being admitted, which is a slight reduction from the previous month. The chief executive of NHS Providers, Daniel Elkeles, told MailOnline that 'it is good to see' that fewer people are waiting for procedures, on average. He praised the staff who he says have been 'working flat out to bring those figures down faster and faster.' But he added: It is also a concern to see the waiting list for outpatient services at record levels.' In particular he highlighted a 'worrying trend in rising long waits for children and young people', and 'very high demand for mental health services'. 'These figures show there's no respite for the NHS as we head into summer but there is a determination to drive down delays,' he said. The news comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves gave the NHS a cash injection worth an extra £29 billion per year. Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'We are putting the NHS on the road to recovery after years of soaring waiting times, by providing record investment and fundamental NHS reform. 'Thanks to our interventions and the hard work of NHS staff, the overall waiting list has now fallen in April for the first time in 17 years – dropping by almost a quarter of a million since we took office. 'This is just the start. We've delivered millions of extra appointments since July, we are pushing on with our mission to get the NHS working for patients once again as we deliver our Plan for Change.' Meghana Pandit, NHS England's co-national medical director, said NHS staff were working to 'turn the tide for patients waiting for care'. She said while huge pressure on services remains, 'we are starting to see a real difference across our services – this is just the start of the work we're doing to reform care and deliver improvements for patient'.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Oceans have absorbed heat of 1.7 billion atomic bombs, scientists warn as UN summit opens in Nice
Oceans have absorbed enough heat since the Paris Agreement was signed to match the energy of 1.7 billion atomic bomb explosions, scientists warned just as the UN Ocean Conference got underway in Nice. The figures were shared by researchers on the sidelines of the summit where delegations from countries were working to create a global treaty for ocean conservation. Scientists said warming was accelerating changes in marine systems, driving sea level rise, sea ice loss, and increasing marine heatwaves. 'Global warming over the last 10 years equates to about 1.7 billion atomic bomb explosions,' said Alex Sen Gupta, associate professor at the University of New South Wales. 'If we divide this by the number of seconds in 10 years, it's equivalent to about five atomic explosions worth of energy every single second. Clearly this is having an effect on the ocean – it is causing the sea level to rise, our ice systems to melt, and our atmosphere and oceans to warm.' As the conference opened on Monday, UN secretary general António Guterres said the world 'must move from plunder to protection to save the oceans'. Among the most serious warnings are new records set for sea surface temperatures this year, an all-time low for global sea ice, and what scientists say is the largest coral bleaching event ever recorded, affecting 84 per cent of monitored reef areas. 'My recent research has shown that marine heatwaves have caused severe impacts globally over the past few years,' said Dr Kathryn E Smith of the Marine Biological Association of the UK. 'We've seen more fisheries collapses, mass mortality events, and damage to ecosystems. The warming oceans have also fuelled storms on land causing billions of dollars in damages and resulting in thousands of deaths. These impacts have all occurred before we have reached the 1.5 C benchmark. A decade on from the Paris Agreement it is clear that it's even more important than ever that we make every effort not to exceed the warming limits agreed in 2015.' The UN Ocean Conference is co-hosted this year by France and Costa Rica, with participation from over 100 countries. It aims to accelerate action to meet global ocean protection targets and finalise voluntary commitments on issues including pollution, overfishing, deep-sea mining and marine biodiversity. France's president Emmanuel Macron said the High Seas Treaty could come into force as early as January 2026. Eighteen countries ratified the treaty during the opening sessions, bringing the total to 49 – just 11 short of the number needed for adoption. Mr Macron also reiterated France's call for a moratorium on deep-sea mining, declaring the "oceans are not for sale". Several experts at the Nice conference said ocean protection must now move from pledges to policies. The conference is expected to issue the 'Nice Ocean Action Plan' and press for the legally binding entry into force of the High Seas Treaty. The UK, which had faced criticism for delays, said it would introduce legislation by the end of the year to ratify the High Seas Treaty. 'Our oceans are dying. Without urgent action, they will be irreversibly destroyed,' marine minister Emma Hardy said. ' Climate change is pushing our ocean into unknown territory, causing collapse and irreparable damage to many valuable ecosystems and marine species,' Dr Karen Filbee-Dexter from the University of Western Australia noted. 'What is most concerning is our emissions have already locked us into impacts that will be felt for generations.' Dr Jennifer Francis, senior scientist at the Woodwell Climate Research Centre, said sea ice loss in the Arctic was one of the clearest indicators of climate disruption. 'During summer, the real estate it covers has diminished by nearly half and its volume by nearly three-quarters in less than a human's lifespan,' she said. 'The loss of ice means ships can now travel more freely along polar routes, with economic benefits but higher risks of fuel spills. Larger areas of open water allow marine algae to proliferate in abnormal ways.' A final political declaration and the Nice Ocean Action Plan are expected at the end of the summit on Friday. Scientists, small island leaders and civil society groups are calling for stronger integration between climate policy and marine conservation efforts. 'Ultimately, the vast majority of ocean impacts that we have seen in the last decade are a result of human induced climate change,' Dr Smith said. 'The escalation of impacts we are seeing is, quite frankly, shocking and without reducing emissions and use of fossil fuels globally, the impacts we see are only going to increase further in coming years.'
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Council tax bills set to rise at fastest rate for two decades, economist warns
Paul Johnson said that local government in England did 'perhaps a little bit better than it might have expected' out of the Chancellor's statement on Wednesday, but the 'sting in the tail' is the assumption that 'council tax bills will rise by 5% a year' as part of the funding. The core spending power of councils is set to increase by 2.6% a year from next year, and 'if English councils do choose 5% increases – and most almost certainly will – council tax bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05', Mr Johnson said on Thursday. On Wednesday, Ms Reeves said that ministers will not be 'going above' the 5% annual increases in council tax. She told ITV: 'The previous government increased council tax by 5% a year, and we have stuck to that. We won't be going above that. 'That is the council tax policy that we inherited from the previous government, and that we will be continuing.' The biggest winner from Wednesday's statement was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms. Ruth Curtice, the chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, has said that Britain is turning into a 'National Health State'. Overnight, the think tank said Ms Reeves' announcements had followed a recent trend that saw increases for the NHS come at the expense of other public services. Ms Curtice said: 'Health accounted for 90% of the extra public service spending, continuing a trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade.' Defence was another of Wednesday's winners, Ms Curtice said, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6 billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although Mr Johnson warned on Wednesday the money may not be enough. In his snap reaction to the review, Mr Johnson said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Speaking after delivering her spending review, Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described rising health spending as a 'conundrum', with a similar approach having been taken 'again and again' as she spoke at a business conference in central London on Thursday morning. In reference to a pro-Brexit campaign stunt, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I mean, who remembers the side of a red bus that said 'we're going to give the NHS £350 million more a week'? 'Many people don't know that we did that. We did do that, and yet, still we're not seeing the returns. 'We've put more and more money in, and we're getting less and less out.' The Government have not explained how and why the NHS will be better as a result of its spending plans, the Tory leader added, and claimed the public know 'we need to start talking about productivity reforms, public sector reforms'.
