logo
Trump administration restores status of international students after abrupt terminations

Trump administration restores status of international students after abrupt terminations

Yahoo26-04-2025

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is reinstating the status of some international students whose records they terminated on a Department of Homeland Security database, court records suggest.
In an email submitted in federal court, U.S. Attorney Mark Sauter told Brad Banias, a lawyer representing some of these students, that some records were being restored in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, a database that schools and government agencies use to confirm if foreign students are abiding by the conditions of their stay.
"ICE is developing a policy that will provide a framework for SEVIS record terminations. Until such a policy is issued, the SEVIS records for plaintiff(s) in this case (and other similarly situated plaintiffs) will remain Active or shall be re-activated if not currently active and ICE will not modify the record solely based on the NCIC finding that resulted in the recent SEVIS record termination," Banias said in the email.
"ICE maintains the authority to terminate a SEVIS record for other reasons, such as if the plaintiff fails to maintain his or her nonimmigrant status after the record is reactivated or engages in other unlawful activity that would render him or her removable from the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act," he added.
But DHS clarified this reinstatement applies only for "people who had not had their visa revoked."
"We have not reversed course on a single visa revocation. What we did is restore SEVIS access for people who had not had their visa revoked," a spokesperson for the DHS wrote in a statement to ABC News when asked how many of the SEVIS statuses it had terminated in recent weeks will be restored.
Having one's SEVIS record terminated doesn't necessarily mean a student's visa is automatically revoked, but it can lead to the visa being revoked.
The major reversal comes as dozens of cases representing hundreds of students have popped up across the country in recent weeks. Lawyers accused the government of abruptly terminating the records on SEVIS.
Attorney Charles Kuck, who represents 133 students in a class-action lawsuit whose statuses were ordered to be restored by a judge earlier last week, told ABC News on Friday that additional clients of his also had their status restored without a court order. His clients began alerting him of the change Thursday night.
"They started rolling in -- I went to bed at about 10 and I had gotten about 30 emails," he said. "When I woke up this morning, there was hundreds, so clearly ICE was working all night long."
Lawyers representing these students said the termination of their records was putting them at risk of being deported.
"If you don't have a SEVIS record, you can't provide the mandatory updates and it's the school's position, attorney's position, and even USCIS' position that when they terminate SEVIS, they terminate F-1 status. It's kind of like they are inextricably interposed, that is what was understood," Banias told ABC News in an interview earlier this week.
"So when these kids got their records terminated over the last couple of weeks, you know, their schools were saying … DHS is telling you to leave," he added.
MORE: ICE, Florida officials arrest over 750 in 4-day operation
That confusion erupted in courtrooms across the country as government lawyers at times were unable to tell the court whether a person whose record was terminated on this database was no longer in the country legally.
When terminating their records, the government often gave little to no explanation as to why. While some cases involved students who had participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations at university campuses, the majority did not, lawyers told ABC News.
A large portion of the lawsuits involved students who had run-ins with law enforcement and were not convicted for things such as minor traffic infractions and minor misdemeanors, which would not typically lead to a termination. But many of the cases also involved students who had no interactions with law enforcement at all.
It's unclear how many records will be restored.
In recent weeks, two federal judges issued temporary restraining orders directing that ICE must temporarily reinstate the SEVIS status of two Ohio State University students whose SEVIS records were abruptly terminated.
In one of those cases, Ohio State University student Ahwar Sultan's SEVIS record was terminated following his arrest at a pro-Palestinian protest, and his visa was subsequently revoked.
Sultan's attorney Rafael Urena told ABC News that Ohio State University told him Friday afternoon that his client's record "has still not been updated by the government to reflect an Active status yet" and that he did not know if and how his client's status will be affected.
The American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire filed two lawsuits on behalf of students whose statuses were rescinded in SEVIS. One involved Xiaotian Liu, a doctoral at Dartmouth College, while the other involved a class-action lawsuit for students across New Hampshire, Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Puerto Rico.
"It is clear that the deluge of legal filings and initial judicial rulings in New Hampshire and nationwide have had a profound impact on the government's decision to reactivate the SEVIS records of some students and allow them to continue their studies," said Gilles Bissonnette, legal director of the ACLU of New Hampshire. "Many questions remain, including the criteria that will be used for these reactivations and whether this will apply to students who did not file lawsuits.
"In the litigation we have filed in New Hampshire, it is too soon to tell how today's developments may or may not impact our class-action lawsuit," Bissonnette continued, noting that in Liu's case, the ACLU of New Hampshire is "unable to confirm" his status and so the court has extended a temporary restraining order in his case until Tuesday.
MORE: 5 million student loan borrowers face mandatory collections starting May 5
Fanta Aw, the CEO of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, an organization that represents thousands of universities and international educators across the country, said her organization has logged about 1,500 cases that have been terminated. While she said she is thrilled to hear the records are being restored, she emphasized that there are no answers about what happens now to students who have lost job opportunities, been unenrolled from classes, or had their student visas revoked.
"The relief comes from knowing that the question of, can I go to class today or tomorrow? The answer is yes," she said. "But in the same token, knowing that this happened with no clear explanation is not assurance that it can't happen again."
At a recent hearing in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Judge Ana Reyes repeatedly asked a government lawyer if the termination of a SEVIS record means a student is no longer in the country legally. The lawyer said he did not know.
"Do you realize that this is Kafkaesque," she asked.
"I've got two experienced immigration lawyers on behalf of a client who is months away from graduation, who has done nothing wrong, who has been terminated from a system that you all keep telling me has no effect on his immigration status, although that clearly is BS," she said.
"And now, his two very experienced lawyers can't even tell him whether or not he's here legally because the court can't tell him whether or not he's here legally because the government's counsel can't tell him if he's here legally."
Trump administration restores status of international students after abrupt terminations originally appeared on abcnews.go.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Most-Followed TikToker Khaby Lame Detained, Released by ICE Over Visa Issue
Most-Followed TikToker Khaby Lame Detained, Released by ICE Over Visa Issue

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Most-Followed TikToker Khaby Lame Detained, Released by ICE Over Visa Issue

Khaby Lame, the most-followed TikToker in the world, was detained and released by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on June 6. On Monday, an ICE spokesperson confirmed that the Italian-Senegalese star had been detained at Las Vegas airport for alleged immigration violations. According to ICE, the 25-year-old TikToker, whose real name is Seringe Khabane Lame, had 'overstayed the terms of his visa' and was later granted voluntary departure. More from Rolling Stone Trump Continues Inflaming L.A. Protests: 'BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' Republicans Say They're Cool With Trump Deploying Troops Against Protesters Trump's Response to L.A. Protests: What We Know 'U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained Seringe Khabane Lame, 25, a citizen of Italy, June 6, at the Harry Reid International Airport, Las Vegas, Nevada, for immigration violations,' an ICE spokesperson said in a statement. 'Lame entered the United States [on] April 30 and overstayed the terms of his visa.' According to ICE, Lame has since left the country. The influencer shared a photo of himself in São Paulo, Brazil, on Monday morning. A rep for Lame did not immediately respond to Rolling Stone's request for comment. The detainment of Lame comes as the Trump administration called for the military to be deployed against anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. The protests, which began in response to raids on Friday, escalated over the weekend after Trump ordered the deployment of National Guard troops into the city. Gov. Gavin Newsom requested on Sunday that Trump revoke his federalization of the National Guard and withdraw them from the city. 'The decision to deploy the National Guard, without appropriate training or orders, risks seriously escalating the situation,' he wrote. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation.' Lame's detainment also comes as numerous artists and celebrities have faced visa issues under the Trump administration, including Grupo Firme and Julión Álvarez. Best of Rolling Stone Every Super Bowl Halftime Show, Ranked From Worst to Best The United States of Weed Gaming Levels Up

Contributor: Federalizing the state National Guard is a chilling push past the law
Contributor: Federalizing the state National Guard is a chilling push past the law

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Contributor: Federalizing the state National Guard is a chilling push past the law

The use of the military to quell protests is something associated with dictators in foreign countries, and as of Saturday night, with a president of the United States. When President Trump federalized 2,000 members of the California National Guard, deploying them because of protests against federal immigration authorities, he sent a chilling signal about his willingness to use the military against demonstrators. There are two relevant aspects of federal law: One allows the president to federalize a state's National Guard and the other permits the president to use the military in domestic situations. Neither, at this point, provides legal authority for Saturday's action. As for the former, a federal statute, 10 U.S.C. section 12406, authorizes the president to take over a state's National Guard if 'the United States, or any of the Commonwealths or possessions, is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation; there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' This is the statutory provision Trump has invoked. But it is highly questionable that the protests against ICE agents rise to the level of a 'rebellion against the authority of the Government.' This statute does not give the president the authority to use the troops. Another law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally prohibits the military from being used within the United States. The 2,000 National Guard troops are only deployed to protect ICE officers. However, even this is legally questionable unless the president invokes the Insurrection Act of 1807, which creates a basis for using the military in domestic situations and an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act. On Sunday, Trump said he was considering invoking the Insurrection Act. The Insurrection Act allows a president to deploy troops domestically in three situations. One is if a governor or state legislature asks for the deployment to put down an insurrection. The last time this occurred was in 1992, when California Gov. Pete Wilson asked President George H.W. Bush to use the National Guard to stop the riots that occurred after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. With Gov. Gavin Newsom opposing the federalizing of the National Guard, this isn't the case in Los Angeles today. A second part of the Insurrection Act allows deployment in order to 'enforce the laws' of the United States or to 'suppress rebellion' whenever 'unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion' make it 'impracticable' to enforce federal law by the 'ordinary course of judicial proceedings.' Since no one disputes the courts are fully functioning, this provision has no relevance. It is the third part of the Insurrection Act that is more likely to be cited by the Trump administration. It allows the president to use military troops in a state to suppress 'any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy' that 'so hinders the execution of the laws' that any portion of the state's inhabitants are deprived of a constitutional right and state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect that right. President Eisenhower used this power to send federal troops to help desegregate the Little Rock, Ark., public schools when the governor defied federal court orders. This section of the law has additional language: The president may deploy troops in a state that 'opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.' This broad language is what I would expect Trump to invoke to use the troops directly against the anti-ICE protests. The Insurrection Act does not define crucial terms such as 'insurrection,' 'rebellion' or 'domestic violence.' In 1827, in Martin vs. Mott, the Supreme Court said that 'the authority to decide whether [an exigency requiring the militia to be called out] has arisen belongs exclusively to the President, and ... his decision is conclusive upon all other persons.' There have been many calls over the years to modify the expansive language of the Insurrection Act. But since presidents have rarely used it, and not in a very long time, reform efforts seemed unnecessary. The broad presidential authority under the Insurrection Act thus has remained on the books as a loaded weapon. There is a strong set of norms that has restrained presidents from using federal troops in domestic situations, especially absent a request from a state governor. But Trump shows no respect for norms. Any use of the military in domestic situations should be regarded as a last resort in the United States. The readiness of the administration to quickly invoke any aspect of this authority is frightening, a message about the willingness of a remade federal government to quell demonstrations. The protests in Los Angeles do not rise to the conditions that warrant the federalization of the National Guard. This is not to deny that some of the anti-ICE protests have turned violent. However, they have been limited in size and there is no reason to believe that law enforcement could not control them absent military force. But the statutes Trump can invoke give presidents broad powers. In the context of everything that we have seen from the Trump administration, nationalizing the California National Guard should make us even more afraid. Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, is an Opinion Voices contributing writer. If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Dr. Phil Embedded With ICE to Film Weekend Raids That Led to LA Protests
Dr. Phil Embedded With ICE to Film Weekend Raids That Led to LA Protests

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dr. Phil Embedded With ICE to Film Weekend Raids That Led to LA Protests

Dr. Phil McGraw, the longtime television personality and author, was on the ground with a camera crew Friday to interview Trump border czar Tom Homan and document the ICE raids in Los Angeles that sparked weekend-long protests throughout the city. McGraw did not personally tag along with ICE officers for the raids. Instead, he remained at the Homeland Security Investigations field office in L.A. and interviewed Homan for his conservative TV channel, MeritTV. The conversations he had with Homan throughout ICE's L.A. operation will air Monday and Tuesday night as part of the week's 'Dr. Phil Primetime' broadcasts. According to MeritTV representatives, McGraw was in L.A. to 'get a first-hand look at the targeted operations.' He was also given exclusive access to Homan and spoke to the border czar about ICE's aggressive deportation efforts this year both the day before and day after the agency's L.A. raids. This is not the first time McGraw has gotten to see an ICE operation quasi-firsthand. In January, he became embedded with ICE officials stationed in Chicago. On Friday, however, he chose to sit-out the raids that turned Los Angeles, once again, into a cultural and political hotspot. 'In order to not escalate any situation, Dr. Phil McGraw did not join and was not embedded,' a MeritTV spokesperson said. ICE's recent L.A. operation is far from the first, headline-worthy immigration effort that the agency has conducted since President Trump took office again in late January. The administration made waves months ago when it deported hundreds of Venezuelan migrants it claimed had ties to a notorious gang to an El Salvadoran prison. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, nicknamed 'ICE Barbie,' has gone out of her way to promote the administration's aggressive immigration policies and efforts as well. She has accompanied ICE raids throughout the year, posed for photos wearing the same gear as immigration officers and been at the center of certain filmed ICE operations. In March, she even visited the El Salvadoran prison where the Trump administration deported hundreds of purportedly illegal immigrants and stood for photos in front of its full jail cells. McGraw's presence at ICE's recent L.A. raids is, in other words, part of an ongoing effort on the Trump administration's part to publicize and increase the visibility of its immigration strategy. ICE's L.A. raids were met with fierce opposition from the city's residents. They sparked protests, some of which turned violent and resulted in multiple injuries, that have continued throughout the weekend and into Monday. President Trump, in response, sent hundreds of National Guard troops to the city. Trump's decision has been fiercely criticized by California Governor Gavin Newsom, who released a letter Sunday denouncing the move as a 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and requesting that the president recall the National Guard. The post Dr. Phil Embedded With ICE to Film Weekend Raids That Led to LA Protests appeared first on TheWrap.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store