Conservation groups hit out at ‘unfulfilled promises' over Scotland's seabed
In a letter to Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon and acting Energy and Net Zero Secretary Gillian Martin, the groups claimed the Scottish Government had 'systematically neglected' the country's seabed – which they said was 'one our greatest assets'.
Their letter, they said, was sent to 'mark an unfortunate and deeply disappointing milestone of unfulfilled government promises'.
The groups told Ms Gougeon and Ms Martin: 'Our primary concern is that less than 5% of Scotland's coastal seabed is protected from bottom-trawling and scallop dredging, two highly destructive methods of fishing that need much more effective management.'
They made the plea as they said the new Ocean film by Sir David Attenborough is 'set to lift the lid on the environmental damage caused by bottom-trawling'.
The coalition, which includes organisations such as the Blue Marine Foundation and the National Trust for Scotland, as well as groups such as the Scottish Creel Fishermen's Federation and the Sustainable Inshore Fisheries Trust, hit out at 'broken promises' from the Government on the issue of marine protection.
When is the SNP's leadership going to get their environmental priorities back on track?
Read our new blog https://t.co/Ir2LirNAjy pic.twitter.com/5n0bIPbJRw
— Open Seas (@TheOpenSeas) May 5, 2025
These, they claimed, 'have led to serious environmental harm' and also 'disadvantaged small-scale, inshore, fishing businesses'.
The coalition wants a minimum of 30% of Scotland's inshore waters to be protected from bottom-trawling and dredging, saying this will help the marine ecosystem and allow 'sustainable fishing to continue'.
Calling on ministers to act, the groups said: 'The Scottish Government needs to deliver the protection of our inshore waters, as they hold the majority of Scotland's most important yet vulnerable habitats, species and ecosystems.
'Protecting Scotland's inshore waters will safeguard economically and culturally significant low impact fisheries, fishing jobs in coastal communities and ensure a healthy marine environment that will benefit people and the planet.
'The failure to deliver these policy measures is having continued, direct, negative impacts on the health of our marine environment and its capacity to support future generations.'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government has a legal requirement to put in place fisheries management measures for Marine Protected Areas (MPA) and measures for offshore MPAs will be implemented in 2025.
'We will consult on measures for inshore MPAs sites once the statutory assessments are completed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Terrorism the only issue Starmer handling well, poll finds
Terrorism is the only issue that British people think Sir Keir Starmer is handling well, new polling suggests. In a damning audit of Labour's first year in office, voters gave the Government bad marks on 14 out of 15 key policy areas, from taxation to immigration. The YouGov survey, conducted over the past month, makes grim reading for the Prime Minister, who has struggled with plummeting approval ratings since entering No 10. It indicates the scale of the challenge he faces to win back the public's trust amid the rise of Reform UK, with Labour still reeling from disastrous results at last month's local elections. Asked how the Government was faring in 15 key policy areas, voters indicated that terrorism was the only one they thought Sir Keir was handling well, with a net score of +3. The 14 other issues all received net negative ratings, with immigration the lowest at -60, followed closely by taxation on -58 and welfare on -53. Sir Keir also got bad marks on the economy, with a net score of -52, as well as housing, the NHS, crime, inflation, unemployment, Brexit, the environment, education, transport and defence. The survey, published on Thursday, was conducted between May 3 and June 2, using a representative sample of 8,538 British people. It will come as a blow to the Prime Minister before the spending review next week, at which the Chancellor is expected to unveil cuts to day-to-day spending to keep within her self-imposed fiscal rules. The positive feedback on Labour's handling of terrorism will be encouraging for the Government, suggesting Sir Keir is broadly trusted to keep the country safe. But the lack of confidence in the Prime Minister's ability to tackle the small boats crisis will concern No 10 as Reform storms ahead in the opinion polls. A similarly dire score on welfare suggests Sir Keir has work to do to win back Labour's traditional supporters on the Left, many of whom were dismayed by his sweeping cuts to benefits earlier this year. No 11 will also be disappointed by the lack of faith in Labour's ability to handle the economy, despite Rachel Reeves's attempt to put fiscal responsibility front and centre of her plans. Sir Keir declared Reform his main opposition last month, setting him up for a battle with Nigel Farage on highly charged issues such as migration and net zero. Meanwhile, the Reform leader parked his tanks on Labour's lawn by promising to reverse the cut to winter fuel payments for pensioners in full and lift the two-child benefit cap. The YouGov poll found that nearly three-quarters of voters thought Sir Keir was doing 'very badly' or 'fairly badly' on immigration, compared to just 13 per cent who thought he was doing well. Labour has been accused of losing control of Britain's borders after close to 1,200 small boat migrants crossed the Channel in a single day.
The Herald Scotland
17 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Zia Yusuf quits Reform UK after 'dumb' burka ban question
The shock resignation comes on the day Reform hopes to cause an shock in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. John Swinney has repeatedly described the contest as a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. READ MORE Mr Yusuf gave no formal reason for his departure. He tweeted: 'Eleven months ago I became chairman of Reform. I have worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30%, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time.' 11 months ago I became Chairman of Reform. I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30%, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and… — Zia Yusuf (@ZiaYusufUK) June 5, 2025 His exit came just hours after a criticised Sarah Pochin, the newly elected Reform MP for Runcorn and Helsby, over her call to ban the burka. Using her first appearance at Prime Minister's Questions, Ms Pochin called for full-face coverings to be outlawed — a move widely criticised and swiftly disowned by the party. Mr Yusuf said he had not been consulted and branded the question dumb. Responding to a user on X, he said: 'Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it was not policy. Busy with other stuff.' He added: 'I do think it is dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself would not do.' The row follows a tense few days for Reform UK, which is facing accusations of Islamophobia and race-baiting. At a press conference in Aberdeen on Monday, party leader Nigel Farage pointed to Mr Yusuf — 'Scottish-born, but comes from parents who come from the Indian subcontinent' — as evidence that Reform UK is not a racist party. Mr Farage had been responding to criticism of a campaign video that edited a 2022 speech by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar to suggest he pledged to 'prioritise' the Pakistani community — a phrase Mr Sarwar did not use. Defending the video, Mr Farage claimed the MSP had a 'record of obsession' with race. 'We do not talk about race at all,' he said. He continued: 'We think everybody should be treated equally. We object, very strongly, to the segmentation of people into different types. 'I think that speech he gave was sectarian in its very nature — 'we are the South Asian community, we are going to take over the country and take over the world'. 'We believe what he said was a form of sectarian politics and we do not like it one little bit.' Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice said the party 'would not be where we are today' without the efforts of Zia Yusuf, who has quit as chairman. Mr Tice said: 'I wish to add my huge thanks to Zia for all his hard work and major help in securing such progress and success over the last 11 months. 'We would not be where we are today without him.' Reform leader Nigel Farage said: 'I am genuinely sorry that Zia Yusuf has decided to stand down as Reform UK Chairman. 'As I said just last week, he was a huge factor in our success on May 1 and is an enormously talented person. 'Politics can be a highly pressured and difficult game and Zia has clearly had enough. He is a loss to us and public life.' A Labour spokesperson said: 'Nigel Farage could fit all of his MPs in the back of a cab, yet he can't stop them fighting among themselves. 'Reform only guarantees more Liz Truss-style chaos. Their £80 billion of unfunded commitments would lead to economic meltdown and put up everyone's mortgage and bills. They're just not credible.'
The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
Expert weighs in on Nigel Farage funding for Scotland comments
The Reform UK leader sparked outrage when he suggested axing the Barnett formula during a press conference in Aberdeen earlier this week. Dr Neil McGarvey, a top politics lecturer at Strathclyde University, told The National that Farage's comments suggested the Reform UK leader had not thought 'deeply' about the constitutional question. He said: 'I don't think Farage has thought it through very coherently, if I'm being honest. 'I would actually struggle to label Farage a Unionist; he's not really thought in any way deeply about the Union and the implications of what he's said for the Union.' READ MORE: Douglas Ross accused of 'bullying witnesses' in key Holyrood committee While the Barnett formula is often taken to mean the whole process by which Holyrood is funded, it is only one part, explained McGarvey, with the baseline block grant making up the largest part. The Barnett formula, devised in the 1970s before the first Scottish devolution referendum, is used to calculate how much money Scotland gets as a proportion of UK spending in devolved areas. (Image: PA) McGarvey, who has written about right-wing politics in Scotland and the Union, said that he would describe Farage as holding a 'One Britain philosophy', which he defined as an 'English-stroke-British nationalist approach to governance, that we should all be governed as one'. The academic argued that because of The Vow – a last-ditch attempt to shore up No votes in the 2014 referendum, which included a pledge to keep the Barnett formula while bringing in more powers – both sides in the referendum had cast their ballots for different kinds of constitutional change. He said: 'You could say, from an SNP perspective, if you reopen the whole debate about Barnett, you're reopening the constitutional debate.' READ MORE: Britain was 'extension of Scotland', suggest medieval texts uncovered by historian And McGarvey argued that Farage may find unlikely bedfellows in the SNP over his comments about the Barnett formula, which saw the Reform UK leader saying that Holyrood should be 'able to raise a bit more of its own revenue'. He said this put Farage in similar territory to those in the SNP who would argue for the Scottish Parliament to have 'full fiscal autonomy', which would see it given complete control over tax and public spending short of full independence. Farage's comments were met with outrage not only from pro-independence parties but from the Conservatives, who said his argument amounted to wanting to scrap what they call the 'Union dividend'.
