
How to fix the Eden Project – and Cornwall
From days out with the family to music concerts, the Eden Project has served as a hub of fond memories for Telegraph readers.
However, on Tuesday, Greg Dickinson reported on how the Eden Project, Cornwall's flagship tourist attraction, is fighting for survival 25 years after first opening its doors.
In January 2025, the Eden Project culled a fifth of its workforce due to declining visitor numbers and rising costs.
With the horticultural project facing its biggest challenges to date, readers have outlined the changes they think are needed in order to keep its doors open. Many also highlighted how Cornwall has struggled with wider tourism issues since the pandemic.
From reducing entry fees to ending the war on holidaymakers, here's your manifesto on how to fix tourism to the Eden Project and Cornwall.
'Reduce the entry price'
General tickets to the Eden Project cost £38 when purchased online, increasing to £42 when bought on the door. These tickets grant a visitor access for an entire year, but readers still feel that the price does not justify the experience.
While reader Simon Roberts believes that the project is 'a brilliant concept perfectly executed,' he believes that the cost is 'a big outlay'.
He says: 'I appreciate that you can visit as many times as you want for a year, but it's off-putting and the reality is that most will visit during their holidays and won't be back in the area for some time.
'Reduce the entrance prices to get people in and then try and upsell optional food, gifts and items to people once there.'
Chris Jeans, who holidays in Cornwall every year, asserts: 'Not enough consideration is given to non-locals.'
Instead, Mr Jeans suggests offering 'a 10 per cent reduction in price for each subsequent visit'.
'That way, even after many visits and therefore a low admission, the Eden Project would still make money out of a visit through its shops, restaurants and enthusiastic regulars.'
Likewise, Stephen Jakeman doesn't view year-long tickets as 'much use when you live over 100 miles away'. Mr Jakeman calls upon the project to 'have the bottle to drop prices considerably for a day visit'.
Andrew Brown argues that the project is not 'value for money'.
He says: 'Drop the entrance fee while increasing the plants available to purchase but from a separate on-site location, prioritising the main location for more creative sales opportunities.'
'Make the site worth coming back to see again'
Reader Catherine Guild recently visited the project for the second time after first going around five years ago and felt dejected when seeing 'nothing had changed'.
She believes the slashing of the project's workforce in January has affected its appearance and could deter others from revisiting.
'It looked unkempt, which annoyed me given the amount of cash they took for the experience,' she shares.
Another repeat visitor is Helen Brown who went as a child over 20 years ago and again as an adult in 2021. Despite the vast amount of time between visits, Ms. Brown shares her shock to see some of the material from her first visit still on display.
She says: 'A lot of the information boards outside were original and sun-bleached. There was a lot of inside space that had no exhibits and was empty. Apart from the biomes, there is nothing to see there.'
In offering a solution, Ms. Brown suggests the project should 'look at how they can maximise their estate and make more of the site worth coming back to see again'.
In a similar vein, one-time visitor Ann Stokell says that while she admires the original idea for the project, she feels that 'there is no investment and planning for the future'.
'During Covid, the Cornish ripped off people terribly'
Meanwhile, other readers discuss what they deem to be the poor treatment of visitors to Cornwall.
The post-pandemic influx of holidaymakers and second homers pushed up prices for residents, fomenting resentment.
Reader George Williams lives in Devon and believes that the rising costs of hotels in Devon and Cornwall during and after Covid may have deterred tourists from returning to the area.
He says: 'Our local pub was charging over £250 a night for a room and they wonder why people who visited did not come back?'
He adds: 'The Cornish ripped off people terribly when they could not go abroad. They now know it is much cheaper to go abroad and much quicker if you live in London.'
Dominic Evans, a regular visitor to Cornwall, supports this belief by stating that if 'accommodation was more reasonable, money would be available for attractions,' such as the Eden Project.
Reader Richard Watson urges 'the Cornish powers that be' to call for an end to their 'war' on holiday let and second-home owners, thereby encouraging people to visit the area.
'Cornwall is seriously out of the way for most in the UK'
Other readers explained that tempting tourists back to the area – and the project – could prove difficult purely based on its location and poor accessibility.
Due to Cornwall being 'seriously out of the way for most in the UK,' one reader renders the concept of an annual pass to the Eden Project as useless.
He says: 'I disagree with this broad viewpoint of the annual pass meaning you can come in as many times as you want for the rest of the year. Realistically the chance of coming in many times is nonsensical.'
Another reader, Peter Wakeman, suggests that 'poor' road links into Cornwall could also be another reason people are deterred from visiting the area.
He argues that journeys are turned into 'marathon treks for the relatively short distances involved' and that this is an issue which affects much of the West Country.
Reader David Lee believes that Britain should 'put customers first for once by improving the country's infrastructure in order to prevent the country from grinding to a standstill'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves in stand-off over policing and council budgets days before spending review
Rachel Reeves has been locked in a standoff over the policing and council budgets just days before this week's spending review, which is set to give billions to the NHS, defence and technology. Yvette Cooper's Home Office and Angela Rayner's housing and local government ministry were the two departments still at the negotiating table on Sunday fighting for more cash, after weeks of trying to reach a settlement. Whitehall sources said the policing budget would not face a real terms cut, but there was still disagreement over the level of investment needed for the Home Office to meet its commitments. Rayner's department is understood to have reached an agreement with the Treasury late on Sunday night after last-minute wrangling over housing, local councils and growth funds. However, any failure to strike a deal would raise the prospect of a budget being imposed on an unwilling department. The spending review, taking place on Wednesday, is a chance for Reeves to hold up billions of pounds of capital spending as a sign she is working to repair public services after years of Tory austerity. After tweaking her fiscal rules last autumn, she has an additional £113bn funded by borrowing for capital spending. Her plans will include £86bn for science and technology across four years and an extra £4.5bn for schools – taking funding per pupil to its highest level ever. However, day-to-day spending is more constrained in some areas, while the NHS and defence swallow up higher allocations. As well as policing, the Home Office budget covers the border force and spending on asylum costs, while the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been battling for funds for the affordable homes programme, councils, homelessness and regional growth. Labour has manifesto pledges to build 1.5m homes and deliver 13,000 new police officers. Pressed on the policing budget, the technology secretary, Peter Kyle, said Home Office and others would have to 'do their bit'. Funding for the police has the potential to become a politically difficult issue for Keir Starmer. Tory former shadow cabinet minister Robert Jenrick has been campaigning against transport fare dodging and Nigel Farage's Reform are also highlighting the issue. Asked about which public services will be prioritised, Kyle said 'every part of our society is struggling' and numerous sectors had asked Reeves for more money. 'On the fact that the police have been writing to the chancellor, they have,' he told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme. 'We also have letters from the universities, we have letters from doctors about the health service, we have letters from campaigners for child poverty writing to us, and other aspects of challenges in Britain at the moment. 'Every part of our society is struggling because of the inheritance that we had as a country and as a government.' He pointed to the £1.1bn extra funding already earmarked for police this year, as he defended Reeves's handling of the spending review process. 'We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do, to do their bit for change as well. We are doing our bit,' Kyle said. 'You see a chancellor that is striving to get investment to the key parts of our country that needs it the most … You will see the priorities of this government reflected in the spending review, which sets the departmental spending into the long term. 'But this is a partnership. Yes, the Treasury needs to find more money for those key priorities, but the people delivering them need to do their bit as well.' While some areas of spending may be cut or receive only low increases, the NHS is set to receive a boost of up to £30bn by 2028, while defence spending is expected to rise to 2.5% of GDP by 2027. Kyle defended the chancellor's approach to public spending, saying she was like Apple founder Steve Jobs who turned the company around when it was 90 days from insolvency. He told Sky News's Trevor Phllips: 'Now Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. 'Now we're starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future. Some of the hi-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector. All these really high, highly innovative sectors. 'We are investing into those key innovations of the future. We know that we cannot break this vicious cycle of high tax and low growth by doing the same as we always have done. We have to innovate our way out of this and we are doing so by investing in those high-growth sectors.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
UK's biggest solar farm ‘will ruin views of the Malvern Hills'
Britain's biggest solar farm will ruin the views of the Malvern Hills if it gets planning permission, residents have warned. Opponents of plans for a 271-acre solar farm near Powick, Worcestershire, have said it will destroy the natural landscape and pose a fire risk to people living nearby. Preserve Powick Landscape and Nature (PPLAN), who have already erected signs around the area, marched from Hospital Lane in Powick through parts of the proposed site on Sunday. They are worried the solar farm will disrupt views of the Malvern Hills, cause harm to local wildlife, and pose fire risks from batteries used to store energy. Peter Loader, the leader of PPLAN who lives adjacent to the site, has described his concerns over the proposed development, including fire risks and traffic disruptions expected to last at least seven months. He said the reason he had been co-ordinating the events in opposition to the solar farm 'is primarily the impact on the landscape'. 'There are a lot of people who won't be able to walk through that area – and the Malvern Hills is an area of outstanding natural beauty,' Mr Loader said. 'Both the Malvern Hills Trust and the National Landscape people have objected because the view from the Malvern Hills would clearly be impacted by this site. 'The A449 has more than 20,000 vehicles a day going along it – and that is pretty much the capacity for a single carriageway A-road. Because they need to lay a cable from this side to the nearest substation, they're proposing putting roadworks up for seven months – and that's pretty serious. 'Not only will it affect people's day-to-day lives, with taking children to school, it will also affect ambulances. Many residents are concerned about the fire risk – when they catch fire, they can't be put out. 'When that happens, there's a toxic vapour cloud that forms, and the fairly large housing estate is downwind.' Steve Lloyd, who lives across from the proposed entrance to the solar farm, said he was worried about increased traffic and noise in the area, as well as the potential fire hazards. He said his greatest concern was 'mainly the size of it'. 'I'm a farmer, and it's so close to my house and my farm. I'm just thinking about what could go wrong. Apparently they can catch fire from the battery storage system,' Mr Lloyd said. 'People are worried about the fire risk and the wildlife. There's also the glare from it, and just the actual size of it. Traffic is also very much a concern – it's on a single-track lane.' RWE Renewables UK Solar & Storage Ltd, which is behind the plans, told the BBC that the site was close to the National Grid, making it 'the best and most suitable' location for the project.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Fire breaks out at fish and chips shop in Brown Edge
Fire crews have been battling a blaze at a fish and chip shop. Flames broke out at Sandy Lane Fish and Chips in Brown Edge, Staffordshire, on Sunday a post on X shortly after 15:30 BST, Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service said four crews were sent to the scene on Sandy Lane, and urged people to avoid the area.A fire service spokesperson told the BBC nobody was hurt and it was believed the blaze started accidentally, although a cause had not been identified. Firefighters had since left the scene, the spokesperson added. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.