Caslick centre of attention in Test homecoming
Charlotte Caslick's Wallaroos immersion will reach new heights in a Test homecoming after the rugby sevens convert was named at inside centre to face Canada.
Keen to get the the Olympic champion more involved, Australian coach Jo Yapp will shift Caslick from the wing into the No.12 on Friday at Suncorp Stadium.
Caslick played off the bench and at fullback for the Queensland Reds this season, came off the bench in her Test debut and started on the wing in her last two Tests.
She scored in a win over the USA last weekend and got more involved generally, but her playmaking ability remains an untapped resource ahead of the World Cup later this year.
First try in a Wallaroos jersey for Charlotte Caslick 🔥#Wallaroos #PAC4 pic.twitter.com/H28gqVW85t
— Wallaroos (@WallaroosRugby) May 17, 2025
Yapp has made four more changes to the side that pipped the Eagles in Canberra, with Biola Dawa named on the wing to face a Canadian team that pushed world champions New Zealand to the brink in a 27-27 draw last Friday. Adiana Talakai will return from a long-term knee injury on a new-look bench also featuring Ashley Fernandez and Tia Hinds. Martha Fua, Katalina Amosa and Bridie O'Gorman form a new-look front row with Bree-Anna Browne and Eva Karpani moving to the bench."The past month has been about growth and we continue to give players opportunities through the last match now with the World Cup coming up," Yapp said. "Canada are a strong side that will provide a physical challenge for us on Friday."
The Wallaroos will play at Suncorp Stadium for just the second time and are in contention to win the Pacific Four series despite a first-up loss to New Zealand.
WALLAROOS: Martha Fua, Katalina Amosa, Bridie O'Gorman, Kaitlan Leaney, Michaela Leonard, Siokapesi Palu (capt), Ashley Marsters, Tabua Tuinakauvadra, Layne Morgan, Faitala Moleka, Desiree Miller, Charlotte Caslick, Georgina Friedrichs, Biola Dawa, Caitlyn Halse. Reserves: Adiana Talakai, Bree-Anna Browne, Eva Karpani, Ashley Fernandez, Emily Chancellor, Ruby Anderson, Tia Hinds, Trilleen Pomare.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
29 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Germany picks experienced squad for Euro 2025 but leaves out two critics
RUST, Germany (AP) — Germany has retained 11 players who reached the 2022 Women's European Championship final for Euro 2025. There's no place for two prominent critics of coach Christian Wück. The 23-player squad announced on Thursday is captained by Bayern Munich's Giulia Gwinn, one of the returning players from the team which lost to England in the 2022 final . North Carolina Courage defender Felicitas Rauch and Eintracht Frankfurt forward Nicole Anyomi were in the 2022 squad but aren't this time. Both have previously criticized Wück for what they called a lack of communication around his decision not to pick them for earlier squads. Rauch was among 12 players included in a reserve list on Thursday. The 20-year-old forward Cora Zicai is considered one of Germany's brightest young players after scoring two goals in her three national team games. Germany starts its Euro 2025 campaign in Switzerland on July 4 with a group game against Poland followed by Denmark on July 8 and Sweden on July 12. Since the last Euros, Germany suffered its worst ever World Cup result in 2023 with elimination in the group stage, but rebounded to win the bronze medal at last year's Paris Olympics. ___ AP soccer:
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mancini wants to be Italy coach again: ‘I made a wrong choice'
Mancini wants to be Italy coach again: 'I made a wrong choice' Former Italy boss Roberto Mancini admits he's open to coaching the Azzurri again after Luciano Spalletti's dismissal: 'Sometimes, wrong decisions are made.' Mancini stepped down as the Nazionale coach in September 2023, becoming the coach of the Saudi Arabia national team only a few weeks later. Advertisement The 60-year-old only remained in charge for 18 games until October 2024. Today, he explained his Italy exit once again and admitted he's open to returning. Mancini explains his Italy exit and offers an apology AL RAYYAN, QATAR – JANUARY 25: Roberto Mancini, Head Coach of Saudi Arabia, reacts during the AFC Asian Cup Group F match between Saudi Arabia and Thailand at Education City Stadium on January 25, 2024, in Al Rayyan, Qatar. (Photo by) 'These situations happen in football; the problem was that two or three of them piled up,' Mancini told Gazzetta. 'It's fair to say that if Gravina and I had talked more often during those weeks, to clear things up, none of this would have happened. Sometimes, wrong decisions are made. 'It's true that I no longer felt the same level of trust as before, but I should have spoken to the president about it,' Mancini continued. Advertisement 'I could have done that, and it's my fault. Today, who knows, we may still be working together, trying to reach the World Cup. Maybe, after winning the Euros for a second time.' Mancini wants Italy return Roberto Mancini, Head Coach of Italy interacts with Alberigo Evani, Assistant Coach of Italy during the UEFA Euro 2020 Championship Round of 16 match between Italy and Austria at Wembley Stadium at Wembley Stadium on June 26, 2021 in London, England. (Photo by Justin Tallis – Pool/Getty Images) Why would he return? 'There's nothing better than coaching the national team,' Mancini admitted. 'I've won with clubs, but winning with Italy is something else entirely. Also, you always want to return to where you were happy. I felt amazing at Coverciano; the atmosphere was truly fantastic. Be the Italy coach – Football Italia writers pick ideal Italy XI: choose yours' 'There's no doubt it would be a great challenge, a big risk. But sometimes you need to take risks, right?' Mancini won the Euros in 2021, but faced elimination from the World Cup qualifying playoffs just a few months later. During his tenure as the Azzurri boss, Mancio said he dreamt of winning the World Cup with La Nazionale. Advertisement 'It's the only debut I feel with the fans. As I've always said, I would have loved, and I'd still love, to win a World Cup,' he confirmed. Mancini feels he and Gravina can clear the air BOLOGNA, ITALY – JUNE 4: President Gabriele Gravina of the FIGC looks on during the international Friendly match between Italy and Turkiye at Renato Dall'Ara Stadium on June 4, 2024 in Bologna, Italy. (Photo by) 'I've said for a few months that I made a wrong choice and I wouldn't make it again. I said that back when no one expected it.' Mancini is confident he'd find a way to clear the air with FIGC President Gabriele Gravina. 'I don't think it would be a problem,' argued Mancini. 'We already met and spoke in the past. The president knows mistakes happen in life. The most important thing is that we understood each other on that point, regardless of what happens next.' Advertisement Has he spoken to some of his ex-Italy players? 'Not in the last few days, but it hasn't been long since we last talked,' Mancini concluded. Football Italia understands that Gennaro Gattuso, a 2006 Italy World Cup winner, is now the leading candidate to replace Luciano Spalletti as Italy coach. The former midfielder has already spoken to Italy Delegation Chief Gianluigi Buffon.
Wall Street Journal
44 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Schools Can Pay Their Athletes—and College Sports Will Never Be the Same
College sports are dying, college sports are dead, college sports aren't about college anymore—it's Christmas in June for anyone feeling apocalyptic about the state of college sports, now that a settlement has been approved allowing schools to directly pay their athletes. This isn't a salary, technically. This is compensation from schools to athletes for use of their 'name, image, likeness,' but it's not a measly NIL like a burly offensive lineman getting all the bratwurst he can eat. This is a real paycheck, directly from the college. It's really happening—for Division I schools that have opted in. It's set to start July 1. 'A new beginning,' NCAA boss Charlie Baker called it. Is it going to work? Will it cannonball Olympic and nonrevenue sports? How does it square with Title IX? Will it withstand legal challenges? Will it all fall apart? I have no idea! Neither does anyone else! Hold on to your helmets, everyone. We're all jumping off the diving board together. (I will now pause 90 seconds for you to climb the ladder and jump off the diving board with the rest of us.) The settlement of this class action—House vs. NCAA, in which current and former athletes sought name, image and likeness opportunities and a share of athletic department revenue—had been in the works for a while. On Friday, a federal judge signed off on the $2.6 billion settlement, which includes back pay to litigants but also creates a revenue-sharing system 'in which each Division I school will be able to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes,' the Journal reported. That's right. Colleges can chop up $20 million and split it among their jocks. It will take some getting used to. Naturally, the revenue sharing is already provoking some to bemoan the demise of 'amateurism' and the college sports landscape. But schools have to be oblivious to not see who's to blame: They are! College sports did this to itself. The NCAA and its member schools set professionalization into motion with decades of arrogance and denial about the bountiful but warped economy they built around the games we love to watch. When college sports started chasing every dollar as a market-driven business—and frankly, there's a case that college sports has always been a business—paying athletes became inevitable. The bigger the money got, the harder the system was to defend. When college sports started indulging in the $10 million dollar coach, the billion-dollar television deal, the megabuck locker rooms and the assistant to the assistant strength coach making more than a surgeon, the hypocrisy was easy to see. Everyone was making a buck, except the talent on the field. It's why the Supreme Court more or less reacted to the NCAA's claims of amateur status with the following: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Public opinion shifted, too. A decade ago, I'd write about proposals to pay athletes and I could hear the jeering a mile away. Boooooooo! That's not what college sports are about, man! Eventually, those big-dollar media deals, private jets and Pop-Tart Bowls caught up with college sports. It was hard to argue there was anything amateurish about it anymore. Now schools will have to figure it out for themselves. I mean that literally: schools and conferences are navigating a new wilderness in which they are permitted to directly compensate athletes—but without a precedent or a clear road map. Yikes. We do know a few things: The bulk of those $20 million allotments are expected to go to high-revenue sports like football and men's basketball—that's where the money's coming from, after all. Other beneficiaries may be growing sports like women's basketball and softball. The settlement also attempts to inject some calm into the craziness around name, image and likeness. The revenue sharing payments will come from the schools, and third party NIL deals over $600 will be subject to review by 'NIL Go,' an oversight group overseen by Deloitte. The idea here is to put outside NIL deals under a microscope—find out what player deals are legitimate arrangements, and what are booster largesses masquerading as NIL. Good luck! Enforcement will be a headache. So will the invariable league challenges. Defenders of the settlement maintain it shouldn't be entangled with Title IX protections against gender discrimination. Already there are parties who want to argue. Also unknown is the impact on nonrevenue Olympic sports. Do schools start eliminating or rolling back certain sports because they're not big contributors to the bottom line? Possible! We'll see. The new setup isn't free of denial, either. While colleges are now entitled to pay athletes, the system still resists the idea that athletes are employees. Good luck with that, too. There will likely be challenges to the revenue sharing system—is the proportion of revenue (22 percent) given to athletes a fair amount, or should it be renegotiated? Is it tantamount to a salary cap? It's hard to not see this heading in the direction of classifying athletes as employees, and eventually, collective bargaining. If you're lying down on a couch right now with a bag of ice on your head, I understand. It's a lot. It's confusing. Imagine being an athletic director in 2025. No job has changed more. A new day is here. It might not be the apocalypse, but college sports will never be the same. Write to Jason Gay at
