
What Trump is doing to US universities is not as bad as the McCarthyite witch trials – it's worse
Some have said the current assault on American universities is the worst since the McCarthyite purges of the 1940s and 1950s. It's actually much worse. McCarthyism targeted individuals with 'Communistic' beliefs, which could include anything left of centre.
Donald Trump
similarly seeks to stamp out dissent. But his attack is McCarthyism on steroids, attempting to destroy universities as institutions.
Trump began by threatening to withhold federal funding from universities that refused his demands. The US spends roughly $60 billion a year on university-based research and development, about half the size of the total Irish governmental budget. Because these funds have already been appropriated by the US Congress, withholding them is illegal. Yet Trump is doing it anyway and daring the courts to stop him.
In March,
Columbia University, fearful of losing $400 million in federal funding, caved to Trump's demands
including surrendering control over its Middle Eastern studies programme. In April,
Harvard fought back
and has had nearly $2 billion pulled. These funds support all manner of research, and their suspension will have devastating effects on scientific progress, the benefits of which would have been felt far beyond the American borders. Just to take one example, say you or a relative develop Alzheimer's disease: these cuts will delay the search for treatments.
More recently, Trump escalated his attack on another key source of university revenue: international students, who make up more than 20 per cent of the student body at most American research universities. Across the country, immigration officers have disappeared international students involved in anti-Israel protests. A haunting video showed one woman, Rumeysa Ozturk, walking near campus, pulled into an unmarked car in broad daylight by masked, plainclothes officers. In some cases, the government has provided no information as to the whereabouts of these students or information as to why they were detained.
READ MORE
[
CCTV footage shows US immigration detaining college student Rumeysa Ozturk
Opens in new window
]
International students seeking to re-enter the US have been detained at the border; like undocumented migrants, these students with the legal right to study in the country fear going home in case they are not allowed to travel back. Now,
Trump has revoked Harvard's certification for enrolling international students
, leaving nearly 7,000 in limbo. And last week, the
State Department paused appointments for international student visas
, which affects any non-citizen wishing to study at any US university.
These actions will permanently damage American higher education – not simply Harvard or Columbia, which are just the most prominent examples. All American universities are potentially in the firing line.
The
New York Times reported last week
that a Trump administration taskforce had identified 10 universities for particular attention. They include George Washington University; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Northwestern; the University of California, Berkeley; the University of California, Los Angeles; the University of Minnesota; and the University of Southern California.
Many measures may be blocked in the courts; indeed, a judge has already prevented him from blocking Harvard's enrolment of international students. Regardless, the measures have created so much uncertainty that no international student can feel good about studying in the US. Who would want to bet their future education on the chance that American courts will restrain Trump? And even if a Democrat wins the White House in 2028, any student considering a multiyear degree in the US will have to factor in the possibility of a future republican victory.
[
Judge blocks Trump administration's ban on international student enrolments at Harvard
Opens in new window
]
To be sure, universities made themselves vulnerable to attack. By cracking down on pro-Palestinian protests in 2024, many gave Trump an entering wedge. Now 'fighting anti-Semitism' is the flimsy pretext of his current assault.
Private universities, in particular, are elitist institutions. The annual cost of a Harvard bachelor's degree is just over $90,000 for next year, though many students – including international students – benefit from need-based financial aid. Because most US universities, including public ones, depend on private gifts to balance their books, they focus on pleasing big donors. They kowtow not just to the rich, but to the ultra-rich.
[
Donald Trump's chilling assault on universities mirrors that of the Nazis in 1930s Germany
Opens in new window
]
Trump retains a lot of political support for anti-elitist attacks on academia among voters without third-level education who have trended republican. The Maga movement loves hierarchies based on wealth, nationality, race, and gender. But it hates the kind of hierarchies that US universities supply: ones based on merit and thereby more open to women and people of colour. Trump's arch nemesis, Barack Obama, demonstrates how a black man could rise to the presidency through academic institutions: Columbia, Harvard Law, and a professorship at the University of Chicago.
As imperfect as US universities are, they remain vital institutions of free speech, which is precisely why Trump is attacking them. His attacks have had a chilling effect on college campuses. Some, such as Columbia, have been internally riven over how to respond. Academics and students are demoralised. Many are fighting back, but they are forced to redirect their energy away from studying, teaching, and researching. Three leading scholars of fascism – Marci Shore, Jason Stanley and
Timothy Snyder
– made headlines by leaving Yale for the University of Toronto. Needless to say, it is a disturbing sign for American democracy when those who know the most about fascism's rise start to flee.
Destroying higher education is a strange way of making America great again.
US universities have been not just engines of economic growth, they have been tremendous sources of soft power. According to one count, more than 50 current world leaders were educated in the US. Like other aspects of Trump's radical agenda such as his imposition of tariffs, his attack on universities in the name of America First is rapidly accelerating the decline of his country's geopolitical power.
But Trump's attack on academia
presents Ireland with a unique opportunity
. Just think how desirable it is for researchers and students to come here to an English-speaking country that is a functioning democracy. Minister for Education James Lawless recently announced a scheme for attracting disaffected American academics. Yet it is unclear whether it will be of the necessary scale and ambition to truly benefit from the US brain drain. Such a scheme, if successful, would enable Ireland not only to be a refuge for academic freedom and democracy, it would generate long-term economic growth through science and innovation. But the scheme shouldn't be too narrowly focused on the hard sciences. After all, we need artists, humanists, and social scientists – and perhaps some scholars of fascism – to help us understand the madness that is Trump's America.
Dr Daniel Geary is Mark Pigott Professor in US History at Trinity College Dublin
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Musk blasts Trump mega-bill, days after farewell
Elon Musk has hammered US President Donald Trump's proposed spending bill as a "disgusting abomination" as tensions between the pair burst into the open following the tech billionaire's White House exit. Mr Musk left his role as an official government employee last week, lauded by Mr Trump for spearheading a federal spending cuts program, but disagreements between the duo have been building. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Mr Musk posted on X, in by far his most caustic remarks on Mr Trump's spending plans. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." It was not Mr Musk's first comments on Mr Trump's so-called "big, beautiful bill" which is set to add $3 million to US deficits over a 10-year horizon, despite deep cuts to health and food aid programs. But Mr Musk's previous criticism was restrained, with the ex-head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) task force offering only that it undermined his cost-cutting efforts. He said that the bill - being considered by Congress - would burden "citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." The escalation in rhetoric indicated bitter hostilities between the White House and Musk, who donated almost $300 million to Mr Trump's election campaign but has recently voiced frustrations. "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill, it doesn't change his opinion," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters in a rapid response to Musk's tweet. "This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Mr Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, their relationship appeared on an even keel as the Republican hailed his fellow billionaire's "incredible service." Once inseparable Mr Trump even insisted that Mr Musk was "really not leaving" after a turbulent four months in which the South African born tycoon cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid. Mr Musk was once almost inseparable from Mr Trump, glued to his side on Air Force One, Marine One, in the White House and at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. The right-wing magnate's DOGE led an ideologically-driven rampage through the federal government, with its young "tech bros" slashing tens of thousands of jobs. But DOGE's achievements fell far short of Mr Musk's original goal of saving $2 trillion dollars. The DOGE website claims to have saved taxpayers about 8% of the $2 trillion figure so far - $175 billion - and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous serious inaccuracies in its accounting. But the non-governmental "Musk Watch DOGE Tracker" puts the verifiable figure at $16 billion - less than one percent of the goal. Tesla shareholders called for Mr Musk to return to work as sales slumped and protests targeted the electric vehicle maker, while SpaceX had a series of fiery rocket failures.


Agriland
5 hours ago
- Agriland
Rabobank: Uncertainty for global beef markets
Global cattle markets have all been trending higher in the first half of 2025, according to a recent RaboResearch report. However, since US President Donald Trump took office in January 2025, uncertainty and unpredictability have reverberated through the global beef market. With beef as one of the largest agricultural commodities traded by the US, any change to US trading arrangements has the potential to affect the beef market at a national and, in turn, a global level. With the global supply and demand situation, RaboResearch expects trade flows to be maintained. Source: RaboResearch However, this is likely to change if major trading blocs such as Europe and China become involved in a trade war with the US. Contracting supplies driving up cattle prices Global cattle markets have been trending higher in the first half of 2025, according to RaboResearch. European prices experienced an especially strong rise in the first quarter of 2025, as domestic supplies contracted while demand remained strong. Senior analyst – Animal Protein for RaboResearch, Angus Gidley-Baird said: 'The rise in European prices now puts them in line with the strong North American cattle prices, which continue to rise slowly. 'In both Europe and the US, disease and pests are affecting cattle supplies. In Europe, and now in the UK, bluetongue continues to affect the herd. 'Meanwhile, New World screwworm in Mexico has caused US authorities to close the border to Mexican cattle imports, and the risk of potential infestation in the US is increasing.' These health threats are challenging production in markets where cattle supplies are already historically low, likely further supporting already elevated cattle prices. Production declines Global beef production is expected to contract through the remainder of the year, with an overall contraction of 2% projected for the year, according to researchers at Rabobank. The largest contractions are expected to happen in Brazil (down 5%) and New Zealand (down 4%), with contractions also expected in Europe, the US, and China. Australia is one of the few regions expected to see a production increase. Global trade managing disruptions On April 5, tariffs were introduced for many countries exporting beef into the US. Additional, so-called reciprocal tariffs for identified countries are on hold until early July, and the US-China tariff escalation has also been put on hold until early August. While negotiations are ongoing, some redistribution of beef trade volumes around the world is becoming apparent. Reports are emerging that Chinese buyers are looking more toward Australian, New Zealand, and South American suppliers as US beef becomes more expensive. Global beef demand to remain stable Although the full extent of the trade war remains uncertain, RaboResearch has stated that it remains cautiously optimistic about beef demand and trade flows. 'Beef isn't being singled out as a targeted commodity, and most major exporters are only facing baseline tariffs,' Gidley-Baird continued. 'So early indications suggest that competitive positions will be maintained, albeit with added costs to the system. 'The global supply and demand situation should maintain current trade flows. But if the US-China tariff war escalates and Europe becomes more involved, this is likely to change. 'Much of the media attention has been on the imposition of tariffs, but this may only be the opener to the main event,' he added. However, RaboResearch said that while tariffs may have grabbed headlines, the real story will be the implications of shifting global trade dynamics.


Irish Independent
6 hours ago
- Irish Independent
David W Higgins: If Ireland can remove all involvement with Israel, why wouldn't Israel do the same to us?
If Ireland can remove all involvement with Israel, why wouldn't it do the same to us? The Trump trade war continues. The EU has joined China with a 90-day reprieve. A burst of dealmaking is unfolding behind the scenes. Exporters are continuing to count the fallout. Everyone has more questions than answers. While chaos is to the fore, a less talked-about budget bill is progressing through US Congress. Section 899 of that bill has raised eyebrows. It allows the US to impose up to 20pc taxes on countries it deems to have unfairly taxed American companies. This could be levied on dividends or interest as they exit the US. It gives a new tool to Donald Trump.