Judge orders many NIH grants restored, calling cancellation unlawful
A federal judge on Monday ruled that the Trump administration's cancelling of federal health grants over their connections to 'gender ideology' and 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' was unlawful and void.
U.S. District Court Judge William Young, a Reagan-appointee, ruled on Monday that targeting research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) based on certain topics was unlawful and arbitrary. The federal government has been directed to immediately make the funds available to grant recipients again.
In February, the NIH issued directives terminating grants relating to LGBTQ+ issues, gender identity and DEI.
In response, several organizations including the American Public Health Association, the ACLU, Ibis Reproductive Health and others sued to reverse the directives.
'The ideologically motivated directives to terminate grants alleged to constitute DEI, 'gender ideology,' or other forbidden topics were, in fact, arbitrary and capricious, and have now been ruled unlawful,' said Peter G. Lurie, president of the Center for Science in the Public Interest and a plaintiff in the case.
'We're certainly very pleased with the judge's decision, and actually the way he portrayed it as, you know, discrimination. I think that's pure and simple, that the administration was trying to undermine the health and well being of these populations,' Georges Benjamin, executive director of the APHA, told The Hill.
The federal government plans to appeal or halt Young's ruling.
'HHS stands by its decision to end funding for research that prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people,' HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said in a statement.
'Under the leadership of Secretary Kennedy and the Trump administration, HHS is committed to ensuring that taxpayer dollars support programs rooted in evidence-based practices and gold standard science – not driven by divisive DEI mandates or gender ideology,' he added.
Based on what the Trump administration has done in response to other rulings blocking or reversing its actions, Benjamins has concerns the White House will find ways to circumvent the ruling.
'Spigots have been turned back on, but this administration has tried to find ways to slow things down, kind of put barriers in the way of getting the dollars out the door,' said Benjamin. 'Just watch what the administration does with their left hand when they're doing something with their right. They've been pretty sneaky about trying to find ways to get around judges rules.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Trump team proposes Iran talks this week on nuclear deal, ceasefire
The White House is discussing with Iran the possibility of a meeting this week between U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, according to four sources briefed on the issue. The objective would be to discuss a diplomatic initiative involving a nuclear deal and an end to the war between Israel and Iran. Why it matters: The meeting hasn't been finalized yet, but it is part of a last-ditch effort by President Trump to swerve away from war and back toward dealmaking. "A meeting with the Iranians this week is under consideration," a U.S. official confirmed. The meeting could be a make-or-break moment for the question of whether the U.S. will join the war in order to eliminate Iran's nuclear program militarily. Zoom in: Trump sees the massive bunker busters needed to destroy Iran's underground enrichment facility at Fordow — which the U.S. has and Israel does not — as a key point of leverage to get Iran to cut a deal, a senior U.S. official said. Describing the decision on bunker busters as an "inflection point," the official said Trump "thinks in terms of deals and leverage. And this is leverage." "They do want to talk," the senior official continued. "But what we don't know is, 'have they been brought to their knees fully so that they realize that in order to have a country, they have to talk?' And assuming they get there, is there any degree of enrichment you would allow them to have?" State of play: Trump has so far declined to directly participate in Israel's attacks on Iran, but he has made clear that Iran must be prevented from obtaining a nuclear weapon one way or another. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is pushing him to join the war and bomb Fordow. Trump has continued to insist he believes he can make a deal, particularly given Iran's weak negotiating position. Driving the news: Trump shocked the Middle East with a Truth Social post on Monday night in which he called on Iranian civilians to evacuate Tehran immediately. Shortly thereafter, Trump dcut short his trip to the G7 summit in Canada to return to Washington and focus on the war. These two moves, together with reports of explosions in Tehran, led to reports in the Israelis press and on social media that the U.S. had joined the war. White House spokesperson Alex Pfeiffer denied the reports. "American forces are maintaining their defensive posture, and that has not changed. We will defend American interests," he wrote on X. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reiterated that message in an interview on Fox News and stressed Trump is still seeking a deal. "President Trump hopes there will be peace," he said. Behind the scenes: The Trump administration discussed the meeting proposal with Iran on Monday, the sources said. "We are talking on the phone but it is better to talk in person," Trump said at the G7. Trump expressed hope that Iran would agree to make a deal. "I think a deal will be signed. I think Iran is foolish not to sign one," he said. During the summit, Trump discussed with other leaders the need for a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, French President Macron told reporters. "The Americans have made an offer to meet with the Iranians. We will see what happens," he said.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump to MAGA critics: I decide what ‘America First' means
Facing backlash from Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson among others for his foreign policy decisions amidst the backdrop of the conflict between Israel and Iran, Trump says he came up with the term "America First" and that he decides what that means.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump to MAGA critics: I decide what ‘America First' means
Facing backlash from Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson among others for his foreign policy decisions amidst the backdrop of the conflict between Israel and Iran, Trump says he came up with the term "America First" and that he decides what that means.
