Millions of Avast antivirus software customers are getting a refund. Here's why.
Millions of Americans who purchased antivirus software from Avast may be eligible for compensation due to a $16.5 million settlement by the company with the Federal Trade Commission, the regulatory agency announced on Monday.
Nearly 3.7 million consumers who bought the software from Avast between August 2014 and January 2020 can expect emails to arrive in their inboxes this week or next notifying them of their eligibility to apply for compensation, the FTC stated.
According to regulators, Avast for years collected information on customers through its antivirus software and browser extensions including data on:
religious beliefs
health concerns
political leanings
locations
financial status
Avast claimed its software would protect user privacy by blocking third-party tracking, but sold the their information without people's consent to more than 100 third-parties through a subsidiary called Jumpshot, the FTC alleged in 2024. Starting Monday, the agency will send email notices to nearly 3.7 million people who may qualify for a refund.
Eligible consumers can file a claim online at www.ftc.gov/Avast. If you get an email with a claim number, you can apply for a payment online at www.avastsettlement.com/file-a-claim.
Those who need help filing a claim can call the refund administrator at 1-866-290-0165. To be eligible, consumers must file a claim by June 5. Payments will depend on factors including how many people file a claim.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
9 minutes ago
- CNBC
Ron Insana says Trump's spending bill unlikely to generate the economic boom he promised
As he did in his first term as president, President Donald Trump is once again predicting an economic boom the likes of which the U.S. has never before seen. In reviewing the publicly available economic data since Ronald Reagan, the period in which the U.S. grew the fastest with the most job creation did not occur in Trump's first term and is unlikely to do so in this term, the reasons why to be explained shortly. First, a brief review of recent economic history where the biggest economic boom actually took place. Former President Bill Clinton's eight years in office produced nearly 4% annual growth, over 240,000 jobs added per month and an inflation rate that averaged less than 3%, considered very low for that time. The unemployment rate when Clinton first took office was 7.3% and bottomed at 3.8% by April 2000. By contrast, in Trump's first term, the economy added under 200,000 jobs per month, roughly equal to that of former President Barack Obama, while GDP growth averaged 2.3%, again, roughly equal to Obama's last three years in office, while inflation was less than a quarter percentage point lower than in Obama's second term. (Trump's numbers, of course, were skewed by the Covid crisis, which featured the steepest and shortest recession in U.S. history.) All that leads me to the notion that a boom, the likes of which we have not seen, is unlikely even if the "Big Beautiful Bill" passes through Congress and lands on Trump's desk. And here's why. Nothing new to help growth First, the bill largely extends existing tax rates that were put in place in 2017, without further lowering corporate taxes, as once promised, from 21% to 15%. There are no major additional tax cuts included in the bill. The bill simply makes much of the existing code permanent. No change, no gain. It's true that taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security payments may be eliminated, but that could also lead to employers seeking out ways, in the first two cases anyway, to pay lower wages if tips and overtime go untaxed. Beyond that, there's not much new in the bill that would accelerate economic growth, nor would a failure of the bill's passage lead to a 68% tax increase for everyone in America, as the president has warned . Published analyses have suggested that 68% of Americans could see a 7% increase in their taxes, but not a 68% increase in what they pay. Given the prospects for rising inflation amid recently imposed tariffs, and a subsequent slowing in consumer spending, some of which is already taking place, the economy appears to be downshifting rather than speeding up. Job growth , as we saw on Friday, has moderated for several months in a row and while not reflective of a recession, we're also witnessing a jump in jobless claims, announced layoffs and, according to some published reports, consumers maxing out credit cards to buy the basics. Add to that the reductions in support for the poorest Americans, whether its access to Medicaid or food stamps, and the ingredients for a further slowdown are embedded in the bill, especially for those who can least afford to have government assistance reduced in a meaningful way. Big changes needed The Department of Government Efficiency spending cuts are also affecting government stimulus in so far as key funding in technology, medicine and education are being slashed, threatening the very areas that make the U.S. economy competitive and very much growth-oriented. The bill, by most accounts, also adds from $2.4 trillion to $3.3 trillion to the budget deficit over the next decade. With the current national debt standing at a record $36.2 trillion, higher federal borrowing needs could further push up borrowing costs as investors, especially international ones, now nervous about America's fiscal position could demand higher yields to compensate them for the risk, however unlikely, that the U.S. runs into trouble in paying its bills. During the Clinton administration, tax rates were higher, and yet growth was stronger, 22.7 million jobs were added and the budget deficit turned to surplus by the end of his term. None of those metrics are supported by existing or proposed policy initiatives today. The Clinton boom was second only to that of FDR, whose economy grew strongly as Roosevelt took over, quite literally, at the very bottom of the Great Depression. In modern times, Clinton's economy was stronger than that of any president who came before or after him. None of the policies currently being pursued by this administration offer the same prospects for growth though, even like Clinton, this president has a major technological revolution underway. That big, beautiful bill would require some big, bountiful changes if it hopes to stimulate growth in a way in which all Americans, rather than perhaps a handful of billionaires, will share meaningfully in any future prosperity.
Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Strategies To Retire Without Running Out Of Money
Nearly two in three Americans (64%) are more worried about running out of money in retirement than ... More they are about death. Nearly two in three Americans (64%) are more worried about running out of money in retirement than they are about death, according to the 2025 Annual Retirement Study from the Allianz Center for the Future of Retirement. As one might expect, exhausting funds without the recourse of youth or the remedy of an income-driven career can generate anxiety. However, knowledge can be a useful tool, and the more individuals understand about their retirement needs, the less intimidating the prospect may become. A simple yet powerful method for estimating how much money one requires to retire with peace of mind and how investments may contribute to achieving that amount is a strategy called Fill The Gap, or FTG. A simple yet powerful method is a strategy called Fill The Gap, or FTG. (Photo by Keystone/Getty ... More Images) Use the 25x Rule of thumb as a guideline. Now that the gap size has been assessed, determine how much in liquid investments would be required to cover it. Use the 25x Rule of thumb as a guideline. Start with the gap amount, in this case $3,000. Next, multiply that number by 25 to find the total savings goal. The 25x Rule of thumb is simply the inverse of the widely utilized 4% Rule of thumb, which helps determine how much money can be withdrawn to adequately fund monthly expenses without depleting the nest egg. In other words, how to max out a retirement lifestyle without running out of financial resources. In the example used: Creating a portfolio that balances both income and growth has worked as an effective fill the gap ... More strategy for many happy retirees. Creating a portfolio that balances both income and growth has worked as an effective fill the gap strategy for many happy retirees. Many investors have achieved yields of 3.5% to 4.5%, generating cash flow that helps offset expenses without eroding the principal too quickly. Nothing is guaranteed and investments may not perform as they have in the past, but the overall goal is an annual return in the 6.5% to 7.5% range. A critical factor many retirees overlook is how taxes might change in retirement. A critical factor many retirees overlook is how taxes might change in retirement. Often, they see their effective tax rate drop significantly, sometimes falling to half of what they paid during their primary working years. Why? There are a few possible reasons: Because of this potential dynamic, it's often more constructive to calculate FTG numbers using after-tax figures. Identify a gap and create a plan to fill it. While every retiree's financial picture is unique—whether they have a pension, own a business, or manage different spending levels—the FTG method tends to be universally applicable. Regardless of variables like marital status, investment comfort levels, or spending habits, the fundamental math remains the same: identify a gap and create a plan to fill it. Using the FTG method to assess targets can highlight the importance of understanding real-life expenses when planning for retirement. Everyday costs add up quickly, and having a clear financial checkpoint helps ensure that both necessities and indulgences can be covered. Why indulgences? Because if a retirement isn't fulfilling, what was the point of the hard work it took to create it? By using the FTG strategy and the 25x Rule of thumb, much of the guesswork can be removed from retirement planning. Instead of worrying about dwindling financial means, a clear, numbers-driven roadmap can proactively facilitate savings and investments to help empower financial security and happiness. Retirement should be a time to enjoy the fruits of labor, not labor over assets bearing enough fruit. Knowing the size of the gap—and how to fill it—can bolster peace of mind and foster a purposeful retirement. Knowing the size of the gap—and how to fill it—can bolster peace of mind and foster a purposeful ... More retirement.
22 minutes ago
Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says
TORONTO -- Canada will meet NATO's military spending guideline by early next year and diversify defense spending away from the United States, which he says no longer plays a predominant role on the world stage, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday. Carney said Canada will achieve NATO's spending target of 2% of gross domestic product five years earlier than it had previously planned. 'Our military infrastructure and equipment have aged, hindering our military preparedness," Carney said. 'Only one of our four submarines is seaworthy. Less than half of our maritime fleet and land vehicles are operational. More broadly we are too reliant on the United States.' According to NATO figures, Canada was estimated to be spending 1.33% of GDP on its military budget in 2023, below the 2% target that NATO countries have set for themselves. Canada previously said it was on track to meet NATO's spending target by the end of the decade. 'Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' Carney said. The announcement of increased spending came as Canada is about to host U.S. President Donald Trump and other leaders at a summit of the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations in Alberta on June 15-17, and before the NATO summit in Europe. It also comes as NATO allies are poised to increase the commitment well beyond the 2% target. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said last week that most U.S. allies at NATO endorse Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more. Carney has said that he intends to diversify Canada's procurement and enhance the country's relationship with the EU. 'We should no longer send three quarters of our defense capital spending to America,' Carney said in a speech at the University of Toronto. 'We will invest in new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles and artillery, as well as new radar, drones and sensors to monitor the seafloor and the Arctic.' Canada has been in discussions with the European Union to join an EU drive to break its security dependency on the United States, with a focus on buying more defense equipment, including fighter jets, in Europe. Carney's government is reviewing the purchase of U.S. F-35 fighter jets to see if there are other options. 'We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a predominant role on the world stage. Today, that predominance is a thing of the past,' Carney said in French. He added that with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the United States became the global hegemon, noting its gravitational pull, always strong, became virtually irresistible and made the U.S. 'our closest ally and dominant trading partner.' 'Now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security,' Carney said. The prime minister said that "a new imperialism threatens.' 'Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu," Carney said. Trump's calls to make Canada the 51st U.S. state have infuriated Canadians, and Carney won the job of prime minister after promising to confront the increased aggression shown by Trump. Carney said that the long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect Canadians is becoming increasingly archaic. full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.
