Trump doesn't think Iran deal needed after facilities ‘blown up to kingdom come'
US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that his administration plans to resume talks with Iran next week, but he doesn't care if a nuclear agreement is signed because Iran's facilities have been 'blown up to kingdom come'.
'We are going to talk to them next week, with Iran. We may sign an agreement. I don't know…I don't care if I have an agreement or not,' he said.
'The only thing we would be asking for is what we were asking for before…we want no nuclear, but we destroyed the nuclear… it's blown up to kingdom come. I don't care very strongly about it. If we got a document, it wouldn't be bad.'
Trump's comments during a Nato summit in the Netherlands come amid conflicting reports about the damage US strikes did to Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities over the weekend.
On Wednesday, Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said the country's nuclear facilities had been 'badly damaged' by the American strikes.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
But a day earlier, several US media outlets reported unnamed sources briefed on a battle damage assessment by the Defence Intelligence Agency that claimed the US strikes had only set Iran's programme back a few months. CNN cited one source as saying that some of Iran's centrifuges were 'intact'.
Trump confirmed the leak was legitimate, but accused American media outlets of misrepresenting the assessment.
'The document said 'it could be limited or it could be very severe [damage]'… and you didn't choose to put that,' he said, addressing a CNN reporter. CNN was the first to report the leak.
Trump said the US received more intelligence about the damage after the report, including by speaking with sources on the ground in Iran with access to Iran's nuclear programme.
What the Israel-Iran-US conflict taught Pakistan Read More »
'We have also spoken to people who have seen the site. The site is obliterated. Everything nuclear is down there. They didn't take it out,' he said.
Trump was likely referring to reports that Iran was able to move a stockpile of uranium from sites before the US struck them.
An Arab official briefed on the matter previously told Middle East Eye that Iran had received advance warning of the US strikes. Amwaj Media first reported that Tehran was notified before the US attacked.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that just five days into the war, its inspectors lost track of Iran's 409 kilograms of highly enriched uranium. That amount, which could be easily transported in a container by truck, is enough for 10 nuclear warheads if Iran were to pursue weaponisation.
Before Israel's attack, Iran and the US were in talks to curb the Islamic Republic's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday that his country was willing to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme, according to state media.
Since launching strikes on Iran over the weekend, Trump has moved to de-escalate tensions. He thanked Iran on Monday for providing advance notice about its retaliatory strike on the US's al-Udeid military base in Qatar.
Trump announced a ceasefire to the war a few hours after the attack. On Tuesday, he lashed out at both Israel and Iran when it appeared to wobble, saying the two foes "have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing'.
Speaking at the Nato summit, Trump said both Iran and Israel were 'tired [and] exhausted' and 'satisfied to go home and get out'.
He also said he would have no problem with Iran selling its oil to China. The US slapped sanctions on Iran's oil sales to China during the nuclear talks.
'They just had a war. They fought it bravely. They are in the oil business…they are going to need money to put that country back into shape….If they are going to sell oil, they are going to sell oil,' Trump said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump says he 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear programme. So does he need a deal?
US President Donald Trump says he doesn't need a nuclear agreement with Iran, but the fact is that Iran, Israel and the United States are all back to posturing for talks after a nasty 12-day conflict between the two arch foes culminated in the US bombing three Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. Iran's foreign minister on Wednesday hinted that his country could pull out of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iran's tightly controlled parliament symbolically voted to ban inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from the country. Current and former US officials tell Middle East Eye they are reading the Iranian moves as setting up bargaining chips for negotiations that Trump said will take place next week. Not to be outdone, Trump, a self-declared master negotiator, is playing it cool. On Wednesday, he said the US's "obliteration" of Iran's nuclear sites made a deal with Iran a moot point, but he would talk to the Islamic Republic anyway. 'The only thing we would be asking for is what we were asking for before…we want no nuclear, but we destroyed the nuclear… it's blown up to kingdom come. I don't care very strongly about it. If we got a document, it wouldn't be bad,' Trump said on the sidelines of a Nato summit in the Hague, Netherlands. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Israel is also positioning itself. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed the war was a 'historic victory' for Israel. His office said on Wednesday that Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment facility had been rendered 'inoperable' by US strikes. Signalling and damage assessments As the dust settles from the conflict, everyone is scrambling to understand how much damage the US strikes did to Iran's nuclear programme - and it's led to a number of strange developments. For example, the Trump administration has cited the Islamic Republic of Iran as a source to push back against American media leaks that claim US strikes did little to knock out Iran's nuclear facilities. On Wednesday, Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said the country's nuclear facilities had been 'badly damaged' by the American strikes. That's not quite as conclusive as Trump's claim that they had been 'blown up to kingdom come". Trump doesn't think Iran deal needed after facilities 'blown up to kingdom come' Read More » The discrepancy is part and parcel of battle damage assessments, current and former US officials tell MEE. BDAs are open to political interpretation and manipulation. It's never-ending,' one US official told MEE. The conflict, which saw missiles rain down on Tel Aviv, and Israel obtain control over Iran's skies, took a head-spinning turn after the US joined Israel in offensive operations. An Arab official previously told MEE that Iran had received advance warning of the US strikes on its Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities. Amwaj Media first reported that Tehran was notified before the US attacked. MEE later reported that Iran carefully choreographed its response to the US attack, with enough signalling that the US knew to move its warplanes and heavy equipment out of al-Udeid air base before Iran shot 14 ballistic missiles at the base. It was the same number of bunker buster bombs the US dropped on Fordow. Trump confirmed the warning and thanked Iran profusely for it. Trump still wants a deal The urgency of nuclear talks might say more about the damage done to Iran's programme and its willingness to advance enrichment than any battle damage assessment. Trump has 43 months left in office - enough time to ride out Iran if his assessment of total obliteration is correct. 'Trump could probably forget about the programme the rest of his presidency,' Frank Lowenstein, a former Middle East negotiator in the Obama administration, told MEE. 'But Trump would still like to be able to say that he got a deal,' Lowenstein said. 'Trump would still like to be able to say that he got a deal' - Frank Lowenstein, former Mena negotiator But Trump's own vice president, JD Vance, has conceded that strikes on Fordow and Natanz aside, the administration does not know the whereabouts of Iran's 60 percent enriched uranium. 'We are going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel, and that's one of the things that we're going to have conversations with the Iranians about,' Vance told ABC on Sunday. Rafael Mariano Grossi, the director of the IAEA, admitted that his team lost track of the fuel that could be turned into nuclear weapons a week before Israel began its attacks, and that he believed the material was protected. Dennis Ross, who served as a senior official on Middle East issues in Democratic and Republican administrations, told MEE that to 'cement any achievement', Trump still needs a negotiated understanding with the Iranians. "Without an agreement, there is no way to know that the Iranians have given up the nuclear weapons option. That is especially true with the Iranians having secreted away their highly enriched uranium,' said Ross, now with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Nuclear deal or 'never-ending' war Iran has yet to announce that it will give up enriching uranium, the big stumbling block to talks before Israel's attack. One former US intelligence official told MEE that the only other option to a nuclear agreement would be some sort of 'never-ending Middle East war'. Indeed, Lowenstein said that the option Israel appears to be on track for is to manage Iran like Lebanon or Syria. In the former, Israel has enforced a ceasefire on Iran's ally Hezbollah, and in the latter, Israel bombarded remnants of Bashar al-Assad's armed forces. But in Lebanon, Israel has the Lebanese Armed Forces working to disarm Hezbollah with the support of a wide swath of the population, including the country's prime minister and president. Meanwhile, Syria is war-ravaged. 'The Israelis could police the status quo. But that means blowing up every Russian delivery of air defences to Iran as it looks to rebuild its defences,' Lowenstein said. 'At some point, too, Iran will conduct a purge and plug the intelligence holes Israel exploited. This Israeli operation was 20 years in the making." US and Arab officials say that before Israel's attack, the US and Iran had engaged in fruitful negotiations. One fresh compromise discussed between the two sides was for a nuclear consortium that Iran could join with Arab states. Leverage As the two sides prepare to sit down again, the question will be who has gained more leverage following the conflict. Jonathan Panikoff, a former senior US intelligence official now at The Atlantic Council, said the conflict had 'significantly increased the US's leverage'. He said it had undermined the last two pillars of Iran's three-tiered defence system. The first, proxies, was undermined with Israel's takedown of Hezbollah and the collapse of the Assad government in Syria. Israel also destroyed Iran's air defence systems and, more importantly, its ballistic missile launching platforms. By Iran's own admission, its nuclear programme had been 'badly damaged'. 'The proxies, nuclear programme and ballistic missiles have all been diminished,' Panikoff told MEE. 'There was always scepticism in Tehran whether or not Trump, or any US president, would ever actually bomb the nuclear facilities. Now it's not theoretical. They know if the US sees them starting to rebuild, they are almost sure to invite a US or Israeli strike.' What Iran achieved during the conflict with Israel Read More » The flip side is that, having been the first Middle Eastern state to withstand a full-scale conflict with Israel since 1973, Iran is emboldened. 'Without a deal, Israel and the US are committing themselves to maintaining that Iran does not have air superiority anymore and can strike it at will. Is that sustainable or will it just drive Iran's nuclear programme underground?' Lowenstein said. Iran insists its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes. Before the conflict, experts said Iran was weeks away from enriching 60 percent uranium to 90 percent weapons-grade. But Iran would then have to make a bomb and then put it on a warhead, a process that could take much longer. In addition, in 2003, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, issued a religious ruling or fatwa that has prevented the country from developing nuclear weapons. That ruling stands. The main hurdle to the talks before Israel's attack was whether Iran would be able to continue enriching uranium on its soil in return for sanctions relief. With Iran, Israel and the US in a baseline agreement that the programme is badly damaged, this could leave open space for a compromise. Iran is also keen to prevent the return of so-called snapback sanctions. These multinational and United Nations sanctions were lifted on Iran as part of the 2015 Obama nuclear deal. Despite the Trump administration's unilateral withdrawal from the agreement in 2018, the sanctions remain paused, but that is due to expire in October without an agreement at the UN Security Council. 'Trump is unlikely to soften his red lines, but he could accept some face-savers for Iran,' Ross told MEE. 'I can imagine the Iranians saying they need the right to enrich even if they won't implement it. However, they would need to know that should they then later try to act on the right, President Trump or his successor would respond forcefully to prevent it.' However, having withstood the might of US and Israeli air power, the Iranians might not be in the mood for compromise. 'They proved they would rather be bombed than give up their uranium enrichment. They have come this far. Why go back now?' Lowenstein said.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
New Yorkers see path for broad political shift through Zohran Mamdani's win
When news broke on Tuesday that former New York governor Andrew Cuomo, who was thought to be a favourite in the New York City mayoral primary, had conceded the race, the announcement was met with disbelief. The idea that an underdog pro-Palestinian Democratic Socialist state lawmaker had secured the Democratic nomination seemed too good to be true for Zohran Mamdani's supporters, after being smeared as an antisemite and "communist" by some of the most powerful politicians in the US. On Wednesday, after Mamdani's victory, US President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social about the election, saying that "the Democrats have crossed the line. Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatics, has just won the Dem Primary, is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Leftists before, but this is getting a little ridiculous". Naaila*, 33, a Mamdani supporter and physician assistant, had been curbing her hopes to avoid eventual disappointment. She attended a packed Democratic Socialists of America's (DSA) watch party at the Boyfriend Co-op in Bushwick, a neighbourhood in Brooklyn, where she said the news was met with both joy and disbelief. 'There was a rumour that Cuomo conceded. Everyone was frantically checking their phones. When the DSA organisers called it, I still didn't believe it. I was checking my phone to see for myself. Then the reality dissipated through the crowd. People started cheering and screaming,' Naaila told Middle East Eye. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters She said the victory brought her to tears and was particularly meaningful because of the current situation in Palestine and the fact that it was two decades on from 9/11. 'You have to question whether you are allowed to be vocally Muslim, immigrant and socialist in public, and can even be eligible for mayor. Everything about this race felt like a referendum on diversity, on people power against the billionaires and super PAC funding, and Islamophobia'. 'It makes me so proud to be an immigrant, a New Yorker, a Muslim, and to be in the Palestinian movement.' Despite resigning from politics in 2021 over allegations of sexually harassing women, Cuomo had been tipped to win the race. This was largely believed to be because of his name recognition - his father, Mario Cuomo, is also a former New York governor - and because he had the financial backing of the largest super PAC ever created in the NYC mayoral campaign, which raised $25m for him. Mamdani, on the other hand, was the underdog. A former housing counsellor and current state assemblyman, he ran a bold grassroots campaign premised on helping all New Yorkers with three central pledges: affordable housing through rent freezes and increasing rent-stabilised housing; free buses and free childcare. His career to date has focused on helping working-class people. With 95 percent of ballots counted, Mamdani leads former governor Andrew Cuomo 43 percent to 36 percent in the Democratic primary, propelled by a wave of grassroots support and a bold left-wing platform. The final count is expected to come through in the next few days. Hope for a broader trend Most people MEE spoke to on Wednesday were surprised by Mamdani's win and excited about the prospect of political change. 'I was a little surprised, honestly. I didn't think he was going to win. I was hopeful he would. He ran a very strong campaign where he was able to get amongst the people, especially the youth. I'm super excited about where we're going next," Billy Summers, a 27-year-old from Prospect Heights, Brooklyn, told MEE. 'A Muslim, brown man as mayor of New York City is indicative of a broader change in the US political climate.' Nia*, a 22-year-old server from Prospect Heights, who voted for Mamdani, said, 'I am really proud of my city for pulling through. I think it was about time for us to vote for someone who actually cares about representing the city and people." Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani fends off hate as he inspires New Yorkers Read More » She believes Israel's war on Gaza is one of the reasons that led to his win, and said that Mamdani's responses in the mayoral debate and handling of questions on Israel and his commitment to standing with New Yorkers, including Jewish New Yorkers, made her want to stand with him. 'I think we're finally realising that the government is supposed to represent us, the people, and that we actually do have the power to change things. We just have to utilise the people and come together. I think this mayoral race showed us we can turn things around, and I hope after this, New York will.' Mawahib* is a first-generation Somali who also lives in Prospect Heights and voted for Mamdani. She said she voted for him because of his plans to freeze rent. She said that people who have lived in NYC for decades have been dealing with rent increases, and supporting communities is really important to her. She was with her flatmate on Wednesday night when the election results came through and said she was 'super hyped and elated' by the results. 'I was incredibly hopeful [Mamdani would win] because a lot of my friends who are transplants registered to vote, so I was really, really excited,' she added. The New York City general mayoral election is scheduled for 4 November, with the Democrats favoured to win. Incumbent mayor Eric Adams, who stood on a Democratic ticket, is due to stand as an Independent in the forthcoming election, but his popularity is at an all-time low. It is unclear whether Cuomo will run as an Independent.
Sharjah 24
2 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
US intel says strikes did not destroy Iran nuclear program
US media on Tuesday cited people familiar with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) findings as saying the weekend strikes did not fully eliminate Iran's centrifuges or stockpile of enriched uranium. The aerial bombardments and missile strikes sealed off entrances to some facilities without destroying underground buildings, according to the report. US media coverage of the DIA assessment appeared to anger Trump, who insisted news outlets like CNN and The New York Times were out to "demean" the military strike by saying it only set back Iran's nuclear program by a few months. "THE NUCLEAR SITES IN IRAN ARE COMPLETELY DESTROYED!" Trump posted in all caps on his Truth Social platform. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the authenticity of the DIA assessment but said it was "flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked" in an attempt to undermine Trump and discredit the military operation. "Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration," Leavitt posted on X. Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steven Witkoff, appeared on Fox News to trumpet the White House version. "The reporting out there that in some ways suggests that we did not achieve the objective is just completely preposterous," he said Tuesday. Witkoff repeated the assertion that the nuclear facilities at Natanz, Isfahan and Fordo had been "obliterated." "All three of those had most if not all of the centrifuges damaged or destroyed," he said. "In a way it will be almost impossible for them to resurrect that program for -- in my view and in many other experts' views who have seen the raw data, it will take a period of years." US B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs over the weekend, while a guided missile submarine struck a third with Tomahawk cruise missiles. Trump called the strikes a "spectacular military success" and said they had "obliterated" the nuclear sites, while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Washington's forces had "devastated the Iranian nuclear program." General Dan Caine, the top US military officer, has offered a more cautious tone, saying the strikes caused "extremely severe damage" to the Iranian facilities. Iran's government said Tuesday it had "taken the necessary measures" to ensure the continuation of its nuclear program. "Plans for restarting (the facilities) have been prepared in advance, and our strategy is to ensure that production and services are not disrupted," the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Mohammad Eslami, said in a statement aired on state television. An adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei meanwhile said his country still had stocks of enriched uranium and that "the game is not over." Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign targeting Iranian nuclear sites, scientists and top military brass on June 13 in a bid to set back Tehran's nuclear efforts. Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up during his first term in 2018, but he ultimately decided to take military action. The US operation was massive, with Caine saying it involved more than 125 US aircraft including stealth bombers, fighters, aerial refueling tankers, a guided missile submarine and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft.
