Sudbury Pride opposes police participation
Northern Ontario Watch
While there is a need for increased security, Pride parade organizers in Sudbury have apologized for past police participation in their parade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
26 minutes ago
- CTV News
Crown tells jury ‘Pat was blindsided' in Adam Drake's murder trial
Crown prosecutors Tanya Carter (centre) and Carla Ball (left) leave court after making closing arguments in Adam Drake's second-degree murder trial. (Callum Smith / CTV Atlantic)
CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
Anishinabek Nation chief says he briefed OPP on protests against fast-track bills
Lake Huron Regional Chief Scott McLeod speaks about his opposition to Bill 5, during a press conference, at Queen's Park in Toronto, Monday, June 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Cole Burston OTTAWA — A regional chief for Anishinabek Nation says he briefed Ontario Provincial Police Thursday on what to expect when First Nations take to the streets to protest provincial and federal legislation aimed at fast-tracking major projects. Scott McLeod said he was invited by an Indigenous relations coordinator to brief officers at the OPP's Orillia headquarters on why First Nations oppose the legislation and why they see the bills as a violation of treaties with the Crown. 'These territories are not just waiting idly for you to come and dig up the resources there. These territories are educational institutes. They are grocery stores. They are pharmacies for our medicines,' McLeod said in an interview with The Canadian Press. 'First Nations leaders in Ontario have consistently said that we are not against development, but the development has to occur in the spirit and intent of the treaty ... It's not simply sending us to mining companies to go and get impact benefit agreements.' Federal and provincial governments have introduced legislation intended to speed up development in response to an increasingly uncertain trade relationship with the U.S. under President Donald Trump. Both Ontario and the federal government have introduced fast-track legislation. The Ontario legislature passed Bill 5 last week and the government of Prime Minister Mark Carney plans to speed its own Bill C-5 through the House of Commons by the end of next week. The Ontario legislation would create so-called 'special economic zones' where the province can suspend provincial and municipal laws. Doug Ford's government is expected to designate the Ring of Fire in northern Ontario as the first such zone, despite years of pushback from First Nations. The federal bill has two parts — one to break down federal barriers to internal trade and the other to fast-track major projects. It sets out five criteria to determine whether a project is in the 'national interest.' Chiefs in Ontario have staged protests outside Queen's Park opposing the provincial legislation, which they say violates their rights. First Nations leaders have meanwhile warned Ottawa that it can expect to find itself in court if it doesn't properly consult with First Nations on its own legislation. McLeod said 'shutting down the economy of Ontario is not off the table' and that if police want to 'avoid another Dudley George,' they need to understand First Nations' position. George was shot and killed during the Ipperwash crisis of 1995, when members of the Kettle and Stony Point First Nation and their supporters occupied a provincial park built on land appropriated from the First Nation in 1942. McLeod said he told the police that First Nations are abiding by their own laws while governments are breaking their treaty obligations. 'This isn't by chance that we're getting these bills that are almost identical,' McLeod said. 'There's no honour in the Crown going through these processes. And it's just going to not only trigger Ontario Idle No More 2.0, but it's going to trigger a nationwide Idle No More.' Idle No More was a 2012 protest movement against the omnibus Bill C-45, introduced by then-prime minister Stephen Harper's government. Indigenous leaders said the bill, intended to ramp up resource development, would trample on their rights while giving governments and businesses more authority to develop resources without thorough environmental assessments. Leaders allied with the Idle No More movement staged protests, rallies and blockades on railway lines and highways and earned widespread support from across the country. The Ontario Provincial Police did not immediately respond to a request for comment. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025. Alessia Passafiume, The Canadian Press
CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
High court overturns B.C. sex assault conviction, clarifies ‘confusion' over evidence
The Supreme Court of Canada is pictured in Ottawa, Monday, June 3, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick The Supreme Court of Canada says a British Columbia man convicted of sexual assault in 2022 should get a new trial because social media messages used as evidence against him were admitted to court without a proper hearing. The court says the ruling confirms that it's not just evidence about a sexual assault complainant's history of sexual activity that's inadmissible at trial without a hearing — but also their history of sexual inactivity. The ruling released Friday says Dustin Kinamore was 22 when he met the 16-year-old complainant in May 2020, and they exchanged sexualized social media messages that became key pieces of evidence at trial. The ruling says the messages were introduced by the Crown to show the complainant wasn't interested in a sexual relationship with Kinamore — but the trial judge didn't hold an admissibility hearing, highlighting 'uncertainty' around rules governing evidence about a complainant's sexual history. The decision says the messages were evidence of sexual inactivity, and confusion about their use in the trial arose because they were introduced by the prosecution rather than the defence. The court ruled that evidence about a complainant's past sexual inactivity is presumed inadmissible, quashed Kinamore's conviction and ordered a new trial because the messages were used without a hearing to precisely determine relevance. The ruling says so-called 'sexual history evidence' is presumed inadmissible because it can perpetuate 'myths and stereotypes' about complainants. 'The increasing complexity of sexual offence trials in Canada poses a challenge to our overburdened criminal justice system. One source of complexity lies in the application of the rules that govern evidence of a complainant's sexual history,' Chief Justice Wagner wrote, with the other judges agreeing. 'Although these evidentiary rules are essential to eliminate discriminatory myths and stereotypes from the fact-finding process and safeguard the dignity, privacy, and equality interests of complainants, uncertainty about their scope and procedural requirements has caused unnecessary confusion and disruption.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025.
