
CNN parts ways with correspondent months after his story cost network millions in defamation suit
Months after his story on a security contractor in Afghanistan resulted in the network paying out millions of dollars to settle a defamation lawsuit, Alex Marquardt announced he was departing CNN as its chief national correspondent.
'Some personal news: I'm leaving CNN after 8 terrific years,' Marquardt tweeted on Monday. 'Tough to say goodbye but it's been an honor to work among the very best in the business. Profound thank you to my comrades on the National Security team & the phenomenal teammates I've worked with in the US and abroad.'
Marquardt's public acknowledgment that he was leaving the network came just as Status News founder Oliver Darcy, a former CNN colleague of the veteran correspondent, reported that CNN had dismissed Marquardt over 'editorial differences.'
A CNN spokesperson declined to comment on what led to Marquardt's departure, stating that the network does 'not comment on personnel matters.' The spokesperson, however, did state that Marquardt's tweet saying he was leaving CNN was accurate.
Earlier this year, however, an investigative story that Marquardt produced and reported about private contractors charging exorbitant fees to desperate refugees looking to flee war-torn Afghanistan was at the center of a defamation complaint filed by Zachary Young, a US Navy veteran who was the only contractor named in the piece.
According to Young's lawsuit, the story – which first ran in 2021 – falsely tied him to 'black market' operations in Afghanistan following the withdrawal of American forces from the country. He noted that Marquardt's report suggested that his activities were criminal, leading to his inability to make a living as his reputation had been destroyed. Young testified in court that his business only charged corporate sponsors to evacuate Afghans and did not target individual residents.
While the story itself didn't explicitly accuse Young of criminal behavior, on-air graphics when the report was featured on The Lead with Jake Tapper included the term 'black market,' which eventually led the network to issue an apology the following year. However, CNN's correction stating that it 'did not intend to suggest that Mr. Young participated in a black market' was not sufficient for Young, who soon filed his lawsuit against the network.
After two days of deliberations following a trial that took place in a deeply conservative Florida district, a jury found CNN liable for defamation and awarded Young $4 million in financial damages and $1 million for emotional damage. The network would then reach a settlement with Young for an undisclosed amount as the trial was set to enter the second phase to determine punitive damages.
Marquardt, along with several other network employees, testified during the two-week trial. For his part, he maintained that CNN's initial correction to the story was unnecessary and that it was only done at the behest of the outlet's legal team in hopes of avoiding a lawsuit.
'I reported the facts. I reported what I found. Everything in there was factual, accurate and, I believe, fair,' Marquardt said during the trial, objecting to Young's legal team describing the story as a 'hit piece' against the plaintiff. 'You needed a bad guy for your scandal story,' Young's attorney Devin Freedman asked Marquardt at one point. 'You hated him, did you not?'
In the end, it may have been the Slack messages and emails from Marquardt to other editors about the story that were presented in court that sealed the trial's fate. Marquardt and other CNN staffers referred to Young as a 'sh*tbag' with a 'punchable face,' with the now-former CNN correspondent saying he was 'gonna nail this Zachary Young mf***er.'
Following the verdict and settlement, a CNN spokesperson told The Independent: 'We remain proud of our journalists and are 100% committed to strong, fearless and fair-minded reporting at CNN, though we will of course take what useful lessons we can from this case.'
Reacting to Marquardt's departure from the network, an attorney for Young said that his client 'believes the universe tends to reconcile things in its own time' and that 'some outcomes speak for themselves.'
Marquardt, who briefly served as a campaign reporter for CNN in 2008, returned to the network nearly a decade later and was eventually promoted to chief national security correspondent in late 2023. Marquardt also occasionally filled in as an anchor.
The case also came at a very perilous time for news organizations, especially as the general public – and particularly conservatives – had grown increasingly discontent with legacy media outlets.
With the trial taking place just weeks after ABC News paid Donald Trump $15 million to settle his defamation lawsuit, legal experts urged CNN to reach a settlement with Young, mainly in light of the 'damning' text messages from Marquardt that had been made public. Additionally, a judge ruled that the burden of proof was lower to prove CNN acted with 'actual malice' because Young was not a public figure.
said. 'Admit you're wrong. Admit your hyperbole was out of line, and move on.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
Future of Vivergo Fuels plant 'hanging in the balance', says boss
Workers from the UK's largest bioethanol plant have visited Westminster to raise concerns the facility could close within days without government of Vivergo Fuels in Saltend, near Hull, said the plant's future was "hanging in the balance" after the removal of a 19% tariff on US ethanol imports, which was part of the recent UK-US trade firm said that without urgent action, the plant, which employs more than 160 people, would no longer be government said it was working closely with the industry to understand the impacts of the trade deal and it was open to discussions over potential support. According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, about 35 workers made the trip to Hackett, managing director of Vivergo Fuels, said: "With the future of the Vivergo plant hanging in the balance, our workers felt compelled to speak directly to their MPs about what is at stake."This isn't just about one site. It's about protecting thousands of skilled jobs, supporting British farming and preserving a vital part of our green energy infrastructure."MP for Hull East Karl Turner said: "The fact that dozens of workers had to travel from East Yorkshire to Westminster today shows just how serious this situation is."Vivergo is not only a major employer in our region - it's a key player in our green economy and food security."The new mayor of Hull and East Yorkshire, Luke Campbell, urged the government to "rethink" the trade deal with the US to protect British April, Associated British Foods (ABF) said it was in talks with the government to help save its Saltend plant after the company was forced to cut production levels due to low bioethanol Fuels produces bioethanol which is used in E10 petrol.E10, which was introduced in 2021 to help cut carbon emissions, contains up to 10% plant also produces animal feed, which is a by-product of the bioethanol production process. Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.

Leader Live
20 minutes ago
- Leader Live
LTA commits to introducing equal prize money at Queen's and Eastbourne by 2029
Women will play at Queen's Club next week for the first time in more than 50 years at the inaugural HSBC Championships, featuring the likes of Emma Raducanu, Katie Boulter and top-10 stars Madison Keys and Zheng Qinwen. The LTA announced on Thursday it would pay total prize money of 1.415million US dollars (approximately £1m), the highest for a WTA 500 event of its draw size this year. A post shared by LTA (@lta) But that is still less than half of the prize pot that will be paid out to the male players the following week for the equivalent tournament on the ATP Tour. At the Lexus Eastbourne Open, a joint WTA and ATP event staged the week before Wimbledon beginning on June 23, the difference is even starker, with the women's prize fund of 389,000 US dollars (approximately £287,000) significantly inferior to the more than £630,000 that will be paid to the men. While prize money is equal at the grand slams and some joint tour events, generally remuneration on the WTA Tour is substantially lower than the ATP. The LTA stated an aim to achieve parity before 2029 but its rationale comes against a £4million loss made across the grass-court events it staged last year – Wimbledon is run by the All England Club – with the men's event at Queen's the only profitable tournament. Scott Lloyd, the governing body's chief executive, said: 'We are making significant increases this year to the women's prize money at Queen's and Eastbourne and want to achieve equal prize money as soon as possible. 'The LTA is committed to growing women's tennis, both at professional and grass-roots level, and this move is an important part of that commitment. 'This year fans will be able to enjoy both men's and women's tennis on the biggest stages that we can offer and we want to develop the tournaments so that the women's events deliver a path to profitability and greater visibility for the sport.' Ticket sales for the women's event at Queen's are currently around 80 per cent, with the men's tournament sold out, while 55 per cent of those purchasing WTA tickets have been female.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Musk says Trump would have lost election without him as clash between the two escalates
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.