logo
Mulcair: Liberals must heed lessons on connecting 'two Quebecs'

Mulcair: Liberals must heed lessons on connecting 'two Quebecs'

An environmental research team from McGill University made front-page news in the Journal de Montréal this past weekend about their discovery of massive environmental devastation stretching from the South Shore of Montreal to the U.S. border.
The McGill team, styled 'Leadership for the Ecozoic,' had been studying the watershed of the Châteauguay River with colleagues from Vermont. Their landmark research revealed that the entire region had become a dumping ground for tens of thousands of truckloads of construction, demolition and other waste. The long-term damage to the environment, in particular to the underground water, is incalculable.
This incredible work was not just important for the ecosystems, it is, to me, symbolic of a positive evolution I've been seeing in the institutions of the English-speaking community.
Ever since the Legault government decided to undermine McGill and Concordia, I've noticed an enhanced presence of both universities at academic and research events. Their work has always been world class, but now, more than ever it seems, it's being connected to the wider community — and it's a good thing for the universities and for life here in Quebec.
Over the past few months I've seen and heard researchers from McGill, Concordia and Bishops at conferences on the environment and on pressing social issues. The most recent ACFAS assizes included a thoughtful conference on Section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on minority language education rights.
ACFAS (founded in 1923 as the Association canadienne-française pour l'avancement des sciences) is the premier organization promoting research and science in French in Canada. To see QUESCREN (the Quebec English-speaking Communities Research Network) out of Concordia organizing a part of the activities was positively refreshing. To hear these complex legal and social issues being shared and discussed dispassionately and professionally was also more than welcome.
This evolution opens onto the wider question of how we can connect the 'two Quebecs': greater Montreal, and the rest of the province dominated by the Coalition Avenir Québec in the last two provincial elections.
Understanding that urban-rural divide is central to the race now taking place for the leadership of the Quebec Liberal Party. There are three main contenders: Karl Blackburn, former MNA from Roberval and Conseil du patronat head; Charles Milliard, a pharmacist and former head of the Fédération des chambres de commerce du Québec; and Pablo Rodriguez, a former federal minister.
Rodriguez has strong support within the QLP caucus that is dominated by Montrealers like himself. Unfortunately for the Liberals, the entire province gets to decide the result of the next election, not just Montreal.
Watching their first debate in Laval early this month I was struck by how little Rodriguez seemed to know about Quebec and its institutions. He was the only participant who was obliged to constantly flip through a binder of notes to find something to say, and it's easy to understand: He spent his entire career in Ottawa.
It now appears clear that no one will win on the first round of voting. The rules of this leadership contest provide that only the two top finishers will take part in the run-off vote, and that provides hope for a candidate who can speak to all of Quebec.
Milliard has rallied a lot of support from the youth wing, but Blackburn's numbers appear the most promising for a second-round win, owing to his widespread popularity in the regions.
The QLP is a large tent that brings together federalists of very different stripes. It includes many Quebecers who vote Conservative or NDP federally. To win, the QLP cannot be seen to be the federal Liberal party in Quebec; otherwise, votes will again peel off to the Quebec Conservatives and Québec solidaire.
It would be nice to see our universities' spirit of openness to working with the wider Quebec society pierce the wall of the QLP Montreal caucus.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This is what happens when you ask an AI slop factory to write like me
This is what happens when you ask an AI slop factory to write like me

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

This is what happens when you ask an AI slop factory to write like me

Could AI steal my writing job? A month ago, skeptical of almost everything American AI tech bros promise, and watching AI produce enough word slop to raise sea levels even further, I asked ChatGPT to imitate my work. Be me, I said. 'Please write a 650-word column on modern feminism in the style of Heather Mallick.' It responded personally, which will never not be creepy. 'Certainly! Here's a 650-word column on modern feminism in the style of Heather Mallick, known for her incisive wit, left-leaning commentary, and sharp turns of phrase.' Enough with the flattery. First, that's not what I'm known for. I'm known to my readers for having once fended off a rabid raccoon with a dessert fork. Thank you, yes, still proud. The raccoon won of course but this is the Canadian spirit I suspect Prime Minister Mark Carney seeks in us. I am known to neighbours for my busy little litter pickup stick. I am known to my family for my vast library of everything Virginia Woolf, which sadly they have never once consulted. I am known to my husband. Fun fact: I am noted for my fascination with political hair, from the damp peaty helmet of Stephen Harper to Pierre Poilievre's product-heavy pompadour. Didn't spot that, did you, ChatGPT. I am distrait. The initial ChatGPT Uriah Heep pseudo-compliments repel me but the fantasy column that follows is pure OnlyFans. What should I call this slop generator? Dr. Tobias Funke of 'Arrested Development' fame? Chareth Cutestory? Or just Brian? Chareth it is. Second, ditch the placatory exclamation point, Chareth. Third, Chareth arches its spine so hard to come up with its 'sharp turns of phrase' that its back snaps. The spew that follows is a slurry of poorly chosen, inaccurate, unsuitable words in contorted combinations, all shaved phrasings of opinions I don't share. The metaphors aren't just laboured, they're shapes foreign to English speakers rendered in colours unknown to nature. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Worst of all, it tries too hard. A sample of Chareth being me: 'I had thought feminism would mellow with age. (No, I didn't.) Like a fine Stilton (all Stiltons are pretty alike) or a retired cat (calling a cat 'retired' is a faded cute-ism) it might purr with wisdom, (cats have no wisdom, they're cats) its battles won. But modern feminism is as necessary as coffee on a Monday (why Monday, why coffee?) and as reviled as truth at a shareholders' meeting (lame).' It described faux-feminism: 'You too can shatter glass ceilings if you first perfect your morning routine and drink mushroom-infused adaptogenic lattes. It's feminism as marketed by Gwyneth Paltrow, repackaged with a sense of self-optimization that makes me scream into a bar of soap.' This is awful. It's word slurry from the 2010s, none of it mine. Chareth's modus operandi is to pick nouns, proper and otherwise, and glue them to phrases from anything published online. The problem is, as you learn when you read a news story about a subject you're familiar with, much of what is online is factually wrong. Chareth may have good burglar's tools. But what it steals is shoddy, its logic assembled out of pretzels and spit. I asked Chareth to have another go. 'Certainly! Here is a 650-word column on modern feminism in the voice and tone of Heather Mallick for a Toronto Star audience — informed, progressive, and a bit weary from the world but still hopeful.' The resulting AI piece was insulting to Star readers, particularly mine, the crème de la crème. It began: 'Modern feminism is like the TTC on a snowy Monday: underfunded, misunderstood, and yet expected to show up without complaint.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW I am no longer distrait, I am irate. What is TTC feminism? Is Chareth suggesting the Star hyper-fixates on local transit? Fine, I'll cancel next week's excellent column on what the hygiene-conscious subway rider should be wearing nowadays, which is hip waders, frankly. Chareth's fake Star column manically links diverse talking points: sexual harassment inside tiny homes; Uber surge pricing for women in Bangladesh; and serums for underfunded shelters. Cute stories, Chareth, woven from bear spray and barcodes. Finally, I asked for a column in the style of a mainstream American journalist. I call them 'boneless chicken' columns. They use buffered phrases like 'some may say,' and 'it seems that.' Pale, smooth, without assertion or even a point, they do fill the space. But such writers live a restful life. Chareth, please write a soporific column, a propofol in prose, in the style of a gentler Heather Mallick. A drowsy numbness drains the senses. Oh look, Star readers are snoring. Heather's passed out. Just look at what Chareth Cutestory, AI's badly trained seal, can deliver.

Hanes: STM public-transit strike could be harbinger of doom spiral to come
Hanes: STM public-transit strike could be harbinger of doom spiral to come

Montreal Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Hanes: STM public-transit strike could be harbinger of doom spiral to come

By We take it for granted in Montreal that any time we descend the escalator to the underground platform, a métro train will arrive shortly to whisk us to another part of the city. It happens every few minutes from early morning until after midnight. Ditto for the bus. If we stand at the stop long enough — and sometimes it's a while, depending on the (in)frequency of the route or delays caused by traffic — the bus will eventually pull up to the curb and off we'll go. It's a critical service we depend on, but one we often take it for granted. So Montrealers could be in for a rude awakening next week. If maintenance workers at the Société de transport de Montréal make good on a plan to go on stirke, métro and bus service will be drastically curtailed. Because public transit is an essential service — a sign of its importance — it can't be halted completely. But the reduced schedule that the Tribunal administratif du Québec signed off on will still be a shock. Service will operate at normal levels only during three time slots each day, starting Monday. The métro will operate from 6:30 a.m. to 9:38 a.m., 2:45 p.m. to 5:48 p.m. and 11 p.m. to 1 a.m. Buses will run from 6:15 a.m. to 9:15 a.m.., 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. and 11:15 p.m. to 1:15 p.m. Outside those hours, there will be no other transit service Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. Brace yourselves. As of Thursday, métros and buses will run at half-capacity during off-peak hours, and at regular intervals during those three daily windows. There will be full restoration of service for the Grand Prix weekend, to avoid hurting the marquee event or besmirching Montreal's international reputation. Then the rush-hour and 50-per-cent itinerary will return for two more days. The approved strike concludes June 17. At least for now. This major disruption should only be temporary, depending on how quickly the union and management hammer out a new contract. But it could nevertheless offer a harrowing glimpse of Montreal's future in the event of a transit doom spiral. This vicious cycle, described by McGill University researchers, is when cutbacks to mass transit precipitate declines in ridership that lead to further losses in revenue and reductions to service. It's a crisis that undermines the long-term sustainability, viability and attractiveness of a vital public good. Once triggered, it's difficult to reverse. Sadly, a doom spiral is a not-so-remote possibility in Montreal, where transit operations face a growing structural deficit. The Autorité régionale de transport métropolitaine, which funds and runs public transport in the greater Montreal area, faces a shortfall of $2 billion over five years, which has been a source of ongoing friction between Montreal and the province. The Quebec government has only agreed to fill part of the hole in each of the last few years, leaving Montreal, other municipalities, and transit operators to come up with the rest — or face the spectre of painful cuts. The STM has contemplated closing the métro earlier at night and has reduced the frequency of bus lines that were supposed to arrive every 10 minutes. The ARTM has warned it may have to axe entire Exo commuter train routes and limit departures on others, all of which are lifelines connecting suburbs to the city. To offset the deficit, the Communauté métropolitain de Montréal tripled its vehicle registration fee this year to raise more than $320 million for transit. But it's still not enough. Montreal needs more transit, not less. Yet what we have is inexcusably at risk. This unresolved issue is crying out for a permanent fix. If only the Quebec government of Premier François Legault would recognize the importance of public transit to Montreal's economic, social and environmental well-being and commit to supporting what already exists, while investing in new infrastructure. Pollution from transportation is, after all, the largest and fastest-growing share of Quebec's greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to the climate emergency. Road congestion is a huge drain on productivity. We're about to get a sneak peek of what happens when transit service is slashed. Students might have to rush home from school to avoid getting stranded. Shift workers may not be able get to and from their jobs outside of rush hour. Office employees could skip the 5 à 7 or the gym workout to make it home before service is shut down. Passengers could be packed in like sardines. More people will end up driving, worsening Montreal's already hellish traffic and spewing more emissions. Many will work from home, harming the post-pandemic recovery of downtown. Even this brief interruption could have long-lasting ramifications. The strike should serve as a wakeup call that we must avert a doom spiral for Montreal transit at all costs.

Trump's latest move on aluminum tariffs defies all logic, Legault says
Trump's latest move on aluminum tariffs defies all logic, Legault says

Montreal Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Trump's latest move on aluminum tariffs defies all logic, Legault says

By QUEBEC — U.S. President Donald Trump's latest move on trade tariffs, penalizing the Canadian and Quebec economies, defies all logic, Premier François Legault said Wednesday, 'What he is doing with aluminum does not stand up,' Legault said, arriving for question period at the legislature. 'What we are realizing is Mr. Trump is defying all logic.' After saying last week that he would double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, Trump acted Tuesday, signing an executive order raising U.S. tariffs from 25 per cent to 50 per cent as of 12:01 am Wednesday. Legault immediately responded on social media, saying it was an 'unjustified decision which hurts our workers, our economy as well as that of the United States.' Les nouveaux tarifs de Donald Trump sur notre acier et notre aluminium entrent en vigueur demain. Une décision injustifiée qui nuit à nos travailleurs, à notre économie, ainsi qu'à celle des Américains. On suit la situation de très près. Nos programmes d'aide sont disponibles,… — François Legault (@francoislegault) June 4, 2025 'Of course we are disappointed,' Legault said, sounding exasperated with Trump's flipflops and policy changes. 'Putting 50-per-cent tariffs on aluminum and steel is completely illogical, particularly for aluminum.' He noted the United States gets 60 per cent of its aluminum from Quebec and is unable to produce more than it does now. The immediate result will be to increase the costs of producing automobiles for Ford and General Motors, he said. 'They will be obliged to increase their prices, it will reduce the demand so it will penalize Quebec workers, but also American workers a lot.' He said there was a meeting Tuesday between Dominique Leblanc, the federal minister of intergovernmental affairs, and U.S. secretary for trade Howard Lutnick, 'and nothing came of it.' 'It seems nobody can bring him back to reason. We don't understand what he's doing.' Legault said Quebec already has programs in place to help Quebec companies through the storm, but, 'We hope Mr. Trump will change his mind.' 'It more important than ever to speed up all the economic projects we have to replace and be able to create jobs, particularly in the regions of Quebec,' he said. He used the situation to press the opposition parties to end their blocking of legislation overhauling Quebec's energy sector, Bill 69. With rumours flying that the Coalition Avenir Québec make invoke closure to fast-track the bill into law, Legault said there are a series of projects in the regions depending on the new law. Legault said he intends to again discuss the situation Thursday with Prime Minister Mark Carney to make a pitch for expanding aide programs for multinational companies. And Legault announced he will head to France from June 13 to 16 to participate in the 55th annual Paris air show at Le Bourget. He plans to meet major players in the aeronautical and aerospace field to stimulate business for Quebec companies to make up for losses on the American markets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store