
Medicare Update: What Trump's New Budget Request Says About Program
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Trump administration's newly released Fiscal Year 2026 budget proposal calls for targeted cuts to Medicare and Medicaid operations. The administration said it will eliminate "wasteful" and "woke" initiatives while maintaining direct benefits to tens of millions of Americans.
Why It Matters
More than 70 million people rely on Medicare and Medicaid for health coverage in the U.S.
Democrats have long been raising concerns that President Donald Trump's administration and Republicans will make cuts to these popular programs, but Trump has insisted he will not. The administration has pledged to root out waste, fraud and abuse of these programs, which it says will save money.
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks in the Cross Hall of the White House during an event on "Investing in America" on April 30, 2025 in Washington, DC.
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks in the Cross Hall of the White House during an event on "Investing in America" on April 30, 2025 in Washington, DC.What To Know
According to budget request released by the White House on Friday, the administration aims to "eliminate funding that had been used to carry out non-statutory, wasteful, and woke activities" and will end "unnecessary DEI and support contracts."
It also proposes cuts to programs focused on health equity and public outreach related to the Inflation Reduction Act, which passed in 2022 during the administration of former President Joe Biden. The White House emphasized that none of the proposed changes will reduce benefits to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries.
Under the new budget, congressional committees would be tasked with identifying administrative savings within Medicaid and Medicare—totaling up to $880 billion in reductions over 10 years.
The Trump administration says the savings will come from eliminating nonessential contracts and focusing agency resources on core health service functions. "This cut will have no impact on providing benefits to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries," the administration's budget says.
Critics have raised concerns that such large budget reductions could eventually affect service delivery.
"You cannot materially cut spending strictly through administrative tweaks," Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group, previously told Newsweek. "The cost is embedded within the system itself—health care pricing, insurers, regulatory structures, all of it."
At the same time, federal oversight of Medicare programs is ramping up in other ways.
The Department of Justice recently opened investigations into alleged kickbacks between Medicare Advantage brokers and insurers. Prosecutors are examining whether middlemen improperly steered seniors toward plans based on the incentives they received, not on patient needs.
Newsweek reached out to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for comment.
What People Are Saying
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, to CNN: "The White House has made a commitment. The president said over and over and over, 'We're not going to touch Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid.' We've made the same commitment. Now that said, what we are going to do is go into those programs and carve out the fraud, waste and abuse, and find efficiencies."
Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek: "This is political sleight of hand, plain and simple. What they're calling 'woke activities' are actually programs designed to reach underserved communities. Why target health equity initiatives? Because they're easier to label as unnecessary than admitting to benefit cuts."
"The math doesn't work. You can't slash billions without consequences. It's like removing the foundation but promising the house won't collapse."
Smile Insurance Group CEO Chris Fong told Newsweek: "The new budget and the statements made by Trump is counterintuitive to each other in actual practice. There are currently numerous examples of government benefits that are being under utilized because lack of knowledge and education that those benefits exist. Additionally, an argument can be made that this budget is discriminatory towards certain groups of US citizens by making it much harder to know about and access these benefits."
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The new budget proposals do scale back from some of the bigger, broader cuts to Medicaid and Medicare that were originally proposed. Medicaid and Medicare are two of the most popular government programs, and there was a general belief that major cuts to them would trigger a backlash at the ballot box in future years."
"Still, it's hard to imagine the cuts to administration and recipient resources would be enough to add up to the lofty funding the budget hopes to save. The jury is still out as to whether the final budget will impact recipients' coverage in any way."
Senator Bill Cassidy, a Louisiana Republican, told CNBC: "The president has said, for example, that he doesn't want to touch Medicare and Medicaid...He's saying don't cut benefits to beneficiaries."
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Every time I hear the word 'woke' used in a budget conversation, it hits like a dog whistle. A term that once stood for awareness and justice has been twisted into a pejorative. That kind of rebranding, turning something powerful into something weaponized is frustrating, but not surprising, but I digress."
What Happens Next
The Trump administration's budget still needs approval from Congress, where Democrats are likely to push back against reductions to health equity initiatives and DEI programs. Meanwhile, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are expected to closely scrutinize how the administration defines and implements "wasteful" or "duplicative" spending.
Legislative debate over the final budget terms is expected to continue through the summer, but there's doubt on how the budget could actually be enacted without shrinking benefits. "When politicians say cuts won't affect services, check your wallet and your pulse," Ryan said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
25 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 12:44 IST In what appears to be a shift in tone, Elon Musk on Tuesday posted that he regrets some of his recent remarks about President Donald Trump, saying, 'They went too far.' I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 This comes just days after Trump addressed their ongoing feud, stating he wished Musk 'very well' and suggesting the tech mogul might be seeking a conversation. In a gesture that caught attention, Musk had responded with a heart emoji on X (formerly Twitter), sparking speculation about a possible reconciliation. Tensions between the two escalated last week after Musk called Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' a 'pork-filled abomination' and accused the President of suppressing Jeffrey Epstein-related files. The latter post, which Musk later deleted, reportedly infuriated Trump, who retaliated with harsh criticism and even threatened to sever government contracts with Musk-led firms. The feud intensified when Musk countered by threatening to halt NASA-linked SpaceX missions and claimed Trump would have lost the 2024 election without his support. He also floated the possibility of impeachment. However, Musk's latest message—posted at 12:34 PM on June 11—marks a notable departure from his confrontational stance, possibly signaling the beginning of a de-escalation. While no official conversation has been confirmed, both camps appear to be softening their positions, leaving the door open for future dialogue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.


Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Releases Photos of Aircraft Carriers Beyond First Island Chain
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China released photos showing its aircraft carriers conducting "training exercises" in the western Pacific beyond the first island chain, which is intended to keep its navy in check. "The training complies with relevant international law and practice, and is not targeted at specific countries or entity," a Chinese navy spokesperson said in a statement on Tuesday. Why It Matters The first island chain—comprising Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines—is one of three Pacific island defense lines established by the United States, utilizing its own territories as well as those of its allies and partners, with the goal of restricting China's naval activities. The Chinese navy, the largest in the world by hull count, deployed its aircraft carriers—CNS Liaoning and CNS Shandong—to the eastern side of the first island chain simultaneously for the first time over the weekend, challenging the U.S.'s naval dominance in the region. Meanwhile, the Liaoning became China's first aircraft carrier to be spotted operating in waters east of the second island chain, which stretches from Japan to New Guinea—north of Australia—via Guam, the westernmost U.S. territory that serves as a military hub. What To Know Senior Captain Wang Xuemeng, a spokesperson for the Chinese navy, confirmed in the statement that both the Liaoning and the Shandong had been deployed to the western Pacific Ocean in recent days to test their capabilities in "far-sea defense and joint operations." The spokesperson said the dual aircraft carrier deployment was a "routine arrangement included in the annual training plan," which sought to improve the ability of the Chinese navy—officially known as the People's Liberation Army Navy—to fulfill its missions. Chinese aircraft carriers CNS Liaoning, top, and CNS Shandong, bottom, conducting flight operations with J-15 fighter jets in the western Pacific Ocean in early June. Chinese aircraft carriers CNS Liaoning, top, and CNS Shandong, bottom, conducting flight operations with J-15 fighter jets in the western Pacific Ocean in early June. Chinese military Official photos show both Chinese aircraft carriers launching J-15 fighter jets at an undisclosed location in the western Pacific Ocean during both day and night. A supply ship attached to one of the aircraft carriers was seen providing supplies to a destroyer. However, it remains unclear whether the Liaoning and the Shandong were operating in the same vicinity. They were last tracked underway on the eastern and western sides of the second island chain, respectively, according to a map published by Newsweek. Japan, a U.S. ally that tracks and monitors the Chinese navy, has made a "proper request" to China through diplomatic channels regarding the activities of the Chinese aircraft carriers, Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said at a news conference on Tuesday. The Chinese supply ship CNS Hulunhu providing supplies to the destroyer CNS Wuxi in the western Pacific Ocean in early June. The Chinese supply ship CNS Hulunhu providing supplies to the destroyer CNS Wuxi in the western Pacific Ocean in early June. Chinese military "China intends to improve the operational capability of its two aircraft carriers and its ability to conduct operations in distant seas and airspace," the minister said, adding that Japan had both the will and the ability to deter unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force. What People Are Saying Lin Jian, a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said on Tuesday: "Let me reiterate that Chinese naval vessels' activities in those waters are fully consistent with international law and international practices. Our national defense policy is defensive in nature. We hope Japan will view those activities objectively and rationally." Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said on Tuesday: "In any case, the Ministry of Defense and the Self-Defense Forces will continue to closely monitor the movements of the Chinese Navy vessels, including these two aircraft carriers, and will take all possible measures to conduct surveillance activities." What Happens Next China's dual aircraft carrier deployment comes as two U.S. aircraft carriers—USS Nimitz and USS George Washington—are underway in separate areas of the western Pacific Ocean.

29 minutes ago
Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'