Richmond police chief says he'll announce campaign for Wayne County sheriff on June 12
RICHMOND, IN — Richmond Police Chief Kyle Weatherly has announced he will run for Wayne County sheriff in the 2026 election to replace outgoing Sheriff Randy Retter.
Weatherly said in a Facebook announcement Tuesday night that he will formally announce his candidacy June 12 at 5:30 p.m. at Smiley's Pub & Beer Garden, 39 N. 8th St.
"For more than two decades, I've served Wayne County, not for recognition, but because this place is home," Weatherly said in his announcement. "And now … it's time for what's next."
Weatherly was named Richmond police chief by then-Mayor-elect Ron Oler on Nov. 16, 2023, after working with the Wayne County Sheriff's Department for 22 years.
At the time of his departure from the department, where he had spent his entire law enforcement career up to that point, Weatherly was the supervisor of detectives and of the investigations division.
"Come hear about my vision for Wayne County, ask questions and connect with those who care deeply about public safety and our community," he said about his upcoming campaign launch. "After all, we're not just running a campaign — we're building a team to serve you."
Retter is in his second term and is ineligible to run again, according to Indiana election laws.
Weatherly's campaign website and Facebook page do not indicate a party affiliation. A phone call requesting more information Wednesday was not immediately returned.
Evan Weaver is a news and sports reporter at The Palladium-Item. Contact him on X (@evan_weaver7) or email at eweaver@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Richmond Palladium-Item: Richmond Police Chief Weatherly announces bid for Wayne County sheriff
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Every Election Is Now Existential
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. A few days before the Polish presidential election on Sunday, a Polish friend of mine received an unexpected message from someone she had not seen for 20 years. The woman had found my friend on Facebook, noticed that she was supporting the candidacy of Rafał Trzaskowski—the mayor of Warsaw, a liberal centrist—and begged her to change her mind. She asked her to vote instead for Karol Nawrocki, a nationalist historian, former boxer, and veteran of street fights that he describes as 'noble battles.' She sent my friend a copy of an anonymous appeal that has shown up elsewhere on social media but seems to have been one of many similar warnings spread widely by email. It began like this: Before you put your ballot in the ballot box, call up your memories. Open your eyes, clear your mind, reach for the truth—not the one on TV, but the one you carry in your heart, the truth acquired from life, from work, from the blood spilled on this land. Because I am married to the Polish foreign minister, Radek Sikorski, and because he was briefly a presidential candidate in the past, I have read a lot of this kind of thing before (and, of course, hereby make a declaration of interest). Nevertheless, the appeal that my friend received seemed to me a particularly striking, almost paradigmatic invocation of the blood-and-soil nationalism that is now part of Polish politics, American politics, and European politics. The message listed all of the crimes allegedly committed by a series of Polish center-right and center-left governments, twisting the record and rewriting the history of the past 30 years into a story of trauma and victimization. One statement accused Trzaskowski and his ilk of having 'allowed foreigners to rob Poland and humiliate us, forcing young people to emigrate in exchange for bread.' In truth, Poland has been a major beneficiary of both foreign investment and European Union funds, has grown consistently for 30 years, and is now one of the fastest-expanding economies in Europe. The level of social spending has grown too. The appeal did not go into these details. Instead, it warned against impending treason: 'Wake up from your lethargy! Look how Poland, your motherland, is being torn apart by external and internal forces. Don't let her be abused, don't let her face be as sad as the soil of a graveyard.' The language used by Trzaskowski's campaign and his supporters was very different. On the day after the election, which he lost, the Warsaw mayor wrote that he had wanted to build a 'strong, safe, honest, empathetic Poland. A modern Poland in which everyone will be able to fulfill their goals and aspirations.' It was an optimistic message—but also a message that, at least among a large part of the population, could not compete with blood, graveyards, humiliation, and treason. The election was so close that exit polls predicted a narrow win for Trzaskowski on Sunday evening. But by Monday morning, the tiny majority had swung the other way. Nawrocki won with 50.89 percent of the vote, to Trzaskowski's 49.11 percent. Poland's constitution has some peculiarities, so the impact on policy and politics is not straightforward. The Civic Platform party, to which Trzaskowski belongs, now runs the government as part of a three-party coalition of the center left and center right. The coalition won parliamentary elections in October 2023, following eight years of governments led by the Law and Justice party, which nominated Nawrocki. During its two terms in office, Law and Justice politicized the Polish court system, as well as the civil service and public media; it created a string of taxpayer-funded foundations designed to support the party and enrich some of its members. The current government has been unable to reverse all of these policies because President Andrzej Duda, also aligned with the previous regime, has vetoed or threatened to veto all of the changes. The election of Nawrocki does not change Polish foreign policy. The Polish prime minister, not the president, will continue to control domestic policy, budgets, and trade. But because the president can veto legislation and pardon criminals, Nawrocki's election probably means that the courts cannot be repaired, and that those who broke the law or stole from the state will not face any consequences. For people who spent the past decade trying to fix Poland's judicial system and protect Polish democracy, this is dispiriting, even devastating, and the same kinds of recriminations and anger that followed the 2024 American presidential election are echoing around Poland this week. But for anyone fighting creeping authoritarianism anywhere else, there is a larger lesson: The language of blood and soil, which has once again become central to public debate in many democracies, is very powerful. It helps many people explain a complex world. It cannot easily be defeated or dismissed in one electoral cycle. The triumphant election of a centrist coalition in 2023 did not remove it from Polish politics, just as the election of Joe Biden in 2020 did not weaken its power in the U.S. At the same time, the election of Nawrocki also does not mean, as so many will now be tempted to write, that nationalism in Poland or Europe is 'on the rise.' In fact, this knife-edge election result in Poland is almost exactly the same as the knife-edge result in the country's presidential election five years ago. Had Trzaskowski won an additional 0.9 percent of the votes, that would not have spelled final defeat for authoritarian populism. Other narrow victories in other places don't either. When a centrist candidate defeated an authoritarian populist in Romania a few weeks ago, some were trumpeting that as the possible start of a trend. But the same challenge will emerge in Romania during the next election too, and will once again be the defining argument of the campaign. And that is how all elections will look, for a long time to come. Although many hoped otherwise, we do not seem to be returning to a world in which the center left and the center right compete over tax rates or budgets. Economic and policy arguments just don't matter as much to people right now as these deeper cultural divides. That's why all elections are now existential: Small numbers of voters swinging one way or the next will decide the nature of the state, the future of democracy, the independence of the courts. Every time we go to the polls, politicians will say that every election matters and every vote counts. They will be right. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
That Time the FBI Conspired To Get George Foreman an Award for Boxing
The FBI is concerned with a great many things today. Incels. Orgasm cults. Facebook posts. Safe-deposit boxes. Encryption. But in October 1968, the Bureau was concerned with whether George Foreman got the proper recognition as a boxer. Files released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) show that the Racial Intelligence Section of the FBI's Counterintelligence Division intervened to get Foreman an additional award for his patriotism after winning an Olympic gold medal. Foreman "gave every American an emotional lift when immediately after defeating Inoas Chepulis [Jonas Čepulis] of the Soviet Union…he showed the world that he was proud to be an American by waving a small American flag," Associate Director G.C. Moore wrote in a memo to Assistant Director William Sullivan. The Bureau also saw Foreman as a useful cudgel against domestic opponents. Foreman's patriotic victory display, Moore wrote, "was in sharp contrast with the earlier despicable black power-black gloved demonstration of Tommie Smith and John Carlos on the Olympic victory stand and the anti-Vietnam stand of Cassius Clay." Smith and Carlos were kicked off the American team for making a black power salute after winning a 200-meter race. Clay, who changed his name to Muhammad Ali, had won an Olympic gold medal for boxing in 1960. He was convicted of defying the military draft in 1967—Ali opposed the Vietnam War on religious grounds—a conviction that was overturned in 1971. Back in 1968, Moore suggested helping get Foreman his "justly deserved award," on the recommendation of two special agents who belonged to the American Legion. With the approval of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, the Bureau eventually settled on trying to get Foreman the Americanism Award from the Freedoms Foundation. Although he was nominated for the award, Foreman didn't win that year. He did win a George Washington Honor Medal from the Freedoms Foundation in 1974. Foreman, who died in March 2025, had a long career after his Olympic victory. He remained undefeated until his famous "Rumble in the Jungle" with Ali. He retired in 1977, became a Christian minister in the 1980s, returned to boxing in 1994, and began marketing the famous George Foreman Grill that same year. Reason requested Foreman's FBI file after he passed away, and the Bureau released the memos on his Olympic victory earlier this week. The FBI's interest in Foreman came amidst COINTELPRO, a paranoid Cold War counterintelligence program that treated everyone from draft resisters and Martin Luther King, Jr. to the Ku Klux Klan as vectors for foreign subversion. In addition to trying to get Foreman an award, the Bureau heavily spied on Ali and Carlos. Ali ultimately got the last laugh. During his 1971 match with Joe Frazier, a group of dissidents known as the Citizens Committee to Investigate the FBI used the boxing match as a distraction to break into an FBI office in Pennsylvania and steal the COINTELPRO files. The burglary led to Congress reining in the FBI's power. Fortunately, America has learned from those dark days. Surely, the FBI no longer uses fantasies about foreign conspiracies as an excuse to spy on Americans and interfere with domestic politics. Right? The post That Time the FBI Conspired To Get George Foreman an Award for Boxing appeared first on
Business Wire
3 hours ago
- Business Wire
Win Bacon for a Year with Save A Lot
ST. LOUIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Save A Lot, one of the largest discount grocery chains in the United States, invites bacon lovers everywhere to enter for a chance to win a $500 gift card, equivalent to a year's supply of Farmington ® bacon* ─ an exclusive Save A Lot brand known for its quality and flavor. Customers and fans alike are encouraged to enter the sweepstakes, one of two ways ─ in the Save A Lot App or by mail-in entry. One lucky winner will take home the bacon after a winner is randomly selected June 23. 'What better way to start the summer than with this mouth-watering offer of bacon for a year?' said Katie Kobus, Vice President of Marketing at Save A Lot. 'Whether you're frying it up for breakfast or adding it to your favorite recipes, the winner of this sweepstakes will ensure 2025 is the tastiest yet. And for those who don't walk away with the bacon, Save A Lot always has your back with great deals on your favorite grocery items every day.' Save A Lot believes that everyone should have access to fresh, high quality food options in their hometown. Save A Lot focuses on offering everyday low prices on great tasting, high quality private label brands as well as national brand products, USDA-inspected meat cut fresh in store, farm-fresh fruits and vegetables, and other non-food items. For more information about Save A Lot and the Win Bacon for a Year Sweepstakes, please visit *NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. Sweepstakes begins on or about June 6, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. CT and ends on June 21, 2025, at 11:59 p.m. CT. Open only to legal U.S. residents (excluding Rhode Island residents) who are 18 years of age or older. Prize is $500 gift card. See Official Rules at for complete details. Odds of winning depend on the number of eligible entries received. Void where prohibited. About Save A Lot Founded in 1977, Save A Lot is the largest independently owned and operated discount grocery store chain in the U.S., with approximately 720 stores in 30 states. True to its mission of being a hometown grocer, Save A Lot strives to provide unmatched quality and value to local families. Customers enjoy savings compared to traditional grocery stores on great tasting, high quality private label brands, national brand products, USDA-inspected meat, farm-fresh fruits and vegetables, and other non-food items. For more information visit and follow Save A Lot on Facebook ( on X (@savealot), and Instagram (@SaveALotFoodStores), or for more information on becoming a Save A Lot independent retail operator, visit
