Notices pasted on homes of 28 fugitives directing appearance before courts, cops
Berhampur: Police in Ganjam district on Saturday served proclamation orders against 28 accused in various cases who are on the run for a long period despite warrants issued against them by courts.
Police personnel pasted the notices on the gates of the residences of the offenders.
As per the notices, the warrantees were asked to appear before the respective courts or before police within 30 days. If they failed to do so, steps would be taken to attach their movable and immovable properties, police said.
SP (Ganjam) Suvendu Patra on Sunday said the proclamation proceedings under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) are being conducted in all police stations in order to ensure the presence of fugitives before courts.
"If they fail to appear within the mentioned timeframe, they will face serious consequences, including attachment of properties," he said.
"This process would expedite the speed of pending trials and increase public confidence in the criminal justice system" he said. Some years ago, police had adopted the process, which yielded good results with executing long-pending warrants.
He said proclamation orders have been issued to 28 people in 11 different police stations.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Find the Best Help Desk Software [Explore]
Help Desk Software | search Ads
Search Now
Undo
The highest orders were issued by Gangapur police (5) followed by Bhanjanagar (4), Polasara and Buguda (three each). Most of the accused are on the run for over 10 years after committing various offences, police said.
Jeebananand Jena, inspector in-charge, Bhanjangar police station, said the process has already yielded results as they arrested a 57-year-old accused on Saturday, who was on the run for 22 years. The accused was identified as Sibaram Nayak, a resident of Sana Tulasipalli, he said.
A police team found he was at home when they went to put up the proclamation order and immediately arrested him. He said the accused was allegedly involved in a property offence case (receiver of stolen properties) in 2003 in Berhampur. Despite the court issuing warrants against him several times, he did not turn up, police said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Honeymoon murder: Shillong cops recover burnt bag having Raja Raghuvanshi's jewellery from Indore plot; nab 2 more suspects
INDORE: In a significant breakthrough in the Raja Raghuvanshi murder case, the Shillong police officials recovered the charred remains of the bag which was brought back to Indore by key accused, Sonam, after the murder. The bag, the officials believed, contained key evidence including mobile phones, Raja's gold jewellery. The police have been on the lookout for the bag. The recovery was made from a vacant plot in Hare Krishna Vihar Colony near MR-3 in Indore. The operation was carried out by Shillong Police in coordination with Indore Crime Branch and forensic experts, who collected the partially burnt electronic components and blackened metallic fragments from the site. Balvindar & Silom hold key links to probe in Sonam's escape after murder These remains, which are linked to the murder, have been sealed and are being sent to the Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL) for detailed examination, said police. The location of the remains was revealed by accused Silom, property dealer arrested on Saturday, who led the police to the spot where he admitted to burning the bag with the help of the second accused Ballu alias Balvindar, security guard of the building where Sonam had rented the flat. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The SIT, has been carrying out intensive searches in the city for the past five days looking specifically for the bag hidden in the flat which was rented by Sonam during her stay in Indore while evading arrest. The Shillong SIT officials had on Saturday late night arrested Silom James, a property dealer from Mahalaxmi Nagar in Indore. Silom had rented the flat to Vishal for Rs 17,000 a month. Sonam shifted into the flat after returning to Indore. After the arrests of other accused in the case from Indore, Sonam left for Ghazipur on June 8, leaving the bag behind. Two days later, Silom allegedly entered the flat using a duplicate key and took away bags, clothes, food items, and other belongings which he claimed he destroyed at the vacant plot. Police sources said that CCTV footage sourced by them shows the accused Silom removing the bag from the flat in his car on June 10. Earlier, Silom had appeared before the media on June 13, claiming he recognized one of the accused, Vishal, after seeing him in TV news and newspaper reports. Meanwhile, the second accused Ballu alias Balvindar, was arrested from Ashoknagar and brought to Indore on Sunday afternoon. Both have been booked for aiding murder accused and tampering with evidence. Both accused produced in court Additional DCP Rajesh Dandotiya said that both accused were produced before the court and sent on transit remand for seven days till June 28. Krishna Pandey, defence advocate on behalf of Silom James said, "He was produced before the court and sent on transit remand for seven days. James is just a property dealer and has no direct involvement in the crime. He never spoke to Raj or Sonam and the Shillong police officials have not submitted any audio or video evidence to support this." On being asked how James showed police where he had burnt the bag, Pandey said, "He has no connection with the building in question; he only facilitated the deal as a broker. We have already submitted this in court." The breakthrough came through the statement of an auto-rickshaw driver, Sunil Uchawane, who inadvertently became a key link in the investigation. Sunil, booked via an application by Vishal, had unknowingly transported the bag. Sunil told police that on May 31, around 1pm, he went near Church School in Nandbagh where a young man, suspected to be Vishal alias Vicky, handed him a bag. He was instructed to deliver it to Heera Bagh. About an hour later, upon reaching Heera Bagh Colony near Dewas Naka, another man received the bag and paid his fare. This revelation confirmed that the bag belonging to Sonam and Raja had remained in the flat even after their departure. SIT officials checked the CCTV footage, it was found that while the bag was taken to the flat, it did not come out when Sonam left the city. Two days later, Silom was seen taking it with him. It is suspected that Silom transferred the money and gold somewhere else before burning the electronic appliances and documents including phones, laptop and other items.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Hockey Canada scandal: How police errors nearly buried and delayed the sexual assault case
Experts say original investigation lacked depth and proper focus on consent (Getty Images) In a case that has shaken Canadian hockey and the criminal justice system, five former World Junior hockey players—Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé, and Cal Foote—are on trial for an alleged sexual assault that occurred in 2018 in London, Ontario. While all five have pleaded not guilty, court documents and testimony reveal that the initial police investigation was fraught with missed opportunities, leading experts to call it a prime example of systemic failure in how sexual assault cases are handled. Experts say original investigation lacked depth and proper focus on consent Back in 2019, former London police detective Stephen Newton closed the investigation, telling the complainant—known as E.M. due to a publication ban—that there wasn't enough evidence to proceed. 'I informed her I would be closing the case with no charges,' he wrote. But when new evidence surfaced and Hockey Canada's secret settlement came to light, the investigation was reopened in 2022. A new detective laid charges in early 2024. Police Chief Thai Truong later issued a public apology to E.M. and her family. — globeandmail (@globeandmail) Legal and policing experts interviewed by The Globe and Mail argue that Newton's investigation failed to meet the basic standards for sexual assault cases. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Our one of a kind Patented Cold Water Extraction Process Superior Ginseng Undo Melanie Randall, a Western University law professor, said, 'It's a perfect case study of where things go wrong... with police interviews and investigations.' Newton's narrow focus on whether E.M. had been physically coerced or was too intoxicated to consent missed a broader legal definition of consent. As legal expert Kat Owens put it: 'Colloquially, only yes means yes... You have to be giving an active ongoing consent to each sex act.' Newton admitted during the trial that he did not ask key questions or follow up on vital details, such as surveillance footage or aggressive physical interactions described by E.M. Trauma-informed approach ignored despite request for female investigator E.M.'s emotional state and trauma responses were also poorly handled, experts say. Despite requesting a female lead investigator, Newton stayed on the case, merely involving female officers peripherally. Clinical psychologist Dr. Lori Haskell criticized this, stating, 'It's a trauma-informed response that recognizes the psychological and emotional safety needs of the complainant.' Notably, Newton failed to pursue or review key text messages and surveillance footage. One incriminating message sent from McLeod's phone—'Who wants to be in a 3 way quick. 209 – mikey'—was only uncovered during the reopened investigation by Detective Lyndsey Ryan. That message, now a core piece of the Crown's case, had not even been known to Newton. Also Read: Hockey Canada trial judge faces complex decision as case hinges on unseen question of consent The trial's verdict, expected July 24, could send shockwaves through both Canadian sports and law enforcement, but for now, it underscores one chilling reality: how flawed police work can delay justice in cases that demand it most. Follow all the live updates, scores, and highlights from the India vs England Test match here . Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Owner's risk no excuse: Punjab and Haryana high court holds railways liable for pilferage losses
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court has held the railway department liable for compensating losses due to pilferage of iron consignments even when goods were booked at "owner's risk", clarifying that this classification does not absolve railways of liability if negligence is evident. Citing sections 79, 93, and 94 of the Railways Act, the court has emphasised the duty of the railways to account for consignments once they assume control, even if loaded at private sidings. "The refusal to allow re-weighment, a right under Section 79, was deemed a serious lapse," the court has held. Justice Pankaj Jain passed the order while deciding a 34-year-old matter in the appeals filed by the Steel Authority of India Limited and Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited, challenging the dismissal of their claim petitions by the Railway claims tribunal. The case dates back to the early 1990s, when the steel companies booked consignments of pig iron from Vishakhapatnam to Goraya, Jalandhar. Though the journey was expected to take 6–8 days, the wagons remained in transit for nearly a month. Suspecting pilferage, the consignees requested re-weighment of the goods. However, the request was repeatedly denied by the railway authorities. The companies engaged an independent surveyor, who confirmed significant shortages in the delivered material. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트, 지금 시작하세요 [자세히 보기] 임플란트 더 알아보기 Undo However, the railway tribunal previously rejected their claims on technical grounds, including lack of proper authorisation to file claims and failure to establish service of statutory notices under section 106 of the Railways Act. In its detailed order released last week, Justice Jain held that the railway tribunal erred. The judge held that the regional manager legal, who filed the claim, was duly authorised under a valid board resolution. Further, the court observed that statutory notice was served and backed by affidavit, and no evidence was produced by the railways to refute it. The single bench was also of the view that the denial of re-weighment and failure to counter the surveyor's findings pointed to such negligence. Finally, the court ordered compensation for the claimants for the full extent of the losses suffered, with 7% interest per annum from the date of filing until actual payment. The cause of action arose in the early 1990s, with the case pending before the high court since 1993. MSID:: 121975080 413 |
