NASA astronaut Don Pettit to return to Earth after more than 200 days in space
A veteran NASA astronaut who flew to orbit more than seven months ago with two Russians is preparing to return to Earth.
Don Pettit, who arrived Sept. 11, 2024 for his third-ever stint at the International Space Station, is expected to depart April 19 with two cosmonauts on the same Soyuz space capsule that transported them to the orbital laboratory.
For more than 200 days, Pettit, as well as Alexey Ovchinin and Ivan Vagner – both of Russia's Roscosmos space agency – have lived and worked at the space station while conducting scientific research for future deep space exploration and performing station maintenance. Much of Pettit's time at the station also overlapped with Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams' extended orbital mission following the failure of the astronauts' Boeing Starliner spacecraft.
The impending departure of the three spacefarers would come 11 days after the arrival of a replacement crew that included NASA astronaut Jonny Kim.
Here's what to know about Pettit's spaceflight and how to watch him return with Ovchinin and Vagner.
Pettit, who turns 70 on Sunday, has now flown on three long-duration missions to the space station since he was selected as an astronaut in 1996.
A native of Oregon, Pettit holds a degree in chemical engineering from Oregon State University and a doctorate from the University of Arizona. Prior to becoming an astronaut, he worked as a staff scientist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
Pettit's first spaceflight came in 2003 when he served as science officer during the six-month Expedition 6 at the space station. Previously, he also served as a flight engineer on the International Space Station for Expedition 30 and 31 between 2011 and 2012, where he lived in space for more than a year.
In 2008, Pettit was part of a Space Shuttle mission delivering equipment to the space station.
Pettit's fourth and most recent spaceflight got off the ground in September, when he lifted off with Ovchinin and Vagner on a Roscosmos Soyuz MS-26 spacecraft. The vehicle launched from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, a spaceport Russia's space agency Roscosmos operates within Kazakhstan.
Now, about 220 days later, the three spacefarers are preparing to head back to Earth.
Pettit, Ovchinin, and Vagner are planning to undock April 19 from the orbiting laboratory's Rassvet module at 5:57 p.m. ET, heading for a parachute-assisted landing at 9:20 p.m. in a remote area of Kazakhstan.
NASA will provide live coverage of the return voyage beginning at 2 p.m. ET April 19 on the space agency's streaming service, NASA+.
A change of command ceremony will take place the day before at 2:40 p.m. ET April 18, which NASA will also livestream.
A complete schedule of coverage can be found here.
After returning to Earth, the three crew members will fly on a helicopter from the landing site to the city of Karaganda. From there, Pettit will board a NASA plane for a flight to Houston, while Ovchinin and Vagner will depart for a training base in Star City, Russia.
The imminent departure of the outgoing astronauts sets the stage for the most recent arrivals to soon commence on Expedition 73 at the space station.
NASA astronaut Jonny Kim and cosmonauts Sergey Ryzhikov and Alexey Zubritsky were the most recent spacefarers to reach the station April 8.
Their arrival came less than a month after four international spacefarers on a SpaceX mission known as Crew-10 reached the space station. That mission drew headlines for its role in paving the way for the NASA astronauts who flew on the infamous Boeing Starliner to return home with the Crew-9 contingent.
The Crew-10 mission includes NASA astronaut Anne McClain, NASA pilot Nichole Ayers, Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov and Japanese astronaut Takuya Onishi of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA.) Onishi will serve as the Expedition 73 commander.
Up next, the new crew of the space station will await the arrival of a SpaceX Dragon cargo craft on a resupply mission set to launch early Monday morning from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
Eric Lagatta covers breaking and trending news for USA TODAY. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NASA astronaut to return home after more than 200 days at ISS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Astronomers discover ultrapowerful black hole jet as bright as 10 trillion suns lit by Big Bang's afterglow
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Astronomers have discovered extraordinarily powerful X-ray jets blasting from two supermassive black holes that are so ancient that the jets shine in the afterglow of the Big Bang. "They are transforming the first light of the universe into high-energy jets," Jaya Maithil, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Harvard and Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, told reporters Monday (June 9) at the 246th meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Anchorage, Alaska. Using data from NASA's Chandra X-Ray Observatory and the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA), Maithil and her team found that each jet spans a whopping 300,000 light-years — nearly three times the diameter of our Milky Way galaxy. Each jet emerges from an actively feeding supermassive black hole, known as a quasar, located about 11.6 billion and 11.7 billion light-years away. The researchers observed these immense structures as they appeared when the universe was just 3 billion years old, during a period when galaxies and their central black holes were growing at breakneck speed. "These quasars are like cosmic time capsules," Maithil said. "If we understand them, we can understand how they were impacting the growth of their galaxy and the environment in which they resided." One of the newfound jets, from a quasar known as J1610+1811, is visible in the Chandra image above. A slender, faint purple line extends from the quasar's brilliant white core toward the upper right, ending in a small, bright blob. A second, dimmer jet appears to shoot in the opposite direction, downward and to the left. "It's like looking for candlelight in close vicinity to a flashlight that's blazing toward us," Maithil said. Related: Hungry black hole shoots out bright X-ray jet 60,000 times hotter than the sun What makes these jets particularly noteworthy is that they remain visible across billions of light-years. In a paper accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal, Maithil and her team suggested that the jets shine in X-rays thanks to interactions with the cosmic microwave background (CMB) — the faint relic radiation from the Big Bang left over after the universe cooled enough for starlight to travel freely for the first time, marking the end of the "cosmic dark ages." Back when these jets formed, the CMB was far denser than it is today, filling space with a sea of low-energy photons. As electrons in the jets raced outward at near light speed, they slammed into these CMB photons, boosting them into the X-ray range detectable by Chandra, according to the new study. RELATED STORIES —Brightest quasar ever seen is powered by black hole that eats a 'sun a day' —How black-hole-powered quasars killed off neighboring galaxies in the early universe —Distant 'quasar tsunamis' are ripping their own galaxies apart This process makes them visible across cosmic gulfs, despite their proximity to the quasars' dazzling cores, the researchers said. The jet from J1610+1811 clocks in at 92% to 98% light, carrying about half as much energy as all the light emitted by matter spiraling into the black hole — a staggering output equivalent to that from 10 trillion suns, the new study found. The second quasar, J1405+0415, located 11.7 billion light-years from Earth, features a jet just as powerful. By combining Chandra's X-ray and VLA's radio data, the researchers calculated that particles in the J1405+0415 jet are traveling at 95% to 99% the speed of light. "We're finding that some black holes may carry a bigger punch at this stage in the universe than we thought," Maithil said in a statement.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
US government uses UFOs as cover to ‘hide a lot of things': ex-NASA official
In an era captivated by unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and government conspiracies, one former NASA official is cutting through the noise and casting doubt on aliens coming to Earth. Joseph Gutheinz, a retired senior special agent with NASA's Office of Inspector General and current criminal defense attorney, said it's time to apply science, not speculation, to the debate. 'Prove it. Honestly, prove it,' he said to those who believe in the presence of UFOs on Earth. 'They've been claiming that there have been UFOs since the 1940s. And, you know, Area 51 supposedly houses UFOs,' he told Fox News Digital. 'Have someone go in, look at Area 51.' Gutheinz said that during his work with the NASA Office of Inspector General, he would regularly get calls from individuals who believed they were abducted, or had a chip in their brain from aliens. 4 Joseph Gutheinz, a former NASA agent, is casting doubt on aliens coming to Earth. Fox News 4 Gutheinz said that during his work with the NASA Office of Inspector General, he would get calls from people who thought they were abducted, or had a chip in their brain from aliens. AP 'What I used to tell my students was the possibility of anybody coming from another world to visit us was beyond unlikely,' he said. 'And what I would tell the people that would call me up with these tales about being visited by aliens, see a psychiatrist.' Citing astronomical distances and scientific understanding of the solar system, Gutheinz explained the improbability of any extraterrestrial visitors reaching Earth. 'There are up to 400 billion stars in the Milky Way. There are maybe one to two trillion galaxies in the universe. But the reality is this, the closest solar system is Alpha Centauri. Alpha Centauri A, B, and Proxima Centauri are the closest stars,' he said. 4 A UFO variety was photographed when it hovered for fifteen minutes near Holloman Air Development Center in New Mexico. Bettmann Archive 'The bottom line is that it's 4.4 light years away, or 25 trillion miles away. And if somebody started flying to Proxima and Satori, or the other way around, it would take them over 70,000 years to get there,' he said. 'Nobody is visiting us from another world, likely.' He pointed to moons like Europa, Ganymede, Titan, and Triton as the only plausible places for primitive life in our solar system. 'If there is life on any of those moons, it's possible. Again, it is primitive, it is microorganisms, it's nothing that's going to visit us in a flying saucer.' 4 Razor wire and security cameras at the entrance to Area 51, a secretive U.S. military base believed by UFO enthusiasts to hold government secrets about extraterrestrials. REUTERS When asked whether such sightings could be explained as natural or spiritual phenomena, he suggested that it could be government testing. 'If you're seeing something up there, and it's real, it's coming from the Chinese or the Russians or your next-door neighbor flying around with their drone,' he said. Historical military secrecy, Gutheinz suggested, may have played a major role in fostering the UFO myths. 'I believe early on in the 1940s when all these UFO stories started coming up, it was because the military was probably testing some aircraft, and they didn't want the Russians to know about it,' he said. 'And so, if the UFO cover worked, and I would not be surprised if there are some people in the military and the government that played along with that in order to conceal our stealth technology, that is really remarkable, and they just don't want to share that with other countries.' 'The bottom line is, I think that we use the UFO cover to hide a lot of things.' Fox News Digital has reached out to NASA for comment.
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
After the Trump-Musk dustup, NASA has much to consider
The social media-driven feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk may have simmered down a bit, with the rhetoric cooling and Musk even deleting some of his ill-considered posts about Trump from X and then apologizing for them. But the shockwaves generated by the tit-for-tat insults and threats still reverberate through NASA and the commercial space sector. When Trump threatened to pull all of SpaceX's government contracts and Musk responded by threatening to decommission the Dragon spacecraft, an apocalyptic scenario that would have cripped NASA loomed. Fortunately, both men have since backed off. Even so, according to the Washington Post, NASA and the Defense Department are quietly urging commercial space companies to hurry the development of hardware that can compete with what SpaceX has to offer. Encouraging competition with SpaceX is sound policy regardless of the relationship between Trump and Musk. However, that competition is months, if not years, in the future. The next flight of the Boeing Starliner, which failed so spectacularly in 2024, will be early next year at the earliest. The Blue Origin New Glenn, an answer to the SpaceX Falcon family of rockets, may launch once more this year and is a long way from achieving Falcon-level launch cadence. It is in Trump's and Musk's interests, and that of the American space effort, that both men repair their relationship and move on. One of the issues that drove Trump and Musk apart was Trump's abrupt and inexplicable withdrawal of the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur and private space traveler, for NASA administrator. Musk had championed Isaacman, who is well regarded in the aerospace community, and took it to heart when Trump changed his mind about his own nominee. The resulting leadership vacuum at NASA is being filled by Congress. The Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), has offered its own ideas for a NASA budget. The Senate Commerce document is at odds with the White House proposal in one important aspect. Whereas the Trump budget eliminates the Space Launch System after Artemis III and the Lunar Gateway, Senate Commerce would retain the massive, expensive rocket at least through Artemis V and would build the Gateway to support future Artemis missions. A NASA administrator such as Isaacman would be able to argue for the White House's approach. As for Isaacman, some people in the MAGA world, no doubt stung by the near-universal outrage sparked by his treatment at the hands of the White House, have started to trash the former nominee in the media. A recent Daily Caller story quoted unnamed White House officials accusing Isaacman of not only giving money to Democrats but of supporting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives at his companies and in his private spaceflights. But both of these facts were known when Isaacman was nominated. According to the story, the officials said, 'Isaacman would have been a black spot on an administration otherwise filled with Republican Trump supporters or, at least, individuals like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who backed the president prior to the election.' To hear these unnamed sources talk, Isaacman is no better than left-wing House members Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and their Squad. It should be noted that even if Isaacman wanted to impose DEI policies at NASA, he couldn't because of Trump's executive order prohibiting it across the federal government. Isaacman posted to X in his own defense: 'I am a moderate and donated to both parties for different reasons … my largest contribution was to President Trump — because I support many of his policies. I definitely did not like the direction this country was going over the last 4 years.' He went on to state, 'I have never spoken against the President. I have never voted against him.' It sounds like Isaacman is very loyal to Trump, remarkable under the circumstances. The suggestion of disloyalty is spurious and against the White House's interests. Isaacman's situation could provide the basis of a rapprochement between Trump and Musk. Musk has already apologized to the president for some of his posts on X, particularly the one suggesting that Trump is named in the Department of Justice's files on Jeffrey Epstein. But the president should admit fault as well. He was deceived by some of his staff about Isaacman's character. If it is not too late, he should reverse himself a second time and send his fellow billionaire's name back into nomination. NASA, the U.S., and the Trump-Musk partnership would gain as a result. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, 'Why is America Going Back to the Moon?' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
