WVEA president says WV schools could lose millions if Trump Administration closes Department of Education
CHARLESTON, WV (WVNS) — The president of the West Virginia Education Association (WVEA), one of two teachers' unions in the state, said eliminating the U.S. Department of Education would be 'devastating' to West Virginia, where around 54% of schools receive Title 1 federal funding.
President Donald Trump said he supports elimination of the department, although no action had yet been taken on Tuesday, February 25, 2025.
The U.S. Department of Education provides Title I funding for schools and districts with a high percentage of low-income students, and the money is used to give free lunches and other supports for academic success.
'In Mercer County, that's a loss of $3.9 million in Title I funds,' said WVEA President Dale Lee on Monday, February 24, 2025.
He added that Raleigh County would lose $4.3 million, McDowell County would lose $3.3 million, Logan County would lose $3.7 million and Wyoming County would lose $2.4 million.
'This would be devastating to our students in southern West Virginia and across the state,' Lee said.
West Virginia senator Rollan Roberts, a Republican who led the private Victory Baptist Academy in Raleigh County for years, said on Monday that not all educators are opposed to loosening of federal regulations that are placed on teachers in schools which accept federal funds.
Sen. Roberts said he recently visited Mary C. Snow Elementary School in Kanawha County and that he asked some of the teachers how they would feel about some federal restrictions in the classroom being loosened, if the Trump Administration makes changes to the U.S. Department of Education or eliminates it altogether, sending control of education back to individual states.
Odd laws that are still around in West Virginia
'Because of all of these ridiculous regulations, they are having to teach with one hand tied behind their back, and they can't get the job done,' said Sen. Roberts. 'They were thrilled if they could get rid of some of these regulations. They are a Title I School. They live there.'
School funding is also based on population, which West Virginia is losing.
Senator Roberts said the state's birth rate is declining more quickly than that of the national average.
He said the drop in the state's birth rate will likely lead to changes in the state's education system.'Five years from now, they tell us we that will have 2,00 less high school graduates in West Virginia,' said Sen. Roberts. 'Two thousand les! We are losing when it comes to the death rate versus the birth rate, because of just how things are working out.'
In addition to population, Title 1 funding is also allocated based on the number of low-income students in a school.
Data collected by the state officials in 2023 shows nearly half of the babies recently born in West Virginia were born to low-income families.
The data also shows the state has such a high number of foster children that hundreds are sent out of state, as far away as Utah, to receive care.
Data on long-term impacts an existing abortion ban in the state could have on the birth rate was not yet available.
State lawmakers have also introduced a bill that, if passed, will prevent rape and incest victims from getting a legal abortion in the state.
It was also unclear if the existing ban will lead to a higher rate, over time, of births among low-income women.
The U.S. Department of Education upholds rights of students through policies and regulations related to educational funding, including the rights of pregnant and disabled students.
Types of donations needed after a disaster
To receive federal funds, school districts must uphold students' civil rights.
Senator Roberts said, state lawmakers would do what's best for all of the state's students and teachers, in case of state oversight.
However, Lee said the loss of federal funds and regulations would devastate the state's most vulnerable students and could even impact athletics, in the case of federal Title IX funding.
'It would impact our girls' sports in many areas. You get some additional funding for our girls' sports, and that would hurt our programs across the state in the middle schools and high schools,' said Lee.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
CBS News
27 minutes ago
- CBS News
Los Angeles mayor announces curfew as anti-ICE protests continue downtown
Mayor Karen Bass announced a curfew for downtown Los Angeles as anti-ICE protests continued on Tuesday. The curfew will begin at 8 p.m. tonight, last until Wednesday morning, and apply to one square mile of downtown L.A. For five consecutive days, protesters and law enforcement have lined the streets of downtown, resulting in nearly 200 arrests. Some of the encounters between demonstrators and police turned violent at times. The demonstrations started on Friday after several immigration raids in the Westlake District, downtown and South LA. Crowds quickly formed around federal agents during the operations. Some individuals attempted to prevent authorities from placing individuals into vans. The nearly week-long protest caught the attention of President Trump, who deployed thousands of troops from the California National Guard and 700 U.S. Marines to protect federal buildings, against the wishes of Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Donald Trump is putting fuel on this fire. Commandeering a state's National Guard without consulting the Governor of that state is illegal and immoral," Newsom wrote Sunday on X. "California will be taking him to court."
Politico
31 minutes ago
- Politico
Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic nomination for NJ governor
Democrats chose Rep. Mikie Sherrill as their nominee for governor of New Jersey, as the party attempts to defy odds by holding onto the governorship for a third term in a row. The Associated Press called the race just under an hour after polls closed. The four-term member of Congress prevailed in the crowded Democratic primary field on Tuesday to succeed term-limited Gov. Phil Murphy. She'll face Republican Jack Ciattarelli, setting up a high-stakes battle of two party establishment favorites. Both sides acknowledge that November's election will be competitive. Although the electorate does favor Democrats, it's been decades since Democrats have won the governorship three terms in a row in the Garden State. But in recent history, the candidate of the party opposite of the one that controls the White House typically wins the race for governor. Still, Republicans are emboldened by President Donald Trump's closer-than-expected loss in New Jersey last November, as well as the gains they've made to cut into Democrats' voter registration advantage. And Republicans argue it helps that they have a candidate with high name ID: Ciattarelli ran for governor two times prior and narrowly lost to Murphy in 2021.
