logo
New law targeting major shipping loophole could change online shopping forever: 'It's about time'

New law targeting major shipping loophole could change online shopping forever: 'It's about time'

Yahoo21-03-2025

A key trade exemption between the U.S. and many of its biggest trade partners appears to be no more. This time, though, there may be environmental benefits, as analysts say its elimination is expected to have a big impact on one industry that greatly affects the planet: fast fashion from China.
On Feb. 4, the White House enacted new tariffs, paused them on Feb. 7, and then enacted them again on March 4, which included eliminating the de minimis trade exemption.
De minimis became law in the U.S. through the U.S. Tariff Act of 1930, with the goal of letting people and small businesses skip import fees for small shipments. The original amount was $200 and was raised to $800 in 2016.
While it was beneficial for consumers who wanted to order a small item for their home without paying huge tariffs, it was greatly overutilized by the fast-fashion industry. Shipments under $800 rose from 153 million to 1 billion between 2015 and 2023, according to the White House.
Fast fashion has made buying cheap clothing from overseas too easy, offering clothes for as little as a few dollars each and therefore encouraging a larger haul per customer. To be able to sell so cheaply, the clothing is made to deteriorate, or at least not made to last, causing Americans to toss 82 pounds of clothing every year, on average.
While these extra few dollars of tariffs might make companies like Shein and Temu absorb the costs with small price increases or find an alternate route to keep consumers, sustainability advocates are hoping for a change in consumer behavior.
Shein chairman Donald Tang reportedly attempted to downplay the effects, saying, "We will find a way to deliver the goods," but industry analysts believe it will strike a major blow to these companies' bottom lines.
"The U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports could be a blessing in disguise for sustainable fashion brands," Rodica Murphy, a sustainability consultant based in Cheshire, England, shared with Trellis. "Fast-fashion behemoths like Shein and Temu, who churn out ultra-cheap, disposable clothing at breakneck speed, now face higher costs. And let's be honest — it's about time."
The CEO of American Circular Textiles, Rachel Van Metre Kibbe, said she is also excited about the potential of this new policy.
"If tariffs make new clothes pricier, people will lean even harder into resale, rental, and repair," she told Trellis, formerly known as GreenBiz. "That's already happening, but this could pour fuel on the fire."
Would you be more likely to shop at a store that paid you for your old stuff?
Absolutely
Only if they make it easy
Depends on the store
Nope
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Costs are rising in all aspects of our lives, and consumers are looking to cut costs everywhere. If buyers are upset about the surcharges on their supposedly inexpensive hauls, you could encourage them to shop secondhand locally, online with thrifting retailers like ThredUp, or to support sustainable brands that produce items that have no planned obsolescence.
Shein sends nearly 1 million packages a day to the U.S. If Americans can be persuaded to cut back, that would make a big environmental impact. If you are looking to break up with fast fashion, check out TCD Guide for more.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sea-Tac screenings to scale back as homeland security ends surveillance program
Sea-Tac screenings to scale back as homeland security ends surveillance program

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sea-Tac screenings to scale back as homeland security ends surveillance program

This story was initially published on The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is terminating the Quiet Skies program, DHS announced via a news release. Quiet Skies was a counterterrorism surveillance program through the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), according to The New York Times. However, DHS stated the program 'has failed to stop a single terrorist attack' and cost taxpayers $200 million a year. The department believes the program was put in place to target political opponents. 'It is clear that the Quiet Skies program was used as a political rolodex of the Biden Administration—weaponized against its political foes and exploited to benefit their well-heeled friends,' DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said, via the release. 'I am calling for a Congressional investigation to unearth further corruption at the expense of the American people and the undermining of U.S. national security.' TSA will continue to vet security threats and reinforce REAL ID requirements, DHS noted. 'The Trump Administration will return TSA to its true mission of being laser-focused on the safety and security of the traveling public,' Noem added. 'This includes restoring the integrity, privacy, and equal application of the law for all Americans.' Follow Julia Dallas on X. Read her stories here. Submit news tips here.

China's Panchen Lama pledges loyalty to the Communist Party in a meeting with Xi
China's Panchen Lama pledges loyalty to the Communist Party in a meeting with Xi

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China's Panchen Lama pledges loyalty to the Communist Party in a meeting with Xi

TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — The man picked by Beijing as the second highest figure in Tibetan Buddhism pledged adherence to the ruling Communist Party's dictates Friday during a rare face-to-face meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, state media reported. Gyaltsen Norbu, who is rarely seen in public, met behind closed doors with Xi Jinping in Zhongnanhai, the government compound in the center of Beijing, about 3,700 kilometers (about 2,300 miles) from his home monastery of Tashilhumpo, high on the Tibetan steppe. Gyaltsen Norbu, 35, said he would 'firmly support the leadership of the Communist Party of China, and resolutely safeguard the unity of the motherland and national unity,' the Xinhua News Agency reported. The Chinese government appointed Gyaltsen Norbu as the Panchen Lama of Tibetan Buddhism in 1995 at age 5 after followers of the Dalai Lama recognized a different boy, Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, as the Panchen's incarnation. That boy and his family disappeared in 1995 in what the U.S. government has alleged was an abduction by the Chinese government, and the Dalai Lama, 89, has refused to recognize the Chinese-appointed Panchen Lama. The Chinese government says Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is now a college graduate living a private life and working at a stable job, while producing no evidence. The Chinese-appointed Panchen Lama was quoted Friday by Xinhua as saying that he would 'contribute to promoting national unity and progress, systematically promote the sinicization of religion in China, and promote the modernization of Tibet." Xi's government uses the term 'sinicization' to mean that all religions including Christianity and Islam must take their orders from the Communist Party, reduce their non-Chinese aspects and limit their role in society. Xi was quoted as telling the Chinese government's Panchen that he should continue Tibetan Buddhism's 'strong sense of community for the Chinese nation, systematically advancing the sinicization of religion in China, and promoting the modernization of Tibet.' Last month, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement marking the 30th anniversary of the disappearance of Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, saying he and his family had been abducted by the Chinese government. 'Chinese authorities should release Gedhun Choekyi Nyima immediately and stop persecuting Tibetans for their religious beliefs,' Rubio's statement read. The position of Panchen Lama is especially sensitive since he is expected to take part in the recognition of a new Dalai Lama and serve as his tutor, a religious process that the officially atheist Communist Party is determined to control. The meeting Friday also reflected Xi's focus on economic and political stability within China's borders, where an economic slump has raised concerns of anti-government outbursts and control over minority groups is an overwhelming obsession. China claims Tibet has been part of China for centuries, but many Tibetans say they were effectively independent for much of that time and that Beijing is now seeking to destroy their human rights, language and Buddhist culture. The Dalai Lama fled into exile in India in 1959 after an abortive uprising against Chinese forces and has long been vilified by Beijing as a separatist. The government denies his traditional right to recognize reincarnated lamas.

Trump vs. Musk: Majority of Americans Side With Neither, Poll Finds
Trump vs. Musk: Majority of Americans Side With Neither, Poll Finds

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump vs. Musk: Majority of Americans Side With Neither, Poll Finds

Whose side are you on? When it comes to the suddenly erupted public feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, most Americans say they do not support either guy. That is according to a new poll released by YouGov on Friday, which found 52% of Americans polled the night before chose 'neither' when asked who they backed in the battle between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man. Still, Trump lapped Musk by comparison when it came to support, with 28% of respondents saying they sided with him — more than triple the amount of respondents (8%) who said they backed the Tesla boss. The approximately 12% of the rest of respondents said they 'don't know' who they support more between Trump and Musk. YouGov's poll included 3,812 Americans surveyed, ages 18 and older. The poll comes after Musk and the president set social media — as well as the media and political worlds — ablaze on Thursday, trading barbs that included Musk accusing President Trump of being named in the Epstein Files and saying he was in favor of impeaching the president. Trump, on his end, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk and questioned whether the U.S. government should end its contracts with SpaceX, the rocket company Musk runs. The war of words started earlier in the week when Musk called Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' a 'disgusting abomination.' Meanwhile, Tesla's stock price took a massive hit as a result of the spat on Thursday, plunging more than 14% in what was the company's second worst drop since the COVID-19 pandemic rocked the market in 2020. Shares have rebounded a fair amount on Friday, climbing to $303 per share a few hours into trading, after dropping to $277 per share a day earlier. Politico late on Thursday reported a Musk-Trump phone call had been set up for Friday to help smooth things over between the two. But those plans went sideways, with President Trump telling ABC News he was 'not particularly interested' in speaking to his former head of the Department of Government Efficiency. As for what the future holds, respondents to YouGov were pretty much split on whether the two would reconcile and work together in the future; 28% of respondents said they believed Musk and Trump will be friends again, 31% said they will not, and 41% said they are 'not sure.' It will be worth keeping one eye on X, the platform Musk owns, and the other on Trump's Truth Social on Friday to see what comes next. The post Trump vs. Musk: Majority of Americans Side With Neither, Poll Finds appeared first on TheWrap.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store