South Carolina cellphone bill passes on last day of legislative session
COLUMBIA, S.C. (WSPA) – Today is the last day of the legislative session in South Carolina. Governor Henry McMaster has signed several bills into law, and more are sitting on his desk, waiting for approval; but Lawmakers have been working since January, and won't return again until next year. At that time, they'll have one more chance to push any bills through to the governor's desk.
This legislative session lawmakers passed the Hands-Free Act, which cracks down on using cellphones while driving. The law also states if police can pull people over if they have a reason to suspect the driver is on their phone. Despite its passage, the bill had strong opposition from some Democrats, who said police could use the cellphones as an excuse to pull someone over.
'I think we all want to see safer roads. We all want to see drivers that are less distracted. My greatest concern is that the bill will allow for discrimination, ' said Representative Kambrell Garvin (D – Richland), who voted against the bill.
Fallen South Carolina officers inducted into law enforcement Hall of Fame
Representative Bill Taylor (R – Aiken) has tried to pass this bill many times, saying that the state's seatbelt rule is equivalent.
'Discrimination, that hasn't been proven, and no one's ever said that. It's the same with this. If they see you with a phone in your hand, you're breaking the law. '
Another bill that pushed through this week deals with the state's energy supply. It creates a partnership between Dominion Energy and Santee Cooper to build a natural gas plant in the midlands. Senator Shane Massey (R – Edgefield) said if this bill were not passed, it would hurt every South Carolinian.
'Your constituents are going to be paying more for energy. They're going to be paying more for energy because of the cost of generation.'
On the education front, Lawmakers pushed forward a bill that would give K-12 students public money to attend private schools. The original law was ruled unconstitutional because of how the public's funds were used. Lawmakers hope that adding a third-party person to oversee the funds will help.
'The education scholarship trust fund has been a long and rocky path sometimes. We've been working on it now for five years,' said bill's main supporter and advocator Senator Greg Hembree (R – Horry).
But still not everyone's in agreement.
'I think there's a strong chance that this ends up in court again. That it potentially gets struck down again. Ultimately this should be left for voters to decide if they want this,' said Patrick Kelly with the Palmetto State Teachers Association.
There are still hundreds of bills left to be debated, but remember this was just the first year of a two-year legislative session. Lawmakers will pick back up where they left off in January of next year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Defying Trump, National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet is still at work
President Donald Trump's latest attempt to assert control over an elite American cultural institution has turned into a high-stakes Washington stand-off. In defiance of Trump's announcement last Friday that he was firing her, Kim Sajet — the director of the Smithsonian Institution's National Portrait Gallery — has continued to report for work, conducting meetings and handling other museum business as she did before, according to several people familiar with her activities who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter. Writing on Truth Social, Trump had declared he is firing Sajet because she 'is a highly partisan person' and because she is a 'strong supporter of DEI,' a reference to diversity, equity and inclusion. He said her replacement would be named shortly. Trump has not provided a legal reasoning to support his authority to fire Sajet. Two top congressional Democrats have asserted the president does not have legal authority for the firing. In a joint statement, House Administration Committee ranking Democrat Joe Morelle of New York and House Appropriations Committee ranking Democrat Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut said: 'President Trump has no authority to fire employees of the Smithsonian Institution — including the Director of the National Portrait Gallery. The dismissal of Director Sajet is unacceptable and has the same legal weight as the President's prior attempts to undermine the Smithsonian's independence: absolutely none. Should the White House require a copy of the Constitution, we would be more than happy to provide one.' Sajet's refusal to abide by Trump's decision sets up a test of the bounds of presidential authority over the Smithsonian, a sprawling complex of 21 museums, 14 education and research centers and the National Zoo. It is not a traditional government agency nor part of the executive branch, and hiring and firing decisions have historically been handled by the Smithsonian's secretary, rather than its Board of Regents. The Smithsonian's current secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch III, is widely expected to discuss the president's attempt to oust Sajet when regents meet next Monday. In an only-in-Washington twist, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. — who has been presented with major questions at the Supreme Court regarding the limits of presidential authority since Trump took office — is the chancellor of the Smithsonian and a member of its board. A Trump White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A Smithsonian spokesperson declined to comment. In February, Trump made another foray into American arts when he took over control of the Kennedy Center, dismissing his predecessor's appointees to its board, who then installed him as chairman and replaced the institution's director with a political ally with scant experience in the arts. The Smithsonian differs from the Kennedy Center because presidents don't appoint members to its board, which is composed of a mix of officials from all three branches of government and members of the public. But Trump is not without allies on the Smithsonian board, including Vice President JD Vance who, like Roberts, is an ex-officio member. Trump's move against Sajet follows an executive order he issued on March 27 titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' which aims to 'restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.' A 35-year-old special assistant and senior associate staff secretary, Lindsey Halligan, was among the order's architects — instigated, in part, by her early-2025 visit to the show 'The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture,' an exhibition at the Smithsonian American Art Museum, which shares a building with the Portrait Gallery. The order calls for Halligan and Vice President JD Vance to 'remove improper ideology' from the Smithsonian and 'prohibit expenditure on exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race.' 'President Trump's attempt to fire the National Portrait Gallery Director is outrageous and represents yet another disturbing example of his relentless effort to control American art and culture,' said Rep. Chellie Pingree (Maine), ranking Democrat of the House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee, which oversees the Smithsonian, in a statement. 'Despite what the President may think, America's cultural institutions are not run by dictatorial impulses.' On Tuesday a White House official provided The Post a list of 17 instances in which, the White House argued, Sajet was critical of Trump or outspoken about her support for diversity, equity and inclusion. The list included her donations to Democratic politicians and advocacy groups; a social media post praising Anthony Fauci; the caption for the museum's presidential portrait of Trump mentioning his two impeachments and 'incitement of insurrection' for the events of Jan. 6, 2021; and numerous quotes from interviews in a variety of publications about her efforts to represent a broad swath of Americans within the gallery's walls. One item on the list was a quote in a 2019 USA Today story about Black artists demanding representation in American artistic institutions: 'We owe it to Americans to reflect them because we owe it to accurate history,' Sajet says. 'I'm not interested in only having a museum for some people.' The list additionally took issue with remarks Sajet has made in support of the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements, and criticism of Columbus Day and her rejection of one artist's 2016 portrait of Trump as 'too political.' It notes that Sajet has commissioned artworks about Mexican immigration and 'the complications of ancestral and racial history.' It was critical of her 2013 decision to use '50 percent of all money spent on art' to 'support diverse artists and portrait subjects.' Since its founding 179 years ago, the Smithsonian, which receives about 60 percent of its budget from federal appropriations and grants, has generally operated independently, although there have been several controversies in which museums have altered exhibitions in response to outside criticisms, including from politicians. Museum directors, such as Sajet — holders of some of the most prestigious positions in American arts — are not paid with federal funds, instead drawing their salaries from the Smithsonian's trust fund. Hours after Trump's post, Bunch told Smithsonian staff in an email obtained by The Washington Post that the White House also sent new details of proposed cuts to the institution's budget, slashing it by 12 percent and excluding funding for its Anacostia Community Museum and its forthcoming National Museum of the American Latino, Bunch said. On Saturday, at the Portrait Gallery and SAAM's joint family Pride celebration, a trio of visitors strolled the central courtyard in neon vests emblazoned with 'Hands off the arts' on the back — closely watched by a Smithsonian staff member, who hovered nearby. 'I'm outraged' by Sajet's firing, said Karen Nussbaum, 75, of Washington. 'There's a place for a political expression in art, but not political control of art.' 'I think the next step is controlling what artists think and do,' said Cynthia Cain, 60, of Washington, 'and that's not acceptable.' Sophia Nguyen and Janay Kingsberry contributed to this report.
Washington Post
13 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Bipartisan deals on voting and election changes are rare. It just happened in one swing state
LAS VEGAS — Facing a legislature dominated by Democrats, Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo stood before Nevada lawmakers earlier this year with a message that some did not expect to go far: 'Set aside partisan politics.' It was a plea that might have seemed more aspirational than realistic, given the country's deep polarization. Yet it set the stage for one of the session's most unexpected outcomes — a bipartisan agreement to bring voter ID requirements to the perennial battleground state by next year's midterm elections.
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Jasmine Crockett mocks Trump, says he's threatened by her ‘effective' message
Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, mocked President Donald Trump for insulting her, claiming it was because he 'knows my message is effective,' in a new podcast interview. The progressive congresswoman appeared on the iHeartMedia Podcast 'Outlaws with TS Madison' on Monday, where she addressed her rise to prominence in the Democratic Party and how that has made her a target for criticism. Crockett said she doesn't pay attention to those who question her credentials or insult her before specifically addressing her beef with Trump. 'Dealing with Trump —Trump likes to dog whistle. Essentially, what he's done is tried to put a target on my back,' she began. Crockett went on to mock Trump for paying attention to her, claiming it was because the president felt threatened by her 'effective' rhetoric. 'But Donald Trump, dropping the name of someone who literally is only just now entering her second term in Congress, kind of tells you who is trying to get on whose level, right? He's the president of the United States. I can guarantee you if I was somehow sitting in the White House I wouldn't be worried about no random nobody young person that is in the House,' she continued. 3 Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett attends the 29th Annual Webby Awards at Cipriani Wall Street on May 12, 2025 in New York City. Getty Images The Webby Awards 'But the reality is that he knows that my message is effective, he knows that the things I'm saying are true, and he knows that he can't just 'fake media' me, 'fake news' me.' 'He knows that people, even who aren't Democrats, listen to what I have to say, because No. 1, I make it plain, and No. 2, I always make sure I back up my information and challenge somebody to find what I'm giving them is false, and that is what's most threatening to him,' Crockett added. 'Because he's been used to Democrats who keep their heads down and do the work. But I do the work while also talking my talk and walking my walk.' 3 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing-in ceremony for the interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Pirro, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 28, 2025. REUTERS On Sunday, Crockett told a surprised local reporter in Dallas that 'Republicans walk up to me and tell me how much they like me.' The left-wing lawmaker has frequently traded barbs with the president. On her X account, Crockett has gone as far as to label Trump a 'buffoon' and a 'mofo,' the abbreviated version of the word 'mother—-er.' Trump has mocked the idea of Crockett being the future of the Democratic Party and called her 'low IQ.' 3 Crockett said that Trump only pays attention to her because the president felt threatened by her 'effective' rhetoric. Fox News While speaking at the National Republican Congressional Committee Dinner in April, Trump took another swipe at the progressive lawmaker, saying her party was in 'serious trouble' if they were 'going to rely on Crockett to bring them back.' Crockett told late-night host Jimmy Kimmel in April, 'It says a lot when you're supposed to be the leader of the free world, and you're worried about a sophomore in the House. I'm just saying.' The White House did not immediately return a request for comment.
