Double-dipping may seem gross, but it's not as risky as you think
The question:
Is it true that double-dipping can spread germs?
Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post.
The science:
Like George Costanza on 'Seinfield,' many of us have done it - dip a chip into a communal bowl of salsa or stick a veggie into the hummus, bite it and then go for a double-dip.
Yes, double-dipping can transmit bacteria and viruses from your mouth to the shared bowl. And yes, in theory, those microorganisms can be spread to other eaters. But in most cases, that might not be as risky as it seems.
Researchers at Clemson University discovered that there were more bacteria in double-dipped situations compared with the single-dipped. In a series of experiments, the team analyzed how many bacteria were transferred from a bitten cracker into a cup of sterile water compared with an unbitten cracker. They found that if someone had taken a bite before dipping, the water contained significantly more bacteria.
Additionally, the researchers reported that the type of food mattered. After double-dipping, salsa, which has a high acidity, had lower levels of bacteria two hours later than dishes made with cheese and chocolate, which have a low acidity.
While people may be introducing bacteria or viruses into the communal bowl, it does not mean these organisms are the type that can make you sick, said Benjamin Chapman, department head of agricultural and human sciences at North Carolina State University.
Pathogens that cause the common cold, influenza and covid, for instance, have not been shown to be transmitted through food, Chapman said. Respiratory illnesses such as these are much more commonly spread by coughing and sneezing around people at a party than by eating or drinking after them, he said.
One strong exception is norovirus. Research shows that the virus - which causes the notoriously unpleasant 'stomach bug' linked to outbreaks on cruise ships and in other places with close quarters - can be spread through direct contact such as hand-shaking, through contaminated food and water, through aerosols, and, most important to this conversation about double-dipping, through saliva.
'If you are recovering from norovirus, double-dipping would be really risky' for other eaters, Chapman said.
But because 'people infected with norovirus get sick very promptly, they're unlikely to spend a whole lot of time during the very brief incubation period sharing a dip with someone else,' said William Schaffner, a professor of infectious diseases and preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University.
There is no real evidence showing that double-dipping can cause foodborne illness outbreaks, though experts said double-dipping often happens in small groups that may not be tracked.
What else you should know:
The double-dipping controversy may be more about social etiquette. 'The presumption is, 'We don't want to make people sick,' but really it's more the 'ick' factor than it is the risk of passing a foodborne illness,' said Keith Schneider, a professor in the food science and human nutrition department at the University of Florida.
But here are some best practices, experts said:
- If you are sick, skip the party and protect others from potential illness.
- In any case, wash your hands or, in a pinch, use alcohol-based hand sanitizers before handling food.
- Cover your nose and mouth with your elbow or a tissue when you cough and sneeze. Then wash your hands again.
- If you are the one planning the party, you could consider using individual dishes for dips rather than communal bowls since, theoretically, a person also could spread the norovirus if they accidentally dip a finger or two into a shared snack.
The bottom line:
While double-dipping can spread bacteria and viruses, in most cases, it is unlikely to make you sick, experts said.
Related Content
Despite ceasefire, India and Pakistan are locked in a cultural cold war
The D.C. plane crash took her mom and sister. She turned to her piano.
Johnson again corrals GOP factions to pass Trump's sweeping tax bill
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kansas law disregarding end-of-life wishes during pregnancy challenged in court
A Kansas state law that revokes a person's decisions about end-of-life care if they are pregnant is now being challenged in court. Three women, one of whom is currently pregnant, and two doctors filed a lawsuit in Kansas over a clause in the state's Natural Death Act that denies people who are pregnant with the ability to accept or refuse health care if they become incapacitated or terminally ill. The plaintiffs argue that the clause violates their rights to liberty and personal autonomy and infringes their right to privacy. Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here Emma Vernon, the plaintiff who is currently pregnant, wrote an advance health care directive outlining the care she would like to receive if she is diagnosed with a terminal condition. Vernon said she would like to only accept life-sustaining treatment if 'there is a reasonable medical certainty' that her child would reach full term and be born 'with a meaningful prospect of sustained life' and without health conditions that would 'impair its quality of life,' according to the lawsuit. But her directive has not been 'given the same deference the law affords to others who complete directives because of the Pregnancy Exclusion,' the lawsuit argues. Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach's (R) office did not immediately return a request for comment from The Hill about the lawsuit. All states have laws that give people the right to craft advance directives on the health care they would like to receive if they become unable to make their own health decisions. And many of those laws have caveats excluding pregnant people, according to The Washington Post, which first reported the lawsuit's filing. Kansas is one of nine states with a law that invalidates an advanced directive of a pregnant patient regardless of if the fetus can survive, according to Compassion & Choices, a nonprofit organization that advocates for end-of-life care. The doctors who joined the lawsuit filed Thursday say the law forces them to provide pregnant patients with a lower standard of care than other patients and opens them up to civil and criminal lawsuits and professional penalties. Compassion & Choices, along with the abortion and reproductive rights lawyer group If/When/How: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice and the law firm Irigonegaray & Revenaugh, filed the lawsuit on behalf of all five plaintiffs. End-of-life care laws have come under scrutiny recently amid reports of a brain-dead pregnant woman in Georgia whose family says doctors are keeping on life support until her baby can be delivered to abide by the state's abortion ban.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
My ‘puppy paws' trick works like a charm when I can't sleep — other people call them ‘T-Rex arms'
Who sleeps deeper or sweeter than a puppy? This essential truth is at the heart, or paw, of a viral sleeping hack. Pablo Herrera demonstrated the canine-inspired trick — also known as 'T-Rex arms' — on TikTok. Looking restless in his frightfully bright bedroom, the influencer rose, removed his pillow, and, folded his hands into paw position, tucking his wrists under his chest and settles down for sleep. 'This works like a charm, I don't know why,' he wrote in the caption for the video, which has amassed more than 2 million likes. Pablo Herrera demonstrated the canine-inspired trick — also known as 'T-Rex arms' — on TikTok. @pabloherreratk / TikTok But sleep experts have some thoughts on why puppy paws may pave the way to slumberland. 'If this position reduces anxious thoughts about sleep, it may be a helpful distraction,' psychiatrist and sleep medicine specialist Dr. Alex Dimitriu, MD, founder of Menlo Park Psychiatry & Sleep Medicine, told The Post. 'Anything that has a calming effect, and takes your mind off of the 'why can't I fall asleep!??!' type of thinking is helpful.' Changing positions when you're feeling fitful can often operate as a reset button for the central nervous system, relieving pressure on joints and muscles, disrupting spiral thinking, and bringing the focus back to the body. The puppy paws position can be accessed by lying on the stomach or side and mimics the feeling of being contained and restrained as swaddled infants, creating a sense of comfort and subverting the body's stress response. Similar to the effects of a weighted blanket of gentle pressure therapy, puppy paws puts light compression on the torso, which can activate the body's 'rest and digest' mode. The hack is inspired by the deep, unbothered sleep of pups. shellybychowskishots – While Herrera ditches his pillow in pursuit of puppy paws, the hack is bettered by a bolster. To sleep max with the power of the paws, experts recommend placing a thin pillow or blanket under the arms to reduce wrist pressure and eliminate neck strain. Paw participants should unclench their fists, allowing their hands to relax. The hack is particularly effective for stomach sleepers who don't require as much mid-sleep shuffling to assume the puppy paws position. However, experts warn that there are drawbacks, or barks, to the benign-sounding puppy paws hack. 'Sleeping on your stomach is the most risky for breathing — the airway can be blocked and the diaphragm cannot move as well,' dentist and sleep expert Dr. Stephen Carstensen told The Post. He noted that the tucked-in hand positioning can cut off blood flow, leading to painful cramping or tingling. In that vein, experts caution the puppy paw curious to be mindful about excessive strain or pressure on the wrists. Indeed, the comments section of Herrera's post is rife with reports of waking up with numb hands and sore wrists, with some users suggesting the pose can contribute to the very real nightmare of arthritis and carpal tunnel. When it comes to puppy paw sleeping, if it doesn't feel right, it isn't right for you. 'There is little harm in this approach. However, it has not been studied or proven,' cautioned Dimitriu. He recommends that those struggling to sleep follow the protocol for more proven methods like Yoga Nidra meditation and the lauded military method.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Should Be Junked': RFK Jr.'s Bogus MAHA Report Is Just AI Slop
Artificial intelligence researchers claim there's 'definitive' proof that Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his team used AI to write his 'Make America Healthy Again' report. Kennedy's report projected a new vision for America's health policy that would take aim at childhood vaccines, ultraprocessed foods, and pesticides. But a NOTUS investigation published Thursday found seven studies referenced in Kennedy's 68-page report that the listed study authors said were either wildly misinterpreted or never occurred at all—and researchers believe that AI could be partly to blame. Some of the 522 scientific references in the report include the phrase 'OAIcite' in their URLs—a marker indicating the use of OpenAI. 'This is not an evidence-based report, and for all practical purposes, it should be junked at this point,' Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, told The Washington Post. 'It cannot be used for any policymaking. It cannot even be used for any serious discussion, because you can't believe what's in it.' AI researcher Oren Etzioni, a professor emeritus at the University of Washington, felt similarly, referring to the report as 'shoddy work.' 'We deserve better,' Etzioni told the Post. During a White House press briefing Thursday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt dodged direct questioning as to whether Kennedy's department had leaned on AI to draft the report. 'I can't speak to that, I'd defer you to the Department of Health and Human Services,' Leavitt said while lauding the Kennedy report as one of the most 'transformative reports ever released by the federal government.' Leavitt added that the 'MAHA report' was backed by 'good science' that had 'never been recognized' at the national level. But what the administration will likely brush off as a temporary flub actually sets a horrifically dangerous precedent for the government, as it starts the slow encroachment of unvetted and unverified AI usage to form the basis of America's public health policy.