Posting about the L.A. protests? Apparently that can get you banned from Facebook
Apparently, acknowledging the existence of violence can get you kicked off Facebook.
Rebecca Solnit 's account on Meta's social media network has been suspended, the San Francisco author and activist posted to Bluesky on Monday, June 10.
'Facebook decided to suspend my account because of a piece (below) I wrote Monday about violence which in no way advocates for it (but does point out who is violent in the current ruckus),' Solnit wrote.
She included a screenshot of Facebook's explanation of its decision, which reads, 'Your account, or activity on it, doesn't follow our Community Standards on account integrity.'
Solnit did not explain how, beyond timing, she believed that the essay in question, 'Some Notes on the City of Angels and the Nature of Violence,' written on her independent site Meditations in an Emergency, was the reason for her ouster.
Meta did not immediately respond to the Chronicle's request for comment.
'I think maybe it's begun, the bigger fiercer backlash against the Trump Administration,' her piece begins, referring to the clashes in Los Angeles between protesters of President Donald Trump's immigration policies and the California National Guard deployed by Trump against city and state officials' wishes.
'All they can do is punish and incite, and I hope that some of the protesters are telling them they're violating their mission and maybe the law,' the essay continues. 'We are escalating because they are escalating.'
The 'Men Explain Things to Me' author goes on to question longtime right-wing and media narratives that stereotype protesters as violent while giving law enforcement a pass for much more harm to people and property.
'One thing to remember is that they'll claim we're violent no matter what; the justification for this ongoing attack on immigrants and people who resemble immigrants in being brown is the idea that America is suffering an invasion and in essence only a certain kind of white person belongs here,' she writes.
The piece never advocates meeting fire with fire. Instead, it argues for a defiant yet nonviolent response.
'I believe ardently that nonviolent resistance is in the big picture and the long term the most effective strategy, but that doesn't mean it must be polite, placid, or please our opponents,' she writes.
Solnit concludes by enumerating the kinds of violence the Trump administration has perpetrated — against the environment, against the First Amendment, against women, against his personal enemies, against the very notion of truth.
'It is up to us to defeat that agenda,' she writes.
Solnit said she appealed the suspension. On Wednesday, June 11, she shared a screenshot of Facebook's response saying it decided to disable her account: 'It still doesn't follow our Community Standards on account integrity. You cannot request another review of this decision.'
Solnit noted that she doesn't think a Meta higher-up has it in for her, despite the popularity of her account. She cited 'inane algorithms that often delete posts' as the likeliest explanation. (In April, the Chronicle reported on Meta's rejection of an ad promoting a Northern California Pride festival.)
Even so, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has cozied up to the Trump administration, dining with the president at Mar-a-Lago and appointing Trump ally Dana White to his company's board. Meta also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration fund.
Meta's Community Standards on its account integrity page state that the company reserves the right to restrict or disable accounts that risk 'imminent harm to individual or public safety.'
Solnit is the author of more than 30 books, including 'Infinite City: A San Francisco Atlas' and the children's book 'Cinderella Liberator,' which Marin Shakespeare Company
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
38 minutes ago
- Politico
Harvard, Trump admin clash over court protection for foreign students
Harvard University and the Trump administration are at an impasse over the terms of an order a judge said she plans to issue stopping the U.S. government from stripping Harvard of its ability to enroll foreign students. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs said two weeks ago during a hearing that she wants to issue a preliminary injunction that would allow international students to attend Harvard while the school presses a lawsuit accusing the Trump administration of infringing on Harvard's First Amendment rights. Harvard's lawyers informed the judge Thursday that the Trump administration is resisting several provisions the university wants to see in the injunction, including a ban on any 'categorical restriction' affecting the school's foreign students and at least 30 days' notice if the Department of Homeland Security revokes the certification Harvard has enjoyed for more than 70 years to receive foreign students. Burroughs, a Boston-based Obama appointee, has already issued two temporary restraining orders in the case: one blocking Secretary Kristi Noem's attempt last month to immediately cancel that certification and another blocking a proclamation President Donald Trump issued last week using his immigration powers to bar foreign Harvard students from entering the U.S. Harvard attorney Ian Gershengorn said in a new court filing that despite those orders, the government has continued to attempt to strip Harvard students of their visas through 'creative relabeling.' International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's enrollment. Lawyers on behalf of the university are asking the federal government to demonstrate how it would ensure the injunction is not simply bypassed and how current and prospective students can be assured their visa statuses are not at risk. 'Even in the short time since the hearing, the government has committed to continuing — indeed to intensifying — its retaliatory campaign,' the lawsuit said. The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Last month, Harvard's International Office told the court in a declaration that dozens of foreign students were asking the school about their options to defer enrollment or transfer to another institution due to the uncertainty around their visas. At least 10 international students or scholars scheduled to travel to study at Harvard this fall had their visa applications refused for 'administrative processing' immediately after the initial DHS action, according to the institution. Harvard President Alan Garber has tried to reassure his international students through community updates. The university has also advised foreign students and scholars to report issues they encounter while attempting to reenter the U.S. and are urging them to contact their country's local consulate or embassy in the U.S. to inform them that they are attending Harvard. 'We will continue to protect the rights of our international students and scholars, and the Constitutional rights of our University,' Garber said in a statement last week. At the hearing late last month, a Justice Department attorney said the administration believes no emergency relief by the judge was appropriate, but he agreed to work with Harvard's lawyers on terms for the preliminary injunction. While the administration and Trump himself have been more critical of Harvard than of other U.S. universities, officials have sometimes sounded more conciliatory in recent weeks, appearing to look for a deal in which the United States' oldest university would make concessions related to antisemitism on campus and to discipline foreign students involved in crimes or protests. Late last month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said his agency would move 'aggressively' to revoke visas of Chinese students in the U.S. linked to the Chinese Communist Party. Trump has also called for the number of foreign students at Harvard to drop by about half. However, on Thursday, he struck a very different tone. 'I've always been in favor of students coming in from other countries. That includes China,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'I think it's a great thing. It's also — it's good for our schools.' He also said he has long favored giving long-term foreign students the right to stay and work in the U.S. 'I'm all for making sure that people like that can go to work for all of our great companies,' the president said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Police Target Dozens of Reporters During L.A. Anti-ICE Protests
Dozens of journalists have been assaulted and injured by federal and local law enforcement in Los Angeles during protests earlier this week against Donald Trump's mass deportation program. Press freedom groups are demanding that law enforcement stop targeting reporters covering the L.A. protests after on-air news broadcasts and cellphone video showed federal, state, and local police firing indiscriminately on crowds with pepper balls, rubber bullets, and other so-called less-than-lethal ammunition, while in other cases officers are seen firing on clearly identified members of the press. A coalition of 28 groups including the Los Angeles Press Club, the Committee to Protect Journalists, and the American Civil Liberties Union, sent a letter to Department Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Monday "to express alarm" over the incidents and urge Noem to ensure that federal law enforcement officers uphold the First Amendment. According to the groups, there were at least 24 documented instances of journalists being targeted by law enforcement while covering Los Angeles protests between June 6 and June 8. "A number of reports suggest that federal officers have indiscriminately used force or deployed munitions such as tear gas or pepper balls that caused significant injuries to journalists," the letter said. "In some cases, federal officers appear to have deliberately targeted journalists who were doing nothing more than their job covering the news." Besides the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press, reporters in California are also protected by a state statute that allows them access to areas closed or blocked off by police responding to protests and prohibits any efforts to obstruct them. Nevertheless, police shot and injured multiple journalists with "less-than-lethal" munitions, physically impeded them from staying in areas they were legally allowed to cover, and threatened them for trying to assert their rights. Australian TV reporter Lauren Tomasi was live on the air when police shot her with a rubber bullet. That same day, a California Highway Patrol officer shot New York Post photographer Toby Canham in the head with a rubber bullet. The New York Post reported that Canham was "standing just off the 101 Freeway at an elevated level, was filming video of the chaos between cops and rioters when a California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer suddenly turned his weapon toward him and fired from about 100 yards away." "When I got whacked, to my best recollection it was just me filming with my cameras on and then I got shot," Canham said. "Where I was hit, I was the only person overlooking the freeway. I wasn't surrounded so I was an easy target." "It's a real shame," Canham continued. "I completely understand being in the position where you could get injured, but at the same time, there was no justification for even aiming the rifle at me and pulling the trigger, so I'm a bit pissed off about that, to be honest." HuffPost reported that freelance news photographer Nick Stern was hospitalized after being shot in the leg with a 3-inch projectile that had to be surgically removed. Stern said he believed the device was supposed to be fired above a crowd, not at it. "Why this device was shot at human, kind of, waist high level, I do not know," Stern told HuffPost. "The people around me at that time was [sic] doing nothing more than waving Mexican flags." Other video shows police firing on a Univision television crew, shoving NBC LA reporters, The Southern California News Group's Ryanne Mena also posted photos of bruising from where she was struck by police pepper balls. CNN's Jason Carroll was also detained by police while reporting in Los Angeles. "Based on these incidents, it is apparent that LAPD and LASD officers are failing to meet their obligation to respect journalists' rights, protected by both the First Amendment and California statute, to gather and report news at protests—including after they're broken up by police," a coalition of press freedom groups wrote this week in a separate letter to the Los Angeles chief of police and Los Angeles County sheriff. The repression of media during protests is one of the hallmarks of lawless authoritarianism. It cuts off the flow of nongovernment information during unrest and chills the right of everyone to hold the government accountable. It should be condemned by leaders and investigated by agencies, and the individual officers should be held accountable. The post Police Target Dozens of Reporters During L.A. Anti-ICE Protests appeared first on
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Targeting Immigrants Won't Make America Safer
President Donald Trump deployed California National Guard troops to Los Angeles this week, without request from local authorities, in response to protests against recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. The decision represents a dangerous escalation in the Trump administration's ongoing assault on immigrants and political dissent. Through mass deportations, expulsions, unlawful detention, and erosion of freedom of expression, it is using authoritarian practices to silence opposition to its agenda. It's putting all of us at risk. The Trump administration's treatment of our immigrant neighbors is not just cruel; it's a calculated effort to weaponize federal power against all of us, especially the most marginalized. This isn't about law and order; it's about fear and control. That effort is on display from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C. This week, as the Senate works on its version of the reconciliation bill, we're calling on lawmakers in both chambers to reject Trump's budget bill, which would fund a machinery of cruel and mass deportations. We also urge Congress to take immediate action to ensure constitutional and human rights apply to all people in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, by revoking the Alien Enemies Act, protecting the right to protest without fear of detention or deportation, returning those who were wrongly removed from the U.S., and fully restoring the right to seek asylum. The stakes are too high for silence or inaction. The raids, mass deportations, family separations, disappearances, and retaliation against student protesters are not isolated incidents. They form a deeply concerning pattern of authoritarian practices, which include sending immigrants to a prison in El Salvador without due process; retaliating against cities and states that protect their immigrant communities; detaining and deporting U.S. citizens; locking protesters up and threatening deportation; and allowing ICE agents into schools, churches, and hospitals. All of these actions send a chilling message to immigrant communities and U.S. citizens alike: no one in the U.S. is safe from state-sanctioned harm. Immigrants and dissenters must not be used as pawns in the game of politics. Human rights—such as the right to a fair trial, access to asylum, legal representation, and protection from torture or forcible removal to a country where a person may face harm—are guaranteed under both U.S. and international law. When the executive strips these rights from some of us, it sets a precedent that puts all of our rights at risk. The next target could be any of us. The administration's recent use of the Alien Enemies Act to disappear more than 200 people to El Salvador's Centro de Confinamiento Contra del Terrorismo, a facility widely criticized for its violent and inhumane conditions, raises serious legal and human rights concerns. Families and attorneys have been unable to contact their loved ones who are being detained. Disappearing people to a prison in a country that is not their own, without due process or legal recourse, is a blatant human rights violation. This dangerous precedent should alarm anyone who believes the rule of law must serve justice rather than entrench systemic inequality. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 11: Protesters continue to march and chant in an approximately one-square mile area of downtown Los Angeles in response to a series of immigration raids, on June 11, 2025 in... LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 11: Protesters continue to march and chant in an approximately one-square mile area of downtown Los Angeles in response to a series of immigration raids, on June 11, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. MoreUnder the Trump administration, even holding U.S. citizenship or lawful immigration status does not shield anyone from being detained and expelled. A clear example is the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent resident who was targeted after participating in peaceful protests for Palestinian rights and has been jailed in an ICE processing center since early March. Make no mistake: organizing and participating in protests is not a crime. Freedom of speech and assembly are protected rights, and using immigration enforcement to silence dissent threatens each and every one of us. ICE has become increasingly brazen in its tactics. It uses agents in masks and plain clothes to terrorize communities and arrest our neighbors, detains people in overcrowded and cruel detention centers, targets activists, violates due process, and tramples on other human rights. The system that is now targeting and brutalizing immigrants of color has a long history of targeting and brutalizing Black, brown, and Indigenous communities across this country. Even the term "invasion," which the Trump administration uses to stoke fear and justify inhumane policies, evokes the white supremacist great replacement theory. As long as the government continues to prioritize militarization, incarceration, and deportation while relying on racist policing and targeting immigrants, communities across the U.S. will not be safe. We must prioritize human dignity and public safety. We need long-term, transformative solutions to our predatory immigration system which currently promotes brutality, surveillance, and incarceration. We call on the White House to end the deployment of the National Guard; change course on its immigration policy; stop its fear-mongering, racist, and xenophobic rhetoric; and bring an immediate end to its attacks on basic human rights. In addition to requesting that the U.S. government immediately return the people it illegally removed to El Salvador and revoke the invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, we also demand that lawmakers comply with the decisions of the U.S. Judiciary by immediately halting all plans for mass detentions and deportations, and reestablishing the right to seek asylum at the United States' southern border. Instead of investing hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars into cruel policies, Congress should invest in solutions that uplift all of our communities. The Senate must vote no on President Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," which would gut life-saving and essential programs like Medicaid, Social Security, food assistance for families, and student loans in favor of Trump's deportation machine. Immigrants and people seeking safety make our communities safer, richer, and more vibrant. Now is the time to stand in solidarity with our immigrant family members, friends, and neighbors to uphold human dignity and the principles of justice and fairness for all. Judith Browne Dianis is Executive Director of Advancement Project. Paul O'Brien is the Executive Director at Amnesty International USA. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
