Germany Moves to Deport Four Pro-Palestine Activists
Rabat – Berlin's immigration authorities have ordered four young foreign residents to leave Germany over accusation 'antisemitism' and 'support for terrorism' to due their participation in peaceful protests condemning Israel's genocide in Gaza.
The deportation orders are set to take effect in less than one month despite the four individuals – three EU citizens and an American – not having been convicted of any crime. The activists, who must leave Germany by April 21, issued a joint statement accusing the German officials of weaponizing immigration law in order to silence pro-Palestinian voices.
The unprecedented move has sparked concerns over freedom of speech and civil liberties in Germany, with many comparing it to the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestine activism in the US.
Alexander Gorski, a lawyer representing two out of the quartet, warned that Germany is witnessing a state of political descent into far-right policies.
'What we're seeing here is straight out of the far right's playbook […] You can see it in the U.S. and Germany, too: Political dissent is silenced by targeting the migration status of protesters,' said Gorski.
The lawyer noted that this isn't the first where German authorities using migration law as a 'tool of repression against social movements' stating that he has encountered more than a dozen cases of Palestinian and other Arab nationals whose refugee status or residency were revoked because of their participation in pro-Palestinian rallies or even over social media posts condemning Israel's actions in Gaza since October 2023.
Under German migration law, authorities can issue deportation orders without the presence of a criminal record if the cited reason is severe enough to warrant such a punishment.
'The key question is: How severe is the threat and how proportionate the response?' said Thomas Oberhäuser, a lawyer and chair of the executive committee on migration law at the German Bar Association. 'If someone is being expelled simply for their political beliefs, that's a massive overreach.'
German officials have repeatedly justified their crackdown on pro-Palestine voices as a measure to combat anti-semitism and protect the country's Jewish population, thus atoning for its Holocaust. However, many argue that Germany has failed to break from its Nazi past, pointing to its treatment of anti-Zionist Jews who have spoken up in support of Palestine.
In October 2023, German authorities arrested Iris Hefets, a German-Israeli psychoanalyst in Berlin, on charges of anti-Semitism, for merely walking alone with a placard reading 'As an Israeli and as a Jew, stop the genocide in Gaza.'
That same month, more than a hundred German-Jewish artists, writers, academics, journalists and cultural workers published an open letter condemning Germany's repression of pro-Palestinian speech and widespread accusations of anti-Semitism directed at everyone who criticizes Israel's actions. Tags: Berlin Germanyfree palestineGaza protests
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
23 minutes ago
- Morocco World
Five Western States Sanction Israeli Ministers for West Bank Violence
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Norway, and the United Kingdom have announced coordinated sanctions against Israeli Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir and Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich, citing their direct role in inciting violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank. Ben-Gvir, previously convicted in Israel for incitement to racism and backing a terror organization, along with Finance Minister Smotrich, will now be subject to asset freezes and travel bans. In a joint statement, the prime ministers of the sanctioning countries pointed to the ministers' extremist rhetoric calling for Palestinians to be driven from their homes—rhetoric that has directly contributed to the death and mass displacement of Palestinian communities. They said that 'extremist rhetoric […] encourages violence and human rights abuses and fundamentally rejects the two-state solution,' adding that they remain 'steadfastly committed' to that solution, which they still say is 'the only way to ensure long term stability in the region.' According to the statement, the five countries had engaged in prolonged discussions with the Israeli government regarding Ben-Gvir, Smotrich, and the Israeli-led displacement of Palestinians and expansion of illegal settlements built atop destroyed Palestinian villages. But the 'appalling and dangerous' actions, the statement says, have continued with 'encouragement and impunity.' 'This is why we have taken this action now – to hold those responsible to account. The Israeli Government must uphold its obligations under international law and we call on it to take meaningful action to end extremist, violent and expansionist rhetoric,' reads the statement. Before addressing Israel's genocide in Gaza, the statement pivots into familiar territory: affirming support for Israel. It revisits the October 7 attacks, despite the fact that over 20 months into a genocide livestreamed in real time, Israel has killed more than 55,000 people and is deliberately starving over 2 million under the pretext of fighting Hamas—an exercise of collective punishment that may well be the least severe crime on Israel's growing list of war crimes. 'We continue to want a strong friendship with the people of Israel based on our shared ties, values and commitment to their security and future,' the statement reads—sounding more like an apology for having to confront Israeli crimes than a serious condemnation of them. The statement's closing lines gloss over the scale of the Gaza genocide: 'We continue to be appalled by the immense suffering of civilians, including the denial of essential aid. There must be no unlawful transfer of Palestinians from Gaza or within the West Bank, nor any reduction in the territory of the Gaza Strip.' Despite these staggering numbers and mounting evidence of war crimes, the statement avoids naming Israel as the perpetrator. In a baffling deflection of blame from Israel, the leaders state: 'We want to see a reconstructed Gaza no longer run by Hamas' — further validating Israel's narrative and providing a veiled justification for its actions.
Morocco World
19 hours ago
- Morocco World
LA Protests: Tensions Rise Between California Governor and Trump
Rabat — As the protests in Los Angeles stretch into their fifth day, tensions between California's Governor Gavin Newsom and US President Donald Trump have escalated dramatically. The unrest, initially sparked by federal agents targeting the migrant community, has now become a focal point for a fierce political confrontation. Most protests have remained largely peaceful, with many demonstrators calling for justice and reform. However, the situation has become more volatile following the federal government's decision to deploy thousands of troops to LA. Trump initially sent 2,000 National Guardsmen, but has since increased this number by an additional 2,000 troops and activated 700 Marines, further bypassing state authority and raising concerns about militarization and the suppression of civil dissent. A controversial deployment of troops Governor Gavin Newsom condemned this escalation, accusing Trump of 'trying to invoke chaos by sending 4,000 soldiers onto American soil'— inadvertently voicing out a reality that many in the global south have faced under American imperialism under the emblem of democracy. 'US Marines serve a valuable purpose for this country—defending democracy. They are not political pawns,' Newsom stated. 'The Secretary of Defense is illegally deploying them onto American streets so Trump can have a talking point at his parade this weekend,' he said, referencing the upcoming parade scheduled in Washington, DC, on June 14, to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the US military. Unsurprisingly, this date coincides with Trump's 79th birthday—conveniently aligning with his ego and desire for a grand spectacle. The state is now suing Trump for sending in troops without the governor's permission as it is highly unusual for the American military to have any domestic law enforcement role without a direct request from the governor. In a provocative move, Trump told reporters outside the White House that he would arrest Governor Newsom if he could. 'I would do it if I were Tom Homan,' Trump said, referring to the acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). 'I think it's great,' Trump added, suggesting he supports the idea of Newsom's arrest. In response, Governor Newsom took to X to condemn the threats, saying, 'This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or Republican—this is a line we cannot cross as a nation. This is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' When asked about the possibility of being arrested, Newsom remarked during an interview with Pod Save America, that he has been seriously considering this possibility which 'says everything you need to know about who's in the White House right now.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass echoed concerns about the federal escalation. Speaking to CNN, she argued that the unrest was a direct response to aggressive ICE raids and could have been avoided otherwise. 'This has been a recipe for pandemonium,' she said. Bass emphasized that most protests have been peaceful, only turning unruly after Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard. She insisted that if things had gotten out of control, it was the responsibility of the state—and not the federal government—to request troop deployment. 'We were told he was going to target violent criminals, but what he's really doing is sending troops to a city with a significant immigrant population and long-standing advocacy for immigrant rights,' she said, questioning the rationale behind ICE raids in Los Angeles. 'This makes no sense—particularly when they're happening at places like Home Depot, where people are simply trying to work.' Unsurprisingly, Trump did not recognize the ICE raids, police brutality and troop deployment as underlying causes for the escalating unrest. Instead, he dismissed the protesters as 'professional agitators' and insurrectionists who should be in jail– completely avoiding any acknowledgement of responsibility. Legitimate protests Despite the heightened unrest, Mayor Bass maintains that the National Guard is unnecessary at this stage and that the vandalism and violence are confined to a few streets downtown. She stressed that anyone committing crimes will be detained and that violence is not a legitimate way to promote a cause. Newsom has also urged protesters to remain peaceful, warning that those who take advantage of the chaos will be held accountable. 'If you're protesting peacefully. Stay calm. Look out for another.' However, many activists and observers have contested the idea of a 'peaceful protest,' arguing that protests are inherently disruptive and aimed at challenging the status quo. The LAPD has employed rubber bullets and flash-bangs—stun grenades that produce a bright flash and loud noise—to disperse crowds, claiming these measures are responses to protesters throwing objects at officers. However, footage from 9News showing a journalist being hit by a rubber bullet—despite being clearly identifiable as press and not near the protesting crowds–might suggest otherwise. Often likened to the Gestapo—the secret police agency of Nazi Germany– the US police have deep roots in the country's history of racial discrimination and systemic oppression, with recent incidents highlighting ongoing issues of excessive force against marginalized communities. As tensions escalate around the US, many around the world view this within the broader context of the country's history of violence both domestically and abroad–a natural outcome of the climate of violence and hatred it has fostered.
Morocco World
2 days ago
- Morocco World
Trump Deploys Troops as ICE Raids Spark Widespread Protests
Rabat– Protests erupted across Los Angeles this weekend after a series of aggressive immigration raids by federal agents. US President Donald Trump escalated the federal response by deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to the city in an effort to quell what he described as 'insurrectionist' unrest. 'Looking really bad in LA. BRING IN THE TROOPS,' said Trump. The protests began following sweeping Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids at multiple worksites, which immigrant rights groups and labor unions condemned as violent and fear-driven. Among those arrested was David Huerta, president of Service Employees International Union (SEIU) California, who was reportedly observing a raid peacefully when he was violently detained. Union leaders called the arrests part of a deliberate campaign to intimidate immigrant communities. 'As a union, we will always stand with our immigrant brothers, sisters, and siblings. We will not be intimidated into silence. We will keep showing up. We will keep fighting back,' said SEIU, emphasizing the direct link between workers and immigrants' rights. Clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement escalated rapidly across Los Angeles. Federal agents fired tear gas and flash-bangs outside a federal building, while protesters gathered at multiple locations, including a Home Depot in southeast LA Police reported property damage and began making arrests. Authorities alleged that some protesters looted stores, set up barricades, and attacked officers on the 101 Freeway–a major highway that cuts through Los Angeles– with fireworks and rocks. In response, the LAPD authorized the use of 'less lethal munitions,' as National Guard troops were deployed to join federal agencies on the ground. In the midst of police escalation, an Australian journalist was also injured. Lauren Tomasi, reporting live for Nine News, was shot with a rubber bullet despite being clearly identifiable as press and not being involved in the protests. Trump vs California The deployment marks the first time in decades that a US president has unilaterally sent National Guard troops into a state without its request or consent—raising serious concerns over Trump's continued disregard of the law and constitutional boundaries. Typically, such deployments require coordination with state governors or are carried out under the Insurrection Act, which was not invoked in this case. Instead, Trump used 'Title 10' of the US Code to federalize the Guard, placing them under direct presidential command. Legal scholars argue this move tests the limits of executive power and potentially violates the 10th Amendment, which protects state sovereignty. Without the legal cover of the Insurrection Act, the troops are restricted from engaging in law enforcement, and their presence has been criticized as an unlawful escalation rather than a legitimate response. California Governor Gavin Newsom fiercely condemned President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and demanding their immediate withdrawal. In an official letter to the Department of Defense, Newsom argued the order was unlawful, noting it bypassed the governor's authority in violation of federal law: 'This directive did not issue 'through the governor of the state' as required by section 12406.' Newsom stressed that local law enforcement was adequately handling the situation and warned that Trump's intervention was 'inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed.' Newsom formally requested the federal government rescind the order and return control of the Guard to the state, potentially laying the ground for a legal challenge. Legal experts raised concerns about the deployment. Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow broader military authority. Instead, he used Title 10 to place the Guard under federal control—an approach that typically requires coordination with state governors- actions in line with Trump's continued disregard of legal and constitutional boundaries. Although federal officials say the troops are only protecting immigration officers and property, civil rights advocates argue the military presence is inflaming an already volatile situation. Protests have now stretched into a fourth day, fueled by outrage over the raids, the arrests, and the use of military force in a major American city. Raids and federal quotas White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem met last month with ICE leadership and demanded the agency increase arrests to 3,000 per day—reportedly threatening job loss for officials who didn't comply. The result has been a dramatic escalation in enforcement nationwide, including the detention of over 2,200 individuals in a single day in early June. Many of those arrested had been enrolled in ICE's Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program—a monitoring system meant to provide a more humane and cost-effective alternative to incarceration while immigration proceedings are pending. Under the new enforcement orders, even asylum seekers who are following all the rules are being detained. In Los Angeles, families with pending cases were arrested after showing up for routine ICE check-ins—some, including children, were held for hours without food or water. Similar arrests have taken place in courtrooms across the country, even in cases where judges had dismissed deportation. Home to over ten million immigrants, California's resistance to the federal deployment also stems from its long-standing identity as a 'sanctuary state'. Under the California Values Act, local and state law enforcement are prohibited from using their resources to assist federal immigration agencies in most cases. This law limits cooperation with ICE—such as sharing information about detainees or honoring federal immigration detainers—unless an individual has been convicted of certain serious crimes. The aim is to protect undocumented residents from deportation over minor offenses and to foster trust between immigrant communities and local authorities— setting it apart from the federal government's punitive immigration approach.
