Council urged for 'Plan B' to tackle congestion
A council has been urged to find a "Plan B" for tackling a city's congestion problem after a traffic filters trial was pushed back.
The managing director of Oxford Bus Company, Luke Marion, said congestion in Oxford was at "emergency levels".
Oxfordshire County Council's Lib Dem administration was set to introduce contentious traffic filters on several major roads in autumn 2024, but they were pushed back for another two years due to the ongoing closure of Botley Road.
The council's newly elected cabinet said it is going to draft new plans to deal with the city's congestion problem.
The traffic filters would be introduced on Hythe Bridge Street, Thames Street, St Cross Road, St Clement's Street, Marston Ferry Road and Hollow Way, with motorists without a permit facing a £70 fine for driving through.
The plans are part of the county council's drive to create a net-zero travel and transport system by 2040.
Last week, Banbury's Labour MP Sean Woodcock wrote to the council asking whether they would take advantage of powers to bring more bus services under their control, if the government's better buses bill was passed.
Andrew Gant, cabinet member for transport management, said the calls for action were taken "seriously" and that they looked forward "to engaging on proposals soon".
"We need faster, more regular, cheaper bus services, and we need them now," he said.
"The way to do that is to tackle congestion, which will of course also deliver safer, quieter, cleaner streets, and help key workers and businesses delivering vital services on our roads."
Green county and city councillor Emily Kerr said she was "delighted" at the news and called the delays due to the Botley Road closure "exceptionally problematic".
"Everyone agrees we need to speed up the buses," she added.
"But whilst Labour and the Tory Alliance say they want this, they've opposed the policy suggestions which will deliver it, such as traffic filters."
Labour councillor Brad Baines argued that the county council plans "do not answer questions about affordability of bus services or routes going where people need to go".
"These are key barriers which are yet to be addressed or even considered."
Councillor David Henwood is part of the Oxfordshire Alliance, which consists of Conservative and Independent councillors.
"The solution is clear: remove the LTNs to unlock Oxford's radial routes, relieve pressure on the main roads, and finally make space for efficient, reliable bus services across the city," he said.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Urgent health responders exempted from city's LTNs
LTNs and cycle lanes cost council almost £4m
Council refuses calls to open LTNs in emergencies
Oxfordshire County Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Anger as Oxford rail line classed as Wales project
There is anger that a multi-billion pound project to build a railway line between Oxford and Cambridge has been classed as an England and Wales project. The £6.6bn line will see no tracks laid in Wales, but because of the way it has been classified, it means the country will not benefit from any extra cash. David Chadwick, Liberal Democrat MP for Brecon, Radnor and Cwm Tawe, told Radio Wales Breakfast it was "HS2 all over again". The UK government said it was paid for through its "rail network enhancements pipeline, which funds projects in both England and Wales". Chadwick said Wales was "being denied hundreds of millions in funding that could transform our own rail network". He added that Labour expected people in Wales "to believe the ridiculous idea that this project will benefit them and they are justified in not giving Wales the money it needs to improve our own public transport systems". Why a 49-mile train journey took me seven hours From paralysis to Parliament in 10 years for MP Wales has 'entitlement' to HS2 cash - ex-minister Unlike Northern Ireland and Scotland, most of Wales' railway is funded by the UK government, and not ministers in Cardiff. Under the system used to fund the devolved nations, called the Barnett Formula, Scotland and Northern Ireland get extra money when more cash is spent on rail in England and Wales. It follows the long-standing row over HS2 - deemed to be an England and Wales project - so Wales gets no extra cash, which would be the case if it was England only. However, none of the track planned for HS2 will reach Wales. Differing figures have been given for how much politicians think Wales is owed from HS2, from £4bn suggested by Plaid Cyrmu and the Welsh government in the past to £350m in the most recent figures from Welsh ministers. The UK government said its rail network enhancements pipeline also paid for the redevelopment of Cardiff Central Station, improved level crossings in north Wales and support for the upgraded south Wales relief lines. Wales' Transport Secretary Ken Skates said the UK and Welsh governments had agreed "an ambitious pipeline of improvements that will make up for underinvestment by previous governments" and were "seeking a fair share of investment".
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Second indyref not a ‘priority' during my time as Prime Minister
Sir Keir Starmer has said another Scottish independence referendum is not a 'priority' and he cannot imagine one taking place during his time as Prime Minister. The Labour leader said First Minister and SNP leader John Swinney had not raised the issue with him during their recent talks. Scots voted in an independence referendum in 2014, with the 'No' side securing 55% of the vote. Since then, successive UK governments have denied the SNP's pleas for a second referendum. The Prime Minister was speaking to the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme, having launched the strategic defence review in Glasgow on Monday. He was asked if there would be another independence referendum if a nationalist majority emerges after next year's Holyrood election. Sir Keir said: 'I think it's really important to focus on the priorities that matter most. 'We got a big election win last year on the basis that we would stabilise the economy and ensure that on that foundation we build a stronger Scotland in a stronger United Kingdom and that's what I intend to do.' He was then asked if he could imagine another independence referendum during his time as Prime Minister. Sir Keir said: 'No, and nobody's raising that with me as their first priority. 'Certainly, in the discussions I'm having with the First Minister, that is not – we're talking about jobs, energy, security and dealing with the cost-of-living crisis.' Last month Mr Swinney said a 'democratic majority' of pro-independence MSPs following the next Scottish Parliament election should result in another referendum. The Prime Minister said that whatever the outcome in May, an independence referendum is 'not a priority'. Speaking to Good Morning Scotland, Sir Keir also discussed the defence sector in Scotland. He said there are around 25,000 defence jobs in Scotland and the strategic defence review announcements would 'build on that'. The Prime Minister said: 'I would like to see many, many jobs in Scotland. 'Scotland has an incredible heritage and skilled work people in Scotland. 'We've just been looking at some of the frigates which have been built and are being built in Scotland.' He insisted the SNP is 'wrong' in its opposition to nuclear weapons and said 'we're entering a new era on defence and security'.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Customer service is collapsing in high-tax Britain
Want to pick up some groceries after a late night at the office? Forget it. Or, if you can get to a supermarket, fancy grabbing a coffee after traipsing around with a couple of kids? It's no longer possible. Trying on a pair of jeans at the clothes shop? Good luck finding someone to help you. One by one, companies are cutting back on opening hours, reducing checkout staff and cutting in-store services. Many are closing branches completely. Following the huge rise in employment taxes imposed by the Government, bosses don't have much choice. Companies have to save money on staff somehow. But with every cut they make, the experience gets a little worse. In Labour's high-tax Britain, customer service is dying – and we will all end up poorer as a result. It has been a worrying few weeks for anyone who cares about the quality of customer service. Self-checkouts are becoming more ubiquitous, opening hours are getting shorter and manpower is being cut back. Over the weekend, we learnt that Tesco is trialling the closure of some of its Express stores at 10pm rather than 11pm, and will have fewer staff on hand for the hours that they remain open. It is not hard to guess why: after Rachel Reeves's recent increase to employers' National Insurance, the company has said it will have to pay an extra £235m in contributions. That is just the latest example of a broader trend. The self-service checkout is proliferating even though it has become very unpopular with shoppers, and not just in the supermarkets. Next revealed earlier this year that it is to start trialling automated checkouts as it looks to find ways of coping with the extra £67m the chain estimates it will have to pay in employment taxes this year. Others are slashing services. Morrisons said in March that it was closing down cafes in its stores, along with florists and specialist meat counters. Sainsbury's said that it would lose 3,000 jobs by closing down in-store cafes, bakeries and pizza counters. The National Insurance increase was not directly blamed but both chains said they had to reduce costs. There are even examples of pubs closing at 9pm so they can cut back on the staff hours, and therefore lower their tax bill. Add it all up, and one point is clear: the customer is no longer the number-one priority – bosses are more obsessed with managing costs. There is no point in blaming the big chains for these decisions. After all, they are all commercial companies, and their primary duty is to their shareholders. If the Government is determined to tax them based on how many people they employ, instead of on their profits, then the only rational response is to skimp on staff as much as possible. We may only be seeing the start of the process. Before long, there will be QR codes in place of waiters and waitresses at restaurants (after all, in fast food places it is already almost impossible to place an order with a human being any more). Get ready for self-serving beer kegs at your local 'Spoons, while an app will check you into your hotel room, and the estate agent will just send you an AI-generated video link over actually showing you around the new home you were thinking of buying. It won't be possible to interact with a human being any more. Conventional economic statistics don't capture the impact of all this on our day-to-day lives. If you spend £200 at the supermarket, that is an extra £200 added to the total GDP figure regardless of whether you had to struggle with a self-service checkout for 20 minutes or if you were whisked through the till by a smiling sales assistant who chatted to you and wished you a pleasant day as you left. It may not make a difference to the economists but it makes a big difference to you. Likewise, it doesn't make any difference to GDP if you have to rush out of the house or your office to get to Tesco Express at one minute to 10 because you don't have any food and it will close soon. But again, it makes a big difference to you. A successful economy is not just about maximising raw output. It is about maximising total consumer satisfaction. As service levels collapse, GDP may stay the same, but we are all worse off in ways that the figures don't reveal. More worryingly for the GDP statistics, companies can't innovate. The most successful businesses find new and original ways of delighting their customers. It might be by staying open for different hours, or offering a broader range of services or products, or a more complete experience, or all sort of things that we have not thought of yet but which might prove very popular. The best ideas can then be taken out to the rest of the world. And yet instead of encouraging companies to try out new ideas, we are forcing them to put all their energy into cutting staff. Over time, that will impact the competitiveness of the British economy. The Chancellor may or may not raise the extra £25bn she is expecting from her increase in employers' National Insurance contributions. We will find out over the next few months as the tax starts to bite. But the costs of the tax raid are becoming painfully clear. It will be measured in fewer jobs, lower wages, higher inflation and, perhaps worst of all, in a country characterised by poor service and declining innovation. When you find the doors to Tesco Express closed at 10.01pm, at least you will know who to blame. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
