Arizona has some weird laws on the books. Here are 8 of the strangest you should know
Arizona has some unusual and strangely specific laws still on the books.
While Arizona drivers might know about some of the weird rules regulating traffic, there are a lot of other goofy laws on the books. Did you know the Grand Canyon State has placed restrictions on when hotel staff may restock a minibar and whether certain arcade games are allowed to be rigged? We didn't either.
Here are eight unusual Arizona laws that you should know about, though most actually do make sense when you think them through. (We're not sure about the minibar and lemonade statutes, though).
Arizonans can't feed garbage to pigs without first obtaining a permit, according to ARS 3-2664. ARS stands for Arizona Revised Statutes.
There's an exception, however, for anyone who feeds only their own household garbage to pigs that are raised "for his own use." (We're assuming that women can be pig owners, too, but the statute just refers to "his.")
Arizona has unique driving laws: Here are 8 traffic rules you must know to avoid a ticket
A person operating a motor vehicle on a public highway and approaching a horse-drawn vehicle or a horse and rider "shall exercise reasonable precaution to prevent frightening and to safeguard the animals and to ensure the safety of persons riding or driving the animals," ARS 28-858 says.
If the animals appear frightened, the person in control of the vehicle needs to reduce their speed and "if requested by signal or otherwise shall not proceed further toward the animals unless necessary to avoid accident or injury until the animals appear to be under control."
A person who knowingly or intentionally trips an equine for entertainment or sport is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor, according to ARS 13-2910.09, must serve no less than 48 hours in jail and pay a fine of $1,000. The punishments get more severe with repeat offenses.
Equine, per the law, is defined as a horse, pony, mule, donkey or hinny. A hinny is the offspring of a male horse and a female donkey.
By "trips," the law means knowingly or intentionally causing an equine to lose its balance or fall by use of a wire, pole, stick, or rope or any other object or by any other means.
The law doesn't apply to jumping or steeplechase events, racing, training, branding, show events, calf or steer roping events, or any traditional western rodeo events.
Those arcade games that pick up stuffed animals and other prizes with a robotic claw, known as crane games, can't be knowingly rigged, an Arizona law says. Anyone found guilty of rigging a crane game is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Rigging a crane game, per the law, can include:
Altering or maintaining a crane game so that the claw is physically unable to grasp exposed prizes.
Displaying prizes in a crane game in a manner so that the claw is physically incapable of grasping exposed prizes.
Misrepresenting the value of prizes.
Using cash or currency as prizes in crane games or awarding prizes in crane games that are redeemable for cash or currency.
The saguaro cactus is protected under the state's Arizona native plant law. Anyone who moves or salvages a saguaro cactus (cereus giganteus) that is more than four feet tall, from other than its original growing location, must purchase a permit, Arizona law says.
Destruction or theft of a saguaro, which are exclusive to the Sonoran Desert, is illegal under state law and can result in fines and a class 4 felony.
Landowners have the right to destroy or remove plants on their land, but only if the land is privately owned, the protected plants are not taken off the land or offered for sale, and the state was notified of the intended destruction before the plants were destroyed, according to Arizona law.
Alcohol in Arizona generally can't be sold between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m., which is likely the reasoning behind ARS 4-206.05, which says that hotel and motel minibars in Arizona may not be "replenished or restocked with spirituous liquor between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m."
Writer Andrea Coleman questioned the usefulness of the law in a 2019 article published in Medium.
"Hotel rooms seem to be pretty safe places to drink. There's a bed, a carpeted floor, even a toilet to vomit in," Coleman wrote. "It's like drinking at home. You're not behind a motor vehicle, less chance of putting someone's life in danger."
Speaking of minibars and drinks, Arizona has a state drink, and it's lemonade. The official state drink is documented in the Arizona Revised Statutes with a simple sentence: "Lemonade is the official state drink." It was signed into law by Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey in 2019.
The idea came from Gilbert teenager Garrett Glover. Glover said lemonade seemed most fitting because of Arizona's five C's: copper, cattle, climate, cotton and citrus.
Social media users at the time suggested everything from horchata to margaritas as other contenders for Arizona's state drink, but lemonade won. AriZona Iced Tea was not a contender − turns out that drink originates in New York.
Arizona's "stupid motorist law" has received attention on lists of unusual driving laws for sounding silly, yet it actually makes sense.
State law penalizes drivers who ignore warning signs about flooded roadways, leaving the drivers financially responsible for a potential rescue if they deliberately drive around warning signs.
Frequently referred to as Arizona's stupid motorist law, ARS 28-910, the law mandates that the expense of rescuing a driver, along with towing a vehicle stranded by floodwaters, would be billed to the driver up to $2,000.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Arizona has some strange laws still on the books. Here are 8 of them

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration rescinds policy protecting emergency room abortions
The Trump administration has rescinded a Biden-era policy that protected emergency room abortions, stripping away a critical legal shield for doctors and pregnant women who live in states that ban the procedure. Photo by Tetra Images | Getty Images The Trump administration has rescinded a Biden-era policy that protected emergency room abortions, stripping away a critical legal shield for doctors and pregnant women who live in states that ban the procedure. Three years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the federal right to abortion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Many states, including Arizona, responded by passing restrictive laws or outright bans. While Arizonans last year voted to enshrine a fundamental right to abortion in the state Constitution, as many as 13 other states currently outlaw abortion in all cases. Shortly after the fall of Roe v. Wade, efforts to restore the right stalled in Congress, but the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, at former President Joe Biden's direction, circumvented that gridlock by issuing guidance that sought to assuage the fear of criminalization among health care providers and prevent delays in care for women facing pregnancy complications. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX In a July 2022 letter, then Secretary Xavier Becerra underscored the responsibility of virtually every hospital — even those in states with abortion bans — to perform an abortion if one is necessary to keep a pregnant patient stable. While the majority of abortions occur in abortion clinics, some are performed in hospitals, when women dealing with immediate pregnancy complications seek help at their local emergency rooms. In 2023, the latest year for which there is data, 33 of 12,705 abortions performed in Arizona occurred in hospitals. In his letter, Becerra wrote that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, which governs how hospitals treat patients dealing with medical emergencies, supersedes state law. Known as EMTALA, the act has long required hospitals that participate in Medicare ensure patients are medically stable before transferring or discharging them. Expanding the act's protections to abortions was a bid to create one last line of defense for women in hostile states who were confronting the life-endangering consequences of abortion bans. One woman in Oklahoma with an unviable pregnancy was told by hospital staff they couldn't help her until she was 'crashing out,' and advised her to wait in the parking lot until that happened. And a Tennessee woman whose local hospital refused to perform an emergency abortion was transported by ambulance six hours away to North Carolina to receive care, where she arrived with dangerously high blood pressure and signs of kidney failure. That legal shield was revoked on Tuesday, with a statement posted to the website of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services saying that the Biden-era interpretation does 'not reflect the policy of this Administration'. EMTALA will still be enforced, according to the update, including for 'emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy'. The change is the latest move from the administration to solidify its pro-life stance and drop the previous administration's resistance against state-level abortion bans, effectively greenlighting their continued existence. Along with expanding the role of EMTALA, the Justice Department under Biden sued Idaho over its abortion ban, arguing that it was a violation of federal law. In March, however, the Trump administration abandoned that lawsuit. A related lawsuit headed by Idaho's largest healthcare provider is on its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, and has successfully won a ruling that prevents Idaho from enforcing its abortion ban in emergency rooms, for now. It's unclear where the justices will land on the conflict when it it goes before the high court; a hearing in the lawsuit brought by the Biden administration showed them split on the issue last year, and the court later dismissed the case as mistakenly granted, leaving in place a previous ruling that froze Idaho's law in medical emergencies, rather than consider the problem. Reproductive rights advocates decried the decision to walk back the Biden guidance as 'callous'. Amy Friedrich-Karnik, the director of federal policy for the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that advocates for abortion access, noted that while federal law still directs doctors to provide stabilizing care for their patients, even if that means an abortion, the elimination of the guidance that clearly spells that out is worrying. 'While this action by the Trump administration does not change the law and providers' obligation to guarantee patients access to abortion care in an emergency, it does tell us everything we need to know about the anti-abortion movement: They would rather let pregnant people suffer life-threatening health consequences than allow them to receive stabilizing abortion care,' she said, in a written statement. Skye Perryman, the president and CEO of Democracy Forward, a legal group that defended Biden's interpretation of EMTALA in court, said that erasing the guidance would prove dangerous for pregnant women seeking reproductive healthcare in states with abortion bans on the books. 'The Trump administration's decision to withdraw EMTALA guidance guaranteeing pregnant people medical care in emergency situations will sow confusion for providers and endanger the lives and health of pregnant people,' she said, in a written statement. 'Every American deserves the right to access the necessary care in emergency scenarios, including pregnant people, without political interference.' Arizona Democratic leaders, too, lambasted the recission. Gov. Katie Hobbs, who campaigned on protecting abortion access while the state grappled with abortion bans, echoed concerns that removing the guidance would harm women. 'Politicians should not make decisions for women and their doctors,' she wrote, in a post on social media site X, formerly Twitter. 'This cruel and reckless policy will put women's lives at risk.' Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, who has also been a strong advocate of reproductive rights and has mobilized her office to defend against the criminalization of health care providers, added that doctors shouldn't be worried about treating their patients. 'Doctors shouldn't have to guess if they're allowed to save a woman's life,' Mayes wrote, in a post on X. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Firefighter in daring Harlem rope rescue given FDNY's most prestigious award
An FDNY firefighter who risked it all to rappel down the side of a burning Harlem building and save a man trying to escape the flames will be honored with the department's most prestigious award, officials said Tuesday. During the FDNY's Medal Day celebration Wednesday at City Hall, Firefighter Michael Kotzo will be given the Chief of Department Peter J. Ganci Medal for being 'instrumental in two of the three life-saving rope rescues' at the dramatic Feb. 23, 2024, fire at St. Nicholas Place and 'acting in the highest traditions of the Fire Department of the City of New York,' FDNY officials said. Several other firefighters who combated the flames and conducted rope rescues during the same fire will also receive Medal Day awards, department officials said. Kotzo, 49, didn't think twice when he saw the stranded building resident crawling out of the top-floor window of the six-story building, gasping for air. 'It really wasn't much of a thought as it was just reaction,' Kotzo told the Daily News. 'It just happened. We train quite a lot, and rope rescues — that's one of those drills we do every week. 'It's nothing out of the ordinary to go to the roof of our firehouse and, one after the other, go down the side. We're doing it all the time,' he said. But there was nothing ordinary at the St. Nicholas Place fire, which officials said was sparked by an exploding e-bike battery. The blaze broke out on the apartment building's third floor, trapping residents on the three floors above. Firefighters arrived within three minutes, but one tenant had already fallen from a window he was trying to climb down from. Kotzo, of Ladder Company 28 on W. 143rd St., nicknamed the 'Harlem Hilton,' drove the ladder truck to the scene and set the aerial ladders to the upper floors, but saw multiple people in the upper windows trying to climb down on their own. The FDNY conducts roughly one rope rescue a year, sometimes none at all. On that frosty day in February, Kotzo and his team conducted three within a matter of minutes, FDNY officials said. In rope rescues, one firefighter is attached to a rope secured from above by another firefighter who lowers them down from the roof. After each rescue, a new line is thrown down, so there's no strain on the ropes and harnesses. Kotzo had just lowered one firefighter down to save someone hanging from a window when he saw another resident poke his head out of the next window over. 'With no other rope yet on the roof, Firefighter Kotzo determined that the victim's only chance of survival was to reuse the rope a second time,' the FDNY said in acknowledging the smoke eater's heroics. 'While attempting to calm the victim at the window, he retracted the rope and transmitted to Battalion 16 that a second rope rescue was being conducted.' Understanding 'the inherent risk of using the same rope a second time,' Kotzo snapped on his personal harness, handed the rope to Firefighter Thomas Morrison to secure and 'bravely dismounted the parapet,' the FDNY said. Lowering himself down to the window, Kotzo realized there was a language barrier between himself and the building tenant, he recalled. 'I tried to make eye contact to give him a sense of security,' he remembered. 'Once I saw my opportunity to make my move, I grabbed [him] in a way that was safe. He had his arms around my neck, but during the descent, he let go of my neck, so I was pretty much carrying all of his weight, so I was like, 'Let's hurry up and let's get down.'' Kotzo handed off the patient to EMS. A moment later, he was back inside the building. 'We still had a fire to extinguish and a lot of work to do,' he said. 'I'm just glad everything ran smoothly. We were really fortunate that everything just clicked.' One resident was killed and 17 others were injured in the blaze, officials said. Fazil Khan, a 27-year-old Columbia Journalism School graduate, died at a hospital after he succumbed to the smoke inside the building, officials said. Kotzo's efforts made it easy to decide who should win this year's Ganci Medal, FDNY Commissioner Robert Tucker said. 'These stories are incredible, dangerous and technical, the medal recipients put their own lives at risk in service of others,' Tucker said. 'The efforts of Firefighter Michael Kotzo of Ladder Company 28, conducting multiple roof rope rescues, are exemplary, and he is deserving of our highest honor. His success depended on the training, teamwork and bravery that is the trademark of the FDNY.' Kotzo grew up in Pennsylvania and moved to New York just so he could become an FDNY firefighter. 'It was something I've always wanted to do,' he said. 'I'm proud that I'm able to represent the Fire Department and serve the people of this city.' When he receives his award Wednesday, Kotzo will be joined by his wife Wendy, children Kamryn and Gavin and his parents, who still worry about the 21-year FDNY veteran when he goes out on calls. 'I don't think they want to ask too many questions,' he joked.

Yahoo
23-05-2025
- Yahoo
Arizona woman gets years in prison for using stolen identity to get health care
A Maricopa County woman was sentenced to nearly nine years in prison and ordered to pay restitution after she accumulated nearly $300,000 in medical bills using a stolen identity, prosecutors said. Between September 2022 and March 2024, Shannon Lee Smith, 48, used another woman's name to fraudulently obtain medical care from various hospitals and ambulance providers, according to a statement from the Maricopa County Attorney's Office. The woman discovered her identity had been stolen when she received a bill from her insurance company for services she never received, the County Attorney's Office statement said. Smith received care at the Banner Desert Medical Center in Mesa, according to her indictment. She was ordered to repay Honor Health, Maricopa Ambulance, Radiology Partners, Mayo Clinic and Aetna, the insurance company, according to her plea agreement. "The impact of identity theft goes far beyond the financial implications," said Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell. "It takes away a victim's peace of mind and leaves them to deal with the fallout of having false information tied to their name. I am proud of the work our prosecution team has done to hold the defendant accountable and allow the victim to start reclaiming her life." Victimized: Arizonans' stolen personal information used in large-scale fraud scheme This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Arizona woman gets prison for using stolen identity for health care