logo
Elon Musk's robotaxi launch in Texas tests his vision of Tesla's future

Elon Musk's robotaxi launch in Texas tests his vision of Tesla's future

Reutersa day ago

June 11 (Reuters) - Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab faces an existential test this month as it aims to launch self-driving 'robotaxis' in its home base of Austin, Texas, where public-safety officials are increasingly concerned about the state's anti-regulation stance toward autonomous vehicles.
For Tesla, the launch of between 10 and 20 Model Y vehicles follows a decade of unfulfilled promises of self-driving vehicles from CEO Elon Musk, who last year staked the company's future on such technology as it pivoted away from chasing rapid growth in electric-vehicle sales.
The Austin robotaxi launch, which Musk says will "tentatively" open to the public on June 22, comes as Tesla tries to arrest a global vehicle-sales slide, stemming from both its aging lineup of human-driven electric vehicles and Musk's right-wing political activities.
Some analysts and investors attribute the majority of Tesla's stock market value to hopes for robotaxis and humanoid robots it has yet to deliver. On an earnings call last year, Musk said investors "should sell their Tesla stock" if they did not believe the company would solve the technological challenges of driverless vehicles.
For the city of Austin, Tesla's launch adds anxiety to a regulation-free landscape for autonomous vehicles. The Texas legislature in 2017 prohibited cities from regulating autonomous vehicles as a way to promote the industry's growth statewide. Now, as the vehicles proliferate, some politicians, public-safety officials and advocates are pushing for more rules.
Austin police officers continually have run into problems with autonomous vehicles from Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Waymo and General Motors' (GM.N), opens new tab now-defunct Cruise freezing up when they encounter complex traffic situations, such as festivals where officers direct traffic with hand signals, said Austin Police Lieutenant William White. Vehicles have disregarded traffic barriers and driven into prohibited areas, he said.
'It's been very frustrating on our end from a safety standpoint,' said White, who oversees autonomous-vehicle safety for the department. 'If these machines are learning, they're not learning at a quick enough pace for sure.'
Waymo said it works closely with Austin officials and is always looking to improve the technology.
The Texas legislature passed a bill last month that for the first time would require autonomous-vehicle companies to apply for authorization to operate in the state, and give state authorities the power to revoke permits if a driverless vehicle "endangers the public." Firms are also required to provide the state information on how police and first responders can deal with the vehicles in emergency situations.
If the bill is signed by the governor, it is unclear when the new system would take effect, but likely not until next year, according to a state Department of Motor Vehicles spokesperson.
Musk and Tesla have given few details about their plans for the Austin robotaxi launch. Among the key questions is whether the cars will include new sensors or other technology that differs from the currently offered "Full Self-Driving" feature, which is not autonomous. In a post on his X social media platform on Tuesday, Musk described the driverless Austin vehicles as "unmodified Tesla cars" using a "new version of software."
In January, Musk said Tesla would be offering 'autonomous ride-hailing for money in Austin, in June,' followed by other American cities 'as swiftly as possible.' He has described Tesla's approach as one that 'works anywhere.'
In April, he said the Austin rollout would begin with 10 or 20 Model Y vehicles, and that the company would 'scale it up rapidly after that' to be in 'many other cities in the U.S.' by the end of the year. He predicted there would be 'millions of Teslas' operating 'fully autonomously' by the second half of next year.
Musk's statements in recent weeks have been more cautious. On CNBC last month, he said that when Tesla deploys robotaxis in Austin, the company will 'geofence' the vehicles and operate in 'only the parts of Austin that we consider to be the safest.' He said company staff would remotely monitor the vehicles.
'We're going to be extremely paranoid about the deployment, as we should be,' he said.
Musk and Tesla have not said who the passengers will be, how Tesla will charge for rides, where in Austin they will operate or how extensive the remote operation will be. Rivals have started testing with their own employees and a limited number of passengers before opening the services to anyone.
In a post on X on Tuesday night, Musk said public rides would begin "tentatively, June 22," adding "the date could shift." One video that surfaced on social media on Tuesday, which Musk reposted, showed a Model Y with the word 'Robotaxi' driving on a street in Austin with no human driver, followed closely by a second Tesla vehicle. In a May 28 post on X, Musk said the company had recently started testing 'self-driving' vehicles on Austin public streets with 'no one in driver's seat.'
Tesla did not respond to requests for comment.
Tesla advertisements for 'teleoperation' positions say the company needs the ability to 'access and control" autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots remotely, adding that such employees can 'remotely perform complex and intricate tasks.'
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration inquired last month about many of the unanswered questions surrounding the Austin rollout.
The agency, which is investigating Tesla's FSD driver-assistance feature after a fatal crash in 2023, sent a detailed request seeking information about safety features, Tesla's timetable for expansion, where exactly it will be operating the vehicles and how it is preparing for accidents and emergency scenarios. The responses are due next week.
A person familiar with NHTSA's operations said the agency sent the letter because it already has concerns about Tesla's current FSD technology, which it sells to customers for $99 a month, and it fears that Tesla's Austin rollout may not be safe.
The Texas attorney general is considering a Reuters request for communications between Tesla and city officials in Austin over the past two years, which Tesla has opposed over trade secrets concerns. Austin's Department of Transportation and Public Works declined to discuss Tesla's operations.
A person familiar with Austin's autonomous-vehicle policies said the city has been meeting regularly with Tesla since December and that the company has shared some deployment plans with the city.
Safety experts say there has been a dearth of information about Tesla's technology. Phil Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and autonomous-vehicle safety expert, said Musk's statements 'leave room for ambiguity' about its plans in Austin and the sophistication of its robotaxi technology. 'When you start to pin it down, it's like jello,' he said.
He questioned whether Tesla would be ready for a rapid nationwide rollout soon.
'Having 10 cars on the road and not having a crash,' Koopman said, 'is sort of table stakes for this game.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump reveals why Elon Musk got ‘strange' and ‘doesn't like me so much'
Donald Trump reveals why Elon Musk got ‘strange' and ‘doesn't like me so much'

Metro

time39 minutes ago

  • Metro

Donald Trump reveals why Elon Musk got ‘strange' and ‘doesn't like me so much'

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video President Donald Trump after Elon Musk walked back some posts attacking him revealed why the tech billionaire 'doesn't like me so much' and 'got a little bit strange'. Trump referred to Musk as 'a friend' and weighed in on their rollercoaster relationship while signing legislation blocking California's rule aimed at making almost all new vehicles electric within a decade. Without even being asked, Trump brought up Musk on Thursday afternoon, a day after his former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) chief wrote he had 'regret' over some posts about the president. Trump noted that on the first day of his second term, he ended the 'Green New Scam' and got rid of the electric vehicle mandate at the federal level. 'We abolished it, which is basically that everybody will be driving an electric car within a very short period of time,' said Trump, before joking, 'Now we know why Elon doesn't like me so much, which he does, actually. He does.' Trump said he was surprised that the Tesla CEO endorsed him in the 2024 election because he has long opposed policies that benefit electric vehicles. 'I used to say I was amazed that he's endorsing me because that can't be goof for him, I'm abolishing the EV mandate,' Trump said from the White House. The president said Musk had a 'very honest answer' on the matter. 'I actually asked him, because it was like really strange that I'm with him, a friend of mine, and he makes electric cars and we're saying… you're not going to be forced to make all of those cars,' Trump said. 'He said, 'As long as I'm on the same plane as everybody else, we're going to do good, we make a better product.' I said, 'That's very cool.'' Trump then took at jab at Musk as the two billionaires have yet to reconcile after their massive feud that started last Thursday. 'After that, he got a little bit strange — I don't know why — over much smaller things than that,' Trump said. He did provide specifics. More Trending Their relationship imploded after Musk's time as a special government employee ended, and he criticised Trump's signature domestic policy legislation, the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill'. Musk reportedly called Trump on Monday and two days later wrote on his X (formerly Twitter) platform: 'I regret some of my posts about the president this week. They went too far.' While Musk has appeared eager to make amends, Trump has turned his focus to a more obvious political opponent, California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Google, Spotify and YouTube down for tens of thousands of users worldwide MORE: Plane skids off runway into grass while landing in Boston MORE: Les Misérables cast 'refuse to attend latest show' over Trump appearance

Michael Johnson cancels Los Angeles Grand Slam Track meeting
Michael Johnson cancels Los Angeles Grand Slam Track meeting

The Guardian

time43 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Michael Johnson cancels Los Angeles Grand Slam Track meeting

Michael Johnson cancelled the final leg of the new Grand Slam Track series in Los Angeles before an emergency meeting with athletes on Thursday night, leaving the host of the 2028 Olympics and the country's second-largest city without a major track meeting this summer. Johnson raised around $30m to launch Grand Slam Track this spring, promising a new way of doing track – involving a group of runners under contract racing twice over a weekend and focusing more on where they finished than actual times. Among the top athletes he signed were Olympic champions Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone and Gabby Thomas, though two other American track stars, Sha'Carri Richardson and Noah Lyles, did not race in the league. The first three events, in Kingston, Jamaica, Miami and Philadelphia, raised about $9.45m, with another $3m expected to be paid in LA. Bonuses were expected to go to season-long winners of the categories. The news on Thursday about the abrupt scrubbing of the meeting, scheduled for the last weekend in June at Drake Stadium, follows USA Track and Field's decision to take an event set for earlier in June – the LA Grand Prix – off the calendar. Max Siegel, USATF chief executive, told the Associated Press that the federation pulled its event because it was not viable to hold two major track meets in LA in the span of three weeks. A person with knowledge of the Grand Slam Track decision told the AP it was because of economic problems with the venue. The person added the new track league is looking towards 2026 and is expected to announce new investors next week. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the decision had not been publicly announced. A meeting with the athletes was slated to take place later on Thursday. Siegel said leaders at USATF 'understand the significance of the [LA] market' and that there are plans for leaders to meet later this summer to coordinate the future of track there and throughout the United States, starting in 2026. 'It highlights the complicated way the [sport] works, and how difficult it is to financially sustain track meets,' Siegel said. 'The only way to do it in a sustainable way is collaboration and partnerships.' In the short term, USATF is looking to find meetings for a handful of athletes who still need to reach standards or collect points to qualify for world championships later this year and were planning to compete in Los Angeles. The news was far from what Olympic and track leaders were hoping as they head towards the first Summer Games in the United States since 1996 in a city that, 12 years before that, put Carl Lewis, Edwin Moses, Evelyn Ashford and others in the spotlight.

GM Announced a Landmark U.S. Manufacturing Investment
GM Announced a Landmark U.S. Manufacturing Investment

Auto Blog

timean hour ago

  • Auto Blog

GM Announced a Landmark U.S. Manufacturing Investment

GMC Hummer electric vehicles on the production line at General Motors' Factory ZERO all-electric vehicle assembly plant in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., on Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2021. More domestic manufacturing? GM says yes In an announcement late on June 10, one of the most prominent Detroit-based automakers, General Motors, announced its landmark investment plans that would catalyze auto manufacturing in the United States. The automaker announced plans to invest about $4 billion over the next two years to support its U.S. manufacturing plants and their efforts to produce gas and electric vehicles. The automaker did not specify how much money each plant would receive, but it said that the $4 billion in question would help adapt the Orion Assembly in Michigan, Fairfax Assembly in Kansas, and Spring Hill Manufacturing in Tennessee for future vehicles in its pipeline. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:09 / 0:09 Walmart is selling a 'heavy duty' $89 step ladder for $48, and shoppers say it's 'sturdy and secure' Watch More Piego Connally, assembly team leader at the Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas City, Kansas. — Source: General Motors These factories are set to produce new products General Motors plans to retool its Orion Assembly plant to produce gasoline-powered full-size SUVs and light-duty pickups starting in early 2027 in response to strong demand for these vehicles. Originally, Orion was set to be reconfigured for electric vehicle production, but GM has announced that its Factory Zero electric vehicle plant in Detroit will be the dedicated facility for manufacturing the Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Sierra EV, Hummer EV, and Cadillac Escalade IQ. GM's Fairfax plant will continue to be retooled to produce the next generation of the Chevrolet Bolt EV, with production expected to begin by the end of the year. However, the automaker announced that Fairfax will share production duties with the internal combustion version of the Chevy Equinox in mid-2027 and also focus on building the next generation of affordable EVs. Furthermore, GM also stated that some of its funding will be allocated to the Spring Hill plant, where it plans to manufacture the gasoline-powered Chevrolet Blazer in 2027, alongside Cadillac's gas-powered XT5 crossover and the Cadillac Lyriq and Vistiq EVs. A Chevrolet Silverado pick-up truck at a dealership in Colma, California, US, on Friday, Jan. 26, 2024. — Source: Getty Images GM's tariff response General Motors's multi-billion-dollar investment in U.S. factories comes at a time when President Donald Trump's tariffs on vehicle imports are putting direct pressure on the auto industry. Previously, GM indicated that these tariffs would cost the company between $4 billion and $5 billion this year, prompting executives to revise GM's full-year earnings guidance. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. According to GM sources who spoke with Automotive News and CNBC, production of the gas-powered Equinox will move to the Fairfax plant to supplement the current output in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. This change means that the Equinox manufactured in Mexico will be designated for overseas markets. Production of the Blazer will also shift from Ramos Arizpe, Mexico, where it is currently produced alongside the Chevy Blazer EV and the Ultium-powered Honda Prologue. GM said in its statement that this investment will help it reach the capacity to build more than 2 million cars per year in the U.S. 2025 Chevy Equinox 'We believe the future of transportation will be driven by American innovation and manufacturing expertise,' GM CEO Mary Barra said in a statement. 'Today's announcement demonstrates our ongoing commitment to build vehicles in the U.S and to support American jobs. We're focused on giving customers choice and offering a broad range of vehicles they love.' The investment announcement has been viewed as a win by prominent labor leaders, who see it as a direct reinvestment in a unionized labor force. In a statement, UAW President Shawn Fain, who previously aired direct support of Trump's tariffs, hailed the levies as a step forward for American labor. 'GM's decision to invest billions in American plants and prioritize U.S. workers is exactly why we spoke up in favor of these auto tariffs,' Fain said in a June 11 statement. 'The writing is on the wall: the race to the bottom is over. We have excess manufacturing capacity at our existing plants, and auto companies can easily bring good union jobs back to the U.S.' Final thoughts In remarks during a Deutsche Bank automotive investor conference on June 11, GM CFO Paul Jacobson confirmed that the automaker's multi-billion-dollar decision was made in response to Trump's tariffs, adding that though it's a lot of money, it can invest in what's next for the auto industry. 'A lot of the fear from talking to investors was that the policies that are being enacted by the administration were going to create a significant run on capital,' Jacobson said. 'Four billion dollars is a lot of money, but I think we've been able to thread that in ways that are capitalizing on the next generation of vehicles coming in, to do it efficiently, not building walls that we don't need to build where we can fill plants up, and also keep our capital forecast in line and consistent with where we've seen it.' At the same time, the company is relying on its flexibility. He pointed out that the improvements at the facilities at Fairfax and Spring Hill will be designed to adjust output based on customer demand for either gasoline or electric vehicles. 'That optionality is really important and critical for us as we move forward, being able to respond to where EV demand is going to be,' Jacobson said. About the Author James Ochoa View Profile

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store