logo
Why the Israeli left's 'peace summit' is in denial about the Gaza genocide

Why the Israeli left's 'peace summit' is in denial about the Gaza genocide

Middle East Eye09-05-2025

On 8 and 9 May, a so-called "People's Peace Summit", titled "The Time Has Come", took place at Binyanei HaUma convention centre in Jerusalem.
Sixty Israeli organisations gathered under the banner of peace, claiming to prepare the ground for a political resolution to the "Israeli-Palestinian conflict".
The summit featured tours, workshops, film screenings, performances, and - on the second day - keynote speeches promoting what organisers described as a "peace-based worldview".
According to its website, the summit aimed to promote "dialogue" between Palestinians and Israelis, in hopes of sparking societal change and inspiring belief that after each war, a political process would follow.
"The time has come," the organisers declared. "Now, when it burns and hurts, after long years of fear and violence, of struggle, of occupation and terror. The war that erupted on 7 October must and can be the last war - the one after which peace will come."
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
But this vision relies on a dangerous abstraction - one that ignores the reality of what is happening in Gaza. The language of peace and dialogue is being used to mask complicity, deflect accountability, and delay action.
Peace performance
Despite the ongoing genocide in Gaza, this marked the second consecutive year the "People's Peace Summit" took place under the same slogans and with the same speakers. Aside from minor adjustments to the schedule, little had changed.
What is happening in Gaza demands explicit political statements and mass mobilisation - not vague appeals centred on Israeli captives
If one wonders how the Israeli public can remain silent in the face of what is unfolding in Gaza, the answer lies in a basic, grim truth: a significant portion of the population embraces extreme right-wing, messianic ideologies.
These beliefs, rooted in a religious-nationalist vision, have increasingly shaped Israeli politics, particularly through parties like Religious Zionism and Otzma Yehudit.
A March 2025 poll conducted by Israel's Direct Polls Institute found that nearly 60 percent of Israelis supported resuming military attacks on Gaza - despite mounting international condemnation and the catastrophic humanitarian toll.
At the same time, many of those who consider themselves liberal or humanitarian continue to avoid making an unequivocal call to end the genocide in Gaza. Their silence reflects not just hesitation, but complicity.
Israeli peace organisations continue to do everything but confront the elephant in the room.
This is not a war - it is a genocide. And calling simply for an end to "the war" is not only useless, but evasive.
What is happening in Gaza demands explicit political statements and mass mobilisation - not vague appeals centred on Israeli captives or Jewish national security, but because infants and children are dying as the world watches.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
While artists stand on stage to sing, dozens more will likely be starved or killed.
On Wednesday alone, Israeli air strikes killed more than 100 Palestinians across Gaza, including in a crowded marketplace and a restaurant in Nuseirat refugee camp. Among the dead were women, children, and two journalists, as Israel escalated its assault in a genocidal war now entering its 20th month.
There is no time - and no purpose - for abstract conversations about future peace processes while genocide is ongoing.
By the time the so-called "day after" arrives, the damage will be so vast, with consequences spanning generations, that the very notion of a political resolution or peace will be rendered meaningless.
Genocide denial
What is happening in Gaza has been visible from the start. No person with internet access and a functioning conscience can deny it. The only thing missing is the will to name it.
Viewed in this light, the summit's refusal to use the word "genocide" - despite the affirmation of international genocide scholars - speaks volumes.
I once lived next to a Holocaust survivor. What would he make of Israel's starvation of Gaza? Read More »
So too does its silence on Israel's use of starvation as a weapon of war, and its failure to address the Jewish-Israeli public about what is being done in their name and with their participation.
The absence of any serious critique of the military's actions raises a fundamental question about the summit's motives: do the organisers truly believe that any means are justified if the alleged goal is to topple Hamas?
Even more surreal is the map the summit organisers published: "The Map of Peace and Love - Israel/Palestine 2040".
At first glance, it looked like satire, but it wasn't.
In this imagined landscape between the river and the sea, nearly every place name is Jewish or a slogan.
The only Arab reference is a central spot named after Lebanese writer Elias Khoury. Arab identities appear only in the context of coexistence with Jews in Jordan and Egypt.
This is not a vision of shared life - it is a colonial fantasy that imagines Israeli expansion beyond the river and the sea, into neighbouring territories.
Privileged distractions
Journalist Orly Noy, chair of B'Tselem, criticised the peace summit for offering what she described as "privileged distractions" - dialogue workshops, interfaith prayers, and future-oriented panels - while Gaza burns.
She noted that not a single panel was dedicated to the ongoing genocide, and argued that the summit was designed to "make Israelis feel better about themselves" without demanding they confront what is being done in their name.
One of the organisers, Raluca Ganea, responded in Haaretz by accusing Noy of aiding Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's agenda through divisiveness.
She insisted that political institutions emerge after wars to build diplomatic solutions, and that energy should be directed toward shaping what comes next.
But framing critique as sabotage is not only evasive, it reinforces the very silence Noy was condemning.
At a time when there has been no large-scale public call for draft refusal or an end to the genocide, dismissing internal criticism further serves to protect national consensus rather than challenge it.
What's more, Ganea is wrong on the facts: genocide typically does not conclude with diplomacy but erasure - just like the Palestinians in Jaffa, Haifa, Acre, and elsewhere, who were ethnically cleansed in 1948.
To this day, Israel refuses to allow them to return, and both the Israeli right and left continue to oppose the right of return.
Beyond 'dialogue'
There is no space to discuss the "day after". No place for talk about peace or a political solution.
The catastrophe in Gaza will be remembered as one of the darkest chapters in modern history.
The Israeli left will be remembered as those who stood by and did the bare minimum to acknowledge the horrors taking place
For their role, the Israeli left will be remembered as those who stood by and did the bare minimum to acknowledge the horrors taking place. When challenged, they adopted right-wing rhetoric and aligned themselves with the national consensus, thereby enabling the continued starvation of children.
The summit makes clear why there is no room left for dialogue with the Israeli left. After 20 months of genocide, something fundamental has shifted in what it means to be Palestinian.
Any cooperation now serves only to reassure the Israeli left - to sustain the comforting illusion that, despite everything, there are still Palestinians willing to talk, negotiate, and feed hope.
But while children, women, and men are being starved and bombed in refugee camps, there is no place for shallow hope-talk.
The only legitimate political discourse now is a demand to end the genocide, grounded in the belief that justice can still prevail.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thousands of Palestinians protested against home demolitions and forcible expulsion in southern Israel
Thousands of Palestinians protested against home demolitions and forcible expulsion in southern Israel

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Thousands of Palestinians protested against home demolitions and forcible expulsion in southern Israel

Thousands of Palestinians protested against Israel's policy of home demolitions and colonial expansion in the Negev in southern Israel on Thursday, Wafa news agency reported. Thousands took to the streets in front of the Israeli government offices in Beersheba, carrying placards calling for the end of home demolitions and forced expulsion of Palestinians, as well as for the resignation of former Israeli Diaspora Affairs Minister Amichai Chikli's plans to forcibly displace Palestinians from the Negev.

Posturing or potential strikes? Iran tensions ramp up ahead of nuclear talks
Posturing or potential strikes? Iran tensions ramp up ahead of nuclear talks

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Posturing or potential strikes? Iran tensions ramp up ahead of nuclear talks

US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that an Israeli strike on Iran "may very well happen', as he confirmed that the US was evacuating some US officials and their families from the region. The US is evacuating non-essential US embassy staff and their dependents from the embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. Other reports said the US was evacuating some staff from embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait, but the embassy in Bahrain denied a change in its posture on Thursday. Trump on Thursday said the risk of "massive conflict" led the US to draw down staff in the region. CBS News reported on Thursday that Israel is prepared to launch an attack on Iran's nuclear sites, and that US officials have been discussing how the US could assist Israel without taking a direct role. The report said options could include aerial refuelling or intelligence-sharing. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The steady drumbeat of leaks raises questions about whether a strike could take place in the future, or if the Trump administration is trying to put pressure on Iran ahead of a sixth round of nuclear talks scheduled to be held in Oman on Sunday. A US diplomat at one of the embassies restricting travel said the orders they have received were not out of the ordinary during flare-ups in local tensions. 'These steps don't necessarily mean military action is imminent. Still time for talks, it takes time to move people out. But these are steps that it would make sense to take as part of preparations, and to show seriousness. Provides important leverage in nuclear talks,' Danial Shapiro, a former US ambassador to Israel, said on X on Wednesday. 'Might help, could blow it' Trump himself toys publicly with the idea that the threat of an Israeli strike may help the US's negotiating position. "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it,' Trump said, referring to Israel, before quickly adding, "Might help it actually, but it also could blow it." In some ways, the reports that Israel is "poised" to strike Iran are redundant. By Trump's own admission, Israel has been lobbying him for months to bomb Iran. One senior US official recently told Middle East Eye on the condition of anonymity that the Trump administration has been impressed by plans Israel shared with it that lay out unilateral strikes against Iran's nuclear programme without direct American involvement. The plans were discussed in April and May with CIA director John Ratcliffe, MEE reported. 'The Israelis have pinpointed everything they can take out that supports Iran's nuclear sites down to the water supply and power generation, etcetera,' the US official told MEE, referring to a process called Target Systems Analysis, by which militaries assess specific nodes to attack that support a bigger main target. Trump says Iran's proposal 'unacceptable' as Tehran touts intel on Israeli nukes Read More » Israel has also discussed combining cyberattacks and precision military strikes. Iran's nuclear facilities are buried deep in fortified bunkers in the Natanz desert and inside a mountain called Fordow. Analysts say Netanyahu has refrained from attacking Iran in defiance of Trump because he wants to share political responsibility if the strikes go wrong and preserve an American backstop in the likely case of Iranian retaliation. On Thursday, Axios reported that Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, told some Republican Senators that the administration fears Iran could retaliate against an Israeli strike with ballistic missiles, causing a 'mass casualty event". The article did not mention that Israel is widely understood to have its own arsenal of nuclear weapons. The Iranians have kept pace with Trump and upped their own rhetoric. During past flare-ups, Iranian officials have sent signals that they could shut down the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf, where 30 percent of the world's oil transits, and have leaked that they could bomb US bases in Gulf states if attacked. Iran has now clearly stated that threat. "All its [the United States] bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister added. Israel and Iran had two unprecedented exchanges of fire in October and April 2024. The US came to Israel's defence, shooting down missiles and drones in an attack Iran had carefully telegraphed beforehand. IAEA tensions Ahead of the talks on Sunday, tensions have also been rising with the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Diplomats said the IAEA's board of governors adopted a resolution condemning Iran's "non-compliance" with its nuclear obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The resolution was carried by 19 votes in favour out of 35. The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a "snapback" mechanism, which expires in October. This mechanism would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then-US president Barack Obama. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, said the resolution was "extremist" and blamed Israeli influence. In response to the resolution, he said Iran would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. The issue of whether Iran will be able to enrich uranium on its territory has become the main roadblock to nuclear talks with the US. Trump has insisted Iran will not be allowed to enrich any uranium.

Trump envoy Massad Boulos to visit Libya amid rising tensions, sources say
Trump envoy Massad Boulos to visit Libya amid rising tensions, sources say

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Trump envoy Massad Boulos to visit Libya amid rising tensions, sources say

US envoy Massad Boulos is set to make his first official visit to Libya next week amid rising tensions in the capital city of Tripoli and neighbouring Sudan, a US official and an Arab source told Middle East Eye. Boulos, who is Trump's senior advisor to Africa, was supposed to travel to Libya earlier this year, the sources said, but Egyptian officials complained, saying they wanted him to visit Cairo first. Boulos met Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and the head of the Egyptian General Intelligence Service, Hassan Rashad, in May. Egypt is one of the main external powers in Libya. Ties between Egypt and the US have become strained over Washington's reassessment of military aid to Cairo and Trump's call earlier this year for a forced displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, MEE previously reported. In Libya, Boulos is expected to visit Tripoli first, home to the United Nations-recognised government, and then travel to Benghazi in eastern Libya, which is controlled by a parallel government backed by General Khalifa Haftar and his sons. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Boulos's office did not respond to MEE's request for comment. The envoy's visit comes as Libya's powerful militias and politicians jostle for power. In May, Tripoli was convulsed by fighting between rival militias that killed at least eight people. The clashes started after the 444 Brigade loyal to Prime Minister Abdulhamid Dbeibah killed the leader of a rival group. The 444 Brigade then launched attacks on a Salafist militia called the Rada Deterrence Force, which controls Tripoli's main airport. Dbeibah was appointed president in 2021 as a consensus candidate with a mandate to usher Libya into elections. The vote never took place. There have been regular protests against Dbeibah. Boulos has been in discussions with Dbeibah's top advisor about unlocking billions of dollars in sanctioned frozen wealth funds, MEE was the first to reveal. The two sides discussed putting some funds into investments with US companies in Libya. NBC later reported that in exchange for releasing the funds, the Trump administration pressed the government to accept up to 1 million Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, which has been under Israeli assault since 7 October 2023, after the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel. Saddam Haftar comes to the fore The instability in Tripoli has allowed Khalifa Haftar's family to lobby for support. Khalifa Haftar is 81 years old. His son Saddam is being cultivated as a likely successor, US and Arab officials tell MEE. Libya and Trump administration discussed sharing billions of dollars in frozen funds, sources say Read More » Saddam's stock is rising with the new Trump administration, especially in national security circles, the US official and Arab source told MEE. Saddam made a high-profile visit to Washington in April, where he met Boulos at the State Department. More importantly, he held a meeting with several senior US intelligence officials in Washington, the sources told MEE. That meeting has not been previously reported. Saddam has also been making overtures to countries traditionally closer to the government in Tripoli. He has visited Qatar and Turkey for support. This week, he visited Italy. Libya has been divided since the Nato-led removal of longtime ruler Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. The civil war became a proxy conflict with Russia, the UAE, Egypt, and France backing Haftar and Turkey supporting the government in Tripoli. In 2019, Trump gave his tacit approval for the elder Haftar's bid to take over Tripoli. The attack failed when Turkey intervened. The battle lines in Libya have become more convoluted in recent years. Sudan spillover A case in point is the competing interests among external powers in Sudan. Although Egypt and the UAE both support Haftar's government, they are backing opposing sides in the Sudanese civil war. Egypt has thrown its support behind Sudan's army along with Iran and Turkey, while the UAE is backing the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Haftar has facilitated the shipment of arms to the RSF. 'You made a mistake trying to leave': Crossing enemy lines in the heart of Sudan Read More » Boulos has been trying to mediate a ceasefire between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Egyptian officials want Boulos to make progress on preventing a spillover of the Libyan and Sudanese conflicts, an Egyptian official told MEE. However, following their May meeting, the Egyptians assessed that his influence would be limited, the source said. Politico reported in May that Trump has curbed Boulos's influence. The US and Arab sources told MEE that expectations for Boulos's trip were low on all sides. The RSF said on Wednesday it seized a strategic zone on the border with Egypt and Libya. The announcements came a day after forces loyal to Haftar launched a cross-border attack alongside the RSF, the first allegation of direct Libyan involvement in the Sudanese war. The attack is likely to strain ties between Haftar and Egypt.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store