logo
Candidate Profile: John F. Butler (Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney race)

Candidate Profile: John F. Butler (Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney race)

Yahoo14-05-2025

John F. Butler is a candidate for Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney and is running as a Democrat. His name will appear on the June 17, 2025 ballot. Butler is running against incumbent challenger Ramin Fatehi in the June primary. The winner will appear on the ballot for the General Election on Nov. 4.
If you are voting in this election, from May 2 through June 14 you can vote early at your On Election Day, polls in Virginia are open from 6 a.m. until 7 p.m. Don't forget to bring your ID. to see who is on your ballot.
10 On Your Side reached out to all of the candidates running in this race, with a request for a bio and a list of questions to answer. If you do not see the candidate listed with a profile, we did not receive one.
WAVY.com Candidate Profiles
Name: John F. ButlerAge: 46Website: butlerfornorfolk.com
John F. Butler is a lifelong Virginian, a lifelong Democrat who worked for Bill Clinton and Al Gore, and a lifelong public servant, who moved to Norfolk 13 years ago as an officer in the Navy JAG Corps. He and his wife fell in love with Norfolk's welcoming spirit and chose to raise their two daughters here.
John served as a federal prosecutor for 10 years, where he was appointed during President Barack Obama's administration, and most recently was the Managing Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia's Norfolk Division, where he supervised 60 federal prosecutors and staff and twice received the Department of Justice's highest honor, the John Marshall Award.
In the Navy, John prosecuted and defended hundreds of cases, serving eight years on active duty, including a deployment to Kandahar, Afghanistan, during Operation Enduring Freedom. He was named the Navy's Prosecutor of the Year, and he continues to serve as a Commander in the Navy Reserves Judiciary Unit.
Now, he is running for Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney to build a safer, stronger Norfolk, because everyone deserves to feel safe, no matter who they are or where they live.
I love public service, and I love Norfolk. I want to improve the lives and safety of everyone in our hometown, and I believe I have the education, training, and experience to be most effective in the role of Commonwealth's Attorney.
Over the past decade as a federal prosecutor and for two and a half years as the Managing Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, I helped make Norfolk and the region safer, delivering justice to victims and leading critical community violence intervention and prevention programs.
I am stepping up to focus my efforts on Norfolk and help build a Commonwealth's Attorney's Office that effectively prepares and evaluates cases, creates a culture of excellence that motivates staff, trains and develops junior prosecutors, and delivers justice to victims to make Norfolk a safer, more thriving city.
I bring nearly twenty years of experience as a leader and criminal litigator – both as a prosecutor and defense attorney in the Navy JAG Corps, and then as a federal prosecutor in the Norfolk Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. In these roles, I have demonstrated an ability to lead teams, try complex cases, and deliver justice to victims.
As a federal prosecutor, I handled some of our region's most significant cases. I managed the office for two and a half years, overseeing 60 attorneys and staff. I led not just by supervising, but by personally trying multiple cases a year and taking them to trial. The most effective managers are servant leaders, and I made it a point to lead by example and provide the resources my teams needed to be successful.
At the United States Attorney's office, I strengthened public safety through community-based initiatives. I created the Hampton Roads Opioid Working Group, bringing together medical professionals, educators, peer recovery specialists, first responders, business leaders, and community partners to address the opioid crisis by connecting people suffering from addiction to the help they needed and taking steps to educate young people to prevent addiction. I took those lessons to the Project Safe Neighborhoods program, a community engagement initiative that intervened with at-risk individuals to prevent them from becoming involved in the criminal justice system.
Through this work, I built and ran an effective prosecutor's office that created a culture of excellence, mentored junior attorneys, implemented community-based crime prevention and intervention strategies, and, most importantly, delivered justice to victims and their families.
We need a competent Commonwealth's Attorney, who can inspire and motivate a strong team that effectively prepares and evaluates cases, delivering justice to victims. You lose the community's trust when cases are repeatedly lost because of avoidable errors, like not turning over discovery, not properly staffing cases, or failing to prepare witnesses.
Winning cases depends on earning the trust of witnesses and the broader community. Witnesses must believe we will win these cases and that they will be safe if they come forward. That requires strong witness and victim protection programs, effective preparation, and a proven record of success in the courtroom.
Building trust also requires a partnership between the police department, the Commonwealth's Attorney's office, and the community. That's why community violence intervention programs like Project Safe Neighborhoods are so critical, and why it is essential to work with trusted community leaders to rebuild and strengthen those relationships.
First, it is necessary to acknowledge the history of redlining, racial segregation, and systemic racism in Norfolk and across Virginia. We are still working to undo the harmful effects of these policies and must prioritize building a relationship of trust between the community and the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office.
A prosecutor must consider and balance the circumstances of the crime, the defendant's history and characteristics, the impact on victims, and the safety of the community. Marginalized communities have faced unfair sentencing and targeting by our criminal justice system, and we must make active efforts to prevent that.
That is why I led Project Safe Neighborhoods, the Department of Justice's Violence prevention and intervention program, which focuses on reaching individuals before they become justice involved and providing them the resources they need to succeed. For too long, the reactive approach has not worked; we must be proactive, especially in marginalized communities, to combat the symptoms of crime. I am proud to have done that work and will implement and support funding community violence intervention programs as your next Commonwealth's Attorney.
The current Attorney General has failed to stand up against Trump's dangerous rhetoric and decision to roll back progress in civil rights that Virginians have fought so hard for by shuttering the Civil Rights Division's focus on race.
When the Trump administration called on our universities to shut down their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs, the Attorney General joined them rather than stand up for our students. We must protect civil rights programs and support the communities that have been overlooked for far too long in Virginia.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Property taxes, book bans and resolutions: Three Grand Forks lawmakers discuss recent session
Property taxes, book bans and resolutions: Three Grand Forks lawmakers discuss recent session

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Property taxes, book bans and resolutions: Three Grand Forks lawmakers discuss recent session

Jun. 6—GRAND FORKS — Through an hour-long conversation looking back on the 2025 legislative session, three Grand Forks state lawmakers found moments of agreement and professed similar opinions on issues more than they disagreed. Rep. Nels Christianson, Rep. Erik Murphy and Rep. Zac Ista, all from Grand Forks, went through some of the topics from the session with different mindsets but familiar answers. For example, on the matter of property tax and Gov. Kelly Armstrong's bill — which expanded the primary tax credit to a maximum $1,600 and capped local-level tax increases to no more than 3% annually — Christianson said they found some common ground. Property tax was one of the several issues discussed during the legislative wrap-up, held at the Grand Forks County office building on Thursday, June 5. All 18 members of districts 17, 18, 19, 20, 42 and 43 were invited, but Ista, Murphy and Christianson were the only ones in attendance. Joel Heitkamp, host of KFGO News and Views and a former state senator, served as moderator. Some issues involved public funding to private schools, Medicaid, the North Dakota Republican Party and what bills the legislators worked on. Property tax was among the most newsworthy issues during the session. Armstrong discussed it prior to his November election and his bill, HB 1176, was not passed until May 2, near the end of the session. "Did we deliver relief? Yes," Christianson said. "Reform? Maybe not so much." Murphy said property taxes are typically something outside of the Legislature's lane, but that he begrudgingly supported Armstrong's property tax bill. "Property tax is part of the reality of living in a nation such as ours," he said. "Property tax, to me, is a local issue." Ista, the only Democrat among the three, said there will be a trade-off. Homeowners will get some tax relief, but political subdivisions will have to figure out how to continue to pay for things. "Now the burden is going to fall on our local, county, city, school districts to see how to live within this new reality. I think it's going to be a challenge going forward for the state and locals to balance it," he said. One issue on which all three agreed was the matter of banning books. Each legislator was against it, though they had different thoughts on the matter. Ista said he has voted against every book censorship bill, and will continue to do so every chance he gets. "The issues in our state that affect our kids are not what books are displayed where in our libraries," he said. "I love taking my kids to Grand Forks Public Library and watch them go down that big pink slide, and I've never once worried about what book they might stumble into." Christianson said that, under no circumstances, should books be banned. Instead, he said, they should be placed in the appropriate area, and that he wants his daughters to be able to go around the children's section of the library and look at any books they would like in that section. "I absolutely do not support taking anything out of the ability for people to check out from the library," he said. "I just want to make sure that ... parents have a chance to be in the loop, just that parents can understand what their children are reading, especially in the younger ages." Murphy said there are better things to do and think about in North Dakota than book bans, and he mentioned Senate Bill 2307, which would have required libraries to make material considered sexually explicit unavailable to minors, and could penalize failure to comply. One issue he took with the bill was the difference between what was said about it versus what it would really do, he said. "What it really did is, opened up every library in the state, whether it's UND's library, it opened up the (North Dakota Museum of Art)," he said. "If there's a nude in there, that could be considered pornography, therefore we need to take that picture down." Two resolutions that failed during the session — House Concurrent Resolution 3013, which requested the U.S. Supreme Court overturn gay marriage, and House Concurrent Resolution 3020, declaring that "Christ is King" of North Dakota — drew disagreement between Christianson, who voted "yes" on both, and the other two legislators, who voted against them. Christianson's thought on HCR 3013 was that issues such as marriage need to be defined at the state level, not through a court decision, referencing Obergefell vs. Hodges, the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding same-sex marriages. Ista said that it was probably the darkest day of the session for him when the resolution came to the floor, and that he was caught "flat-footed" by it. He said he had thought everyone had moved beyond the issue of marriage equality. Murphy said it's not up to him to decide who any individual should love. He also said that during this recent school year, he knew of students who were transgender and transitioning. The resolution sends the wrong message to North Dakota residents and creates a division in the state, he said. As for HCR 3020, Murphy simply said "absolutely not" when Heitkamp asked if he thought North Dakota should be in the business of declaring that Christ is king. Ista said that the faith leaders in his life respected a foundational concept of no official religions in America, and that, while he respects the religion of his colleagues, the state should be accommodating to all religions and not place one above the others. Christianson said the resolution would have no effect on state policies, claiming that he voted for what he believes is the truth. "It was simply a statement, and that's a statement that I will make every day, that Christ is king," he said.

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs says he looks like a ‘koala' in courtroom sketches
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs says he looks like a ‘koala' in courtroom sketches

New York Post

time43 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs says he looks like a ‘koala' in courtroom sketches

Before the jury in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial returned from a lunch break on Thursday, the gray-bearded hip-hop mogul turned to face courtroom sketch artist Jane Rosenberg in the first row to make an unusual request. 'Soften me up a bit, you're making me look like a koala bear,' Combs said, according to Rosenberg. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to five criminal counts of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. During the four weeks of his trial, he has worn sweaters and sported graying hair and a goatee. 3 Sean 'Diddy' Combs watches during cross examination of Cassie Ventura's friend Bryana Bongolan during his sex trafficking trial in New York City in a sketch by Jane Rosenberg. REUTERS Rosenberg, a well-known sketch artist, has been documenting the proceedings for Reuters in Manhattan federal court, where photography and video recording are prohibited. Combs, also known throughout his career as Puff Daddy and P. Diddy, is not the first high-profile defendant to remark on Rosenberg's depictions of them. Earlier this year, Rudy Giuliani told Rosenberg she had made him look like his dog. The former New York City mayor was in court in a civil case stemming from his false accusations that two election workers helped steal the 2020 U.S. presidential election for Democrat Joe Biden. And in 2023, Donald Trump Jr. had a blunt request for Rosenberg during a civil fraud trial over his family's real estate business: 'Make me look sexy.' 3 Jane Rosenberg, law court sketch artist, has also documented Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump Jr, who have commented on her work. Stefano Giovannini 3 Combs watches proceedings near portraits of himself and former girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura during his sex trafficking trial. REUTERS Combs could face life in prison if convicted on all counts in the trial. He has nonetheless demonstrated good spirits during some breaks in the trial, often making a heart gesture with his hands toward family seated in the front row. But his behavior in court drew a rebuke on Thursday by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. The judge said he had noticed Combs nodding in the jury's direction during his lawyer's cross-examination of a witness. Subramanian said that was 'unacceptable' and threatened to kick Combs out of the courtroom if he sought to interact with the jury again.

J.D. Vance Speaks Out After He's Dragged Into Trump-Musk Row
J.D. Vance Speaks Out After He's Dragged Into Trump-Musk Row

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

J.D. Vance Speaks Out After He's Dragged Into Trump-Musk Row

President Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and Vice President J.D. Vance attend the Army-Navy football game at Northwest Stadium on Dec. 14, 2024, in Landover, Maryland. Credit - Kevin Dietsch—Getty Images Vice President J.D. Vance has broken his silence amid the escalating online war of words between President Donald Trump and his former ally and key campaign donor, Elon Musk. 'President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads,' Vance said on X (formerly Twitter) late Thursday night. Affirming his stance and support of Trump, he added: 'I'm proud to stand beside him.' Vance's public statement comes after Musk, who recently left his role leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), indirectly brought the Vice President into the row. On Thursday, Musk responded 'yes,' endorsing a social media post that said 'Trump should be impeached' and that Vance 'should replace him' in the White House. Read More: The Musk-Trump Implosion Can Be Seen From Space Musk also acknowledged an X post from Vance, sharing a laughing emoji in response to the Vice President's commentary that it had been a 'slow news day.' Revealing he was sitting down with popular podcaster Theo Vaughn for an interview, Vance quipped: 'What are we even going to talk about?' The row between Trump and Musk imploded after Musk aired his grievances with Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill," which is being considered by the Senate. The Tesla CEO branded the bill a 'disgusting abomination' and posted more than two dozen messages on his social media platform on Wednesday, targeting the legislation. He ramped up his efforts to thwart the bill's progress when he told his millions of followers to 'call your Senator, call your Congressman… kill the bill.' Trump responded, telling reporters in the Oval Office that he was 'disappointed' with Musk. The row then spiraled and turned personal, with the two going back-and-forth via posts shared on their respective social media platforms. Read More: Revisiting Elon Musk's Most Controversial Moments in the White House 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk said. 'Such ingratitude.' Another post saw Musk claim that Trump is listed in the Epstein files, and that's why they haven't been made public in their entirety. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this. Meanwhile, Trump said via Truth Social: 'Elon was 'wearing thin.' I asked him to leave. I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!) and he just went CRAZY!' The tit-for-tat row between the President and his former right-hand-man shows no signs of slowing down. But Vance has seemingly made his position clear with his late night show of support to Trump. Contact us at letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store