United Airlines Quietly Adds 2 New Routes
Just a few days ago, United Airlines quietly made a big move by placing an order for Airbus A321neo aircraft amid the airline's slight departure from its Boeing relationship.
'It's the first time in a really long time that we took an Airbus, and this airplane right here [A321neo] is our highest-scoring customer service satisfaction airplane that we have in our system," United Airlines' Chief Global Operations Officer, Toby Enqvist, said in a statement, revealing the new product is testing well with customers.
Fast forward to May 16 and the popular airline made another big move without so much as an announcement. United Airlines opened up a direct air link between Newark Liberty International Airport and Algarve, Portugal - home of Faro Airport.
'It is with great joy that we are here inaugurating this flight which just arrived,' United Airlines European spokesperson, Guido Araújo said in a statement. 'This route is part of a very deliberate and sustainable expansion strategy. We started modestly in 1997 with seasonal flights from Lisbon to New York. Today, we celebrate seven routes to Portugal across five destinations.'
The first flight on the direct line touched down on Saturday, May 17 after passenger demand for the new route surged. 'Many of our customers already travel through Lisbon and continue on to the Algarve. This flight offers them a direct entry point to the region,' Araujo added.
The airline will operate four flights per week through the end of the summer season.
But that's not all from United. The airline is also offering a new flight to Madeira starting on June 7 and running through September 23. Service will operated three times per week - on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays - with flights departing at 9:50 p.m. from Newark Liberty International Airport.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
How to Stay Compliant Amid Amazon's Growing Focus on Allergen Labeling
Selling on Amazon used to be about standing out. Now it's equally about staying compliant. As regulations tighten across global markets, Amazon is placing greater emphasis on product safety, and allergen labeling has moved to the front of the line. Undeclared allergens can trigger life-threatening reactions for consumers. This is why Amazon now demands clear, verified allergen disclosures across many product categories, from supplements and skincare to packaged foods. Sellers who overlook these rules risk listing delays, account suspensions, or far more serious legal trouble. Here, we break down Amazon's evolving allergen compliance requirements, the products affected, which allergens must be disclosed, and how sellers can meet Amazon's demands before risking costly disruptions. Allergen compliance on Amazon is no longer optional or negotiable. The platform's increasing focus reflects broader regulatory and public health concerns worldwide. Food allergies are rising globally. For sensitive individuals, even trace exposure to allergens can cause severe reactions. Regulatory agencies expect retailers—online or brick-and-mortar—to ensure proper disclosures that protect consumers. Amazon's allergen rules are designed to reduce these safety risks. Amazon operates internationally and must comply with laws set by agencies like the FDA (U.S.), EFSA (EU), Health Canada, and others. As these regulators increase enforcement on allergen mislabeling, Amazon proactively adjusts its own compliance policies to stay aligned. When undeclared allergens trigger safety incidents, both the seller and Amazon may face regulatory investigations or lawsuits. Strengthening allergen compliance helps Amazon reduce legal exposure while preserving consumer trust. Allergen labeling requirements don't apply to every category equally. Amazon's policies focus on high-risk product groups that pose ingestion or dermal contact risks. Supplements often contain ingredients derived from major allergens like soy, shellfish, dairy, or nuts. Amazon requires sellers to fully disclose all potential allergens both on the product label and within Amazon's listing backend. While applied externally, many skincare products contain ingredients that may trigger allergic skin reactions. Formulations using nut oils, wheat proteins, soy extracts, or egg derivatives may fall under allergen disclosure policies. Amazon's food and grocery listings demand full allergen labeling in line with regional food safety laws. This includes both intentional ingredients and possible cross-contamination risks during manufacturing. Amazon's allergen requirements reflect regional regulations that differ by country. Sellers listing products across multiple Amazon marketplaces must comply with each market's allergen lists. In the United States, Amazon sellers must disclose the following major allergens: Milk Eggs Fish Crustacean shellfish Tree nuts Peanuts Wheat Soybeans Sesame (officially added in 2023) European regulations expand this list further. In the EU and UK, sellers must disclose 14 allergens, which include: Gluten-containing grains (wheat, barley, rye, oats) Lupin Celery Mustard Sulfites (above specific thresholds) Mollusks (alongside crustaceans) Other markets have unique allergen lists. For example, Canada includes sesame, mustard, and sulfites under its priority allergen list, while Japan has its own set of required disclosures. Sellers must verify requirements for each Amazon marketplace they serve. Amazon enforces allergen compliance through both product documentation and its listing creation process. Product labels must include visible allergen declarations following each market's regulatory format. In many regions, allergens must be bolded or listed in separate 'Contains' statements to ensure clarity for consumers. Amazon may require sellers to submit certificates of analysis (COAs), ingredient specifications, and supplier documentation verifying allergen content or absence. Some sellers may also need manufacturing allergen control plans if requested during compliance reviews. During listing creation, Amazon's product attribute forms often include mandatory allergen declaration fields. Sellers must complete these fields truthfully to ensure alignment between backend data and physical labeling. Inaccurate or incomplete allergen disclosures expose sellers to serious consequences, both within Amazon's platform and under local regulatory laws. Amazon may block new product listings or suspend existing ASINs if allergen data is missing, inconsistent, or conflicts with submitted documentation. Resubmissions can delay sales and impact seller metrics. Undeclared allergens that lead to consumer reactions may result in lawsuits, class actions, or FDA enforcement. Sellers remain legally responsible for the safety of their products, even when fulfilled through Amazon. Sellers who repeatedly violate allergen policies risk escalated audits, Amazon account reviews, or permanent bans from selling in certain markets. Working with accredited laboratories offers sellers defensible allergen verification that supports Amazon submissions and reduces compliance risk. Labs use methods like ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), PCR (polymerase chain reaction), or mass spectrometry to detect even trace levels of allergens. This ensures both intentional ingredients and potential cross-contamination risks are properly identified. Labs help manufacturers assess whether shared production equipment or supplier raw materials may introduce unintended allergens into finished products. Expert labs generate clear allergen testing reports, manufacturing allergen control statements, and supporting documents that align with Amazon's compliance documentation standards. Regulatory requirements shift frequently. Expert labs stay current and guide Amazon sellers through these changing allergen compliance landscapes. Labs help sellers align allergen disclosures across multiple Amazon marketplaces, ensuring that products remain compliant whether sold in the U.S., EU, Canada, or Australia. Labs assess supplier facilities to verify allergen control protocols, manufacturing segregation, and cleaning procedures that prevent accidental cross-contact. For sellers requiring periodic verification—especially those using shared production facilities—labs offer batch-by-batch testing programs to confirm ongoing allergen compliance before shipping inventory to Amazon warehouses. Allergen labeling is a high-stakes compliance issue that directly affects consumer safety, regulatory standing, and a seller's ability to maintain active listings. Accurate allergen disclosure backed by verified laboratory testing ensures sellers meet Amazon's growing compliance demands while protecting both their customers and their Qalitex to schedule allergen testing and secure fully documented compliance for your Amazon listings across all global marketplaces. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Google AI Overviews strike again following the fatal Air India crash
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. Google said at I/O 2025 that AI Overviews are quite popular with users, but I've always found them to be the worst kind of AI product. Google is forcing AI results on as many Google Search queries as it can just because it can. It's not because users want AI Overviews in search. The separate AI Mode is generative AI in Google Search done the right way. It's a separate tab or an intentional choice from the user to enhance their Search experience with a Gemini-powered chat. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 The reason I don't like the idea of AI Overviews being forced on users aggressively is their well-known problems with accuracy. We've learned the hard way that AI Overviews hallucinate badly. The glue-on-pizza incident won't be forgotten anytime soon. While Google has improved AI Overviews, the AI-powered Search results still make mistakes. The latest one concerns the fatal Air India crash from earlier this week. Some people who rushed to Google Search to find out what happened saw an AI Overview claiming that an Airbus operated by Air India crashed on Thursday, soon after takeoff. Some AI Overviews even mentioned the type of plane, an Airbus A330-243. In reality, it was a Boeing 787. I've said more than once that Google should abandon AI Overviews. The glue-on-pizza hallucinations were one thing. They were funny. Most people probably realized the AI made a mistake. But this week's hallucination is different. It spreads incorrect information about a tragic event, and that can have serious consequences. The last thing we want from genAI products is to be misled by fake news. AI Overviews do exactly that when they hallucinate. It doesn't matter if these issues are rare. One mistake like the one involving the Air India crash is enough to cause harm. Google is showing It was an Airbus aircraft that crushed today in India. how is this being allowed? byu/Economy_Shallot_9166 inartificial This isn't just about Google's reputation. Airbus could be directly impacted. Imagine investors or travelers making decisions based on that search result. Sure, they could seek out real news sources. But not everyone will bother to verify the snippet at the top of the page. Google's disclaimer that 'AI responses may include mistakes' isn't enough. Not everyone notices, or even reads, that fine print. At least Google corrected this hallucination and gave Ars Technica the following statement: As with all Search features, we rigorously make improvements and use examples like this to update our systems. This response is no longer showing. We maintain a high quality bar with all Search features, and the accuracy rate for AI Overviews is on par with other features like Featured Snippets. I'll also point out that not all AI Overviews may have listed Airbus as the crashed plane. Results can vary depending on what you ask and how you phrase it. Some users might have gotten the correct answer on the first try. We don't know how many times the Airbus detail appeared by mistake. AI Overviews might make similar mistakes on topics beyond tragic news events. We have no way of knowing how often they hallucinate, no matter what Google says about accuracy. If you've been following AI developments over the past few years, you probably have a sense of why these hallucinations happen. The AI doesn't think like a human. It might combine details from reports that mention both Airbus and Boeing, then get the facts mixed up. And it's not just AI Overviews. We've seen other genAI tools hallucinate too. Research has even shown that the most advanced ChatGPT models hallucinate more than earlier ones. That's why I always argue with ChatGPT when it fails to give me sources for its claims. But here's the big difference. You can't opt out of AI Overviews. Google has pushed this AI search experience on everyone without first ensuring the AI doesn't hallucinate. AI Mode, by contrast, is a much better use of AI in Search. It can genuinely improve the experience. I'll also add that instead of talking about AI Overviews and their hallucinations, I could be praising a different AI initiative from Google. DeepMind is using AI to predict hurricane forecasts, which could be incredibly helpful. But here we are, focusing on AI Overviews and their errors, because misleading users with AI is a serious problem. Hallucination remains an AI safety issue that nobody has solved yet. Don't Miss: Today's deals: Nintendo Switch games, $5 smart plugs, $150 Vizio soundbar, $100 Beats Pill speaker, more More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Boeing resumes China deliveries with 787-9 jet to Juneyao Airlines, Yicai reports
BEIJING/HONG KONG (Reuters) -Boeing delivered a new 787-9 aircraft to China's Juneyao Airlines on Saturday, Chinese media outlet Yicai reported, as trade tensions between Beijing and Washington ease. The delivery comes two days after a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner with 242 people on board crashed in a fireball shortly after takeoff in western India. Boeing and Juneyao Airlines did not immediately reply to Reuters requests for comment on the Yicai report. The U.S. aerospace giant had suspended new aircraft deliveries to China in April as President Donald Trump's tariff war escalated between the world's two largest economies. Boeing said at the end of May that deliveries would resume this month after the tariffs were temporarily scaled back for 90 days. China and the U.S. concluded two days of negotiations in London on Tuesday to resolve key trade issues in the two superpowers' bruising tariff war, where negotiators from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework covering tariff rates. On Monday, a new Boeing 737 MAX painted in the livery of Xiamen Airlines landed in China, adding to signs that the planemaker was resuming deliveries to China. The country represents about 10% of Boeing's commercial backlog and is an important and growing aviation market. Boeing had previously said customers in China would not take delivery of new planes due to the tariffs and that it was looking to resell potentially dozens of aircraft. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
