logo
When the nation's press descended after howling mob took over town

When the nation's press descended after howling mob took over town

Yahoo23-03-2025

IN 1910 news editors all along Fleet Street were dispatching their top reporters by the fastest train possible to Droitwich, a fairly sleepy mid-Worcestershire town not particularly known for undue violence or steamy scandal.
But in January of that year everything changed because there was a riot going on.
It made national headlines when the mayor of Droitwich felt forced to read the Riot Act to quell a hostile mob in the centre of the gentile spa town.
The so-called Droitwich Riot led to a major case at Worcester Assizes a few weeks later when 12 local men stood in the dock accused of 'unlawful riotously and tumultuously assembling to the disturbance of the peace'.
However, by the end of the headline-making two-day trial the whole affair had descended into a complete farce.
The riotous events in Droitwich were on the General Election night of January 29, 1910, when votes in the Mid-Worcestershire constituency were being counted.
It became clear the seat had been won from the Liberals by the Unionist (Tory) candidate, the Hon JC Lyttelton, who was later to become the ninth Viscount Cobham of Hagley Hall.
This sparked fears among some people the local salt-making operations would come to an end.
Droitwich had been famous for its salt for centuries but there was a wind of change in the air.
Political feelings were running high in the town although there emerged two sharply-differing accounts of what happened on the night.
The police were to paint a picture of 'a howling, hostile and vicious mob' terrorising the streets of Droitwich.
Yet several witnesses at the Assize hearing maintained there had been little more than 'good-humoured hooting and shouting and the singing of political songs'.
What could not be concealed, however, was a trail of damage, including broken windows at two pubs, the Barley Mow and the Waggon and Horses, as well as at the Conservative committee rooms.
And as midnight approached the mayor of Droitwich, Councillor Gabb, felt he had no alternative but to read the Riot Act.
This he did with some bravery, albeit with the local deputy chief constable at his side, when he walked into the centre of the crowd and read the text by the light of a candle.
It was a wonder none of the rioters blew it out.
Shortly afterwards a contingent of at least 50 policemen 'charged' the assembly and 'wielded staves' to disperse it.
After hearing all of the evidence and on the advice of the judge, the Assize jury decided not to convict any of the men.
All of whom were salt-makers or labourers.
The jury said they felt just one man 'deserved much censure'.
But the judge pointed out it would be difficult to find one man guilty of a riot and so everyone dispersed again.
This time the defendants to the local pubs and the newshounds back to Fleet Street.
Only 12 years later the Droitwich salt-making industry, which dated back to Roman times, was to close because of its relatively small output.
After 1922 the UK sourced its salt primarily from the Winsford rock salt mine in Cheshire, which is the UK's largest and oldest working mine, while today much is imported from Spain.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What are small nuclear reactors and why does the UK want to build them?
What are small nuclear reactors and why does the UK want to build them?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

What are small nuclear reactors and why does the UK want to build them?

Rolls Royce has been selected to develop and build the UK's first small nuclear power stations. It is hoped small modular reactors (SMRs) will help meet the UK's growing electricity demands, be faster to develop than full size reactors and create thousands of skilled jobs. Alongside £2.5bn for these SMRs, the government has also announced £14.2bn to build a new larger scale reactor, Sizewell C in Suffolk. SMRs, sometimes called "mini nukes", work on the same principle as large reactors, using a nuclear reaction to generate heat that produces electricity. Inside one or more large reactor vessels, atoms of nuclear fuel are split, releasing a large amount of heat. That is used to heat water, which drives a turbine. Essentially, reactors are giant nuclear kettles. SMRs will be a fraction of the size and have up to a third of the generating output of a typical large reactor. The modular element means they will be built to order in factories - as a kit of parts - then transported and fitted together, like a flat-packed power station. The aim is to save time and money The government wants a secure, reliable, affordable and low carbon energy system. In 2024, nuclear accounted for 14% of the UK's electricity generation, according to provisional government figures. The aim is to boost that. Along with 30 other countries, the UK has signed a global pledge to triple nuclear capacity by 2050. But no new nuclear power station has been built since Sizewell B began operating in 1995. And most of those in operation are due to be retired by the end of the decade. The SMR industry is in its infancy and, around the world, about 80 different designs are being investigated. Only China and Russia have small reactors up and running. The UK government is convinced that, with investment, SMRs will create thousands of jobs and boost manufacturing. Initially though, both government and private investment will be needed to turn the designs into a commercially viable reality. In the US, companies including Google, Microsoft and Amazon, with their power-hungry data centres, have signed a deal to use the reactors when they become available. Where will the UK bury all its nuclear waste? UK to dispose of plutonium stockpile Sellafield could leak nuclear waste until 2050s In 2011, the Conservative government identified eight sites for "new nuclear" (larger reactors), at Bradwell, Hartlepool, Heysham, Hinkley Point, Oldbury, Sellafield, Sizewell and Wylfa. Then, in February 2025, the prime minister said he would cut planning red tape to make it easier for developers to build smaller nuclear reactors on additional sites across the country. Certain criteria would have to be met, Sir Keir Starmer said. No sites would be approved close to airports, military sites or pipelines. Locations valuable for nature or at risk of flooding would also be ruled out. Great British Nuclear, a public body with statutory powers to push through the government's nuclear plans, ran a competition to find a firm that would develop and build SMRs in the UK. It aims to select and announce a location by the end of 2025, with the first SMR operational by the mid 2030s. Preferred locations are likely to include old industrial sites, such as former nuclear plants, or old coal mines close to the grid. Rolls Royce beat two American consortiums in the competition, Holtec, GE Hitachi. A Canadian company, Westinghouse pulled out. The financial controversy around the new large reactor being built at Hinkley Point C in Somerset is a perfect example of what the UK is trying to move away from. It is running a decade late and has overspent by billions of pounds. SMRs promise to be quicker, easier and cheaper to build. But while they will eventually be built to order, cost savings don't kick in until designs have been finalised and modules are reliably rolling off factory lines. So the first SMRs will probably be very expensive to build. The cost of dealing with nuclear waste also has to be factored in. Sellafield, in Cumbria, currently deals with most of the country's waste, but it is running out of space and costs are spiralling. In 2024, leading nuclear scientists on a government advisory committee recommended any new nuclear power station design should include clear plans for managing waste, to avoid the "costly mistake of the past". Taxpayers today are still paying for Sellafield to deal with nuclear waste from the 1950s. Nuclear industry experts the BBC has spoken to are convinced that SMRs - and more nuclear power - will eventually reduce the cost of our electricity supply. Public attitudes to nuclear power appear to be linked to those prices. A government survey in 2024 suggested that 78% of people would find an energy infrastructure project more acceptable if they were offered discounts on their bills. Although the government has announced discounts on electricity bills for households close to upgraded pylons, there has been no such announcement yet relating to homes near SMRs. The International Atomic Energy Agency says nuclear power plants are among "the safest and most secure facilities in the world". Nuclear power's reputation is tarnished though by high profile disasters, where radioactive material has been released into the environment - including in Chernobyl, Ukraine, in 1986 and Fukushima in Japan, in 2011. Dr Simon Middleburgh, a nuclear scientist from Bangor University, whose research focuses on developing new nuclear materials, describes the smaller reactors that are being considered for the UK as "incredibly safe". "The UK's ONR (Office for Nuclear Regulation) is treated as a sort of gold standard internationally in terms of the regulatory environment," he told BBC News. Some experts do have concerns about nuclear waste. Scientists from the government advisory group recently said the issue of how radioactive waste from SMRs that are in the design stage "appears, with some exceptions... to have been largely ignored or at least downplayed". The number and location of SMRs is also a security issue. With more reactors spread over a larger area, potentially built on industrial sites and closer to people, Dr Ross Peel, a researcher in civil nuclear security from Kings College London, says the security burden will be higher. Security at nuclear power stations is provided by armed police - the Civil Nuclear Constabulary. Dr Peel says the fact that existing nuclear sites generally have "miles of empty land around them" means that anyone in the vicinity arouses suspicion. If officers spot anyone they could just "look through the binoculars and ask 'what are you doing?'," he said. "In urban or industrial environments, suddenly you're trying to do security in a very different [way]."

Arise, Sir Sadiq - London's mayor knighted by King
Arise, Sir Sadiq - London's mayor knighted by King

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Arise, Sir Sadiq - London's mayor knighted by King

The Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan has been knighted by King Charles at Buckingham Palace. The formal ceremony saw the mayor go down on one knee and be dubbed with a sword by the monarch, the traditional process for conferring a knighthood. Sir Sadiq, who was re-elected for a third term in May 2024, is the first mayor of London to receive the honour. When the honour was confirmed in December Sir Sadiq said it was already the "honour of my life to serve the city I love" and that he was "truly humbled" to have been made a knight. Sir Sadiq was recognised in the New Year Honours for his political and public service. However, the Conservatives have criticised his knighthood, with Shadow Home Secretary and Croydon South MP Chris Philp claiming Londoners "will rightly be furious his track record of failure is being rewarded". The mayor worked as a human rights lawyer before entering Parliament as MP for Tooting for Labour in 2005. He became mayor of London in 2016, replacing Boris Johnson, and has since won two further terms. Also honoured on Tuesday was Dame Emily Thornberry, MP for Islington South and Finsbury since 2005, who formally received her damehood at the Buckingham Palace ceremony for political and public service. Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to Sadiq Khan knighthood prompts Conservative criticism London mayor urged to raise SUV parking fees Sir Sadiq Khan in Cannes to 'bang drum for London' The Royal Family

FIRST READING: The new public safety minister doesn't appear to know stuff
FIRST READING: The new public safety minister doesn't appear to know stuff

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

FIRST READING: The new public safety minister doesn't appear to know stuff

First Reading is a Canadian politics newsletter curated by the National Post's own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here. Canada's new public safety minister, Gary Anandasangaree, is tasked with spearheading one of the more controversial pursuits of the Carney government. He's the one championing a border control bill that will ban cash transactions over $10,000 and allow warrantless snooping of Canadian internet users. He will also be the one overseeing the Liberals' various gun bans. Despite this, Conservative MPs have taken turns in the House of Commons pointing out that Anandasangaree doesn't seem to know about some of the more fundamental elements of his job. Some of the highlights are below. He didn't know what a handgun licence is On Thursday, during a routine series of questions about Liberal gun control policy, Conservative MP Andrew Lawton suddenly asked Anandasangaree if he knew what an 'RPAL' is. 'I do not,' replied Anandasangaree. The term stands for 'restricted possession and acquisition licence' and it's the certification that must be possessed by any Canadian who owns handguns. It's a fair bet that most Canadians don't know what an 'RPAL' is. As of the most recent Commissioner of Firearms report, only 752,002 Canadians actually possess one. But RPAL is a universally known term among any Canadian who has a familiarity with firearms. It would be akin to a driver not knowing what a 'vehicle registration' is. RPAL is also a central plank of Anandasangaree's brief given that he is overseeing the ongoing 'handgun freeze.' Since 2022, all of those 752,002 RPAL owners are not allowed to sell or transfer their handguns, and they're barred from purchasing new ones. He couldn't identify the course required of Canadian gun owners Lawton then asked Anandasangaree if he knew what the CFSC is. 'I do not, no,' the minister replied. The acronym refers to the Canadian Firearms Safety Course, a training program that is mandatory for any Canadian looking to own firearms. One of the hurdles of getting a gun licence in Canada is not only taking the CFSC, but scoring at least 80 per cent on both a written exam and a practical demonstration of proper gun safety. It's one of the tenets of Canadian firearms law that most differentiates it from the United States. In Canada, nobody is allowed to own a gun or buy ammunition for it unless the RCMP is confident that they know how to handle and store it. And it's Anandasangaree's own party that is partially responsible for this. Among the many gun control measures introduced under the Trudeau government is that in-person attendance at a CFSC course is now mandatory. Previously, it was possible to simply challenge the exam. He appeared to struggle with identifying the three basic categories of Canadian firearms Speaking of the Canadian Firearms Safety Course, one of the first things it teaches is that Canada divides firearms into three categories, all of which are subject to different levels of control and licensing by the federal government. The broadest category is non-restricted, which mostly covers long-guns. This is the categorization for anything used in hunting. Handguns are covered as 'restricted' firearms: Anything in this category is subject to extremely strict rules on storage and transport. Technically, a restricted firearm in Canada can only legally exist in one of three spaces: Locked up at home, at a licensed gun range, or in a car moving between those two locations. Stricter still is 'prohibited' firearms: These can't really be fired under any circumstances, and Anandasangaree's ministry is actively in the process of seizing many of them. The three categories are pretty central to how the Liberals have pursued gun control. In multiple instances, they've taken whole categories of guns considered non-restricted and reclassified them overnight as being prohibited. But when Conservative MP Frank Caputo asked Anandasangaree 'what are the classifications of firearms?' the minister didn't reply until he was handed a note, after which he correctly replied 'restricted, non-restricted and prohibited.' Replied Caputo, 'this is the public safety minister, and somebody passed him a note with those classifications. Does the public safety minister not know the classifications of firearms?' He didn't get a 'yes' or 'no' from the minister, only: 'Our intention is to ensure that law-abiding gun owners have the ability to hold on to their guns.' He didn't appear to know that his own government had allowed the decriminalization of hard drugs Also on Thursday, Anandasangaree was asked by a Conservative MP whether he thought that drug decriminalization had been a 'success.' Aaron Gunn, the newly elected MP for North Island-Powell River, asked, 'Does the Minister of Public Safety believe the Liberal government's experiment to decriminalize hard drugs, including fentanyl, crack cocaine and crystal meth, has been a success in my home province of British Columbia?' Anandasangaree replied that Gunn was 'factually incorrect.' 'This government decriminalized cannabis and did not go beyond that,' he said. But ever since 2023, Anandasangaree's government has indeed overseen the decriminalization of 'personal use' amounts of hard drugs, ranging from fentanyl to crystal meth. The decriminalization is a pilot project being pursued by the B.C. government, but illicit drugs are federal jurisdiction. As such, B.C. wouldn't have been able to decriminalize anything without an exemption to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act approved by the federal government. Gunn tried to follow up on the point, but Anandasangaree didn't acknowledge a federal role in the matter, saying, 'We look forward to working with our provincial and territorial counterparts to ensure that there are no hard drugs available within their respective jurisdictions.' In yet another check against the likelihood that the Carney government will be building any oil export pipelines, on Friday Prime Minister Mark Carney said that nothing's getting approved without 'a consensus of all the provinces and the Indigenous people.' The statement misrepresents the power of the federal government; obviously Ottawa is able to do things without first getting unanimous approval from all 10 provinces and also an undefined share of the country's 630 First Nations. But with the statement, Carney is effectively making it harder to build a pipeline than to amend the Constitution. For big decisions (such as abolishing the Senate), the Constitution requires the virtually impossible threshold of obtaining unanimous consent from all the provinces – but without any similar benchmark for unanimous Indigenous a recent interview with podcaster Joe Rogan, FBI Director Kash Patel alleged that Canada is an emerging hub of fentanyl production, in part due to U.S. efforts to combat fentanyl smuggling coming in from Mexico. Patel said the component parts to manufacture illicit fentanyl come almost exclusively from China, and were now increasingly being routed through Canada. 'Instead of having the Mexican cartels going right up the southern border and into America, do you know what they're doing? They're flying it into Vancouver, they're taking the precursors up to Canada, manufacturing it up there, and doing their global distribution routes from up there because we've been so effective down south,' he said. B.C. Public Safety Minister Garry Begg dismissed the allegations in a statement to CTV News. 'It's no surprise that Trump's appointee would use his position to continue the president's narrative to justify his tariffs,' he said. 'Their Drug Enforcement Agency's National Drug Threat Assessment report in 2023 and 2024 didn't even mention Canada.' Get all of these insights and more into your inbox by signing up for the First Reading newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store