logo
When the nation's press descended after howling mob took over town

When the nation's press descended after howling mob took over town

Yahoo23-03-2025

IN 1910 news editors all along Fleet Street were dispatching their top reporters by the fastest train possible to Droitwich, a fairly sleepy mid-Worcestershire town not particularly known for undue violence or steamy scandal.
But in January of that year everything changed because there was a riot going on.
It made national headlines when the mayor of Droitwich felt forced to read the Riot Act to quell a hostile mob in the centre of the gentile spa town.
The so-called Droitwich Riot led to a major case at Worcester Assizes a few weeks later when 12 local men stood in the dock accused of 'unlawful riotously and tumultuously assembling to the disturbance of the peace'.
However, by the end of the headline-making two-day trial the whole affair had descended into a complete farce.
The riotous events in Droitwich were on the General Election night of January 29, 1910, when votes in the Mid-Worcestershire constituency were being counted.
It became clear the seat had been won from the Liberals by the Unionist (Tory) candidate, the Hon JC Lyttelton, who was later to become the ninth Viscount Cobham of Hagley Hall.
This sparked fears among some people the local salt-making operations would come to an end.
Droitwich had been famous for its salt for centuries but there was a wind of change in the air.
Political feelings were running high in the town although there emerged two sharply-differing accounts of what happened on the night.
The police were to paint a picture of 'a howling, hostile and vicious mob' terrorising the streets of Droitwich.
Yet several witnesses at the Assize hearing maintained there had been little more than 'good-humoured hooting and shouting and the singing of political songs'.
What could not be concealed, however, was a trail of damage, including broken windows at two pubs, the Barley Mow and the Waggon and Horses, as well as at the Conservative committee rooms.
And as midnight approached the mayor of Droitwich, Councillor Gabb, felt he had no alternative but to read the Riot Act.
This he did with some bravery, albeit with the local deputy chief constable at his side, when he walked into the centre of the crowd and read the text by the light of a candle.
It was a wonder none of the rioters blew it out.
Shortly afterwards a contingent of at least 50 policemen 'charged' the assembly and 'wielded staves' to disperse it.
After hearing all of the evidence and on the advice of the judge, the Assize jury decided not to convict any of the men.
All of whom were salt-makers or labourers.
The jury said they felt just one man 'deserved much censure'.
But the judge pointed out it would be difficult to find one man guilty of a riot and so everyone dispersed again.
This time the defendants to the local pubs and the newshounds back to Fleet Street.
Only 12 years later the Droitwich salt-making industry, which dated back to Roman times, was to close because of its relatively small output.
After 1922 the UK sourced its salt primarily from the Winsford rock salt mine in Cheshire, which is the UK's largest and oldest working mine, while today much is imported from Spain.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees

timean hour ago

British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees

LONDON -- The British government on Monday reversed its unpopular plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had signaled the u-turn last month after a loud outcry from the public and some members of his Labour Party who thought the relatively modest 1.5 billion-pound ($2 billion) savings were too politically costly. Treasury chief Rachel Reeves, who canceled the payment for home heating on all but the poorest retirees after Labour came to power last summer, said the benefit would be restored to 9 million people, or three-quarters of pensioners, in England and Wales whose incomes are below 35,000 pounds ($47,500). Reeves said the move was necessary last year because the previous Conservative government had left public finances in a dire state. 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government," Reeves said. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest.' The payments are worth between 200 and 300 pounds ($271 and $406) a year. The reversal will cost the government 1.25 billion, Reeve said. Canceling the payments for most people last winter was blamed for contributing to Starmer's swift decline in popularity after his party came to power in a landslide. He was blamed for punishing elderly people on limited incomes who struggled to make ends meet during a cost-of-living crisis. Labour fared poorly in local elections in England last month, with many party representatives blaming the removal of the winter fuel payment. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the main opposition Conservative Party, quickly pounced on Starmer's about-face. 'Keir Starmer has scrambled to clear up a mess of his own making," she said. 'This humiliating u-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. The prime minister should now apologize for his terrible judgment.'

Reform UK row 'storm in a teacup', says Zia Yusuf
Reform UK row 'storm in a teacup', says Zia Yusuf

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Reform UK row 'storm in a teacup', says Zia Yusuf

Former Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf has called a row over a social media post - in which he said it was "dumb" for one of his MPs to call for a burka ban - a "storm in a teacup". Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Yusuf said he regretted the post and that "exhaustion led to a poor decision". Shortly after criticising MP Sarah Pochin, Yusuf quit as chairman saying that trying to get Reform UK elected was not "a good use of my time". However, two days later he returned to work for the party albeit in a different role, leading the party's Doge unit, a team inspired by the US Department of Government Efficiency, set up by President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. The initiative aims to cut wasteful spending in the councils Reform now controls. Asked why he had resigned as chairman, Yusuf said: "I've been working pretty much non-stop, virtually no days off. "It is very difficult to keep going at that pace." He said one of the reasons he had "changed his decision so quickly" and returned to work for the party, was that he had been "inundated" by supportive messages from Reform voters and members. Reform UK prepares for real power on a council it now dominates Zia Yusuf returning to Reform UK two days after quitting The series of events began last Wednesday when Pochin, the newly-elected MP for Runcorn and Helsby, asked Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer if he would join France and Denmark in banning the burka, a veil worn by some Muslim women that covers the face and body, "in the interests of public safety". The following day Yusuf, who is a Muslim, posted on X: "I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do". Speaking to the BBC on Monday, Yusuf said "the thing that frustrated me at the time" was that Pochin had not chosen to ask something that was party policy. Asked for his views on a ban, he said: "If I was an MP I would think about it very deeply, I think I probably would be in favour of banning face coverings in public writ large, not just the burka. "I'm very queasy and uneasy about banning things that for example would be unconstitutional in the US but we have a particular situation in the UK." He said he did not believe Islam was "a threat to the country" but added that the UK had "a problem with assimilation". Commenting on the row during a visit to Port Talbot in Wales, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said the party had "hit a speed bump" and joked it had been going over the speed limit. He said Yusuf has "lost his rag" and put out an "intemperate comment or two" but added: "It was pretty clear by the next morning he quickly regretted what he had done. "He made a mistake and plunged us into a difficult place. I forgave him, I said 'don't do it again' but I forgave him." Over the weekend, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch was also asked her views on banning the burka. She told the Telegraph: "People should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear." However, she said that organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear and that she asked people coming to her constituency surgeries to remove face coverings "whether it's a burka or a balaclava". "I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face," she added. The Muslim Council of Britain accused her of "desperation" adding: "Kemi Badenoch isn't setting the agenda - she's scrambling to keep up with Reform UK's divisive rhetoric."

British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees
British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees

LONDON (AP) — The British government on Monday reversed its unpopular plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had signaled the u-turn last month after a loud outcry from the public and some members of his Labour Party who thought the relatively modest 1.5 billion-pound ($2 billion) savings were too politically costly. Treasury chief Rachel Reeves, who canceled the payment for home heating on all but the poorest retirees after Labour came to power last summer, said the benefit would be restored to 9 million people, or three-quarters of pensioners, in England and Wales whose incomes are below 35,000 pounds ($47,500). Reeves said the move was necessary last year because the previous Conservative government had left public finances in a dire state. 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government," Reeves said. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest.' The payments are worth between 200 and 300 pounds ($271 and $406) a year. The reversal will cost the government 1.25 billion, Reeve said. Canceling the payments for most people last winter was blamed for contributing to Starmer's swift decline in popularity after his party came to power in a landslide. He was blamed for punishing elderly people on limited incomes who struggled to make ends meet during a cost-of-living crisis. Labour fared poorly in local elections in England last month, with many party representatives blaming the removal of the winter fuel payment. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the main opposition Conservative Party, quickly pounced on Starmer's about-face. 'Keir Starmer has scrambled to clear up a mess of his own making," she said. 'This humiliating u-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. The prime minister should now apologize for his terrible judgment.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store