Action you can take if a neighbour's tree overhangs your garden – and who has to foot the bill
AN expert has revealed what you should do if a neighbour's tree overhangs your garden, and who has to pay for it.
With temperatures in the UK skyrocketing this week, plants and trees across the country will be seeing vigorous growth.
1
And although many gardening fans will likely be delighted with the rapid growth of their prized plants, some trees and hedges may end up growing into the neighbour's garden.
In order to prevent overhanging branches turning into furious rows between neighbours, Natalie Welsh, head of property at HCB Widdows Mason shared what your rights are in this tricky situation.
"It can be really frustrating when branches or plants from your neighbour's garden start to spill over into your space", she said.
"In England and Wales, you're allowed to cut back any branches that cross onto your property, but only up to the boundary line.
"Just make sure you don't step onto your neighbour's land or damage the tree itself."
When trimming a tree back, you are not allowed to lean into your neighbour's garden, since that can be considered trespassing.
Natalie advised that before taking any drastic action, it's best to have a friendly chat with your neighbour first.
Politely explain to them that the overhanging branches are a problem for you, and let them know that you plan to cut them back.
If the branches are overhanging onto your side, you're responsible for the cost of having them removed, not your neighbour", Natalie continued.
"Once you've cut them back, you're also responsible for getting rid of the branches properly."
Your kids are breaking law if they kick their ball over neighbour's fence, High Court rules after couple sued next door
Natalie revealed that the cut-back branches actually belong to your neighbour, so you can offer to return them to them after you have chopped them down.
However, you cannot throw them over the fence into your neighbour's garden, as this is classed as fly-tipping, which is illegal.
"If your neighbour doesn't want the trimmings, then it's down to you to dispose of them responsibly, whether that's your garden waste bin or taking them to the recycling centre", the expert said.
"In most situations, a friendly word with the neighbour may help establish views of ownership over any respective boundary in question and avoids any disputes or misunderstandings later.
I had a two-year bin war with my next door neighbour
Gemma Smith and Sophie Wood were engaged in a weekly feud for a year over their wheelie bins.
When Gemma moved next door to Sophie, 34, who is unemployed, in November 2020 they were civil to one another.
Gemma, who is single and doesn't work due to stress, says: 'Sophie seemed nice and we'd stop and exchange pleasantries.
'But it all changed at the beginning of 2022, when Sophie's bin was full and she put her rubbish bag in mine.
'I took it out and put it on top of her bin.
'It fell off, gulls pecked at it and there was rubbish everywhere.'
Both women refused to clear up the mess, claiming it was the other one's fault.
Gemma says: 'I felt so angry.
'There was cat litter spread all over my drive — it was absolutely disgusting and we ended up shouting at each other.
'We were both as bad as each other — we'd walk past each other and I'd tell her she was a lazy cow and to clean up after herself.
'We'd scream insults at each other."
Within six months Sophie had set up a CCTV camera and threatened to report Gemma to the council.
In retaliation, Gemma set up the baby monitor — which can record video — to try to pin more wrongdoing on Sophie.
Then last July Sophie spotted Gemma in tears on her doorstep following a burglary at her home.
Gemma says: 'Sophie came straight round and asked if there was anything she could do.
'We are now the best of friends and help each other out all the time."
"Boundary disputes can often become costly and acrimonious - if you're not sure about your rights or think things might get tricky, it's a good idea to speak to a legal expert first."
If you take fruits from your neighbour's trees without permission, it could potentially be classified as theft or trespass, depending on the circumstances and the value of the fruits.
The penalties for theft or trespass can vary.
In the UK, for example, penalties for theft can range from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offence and the value of the items stolen.
It's important to remember that taking someone else's property without permission is illegal and can lead to legal consequences.
Penalties can also include community service orders, injunctions, or in extreme cases, imprisonment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Hardworking senior, 92, forced to mow neighbors' lawns after Dem mayor's neglect in historic city
An elderly Alabama man has been forced to maintain his neighbors' lawns for decades after the city snapped up properties for a project that was never completed. Jimmy Smith, 92, regularly mows the grass of his late mother's house in Birmingham, despite the city having purchased it nearly 20 years ago, reported WBRC. He still lives next door to his mother's derelict home and said the local government stopped taking care of the property years ago. 'What the city said they were going to do has not been done, and my question is why?' Smith said. 'They took what was rightfully ours.' His mother, Nancy Smith, sold her longtime home for $42,000 on March 22, 2006, as part of the 35th Street North Extension Street Improvement Project, according to WBMA. Smith said his mother felt like she had no choice but to sell, and then tragically, she died five days later. 'When my momma got the news... what the city was going to do... although she had medical problems, she died, for lack of a better word, she died of a broken heart,' Smith said. The project, which was conducted during the administration of then-Mayor Bernard Kincaid, was never completed, and the Smith family property has sat untouched, according to 'What the city said they were going to do has not been done, and my question is why?' Smith said. 'They took what was rightfully ours. 'The city took this property, and it's not my responsibility to dictate their policies. They did it — they should have all the answers. Mr. Mayor, it's one of your children. I want action right now. Can't wait.' Smith remembers his once-thriving community and has taken on the burden of maintaining not just his mother's house but also several of his neighbors'. 'You're looking at the maintainer. Not just this, but that and that and that, that on the other side,' he said. Across the street is the former Carver High School, the original site of a high school built for black students in 1959 during the era of segregation. 'That's the school where the children made a difference, and Lord, look at it now,' Smith said. 'My God, man, they could do something with that. That hurts, not as much as my mom's house, but close to it.' 'This was a proud community with houses, filling stations and cleaners,' he said. 'I haven't completely forgotten. I know God says forgive, but I ain't Jesus, I ain't never going to forget that.' A spokesperson for current Mayor Randall Woodin told local media that they are reviewing the forgotten project. 'There are a great deal of historical details related to how the 35th Street North extension project evolved,' the spokesperson said. 'As a city, we are reviewing this area and see the need for access improvements and other changes to benefit the community.' The city intends to consult with Smith and his neighbors to use their input moving forward. 'Our study of this area will include input from Mr. Smith and his neighbors before committing to next steps for the specific property he has cited,' the spokesperson said. 'His advocacy has been impactful. We'll be following up with him and others in the community soon to discuss possible plans for the area.' Smith said he has hope that the community will be revived before he passes away. 'Then I could just go at peace,' he said. 'Some years to come, our babies are going to have a swimming pool, and our babies are going to have safe streets,' he said. 'We're going to have sidewalks. Just watch and see.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Thousands of baby lobsters have been released in Cornwall and Scilly
Almost 5,000 baby lobsters have been released into the waters around Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly by a conservation releases were part of a challenge by The National Lobster Hatchery (NLH) to conduct 25 lobster releases in 25 locations over 25 consecutive days for its 25th "release-athon" began on 19 May on the Isles of Scilly, and finished with more than 1,000 baby lobsters being released last week near Penzance to mark the final NLH, a conservation and education charity for the European lobster, said it was "hugely rewarding" to collaborate with other organisations and "provide another generation of lobsters to Cornwall's coastal waters". The NLH raised the baby lobsters from when they were larvae until they were large enough to be baby lobsters are just two to three months old and barely an inch they are small they are large enough to burrow into sand or seaweed and avoid Johns, senior technician at NLH, told BBC Radio Cornwall it was the "perfect point" in time to release the baby Johns said: "It's at this stage in their life cycle that... they settle on the seabed and live in there [for 12 to 18 months]."European lobsters in the UK are classed as vulnerable and the NLH says their work ensures the UK's population is kept sustainable.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Worcester Barbourne Works lower-floor residents allowed home
A large number of residents forced to evacuate their apartment block over dangerous cladding and fire safety risk nearly two weeks ago are set to return people, including eight children, were told to leave the Barbourne Works in Worcester on 4 June, after fire inspectors raised a safety and Worcester Fire and Rescue Service (HWFRS), which placed the building under a prohibition notice, said it was now safe for the ground and first floors to be FirstPort, the building's management agent, said the second and third floors still did not meet the required standards for fire escape, and work was continuing. The evacuation took place after fire inspectors found problems that dated back to when the former factory was converted to flats 20 years ago. "[But] we are pleased to be able to welcome residents of the ground and first floors back home and we sincerely thank them for their patience and support over the last two weeks whilst we've works through this complex situation," a FirstPort spokesperson said. 'Risk was so severe' The firm had taken a central role in co-ordinating a response to the safety alert, which involved working with stakeholders including Homes England, the fire service, the building's freeholder and council. "Unfortunately, for residents of the second and third floors the prohibition notice remains in place, as these units currently do not meet the required standards for fire escape," the spokesperson added. Work is continuing to implement safety measures so the upper floors could be re-occupied "as soon as possible". Inspectors found dangers "so significant and the risk to residents was so severe" that the notice was issued and residents had to leave the 46 flats. Some residents told the BBC they were shocked, had "absolutely no warning" and had to quickly leave their homes. Forty-seven people went to stay with family and friends and 13 went to a rest centre before being put up in hotels, fire service group commander Simon Cusack said previously. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
