Denver weighs ranked choice voting for municipal elections
Rank-choice voting is back in the spotlight in Denver.
The big picture: Denver City Council members on Monday discussed a proposal to use ranked choice voting for the city's municipal elections.
Why it matters: Ranked choice voting (RCV) would upend how voters choose the city's top officials, including mayor and city council members, while proponents say it could save money, increase turnout and make voting simpler.
How it works: This system lets voters rank each candidate in order of preference, with the candidate who receives 50% or more of first-choice votes winning.
Yes, but: If the 50% threshold isn't met immediately, the tallying repeats until a candidate gets 50% or more of the first-choice votes, creating an "instant runoff."
Candidates with the fewest votes are eliminated, and those ballots count toward each voter's next-ranked pick.
Between the lines: RCV would eliminate runoff elections, which in Denver occur as separate contests about two months after the initial election.
Runoffs come with a roughly $2 million price tag, City Clerk and Recorder Paul López tells us.
What they're saying: Councilmember Sarah Parady, who sponsored the RCV measure, said during Monday's meeting that Denver's current spring election may run afoul of a new state voting right's law.
The city could face a legal challenge due to lack of racial parity in voter turnout during municipal elections, Parady said.
The other side: Councilmember Kevin Flynn said this method can result in reduced voter turnout, noting a downturn in some parts of Portland after introducing RCV last year.
While supporters say it can lead to more candidates of color, Councilmember Jamie Torres said she doesn't think this is an issue in Denver, noting the council's historically diverse makeup.
The intrigue: López, who oversees city elections, in a letter to council said he's not taking a formal position on ranked choice voting, though he noted the city's election systems are capable of adopting the method.
Friction point: Council on Monday also discussed a separate proposal requiring separate ballots for the two at-large seats on the 13-member council — something López in his letter said cannot be implemented simultaneously as ranked choice voting.
Flashback: The city briefly used this RCV in the early 1900s before abolishing it in 1935; council briefly reconsidered its use in 2021.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Party Primaries Need Ranked Choice Voting
Democratic voters in New Jersey must choose a nominee for governor next week from a crowded and contentious field - and polls show no one truly catching fire. The front-runner polls at about 30% of the vote. At least three other candidates can fairly claim that theyre in second place. Two more appear to have double-digit support. Meanwhile, a quarter of New Jersey Democrats remain undecided - and the race just keeps getting more negative. Its a textbook example of an election that would benefit from ranked choice voting. RCV is the tool that solves precisely this problem: how to determine a majority winner with the strongest support from a field of several candidates. And while 2025 is a quieter election year, well surely see this same problem - with RCV as a clear solution - in dozens of marquee races in 2026, with large candidate fields already forming on both the Republican and Democratic sides to fill open gubernatorial and Senate seats. Voters demand elected officials who are accountable to a majority of us, not just a narrow base. But they also deserve choice, and New Jersey Democrats have a lot of it here. The Garden States gubernatorial field is a deep one with two members of Congress, the mayors of the states two largest cities, a longtime senate president, and a union leader all representing a variety of ideologies and backgrounds. With the June 10 primary fast approaching, several recent polls show that U.S. Rep. Mikie Sherrill holds the lead - but her advantage differs widely in each, and so does the candidate in second. Emerson shows Sherrill at 28%, and three candidates tied at second with 11% - Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, and U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer. Teachers union leader Sean Spiller and former senate president Steve Sweeney follow close behind. An InsiderNJ poll finds Sherrill with 31%, Baraka at 21%, and Fulop at 19%, with the others closely clustered around 10%. Rutgers found things even tighter: Sherill with 17%, followed by Fulop with 12%, then Spiller at 10%, with Baraka and Gottheimer tied at 9%. Its entirely possible that the "winner" could end up somewhere in the low 30s - meaning nearly 70% of voters preferred someone other than the nominee. What a mess for voters. There are several distinct groupings of candidates, some more moderate, some more progressive, some more inclined to work with the Trump administration and some vowing to fight it. Theyre all dividing the vote. The polls are so scattered as to be no help at all. Voters are stuck trying to guess the strongest among their favorites. But what if there were an election with multiple candidates, satisfied voters, and a united and strong party? Ranked choice voting makes it possible. Instead of voting for just a single candidate, voters have the power to rank the field in order: first, second, third, and so on. If someone wins a majority right away, they win. If no one does, the candidates at the bottom are eliminated. If your candidate is still in the race, your vote stays with them. If theyre knocked out, your vote simply counts for your second choice. The "instant runoff" continues until someone wins 50%. Its a nonpartisan solution that protects choice and majority winners, and puts voters first. Unsurprisingly, its good for parties too: Research shows that candidates who win a majority in their primaries - which RCV delivers - do better in competitive elections. And instead of a brutal campaign leaving bruises and hard feelings, the party is united heading into the fall. Everywhere RCV is used, from Maine to Alaska, from New York City to Utah, voters say that they like it and find it easy to use. Four years ago, Virginia Republicans faced a similar textbook case: a crowded primary for governor, candidates from multiple wings of the party, even the threat of a divisive third-party challenge from one candidate if they didnt win the nomination. The party turned to ranked choice voting to solve this problem. Glenn Youngkin was the majority winner. He had a unified party behind him - and in November, he defeated the former Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe (who had trouble unifying Democrats after winning a four-way primary without RCV). If theres one thing voters want more of these days, its choice. Poll after poll finds huge majorities of us frustrated with the candidates were given and longing for more options. But we also need the tools to make the most of greater choice - instead of it causing its own problems, like driving further polarization, frustrating voters, and making our campaign cycles ever more toxic. Ranked choice voting allows lots of choices and majority winners to go hand in hand. In the end, that leads to stronger nominees, more unified parties, and most importantly, more satisfied voters. Meredith Sumpter is president and CEO of FairVote, a nonpartisan organization seeking better elections.
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Judge orders El Salvador human rights lawyer jailed for 6 months pending trial
SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador (AP) — A judge in El Salvador ordered a lawyer from a prominent human rights organization who has been an outspoken critic of some of President Nayib Bukele's policies to be jailed Wednesday for six months on illegal enrichment charges, which the judge formally accepted. Earlier, Ruth Leonora López had demanded a public trial as police brought her before the judge. Wednesday's hearing was closed to the public as the case is under seal. Observers say the case against López is retaliation for her work while authorities allege she aided one of her former employers being prosecuted for embezzlement. Authorities arrested López at her home on May 18 . The anticorruption lawyer, who works for the nongovernmental organization Cristosal, has denied the accusations. As she was escorted by police through the court building Wednesday, a shackled López with a Bible between her hands, shouted: 'They're not going to silence me, I want a public trial,' according to a brief video posted by Cristosal on X. 'The people have to know.' Earlier, defense attorney Pedro Cruz, surrounded by reporters in the courthouse, said he disagreed with the decision to seal the case. He said prosecutors had done so 'because they fear they made an unfounded accusation.' Later he said that her defense team had solid arguments and evidence and hoped for a fair trial. She had not made her initial appearance before a judge until Monday, more than two weeks after her arrest. At that hearing, prosecutors announced the illegal enrichment, different from the original embezzlement, and requested that she be held while they continue to investigate. Cristosal has been an critic of some of Bukele's policies, including the state of emergency giving him special powers that has now been in place for more than three years. The measure restricts the right to gather, to be informed of rights and to have access to a lawyer. It extends to 15 days the time that someone can be held without charges. Some 86,000 people have been arrested under the state of emergency. López is the head of Cristosal's Anti-Corruption Unit, which has produced reports and filed legal actions related to government corruption. Mary Lawlor, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders, said via X that she was closely following López's hearing. 'The state must guarantee her right to due process. She must be freed.' López's alleged wrongdoing dates to her time as an adviser to Eugenio Chicas, the former president of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal during the administration of President Salvador Sánchez Cerén (2014-2019). 'Ruth has dedicated her life to the defense of human rights and the fight against corruption,' Cristosal said in a statement last week. 'Hers is not an isolated case: it is part of a pattern of criminalization against critical voices.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
3 days ago
El Salvador human rights lawyer demands public trial as police haul her before judge
SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador -- SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador (AP) — A lawyer from a prominent human rights organization who has been an outspoken critic of some of President Nayib Bukele's policies demanded a public trial as police brought her before a judge in El Salvador Wednesday. Prosecutors sought to charge her with illegal enrichment and jail her for six months pending trial. Observers say the case against Ruth Eleonora López is retaliation for her work while authorities allege she aided one of her former employers being prosecuted for embezzlement. Authorities arrested López at her home on May 18. The anticorruption lawyer, who works for the nongovernmental organization Cristosal, has denied the accusations. Wednesday's hearing was closed to the public as the case is under seal. As she was escorted by police through the court building Wednesday, a shackled López with a Bible between her hands, shouted: 'They're not going to silence me, I want a public trial,' according to a brief video posted by Cristosal on X. 'The people have to know.' Earlier, defense attorney Pedro Cruz, surrounded by reporters in the courthouse, said he disagreed with the decision to seal the case. He said prosecutors had done so 'because they fear they made an unfounded accusation.' She had not made her initial appearance before a judge until Monday, more than two weeks after her arrest. At that hearing, prosecutors announced the illegal enrichment, different from the original embezzlement, and requested that she be held while they continue to investigate. Cristosal has been an critic of some of Bukele's policies, including the state of emergency giving him special powers that has now been in place for more than three years. The measure restricts the right to gather, to be informed of rights and to have access to a lawyer. It extends to 15 days the time that someone can be held without charges. Some 86,000 people have been arrested under the state of emergency. López is the head of Cristosal's Anti-Corruption Unit, which has produced reports and filed legal actions related to government corruption. Mary Lawlor, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders, said via X that she was closely following López's hearing. 'The state must guarantee her right to due process. She must be freed.' López's alleged wrongdoing dates to her time as an adviser to Eugenio Chicas, the former president of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal during the administration of President Salvador Sánchez Cerén (2014-2019). 'Ruth has dedicated her life to the defense of human rights and the fight against corruption,' Cristosal said in a statement last week. 'Hers is not an isolated case: it is part of a pattern of criminalization against critical voices.'
