
Should the Yukon River be considered a 'person' with rights? Some say it's an idea whose time has come
Social Sharing
Intrinsic to the Yukon River are skills shared and carefully honed among families, for generations.
Nika Silverfox-Young, a citizen of the Little Salmon Carmacks First Nation in the Yukon, calls this blood memory.
"We really travelled a lot and we used the rivers as our highways. We really needed them," she said. "We'd pick out the best parts, and listen to the land when the salmon were coming back.
"We've lost that ability to listen to what our land is telling us. She is screaming right now about how we need to protect her."
Silverfox-Young said the river is "part of me."
"I feel like I'm legally, genetically obligated to protect this land ... I want that to continue."
Silverfox-Young is among a growing number of people who think it's time the Yukon River had more significant environmental protections — in part, by granting the waterway legal personhood.
It's an idea that already has the support of the Council of Yukon First Nations, and Alaska Native people, whose cultures are also intertwined with the river.
In the face of climate change, industrial impacts and imperilled salmon populations, advocates are now calling for dialogue and cooperation, among communities along the river and all levels of government.
Efforts often stem from 'long-standing disputes'
There's precedent in Canada for granting environmental personhood. The Innu of Ekuanitshit and a regional municipality in Quebec granted the Magpie River with the status in 2021, to primarily defend it against hydro development. A resolution grants the river nine rights, including the right to flow, the right to maintain its biodiversity and the right to be safe from pollution. It even has the right to sue.
Calls for environmental personhood are mounting in B.C., too.
In October, the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations passed a resolution calling on the province and others to work with First Nations to advance the legal personhood of nature, "including water bodies such as rivers and lakes, forests and mountains within a First Nations' unceded traditional territory."
And in New Zealand, after more than a century-long fight led by Māori to protect the Whanganui River, the country's parliament passed legislation in 2017 that granted the waterway fundamental rights that build in Indigenous cosmologies — the first of its kind in the world.
There's a common dominator to every effort to assign legal personhood to entities found in the natural world, said Stepan Wood, professor at Allard School of Law and the director of the Centre for Law and the Environment at the University of British Columbia.
"They arise out of longstanding disputes or claims of treaty violations," he said, noting the case of the Whanganui River.
"From the beginning, one of the core demands of the Māori was 'land back,' which is again a similar, you know, refrain," he said, referring to the Indigenous-led movement to reclaim Indigenous jurisdiction.
Trouble was, Wood said, the New Zealand parliament was dead-set against allowing Māori ownership of the land. So, a compromise was struck.
The idea was to legally define those connections, steeped in Māori law and cosmology — nature as a group of ancestors.
Legal personhood hinges on local contexts, and it needs to be customized accordingly, Wood said.
"There's no one-size-fit-all approach," he said.
"One of the similarities with Canada is that you have 150 years of systematic violation of treaty promises by the British Crown and, you know, dispossession of Indigenous peoples and total negation of their laws and their jurisdiction and their sovereignty."
As for how this could be applied in the Yukon, Wood said that's likely to be an open question for some time.
"Would the goal be to have laws adopted by the self-governing nations, so within either they're delegated or they're inherent self governance authority? Would it be territorial legislation or federal legislation?"
Wood also said it could take the form of a transboundary Indigenous treaty.
"Kind of like a treaty amongst the various First Nations up and down the Yukon River saying we are all in agreement that the Yukon River is a, you know, a living entity, with spirit."
'The water, to us, is life'
In March, a majority of member nations belonging to the Council of Yukon First Nations (CYFN) voted in favour of looking into legal personhood for the Yukon River.
Made up of two parts, the resolution also calls on the territory to support both short- and long-term management plans of the river's corridor, which includes banks and channels — land integral to the waterway. Linked to that, the missive urges the territory to consider legal personhood "for the entirety of the Yukon River Corridor with all affected First Nations."
Erin McQuaig, the deputy chief of the Tr'ondëk Hwëch'in First Nation in Dawson City, Yukon, said legal personhood would elevate needed protections for the river.
"The water, to us, is life. It gives life to every living form on earth and it should be recognized as such," McQuaig said.
McQuaig said this work corresponds with efforts to save chinook salmon, whose numbers in the Yukon River have declined precipitously for years and have been plunged into a deep crisis.
"It's imperative for us as people to continue and also reclaim our culture. We have many, many young citizens that have never seen a salmon come out of the river where we live."
Premier Ranj Pillai addressed CYFN's resolution last week in the legislative assembly. He said he knows it's important to protect the river, but that his government hasn't contemplated environmental personhood.
"To be very open, I don't have enough of a breadth of understanding of just what this would mean from a policy perspective and legally, but I know that we'll continue to work with Tr'ondëk Hwëch'in … and we'll be speaking with the Council of Yukon First Nations on the resolution," Pillai said.
Whitehorse dam relicensing sparks talk
Pillai said conversations about legal personhood in the territory have stemmed from work on a regional land use plan in the Dawson area. Buried in the recommended plan released in 2022, the planning commission also floats legal personhood.
But the concept has been raised in the territory's south for years.
The Yukon's largest hydroelectric dam, in Whitehorse, has been moving through the relicensing process. While the facility provides crucial electricity — meeting about 75 per cent of the territory's demand in the summer alone — it's come under intense scrutiny at times for its impacts on Yukon River salmon. This is the first time the dam has been reviewed by the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB).
During the assessment phase, the Ta'an Kwäch'än Council raised the prospect of granting legal personhood to the Yukon River.
"To date, there has not been consideration given to the Yukon River as a natural person, complete with rights, nor has there been gratitude expressed for the electricity it has given to us," the First Nation states in a 2023 submission to YESAB.
While the board ultimately did not address the idea of environmental personhood in its assessment of the dam, a spokesperson told CBC News that, "YESAB's process enables future dialogue on this emerging topic within Yukon."
Catherine Ford-Lammers, the lead on the Whitehorse dam relicensing for the Carcross/Tagish First Nation, said her community is also interested in environmental personhood and looking at what's worked elsewhere.
"It does need to be looked at, but then I guess it could come with its own set of complications in terms of who are the parties to manage that personhood for the Yukon River," Ford-Lammers said.
Nicole Tom, former chief of the Little Salmon Carmacks First Nation, now serves as a mentor and advisor for Yukon-based To Swim and Speak with Salmon, an Indigenous-led conservation organization that empowers youth.
No doubt, she said, the process would be complex, with no shortage of legal wrangling and politics.
But Tom said it's necessary to wade into that world — threats to freshwater are too great to ignore anymore. Case in point, she said, the Eagle Mine failure that sent shockwaves across the territory and continues to roil people who live in the region.
"Those conversations are not far-fetched, and when you have political alignment that's when you can really see some changes for the good," Tom said.
"It's necessary with climate change, it's necessary with everything that's going on right now that these special water systems be protected.
"It's a means of survival and it's a means of cultural identity."
A transboundary river coalition
There are dozens of communities along the Yukon, the third-longest river in North America. Like those communities, the river is also diverse — the waterway braids, riffles and plumbs to great depths near Lake Laberge.
Mackenzie Englishoe, youth advisor for Alaska's Tanana Chiefs Conference, a tribal consortium of 42 villages in the state's interior, wants a transboundary coalition formed within five years to help unify communities. Englishoe, who's Gwichya Gwich'in, believes this would further galvanize people to speak up and act.
"I think that would include lobbying, educating ourselves — our people — and outside communities about our relationship to the river, and respect for the river. I think this would establish key protections and help our salmon. It would help all animals and the people along the river," Englishoe said.
"My identity as a person is, I have to look at this river as something that's taken care of me, and has sacrificed for me, and I have to do the same for her."
Jared Gonet, director of To Swim and Speak with Salmon, said the first step is decolonization.
He said the idea isn't to consider rivers as people, so much as living entities that hold entire ecosystems together — communities, too.
"I've heard Kaska Elders speak about, like, mountains, rivers, headwaters as beings having their own agency," Gonet said.
"For me, the biggest challenge is going to be just talking, getting the time, the resources, the people, those bright minds to come back and start, you know, really pushing and talking and engaging people."
Wood, the law professor, said environmental personhood can shift paradigms, changing for the better people's relationship to the natural world.
"So, changing it from nature being a collection of objects to be owned and exploited by humans, through nature as a community of older, more senior relatives to be revered and respected by humans," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Democrats are drawing closer to the crypto industry despite Trump divisions
WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump builds a crypto empire — including hosting a private dinner with top investors at his golf club — Democrats have united in condemning what they call blatant corruption from the White House. But the Democratic Party's own relationship with the emerging crypto industry is far less cut and dried. Work in the Republican-led Senate to legitimize cryptocurrency by adding guardrails has drawn backing from some Democrats, underscoring growing support for the industry in the party. But divisions have opened over the bill, with many demanding it prevent the Republican president and his family from directly profiting from cryptocurrency. 'I'm all on board with the idea of regulating crypto,' said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. 'But at this moment, when cryptocurrency is being so clearly used by Donald Trump to facilitate his corruption, I don't think you can close your eyes to that when you're legislating.' The legislation is moving ahead more rapidly than Congress usually acts when an industry is new. But the big money and campaign donations flowing from cryptocurrency firms have made them a new powerhouse on the political scene, one that's increasingly gaining allies and capturing the attention of lawmakers. A look at what to know about the industry's clout and the political fight over what's known as the GENIUS Act: 'Anti-crypto is a good way to end your career' To understand the growing clout of the crypto industry, look no further than the 2024 election. Fairshake, a crypto super political action committee, and its affiliated PACs spent more than $130 million in congressional races. Fairshake spent roughly $40 million supporting Republican Bernie Moreno in Ohio in an effort to defeat Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown. Brown, who lost to Moreno by more than 3 percentage points, was seen as a chief critic of the industry as the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. 'DC received a clear message that being anti-crypto is a good way to end your career, as it doesn't represent the will of the voters,' Brian Armstrong, the CEO of Coinbase, wrote in a social media post the day after the 2024 election. Coinbase — the largest crypto exchange in the U.S. and biggest contributor to Fairshake — does not view support for its industry as partisan, according to Kara Calvert, the company's vice president of U.S. policy. The industry also spent heavily to support Democrats Ruben Gallego and Elissa Slotkin in their races for open Senate seats in battleground states. Fairshake spent $10 million in support of Slotkin during her successful Senate run against Republican Mike Rodgers, and Slotkin, who won the Michigan race by fewer than 20,000 votes, spoke in favor of crypto on the campaign trail. Similar dynamics are setting up ahead of 2026 in contested House and Senate races. Fairshake said in January that it already had $116 million in cash on hand aimed at the 2026 midterm elections. 'We're not slowing down, and everything remains on the table,' Josh Vlasto, a spokesperson for Fairshake, told The Associated Press. Hours before a May 19 vote to move forward on cryptocurrency legislation in the Senate, an advocacy group tied to Coinbase sent an email to the offices of U.S. senators warning that the vote would count toward their crypto-friendliness scores. 'What the spending does is put crypto on the map. It lets members know that this is not a phase, this is real industry, with real dollars, that is developing its hold in Washington,' said Calvert. Democrats navigate around a 'crypto president' A significant number of Democrats, 16, joined Republicans in advancing the crypto legislation. The GENIUS Act would create a new regulatory structure for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. It is viewed as a step toward consumer protections and greater legitimacy for the industry. The sticking point for many Democrats is that while the bill prohibits members of Congress and their families from profiting off stablecoins, it excludes the president from those restrictions. Trump, once a skeptic of the industry, has vowed in his second term to make the U.S. the global capital of crypto. Meanwhile, he and his family have moved aggressively into nearly every corner of the industry: mining operations, billion-dollar bitcoin purchases, a newly minted stablecoin and a Trump-branded meme coin. Days after Trump's interests in the industry became public in early May, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York urged the Democratic caucus to unite and vote against the package to have a stronger hand in negotiations, according to a person familiar with the matter who insisted on anonymity to discuss private discussions. On May 8, a bloc of Senate Democrats who had previously backed the GENIUS Act reversed course — ultimately voting to block the bill from advancing. Negotiations between Senate Democrats and Republicans followed. The new version of the bill is now expected to pass the 100-member Senate this month. Amendments are still possible. Schumer and Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. are expected to propose one that would bar the president and his family from profiting off stablecoins, though it's unlikely to pass. 'There is room for improvements as there often is with a lot of legislation. But with this in particular, we've got issues with the president,' said Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona 'Having said that, this was negotiated with Democrats and Republicans. We got to a place. We voted on it. I expect this is the version we're going to pass.' Still, the legislation is stirring unease. Schumer, asked if he's urging members to vote against the bill, noted that he has opposed the legislation and said 'there's division in our caucus on that issue.' 'There's a gaping hole in this bill that everybody sees,' Murphy said. 'After it's passed, it will be illegal for me to issue a cryptocurrency, but it's legal for the president of the United States.' 'If this bill passes, we kind of go from a dirt road to a paved road,' he said. What comes next If the Senate approves the stablecoin legislation, the bill will still need to clear the House before reaching the president's desk. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Crypto advocates say the next priority is pushing Congress for market structure legislation, a far more sweeping effort than simply regulating stablecoins. 'Stablecoin is one step of the path. Then you need market structure. We're hopeful that the Senate works together to pass something quickly,' Calvert said. Some Democrats view the legislation as a chance to impose basic guardrails on a rapidly growing industry that's particularly popular among men and younger voters, two groups that drifted from the party in 2024. ___ Associated Press writers Alan Suderman, Lisa Mascaro, Matt Brown and Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.


Winnipeg Free Press
9 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
To fight wildfires and heat waves, Manitoba needs a climate plan
Opinion Facing a record-breaking heat wave in early May, Manitoba has had a devastating start to its unofficial fifth season — fire season — as wildfires continue to ravage communities and smoke blankets much of the province. Climate change is no longer a distant problem for future generations — it is here now. To tackle the crisis, Manitoba needs more than just new water bombers. We urgently need a strong provincial climate action and adaptation plan. Manitoba has already seen over 105 fires this season and smashed numerous temperature records, leading the province to declare a state of emergency. Tens of thousands of people have been evacuated, dozens of homes have been destroyed, and tragically, two lives have been lost. Buckland Fire and Rescue / The Canadian Press / HO-Facebook A Buckland Fire and Rescue tanker truck is shown on a highway after being deployed to La Ronge, Sask., on June 2. Evacuation and emergency response supports for northern communities have struggled to keep pace, with 2,000 residents of Pukatawagan left stranded for days as heavy smoke prevented air evacuations. Tragically, this hot, dry, and smoky spring and summer weather is becoming increasingly the norm. Winnipeg is expected to experience 52 days above 30 C each summer beyond 2050. Extreme heat and wildfires are public health emergencies. They cause increased illness and death from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, injury, and heat-related illness. They contribute to rising anxiety and mental health difficulties for young people — all of which further stresses health care. Climate change poses an escalating financial crisis, with health and other climate damages in Manitoba slated to reach up to $2,235 per person annually by 2050. The climate crisis is an existential threat to Indigenous land-based knowledges and lifeways, and an ecological breaking point. These devastating impacts will continue to intensify if we keep putting off tackling the root of the problem: our reliance on fossil fuels. Failing to reduce our emissions is adding fuel to the fire. While the Government of Manitoba must meet the current moment of emergency response to ensure communities' safety, it also needs a strong and clear plan to swiftly transition off fossil fuels and proactively adapt to the impacts that are already locked in. The previous government's 2017 Manitoba Climate and Green Plan is outdated and inadequate, as it is not aligned with international targets through the Paris Agreement and lacks details such as short-term and long-term goals, specific timelines, and costing. It is not clear if this plan is being implemented because the last progress report was four years ago. Meanwhile, aside from Alberta, Manitoba is the only province with higher greenhouse gas emissions in 2023 than 2005. In 2019, the Manitoba NDP committed to reducing emissions 45 per cent by 2030 and pledged to develop a strong, science-based climate plan with solutions for every sector. However, after a year and a half in office, there is no sign of this plan. Meanwhile, the provincial government is proposing to expand fossil fuel infrastructure and is backpedalling on its clean electricity commitments. A strong provincial climate plan should have two main areas of focus. First, it should chart the equitable pathway for how Manitobans will move around, heat our homes, and feed our families — all without relying on oil and gas by 2050, and to meet their 2030 target. Though Manitoba's emissions are a relatively small contribution globally, Canadian's per-capita emissions are among the highest in the world and come with a responsibility to cut emissions and develop solutions that can be replicated elsewhere. Second, it must plan for the impacts of a changing climate, such as wildfires, extreme storms, and health emergencies like the ones we are currently experiencing. It should do these things in partnership with Indigenous communities, building a new economy rooted in equitable and reciprocal relationships. Some school divisions are taking it upon themselves to model a course, including Seven Oaks, Louis Riel, and Winnipeg School Division, that have begun to establish their own climate plans and are boldly advancing climate change education. However, a clear provincial plan for utilities, transportation, businesses, health and education is needed to make sound decisions aligned with a climate-safe future. In the absence of a plan, Manitoba Hydro's current long-term energy planning, for example, is relying on technologies that aren't commercially viable. A provincial plan will also need to reckon with the small, but not insignificant, oil industry in southwestern Manitoba. As international politics have recently demonstrated, Canada needs a robust, energy-independent economy. Given the province is forecasting a deficit of 23,600 trades people over the next five years, Manitoba should focus on training, education and job growth related to fossil fuel transition. Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. With the U.S. abandoning its energy transition, Canada has an opportunity to attract low-carbon industries and bolster domestic production to create good green jobs. Manitoba, at the centre of the country, is well positioned to encourage federal action and investment in a clean energy future, increased east-west connections, and push back against new pipeline proposals. It is not too late to act. Instead of continuing to expand our reliance on dirty fuels, Manitoba can work together and be a world-class example of climate change preparation, adaptation and prevention. The vast majority of the public is in support of climate action and policy, and are looking for strong leadership. While first responders continue to fight the wildfires, the rest of us can fan the flames of the political will needed to prevent them. Scott Durling is with Educators for Climate Action Manitoba, Laura Cameron is with Manitoba's Climate Action Team), and Chris Morrow is with Manitoba Public Health Association.


Winnipeg Free Press
11 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Under Patel, FBI heightens focus on violent crime, illegal immigration. Other threats abound, too
WASHINGTON (AP) — FOR MOVEMENT AT 12:01 A.M. ON MONDAY JUNE 9TH When the FBI arrested an accused leader of the MS-13 gang, Kash Patel was there to announce the case, trumpeting it as a step toward returning 'our communities to safety.' Weeks later, when the Justice Department announced the seizure of $510 million in illegal narcotics bound for the U.S, the FBI director joined other law enforcement leaders in front of a Coast Guard ship in Florida and stacks of intercepted drugs to highlight the haul. His presence was meant to signal the premium the FBI is placing on combating violent crime, drug trafficking and illegal immigration, concerns that have leapfrogged up the agenda in what current and former law enforcement officials say amounts to a rethinking of priorities and mission at a time when the country is also confronting increasingly sophisticated national security threats from abroad. A revised FBI priority list on its website places 'Crush Violent Crime' at the top, bringing the bureau into alignment with the vision of President Donald Trump, who has made a crackdown on illegal immigration, cartels and transnational gangs a cornerstone of his administration. Patel has said he wants to 'get back to the basics.' His deputy, Dan Bongino, says the FBI is returning to 'its roots.' Patel says the FBI remains focused on some of the same concerns, including China, that have dominated headlines in recent years, and the bureau said in a statement that its commitment to investigating international and domestic terrorism has not changed. That intensifying threat was laid bare over the past month by a spate of violent acts, most recently a Molotov cocktail attack on a Colorado crowd by an Egyptian man who authorities say overstayed his visa and yelled 'Free Palestine.' 'The FBI continuously analyzes the threat landscape and allocates resources and personnel in alignment with that analysis and the investigative needs of the Bureau,' the FBI said in a statement. 'We make adjustments and changes based on many factors and remain flexible as various needs arise.' Signs of restructuring abound. The Justice Department has disbanded an FBI-led task force on foreign influence and the bureau has moved to dissolve a key public corruption squad in its Washington field office, people familiar with the matter have told The Associated Press. The Trump administration, meanwhile, has proposed steep budget cuts for the FBI, and there's been significant turnover in leadership ranks as some veteran agents with years of experience have been pushed from their positions. Some former officials are concerned the stepped-up focus on violent crime and immigration — areas already core to the mission of agencies including the Drug Enforcement Administration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement — risks deflecting attention from some of the complicated criminal and national security threats for which the bureau has long borne primary if not exclusive responsibility for investigating. 'If you're looking down five feet in front of you, looking for gang members and I would say lower-level criminals, you're going to miss some of the more sophisticated strategic issues that may be already present or emerging,' said Chris Piehota, who retired from the FBI in 2020 as an executive assistant director. A greater focus on immigration Enforcement of immigration laws has long been the principal jurisdiction of immigration agents tasked with arresting people in the U.S. illegally along with border agents who police points of entry. Since Trump's inauguration, the FBI has assumed greater responsibility for that work, saying it's made over 10,000 immigration-related arrests. Patel has highlighted the arrests on social media, doubling down on the administration's promise to prioritize immigration enforcement. Agents have been dispatched to visit migrant children who crossed the U.S-Mexico border without parents in what officials say is an effort to ensure their safety. Field offices have been directed to commit manpower to immigration enforcement. The Justice Department has instructed the FBI to review files for information about those illegally in the U.S. and provide it to the Department of Homeland Security unless doing so would compromise an investigation. And photos on the FBI's Instagram account depict agents with covered faces and tactical gear alongside detained subjects, with a caption saying the FBI is 'ramping up' efforts with immigration agents to locate 'dangerous criminals.' 'We're giving you about five minutes to cooperate,' Bongino said on Fox News about illegal immigrants. 'If you're here illegally, five minutes, you're out.' That's a rhetorical shift from prior leadership. Though Patel's direct predecessor, Christopher Wray, warned about the flow of fentanyl through the southern border and the possibility migrants determined to commit terrorism could illegally cross through, he did not characterize immigration enforcement as core to the FBI's mission. A mandate to 'crush violent crime' There's precedent for the FBI to rearrange priorities to meet evolving threats, though for the past two decades countering terrorism has remained a constant atop the agenda. Then-Director Robert Mueller transformed the FBI after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks into a national security, intelligence-gathering agency. Agents were reassigned from investigations into drugs, violent crime and white-collar fraud to fight terrorism. In a top 10 priority list from 2002, protecting the U.S. from terrorism was first. Fighting violent crime was near the bottom, above only supporting law enforcement partners and technology upgrades. The FBI's new list of priorities places 'Crush Violent Crime' as a top pillar alongside 'Defend the Homeland,' though FBI leaders have also sought to stress that counterterrorism remains the bureau's principal mandate. Wray often said he was hard-pressed to think of a time when the FBI was facing so many elevated threats at once. At the time of his departure last January, the FBI was grappling with elevated terrorism concerns; Iranian assassination plots on U.S. soil; Chinese spying and hacking of Americans' cell phones; ransomware attacks against hospitals; and Russian influence operations aimed at sowing disinformation. Testifying before lawmakers last month, Patel took care to note the surge in terrorism threats following the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and a Chinese espionage threat he said had yielded investigations in each of the bureau's offices. But the accomplishments he dwelled on first concerned efforts to 'take dangerous criminals off our streets,' including the arrests of three suspects on the 'Ten Most Wanted' list, and large drug seizures. Rounding out the priority list are two newcomers: 'Rebuild Public Trust' and 'Fierce Organizational Accountability.' Those reflect claims amplified by Patel and Bongino that the bureau had become politicized through its years of investigations of Trump, whose Mar-a-Lago home was searched by agents for classified documents in 2022. Close allies of Trump, both men have committed to disclose files from past investigations, including into Russian election interference and the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, that have fueled grievances against the bureau. They've also pledged to examine matters that have captivated attention in conservative circles, like the leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion that overturned Roe v. Wade. Employees have spent hours poring over documents from the sex trafficking case against financier Jeffrey Epstein, a favorite subject of conspiracy theorists, to prepare them for release. Patel had forecast his interest in rejiggering priorities long before becoming director, including by saying that if he ran the bureau, he would 'let good cops be good cops' and push agents into the field. A critic as a House Republican staffer of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation, which he calls an example of politicized law enforcement, he had said that he would support breaking off the FBI's 'intel shops' to focus on crime-fighting. James Gagliano, a retired FBI supervisor, said he would like to see more specific information about the new priorities but was heartened by an enhanced violent crime focus so long as other initiatives weren't abandoned. 'Mission priorities change,' Gagliano said. 'The threat matrix changes. You've got to constantly get out in front of that.' Terrorism threats persist The Trump administration has touted several terrorism successes, including the arrests of a suspected participant in a suicide bombing at the Kabul airport that killed 13 American servicemembers and of an ex-Michigan National Guard member on charges of plotting a military base attack on behalf of the Islamic State. But the administration is also employing a broad definition of what it believes constitutes terrorism. FBI and Justice Department officials see the fight against transnational gangs as part of their counterterrorism mandate, taking advantage of the Trump administration's designation of the violent street gangs MS-13 and Tren de Aragua as foreign terrorist organizations to bring terrorism-related charges against defendants, including a Venezuelan man suspected of being a high-ranking TdA member and a Utah father-son suspected of providing material support to a Mexican cartel — a charge typically used for cases involving groups like the Islamic State and al-Qaida. A former Justice Department terrorism prosecutor, Patel has called the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Forces — interagency units in the bureau's 55 field offices — as 'shining examples' of its mission. Those task forces spent years pursuing suspects in the Capitol riot but have now been enlisted to track down cartel members, he has said. After an Egyptian man whose work authorization in the U.S. had expired was arrested on charges of using a homemade flamethrower and Molotov cocktails to attack a group drawing attention to Israeli hostages in Gaza, administration officials held up the case as proof of their philosophy that immigration enforcement is tantamount to protecting national security. The FBI says its domestic terrorism investigations continue uninterrupted, though Patel at times has discussed the threat in different terms than Wray, who led the bureau as it investigated the Capitol riot and who cited it as evidence of the dangers of homegrown extremists. At hearings last month, Patel pointed to a string of arsons and vandalism acts at Tesla dealerships as domestic terrorism acts that commanded the FBI's resources and attention. As it reconfigures its resources, the FBI has moved to reassign some agents focused on domestic terrorism to a new task force set up to investigate the Oct. 7 Hamas attack and its aftermath, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel moves. One national security concern Patel has preached continuity on in public is the threat from China, which he said in a recent Fox News interview keeps him up at night. Wray often called China the gravest long-term threat to national security, and when he stepped aside in January the FBI was contending with an espionage operation that gave officials in Beijing access to private texts and phone conversations of an unknown number of Americans. There are signs of a broader national security realignment. A task force tracking foreign influence, like Russia's attempts to interfere in American democracy, was disbanded and the Justice Department has scaled back criminal enforcement of a statute requiring registration of U.S. lobbying on behalf of foreign entities. All of that concerns retired FBI supervisor Frank Montoya, a longtime counterintelligence official who says fentanyl and drug cartels are not 'existential' threats in the same way Russia and China are. When it comes to complicated, interagency espionage work, the FBI, he said, has always 'been the glue that made it all work.' Patel makes no apologies for priorities he says come from the White House. 'President Trump has set some priorities out in a new focus for federal law enforcement,' he has said. 'The FBI has heard those directions, and we are determined to deliver on our crime-fighting and national security mission with renewed vigor.'