AI in E-Commerce Forum: Burhan Sebin and Miami AI Hub Unveil the Future of E-Commerce with Industry Leaders
MIAMI, FL, May 22, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Miami's Wynwood district came alive with future-forward energy on May 21, 2025 as the AI in E-Commerce Forum brought together top minds in artificial intelligence, retail strategy, and digital infrastructure at Northeastern University's campus. Co-hosted by Wasserman Digital, opens new tab and Miami AI Hub, opens new tab, the event spotlighted the transformative power of AI across the entire commerce funnel — from product discovery and personalization to algorithmic trust and compliance.
The evening kicked off with opening remarks by Burhan Sebin, the founder of Miami AI Hub, welcomed attendees with a vision for how South Florida is rapidly becoming a national force in AI innovation.
'Miami has a unique opportunity to lead — not just in culture and creativity, but in how we shape the future of commerce,' said Burhan Sebin. 'This forum was designed to bring together the builders, thinkers, and founders turning generative AI from buzzword into business advantage.'
Graham Lubie, VP of Digital at Wasserman Digital, delivered a powerful keynote on how AI is shifting the way brands engage, transact, and scale online. His address set the tone for an evening rich with insights and tactical takeaways.
The first panel, "AI for Growth: Innovation in E-Commerce," explored how entrepreneurs and brand leaders are leveraging AI to fuel customer acquisition, retention, and category dominance. Moderated by Lubie, the discussion featured Walter Gonzalez, Jr. (GOJA), Daniel Sanchez (Reekolect Corp), Amit Chawla (Publicis Groupe), Mitali Saxena (Fashom/XFashom), and Jevon Howell (ShopHowell). Their stories ranged from scaling Amazon-native brands to building AI-powered personalization engines for fashion retail.
The second panel, "Risk, Data & Infrastructure: Building with AI," shifted focus to backend intelligence — from LLM operations and AI safety to insurance, compliance, and infrastructure. Moderated by Sebin himself, the panel featured Julia MacDonald (SuperAnnotate), Jonathan Horemans (Rezolve AI), Stefano Gulbalis (Nebulai), Jeremy Carr (AiShelter), and Maury Rogow (Rip Media Group).
In addition to the discussions, guests enjoyed a vibrant networking hour offering a taste of Miami's diverse flavor as they exchanged ideas and forged new partnerships.
The event was made possible by the support of Wasserman Digital, 4A Labs, EZ Newswire, Atlas Space, and Northeastern University — a coalition dedicated to advancing Miami's place in the global AI conversation.
For more information, future events, and partnership opportunities, visit: https://lu.ma/miamiaihub, opens new tab.
About Miami AI Hub
Miami AI Hub fosters innovation and collaboration in artificial intelligence within the city's vibrant tech ecosystem. Its mission is to make Miami a global AI powerhouse and to build bridges across the AI ecosystems of the United States, Italy, Spain, and Latin America.Miami AI Hub has convened over 4,000+ participants, supported more than 50 AI startup showcases, and hosted speakers from major companies including NVIDIA, Apple, Google, AWS, and others. As an innovation catalyst, the Hub champions AI solutions that improve lives and transform industries. As a community platform, it brings together enthusiasts and experts to grow a shared knowledge base. And as a startup launchpad, it supports early-stage ventures with mentorship, funding access, and growth resources.For more information, visit www.miamiaihub.com.
Media Contact
Burhan Sebinmeet@miamiaihub.com
###
SOURCE: Miami AI Hub
Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire
See release on EZ Newswire
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
16 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
BRZ Sales Are Way Up Amid Subaru Sales Slide
Subaru at large faced a correction last month, but the sports car market didn't get the memo Subaru, among other automakers, has been enjoying month after month of record sales figures, in part thanks to the threat/eventuality of tariffs. While the brand remains up year over year, May 2025 saw Subaru move almost 6,000 fewer vehicles than in May 2024. It's a mixed bag across models, but there were a handful of winners. Arguably, the most surprising performance is by the brand's lone sports car offering, the Subaru BRZ. 0:08 / 0:09 2025 Ford Maverick: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More Sporty offerings were the biggest winners and losers for Subaru's May sales Diving into the numbers, Subaru's performance offerings are both a point of unexpected pride and a huge drag on the brand. The Subaru WRX tumbled 71.2 percent year-over-year, with the brand moving less than 500 examples off the lot last month. Year over year, the car is down 23.6 percent, the largest decline among the brand's lineup. On a positive note, the Subaru BRZ saw tremendous growth. A 43.6 percent gain compared to May 2024 helped the BRZ enjoy a 24.6 percent gain year-over-year. It's the second biggest gain for the brand, sitting aside the Solterra EV, another surprise, which saw a healthy 28.4 percent increase in volume year over year. There's a bit of a catch to that BRZ statistic, though. You see, Subaru only moved 227 BRZ coupes in May of 2024, so a 43.6 percent increase moves the needle to 326 units. That's hardly the volume needed to save the brand, and remarkably still fewer overall units than the WRX. At the current pace, Subaru is on track to sell nearly exactly 3,000 units over the entire year. Assuming the car stays in play for 10 years, that'll put BRZ production considerably under historically desirable and collectible models like the E46 BMW M3. Per year, BRZ sales are less than a quarter of what Porsche achieves with the 911. Subaru WRX 2025 Subaru BRZ It's complicated across the rest of the Subaru lineup, with sales fluctuating wildly The biggest drag on Subaru's May sales was the Outback. The brand moved just 11,214 examples compared to 16,506 last year, a drop of 32.1 percent and over 5,000 units. The Ascent, too, suffered a 32.8 percent decline, with 3,547 SUVs finding their way into customer hands as opposed to 5,277 in May 2024. There were some winners in May, though. The Crosstrek and Legacy both saw double-digit gains over the previous May and remain up year-to-date, with the former increasing by 15.5 percent and the latter by 24.4 percent. In fact, only the WRX, Outback, and Ascent are down year-to-date, where Subaru stays 3 percent ahead year to date compared to last year. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 2026 Subaru Outback Wilderness — Source: Subaru Final thoughts Other than rekindling my desire to own a BRZ — it's rarer than a Porsche 911, you see — Subaru's sales numbers for May only really paint a bleak picture for the WRX. We're not sure what's going on there, although there's speculation that a new STI model may be on the way. Perhaps would-be buyers are waiting to see where that thread leads. Either way, the next time an automaker starts whinging that sports cars don't sell, we have exactly one data point to rub in their face. Hopefully, they don't look too far into it. About the Author Steven Paul View Profile
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Campainers urge UK watchdog to limit use of AI after report of Meta's plan to automate checks
Internet safety campaigners have urged the UK's communications watchdog to limit the use of artificial intelligence in crucial risk assessments following a report that Mark Zuckerberg's Meta was planning to automate checks. Ofcom said it was 'considering the concerns' raised by the letter following a report last month that up to 90% of all risk assessments at the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp would soon be carried out by AI. Social media platforms are required under the UK's Online Safety Act to gauge how harm could take place on their services and how they plan to mitigate those potential harms – with a particular focus on protecting child users and preventing illegal content from appearing. The risk assessment process is viewed as key aspect of the act. In a letter to Ofcom's chief executive, Dame Melanie Dawes, organisations including the Molly Rose Foundation, the NSPCC and the Internet Watch Foundation described the prospect of AI-driven risk assessments as a 'retrograde and highly alarming step'. 'We urge you to publicly assert that risk assessments will not normally be considered as 'suitable and sufficient', the standard required by … the Act, where these have been wholly or predominantly produced through automation.' The letter also urged the watchdog to 'challenge any assumption that platforms can choose to water down their risk assessment processes'. A spokesperson for Ofcom said: 'We've been clear that services should tell us who completed, reviewed and approved their risk assessment. We are considering the concerns raised in this letter and will respond in due course.' Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Meta said the letter deliberately misstated the company's approach on safety and it was committed to high standards and complying with regulations. 'We are not using AI to make decisions about risk,' said a Meta spokesperson. 'Rather, our experts built a tool that helps teams identify when legal and policy requirements apply to specific products. We use technology, overseen by humans, to improve our ability to manage harmful content and our technological advancements have significantly improved safety outcomes.' The Molly Rose Foundation organised the letter after NPR, a US broadcaster, reported last month that updates to Meta's algorithms and new safety features will mostly be approved by an AI system and no longer scrutinised by staffers. According to one former Meta executive, who spoke to NPR anonymously, the change will allow the company to launch app updates and features on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp more quickly but would create 'higher risks' for users, because potential problems are less likely to be prevented before a new product is released to the public. NPR also reported that Meta was considering automating reviews for sensitive areas including youth risk and monitoring the spread of falsehoods.
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Corporations are ditching rainbow flags and cutting funding for Pride. LGBT+ people say they won't forget it
Every June, like clockwork, multinational corporations — from banks to fashion houses to petrochemical giants — would suddenly don their Pride-themed logos on social media. Many LGBT+ people found it shallow, and mocked the phenomenon as a cynical exercise in "rainbow-washing". But just a few years since the wash of rainbow feeds, even this skin-deep show of support is conspicuous by its absence. Of the ten major U.S. corporations documented by journalist Hunter Schwarz to have adopted a Pride avatar or banner on Twitter in 2023 — including ExxonMobil, Bank of America, and Freddie Mac — just one, the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, is still flying its rainbow flag on the social network today. Major League Baseball, Major League Soccer, the National Basketball Association, and the National Hockey League have also abandoned it since 2023. "A lot of people have hesitations around 'rainbow capitalism', and I'm definitely one of those people," Maybe Burke, a 32-year-old gender inclusion consultant in Philadelphia, tells The Independent. "But to not see anything makes you miss when you did, you know?" Multicolor logos aren't the only things disappearing. Pride marches across the nation have lost corporate sponsorships, from big city extravaganzas to small town celebrations. New York City's Pride organizers reportedly lost roughly one quarter of their corporate donors this year; Kansas City Pride lost half its annual budget; even San Francisco Pride was down $200,000. Some ties, such as that of Budweiser brewer Anheuser-Busch to St Louis PrideFest, were decades old. LGBT+ non-profits have also reported severe drops in their funding. The newsletter Popular Information found 19 examples of companies that appeared to have scaled back their support for Pride, including Dyson, Nivea, UPS, Mastercard, and Citi. The hardware chain Lowe's reportedly also backed out of a regular Human Rights Campaign survey and shut down an LGBT+ employee resource group. Another report by NBC News named Nissan, Comcast, and drinks maker Diegeo. "The scale of the retreat in the U.S. is dramatic and telling," Fabrice Houdart, executive director of the Association of LGBTQ+ Corporate Directors, tells The Independent. "We're not witnessing a mere dialing down — we're witnessing withdrawal, with a few exceptions... the exuberant displays of support we saw five years ago have been replaced by passivity, silence, or strategic invisibility." 'We are seeing the unravelling of conditional support' Burke, who earns much of her living training organizations to be more welcoming to trans and non-binary people, noticed conditions beginning to change after the Trump administration's flurry of executive orders targeting DEI programs — one of which threatened to investigate companies, non-profits, universities, and other institutions that maintain them. "No new inquiries were coming in, and people I had been planning and talking with for months were ghosting me," Burke says. "June has always been my busiest month of the year. June has funded the rest of my summer. In recent years I've had at least two gigs a week in June with different clients; as of right now, I have two gigs for the entire month.' One client, she adds, told her straight up that the company's legal department had intervened and warned that hiring her for a gig might violate Trump's decrees. That's just one symptom of the sudden chill that has descended over corporate America about openly standing up for LGBT+ rights. Some companies pulled back earlier, as a new anti-LGBT+ hate movement gathered steam between 2021 and 2024. But the presence of an openly authoritarian president in the White House, backed by a movement seemingly hellbent on driving queer people back underground, has drastically raised the stakes. "Companies are afraid of backlash, boycotts, and being 'called out' by the administration. But the real issue is that many never developed the courage of their convictions," says Houdart from the Association of LGBTQ+ Corporate Directors. "We're seeing the unraveling of conditional support: the second Pride stopped being universally popular or profitable, many brands quietly exited." Ron deHarte, co-president of the Pride organizers' association USA Prides, says there has indeed been a "noticeable decline" in national-level brand sponsorships, especially in the biggest advertising markets (mostly large cities such as New York and Los Angeles). Yet he stresses that there are other factors at play too. "The broader economic climate", he argues, especially "uncertainty around tariffs", is making companies reticent about spending on events and marketing across the board. Whatever the cause, the lost money will have an impact. Sponsorship money, deHarte explains, is "crucial not only for the flashy decorations and entertainment but also for essential aspects like security, insurance, porta-jons, and maintaining free entry for many events." At least smaller Pride events, which is most of them, will be less impacted on average, because they "traditionally rely more on community fundraising and local business support". 'This is a wake-up call to reclaim our power' Of the nine companies that ditched their Twitter drag since 2023, ExxonMobil, McKesson, Cencora, Cardinal health, Centene, Bank of America, Freddie Mac, and UPS, all either did not respond or declined to comment to The Independent. Citi did respond, though it declined to answer our specific questions. A spokesperson said the company's LGBT+ employee group is 'excited about sponsoring a range of Pride celebrations' worldwide, and will be marching with the LGBT+ elders' charity SAGE in New York City. To be fair, few companies seem to have completely cut all support, instead either scaling down their commitments or simply undertaking them more quietly. Yet that still sends a bitter message to a community that has spent decades fighting not to have to live in hiding. There is, after all, a reason that nobody dubs it LGBT+ Sensible Modesty Month. "In the short term, it's unpleasant. It reinforces the sense that LGBTQ+ dignity is still negotiable and that we never really accumulated any political or economic power," says Houdart. There will, he argues, be lasting damage to companies' reputation: "Many queer people will not forget who stood up and who disappeared." Yet in the long term, deHarte and Houdart are both hopeful that good things will come of this. To deHarte, it's an opportunity for the movement to diversify its funding and prioritize sponsors who demonstrate a real, year-round commitment to LGBT+ equality all year round "It could be a pivotal moment — a forced reckoning,' says Houdart. 'We have been too dependent on institutional validation from parties, governments, and corporations that never honestly shared our long-term vision. "This is a wake-up call to reclaim our power and stop renting our liberation from others... it's a painful moment, but it's also clarifying. Our future depends on solidarity and organizing, not sponsorship."
