logo
Death, divorce and the magic of kitchen objects: how to find hope in loss

Death, divorce and the magic of kitchen objects: how to find hope in loss

The Guardian29-04-2025

I have long felt that kitchen objects can have a life of their own. Even so, I found this eerie. One August day in 2020, I was going to fetch clothes out of the washing machine when suddenly a cake tin fell at my feet with a loud clang. It wasn't just any cake tin. It was the heart-shaped tin I had used to bake my own wedding cake. I wouldn't have thought much of it except that it was only two months since my husband had left me, out of the blue.
Nearly 23 years ago, this giant metal heart had been brand new. My husband-to-be had told me he liked fruit cake but hated glace cherries. For our wedding, I decided to bake him a rich, dark fruit cake with no cherries and chopped-up dried apricots to take their place. There are photos of us cutting the cake together looking blissfully happy. We would soon be on our way to Venice for our honeymoon.
All these years, I kept the tin. We had three children and sometimes I used it to bake their birthday cakes: shiny brown hearts of chocolate sponge smothered in ganache. It lived in the bottom of a dresser in the hallway, where it was slowly rusting. I kept it there because it was too vast to fit in any of the kitchen cupboards. To give it away would have been unthinkable. It was a keepsake of our love.
At the back of my mind, I'd imagined that one day I would use the tin to bake an anniversary cake. In one of her books, the food writer Ruth Reichl gives a recipe for the giant chocolate birthday cake she made for her husband, Michael, the first year that she knew him – a cake so colossal it took four men to help her lift it to the car. Reichl calls it simply Big Chocolate Cake. I had a vague idea that this would be the cake I'd bake for our 25th anniversary. We were getting closer to this moment. I told people how lucky we were, and how we never argued.
As symbols go, a heart-shaped cake tin, bought for a wedding, is not exactly subtle. It's Disneyfied romance, fashioned into a shiny object. I was only 19 when we met and 23 when we married. He was seven years older and was one of my college teachers, which didn't seem to matter at the time.
One morning in June 2020, sitting on an ordinary park bench, drinking a cup of coffee, he said he didn't love me any more, not 'like that'. He never elaborated what 'like that' meant. It didn't seem real. I thought that divorce was something that happened to other people – my parents, for example, who split up when I was 14. At the time, this had been the biggest shock of my life. One New Year's Day, my father announced over lunch that his resolution was not to live with our mother any more. I was the one who had casually asked whether anyone had any resolutions. For years, I felt I caused him to leave with my question.
My purchase of the heart-shaped tin suggests that I was urgently searching for a happy-ever-after: a sweet and unbroken heart. Of all my ex-husband's excellent qualities, one of his greatest was – or so it seemed to me – that he was so steadfast. He never gave me a moment's doubt about his loyalty. The morning of the day he left he brought me a cup of tea in bed, just as he always did, and I thanked him with real gratitude, just as I always did. When the tin clattered loudly to the ground, it echoed my own shock.
Certain kitchen objects become loaded with meaning in a way that we are not fully in control of. You can't predict which will be the utensils you get attached to – the favourite mug, the spoon that feels just right in your hand – and which belongings decline over time into clutter. And then there are the objects that – even if they were made in some anonymous factory and bought in some anonymous shop – seem to carry with them a kind of magic. There is the plate that makes everything you put on it taste better, or the bowl you keep but can't actually bear to use because it reminds you too strongly of the person who gave it to you.
What should I do with the tin heart now that its original meaning was ruptured? When I told the story of it falling on the floor to friends, they all, without exception, made the same suggestion: I should invest the tin with new associations! I should bake a cake for myself in it, the richest cake imaginable, and throw myself a giant divorce party. I was comforted by the kindness of the suggestion, but didn't feel quite ready for this yet. Instead, I left the tin where it was. I walked past it multiple times a day and sometimes winced slightly when I remembered it was there – a clanging metal symbol of rejection.
I started to wonder whether the tin itself – and the cake I originally baked in it – was a powerful indication that our marriage was doomed from the start. Maybe a man who was so fussy about cherries was not the man for me.
But when I picked it up, trying to decide what to do with it, the tin felt as solid as it did 23 years ago, as if it were still waiting to be used.
I started looking for other people who had invested objects in their kitchens with strong meanings or emotions. The more I asked around, the more I saw that feeling emotional about kitchen objects was the rule rather than the exception, even for people who were not especially interested in cooking. I wasn't alone in having intense and even magical feelings about the things I cooked and ate with.
Many people told me that they could still feel the presence of a lost parent or partner in their china cupboard. I met someone who said that the one object belonging to his mother that he and his siblings all wanted when they cleared her house was a glass salad-dressing maker. His mother never rinsed out the garlic at the bottom, just adding fresh garlic before pouring in the oil and vinegar, meaning that this vessel carried the garlicky essence of decades of shared meals. Another person told me that she had a very powerful sense of one of her ancestors, whom she had never met, because she had inherited her rolling pin. A friend told me that the only thing she now had left from her French grandmother was a rusty old herb chopper from long-ago Paris, where her family ran a brasserie. My friend never used this chopper herself, but every time she looked at it she could see her grandmother's hands, alive and cooking.
Some of the people I spoke to said that they were not at all sentimental about kitchen objects, but then when they thought harder there was always at least one exception. One man told me that kitchen objects did not interest him, only to reveal that after his mother's death he had held on to some tea towels and place mats because they seemed to carry the 'texture' of her.
When people described their favourite objects, I noticed certain common themes emerging. Many of the most treasured objects were ones that they or people close to them had held in their hands and used daily – a grandmother's wooden spoon, a mother-in-law's butter dish decorated with a cow, a salt shaker inherited from a parent. Like pets or loved ones, these objects were cherished through daily touch. An excellent cook told me that when she walked past her Gaggia ice-cream maker – which happened every day – she would smile and sometimes even pat it because she had owned it for so long that it felt like one of the family.
On the other hand, people also described as special the kitchen objects that they hardly used at all: a fragile porcelain bowl, some precious crystal glasses passed down through the generations, a linen tablecloth that only came out once a year. Some of these belongings had become so special – so hallowed – that almost no meal was good enough to justify their use. Like religious relics, they were venerated from a distance.
There is more than one way of demonstrating that an object is special. You can learn to relate to old objects in new ways.
One of the people who helped me to start making sense of all this was Roopa Gulati, a chef and food writer who decided to start using her parents' precious best china after her husband, Dan, was diagnosed with a brain tumour. Having spent nearly five decades feeling that this beautiful dinner service was too good to use – she stored it in the attic for years – Roopa suddenly decided that life was too short not to bring out the good china while she could. Faced with the imminent threat of Dan's death, her diffidence about using the best china melted away. 'If it smashes, it smashes' became her new mantra.
Roopa's parents came from Punjab in northern India. She grew up in England, in rural Cumbria, with her brother and sister – the only Asian family in the village. Her father was an eye doctor. The clinic where he worked on Saturdays was next to a very expensive china shop and Roopa remembers that when she was about 11, he and her mother spent weeks looking at different sets of china before deciding on a purchase. It was 1975 and the whole set was 'a huge outlay', maybe £500.
A generation ago, buying a dinner service was a weighty decision, perhaps all the more so for immigrants who were acutely aware of the opinions of others. A woman who worked during the post-second world war decades in a big department store recalled that many of her customers in the china department came in monthly, buying a precious piece or two at a time – a couple of cups and saucers one month, a dinner plate the next – until the set was finally complete.
To those who owned them, laying out a special dinner service was a way not just to honour your guests but also to demonstrate what 'best' looked like in your home. Roopa's mother felt such pressure to get dinner just so for her guests that she laid the table two days before they arrived. Her beautiful dishes were a kind of armour with which, as a foreigner in this cold northern village, she shielded herself from the judgment of others.
When Roopa showed me one of the plates her parents had chosen, a set called Braemar by Royal Doulton, I instantly saw why they would have fallen in love with this particular set, which included vegetable tureens and bowls and platters along with plates. It was an elegant ceramic with a rare delicacy in colour and design: white in the middle, with a rim of silver followed by an olive-green ring and then two different geometric patterns. Roopa thinks that it must have reminded her parents of the Mughal designs of northern India.
We were talking about the plates over lunch at Roopa's house in Pinner, south-west London, where she has lived for the past 20 years. She generously cooked me lunch, a feast of dishes from Indian Kitchens, a book she had been working on about the regional cooking of India. Dan joined us for the first course, a translucent broth of lamb scented with two kinds of cardamom and royal cumin, with fried onions and mint on top. It was only three months since Dan's last stem cell transplant and he was still very weak. It felt like a miracle that he was home from hospital and in humorous spirits, despite his ordeal.
Roopa described the pit she used to feel in her stomach at the idea of breaking one of the Braemar pieces. Suddenly I remembered the 'don't touch' terror I felt as a child walking into any kind of shop selling fancy stuff with my parents. Roopa's fear around the Braemar remained even after her mother died and she took possession of the whole dinner service. Then her father died, but still she kept the dinner service in the attic because the thought of breaking any of it was too awful to bear.
Roopa brought out some of her beloved Braemar plates, on which she served spinach and mustard greens cooked in copious amounts of butter, with flatbreads and finely sliced raw red onions on the side. It was a joy to be able to use the dishes so freely, she said. Her attitude to the dinner service changed immediately after Dan's diagnosis. In the midst of her grief, she had started worrying about the unused plates up in the attic. She wanted the dishes to hold different foods and witness the conversations of another generation: her daughters' children. I noticed that she was talking about her tableware as if it were alive.
As children, we may be taught that certain possessions are only for best, but what if today is all we have? 'Best' doesn't have to be saved for feast days or honoured guests. Each morning that Dan was alive was now a special occasion for Roopa. Using these shiny plates also became a daily treat that reminded her of her own worth: a way to celebrate her own existence even when she felt she had done little except visit Dan in hospital. She found herself using the Braemar to brighten her ordinary solitary breakfast of toast and marmalade – something her parents would never have done.
So many of us spend our whole lives denying ourselves the best things because the time is not right or we feel we haven't earned them yet, or we fear that someone – probably our parents – will disapprove of us if we drop them. This attitude to objects sometimes goes along with a wider impulse of self-denial. This may be the legacy of hunger and rationing, or a religious childhood, or simply of the social attitudes of earlier generations. But if you don't use the best china now, you may never use it.
Roopa realised that the best way to honour the momentous and costly decision her parents made in the china shop all those years ago was to enjoy the crockery, because now could be the best and only time. 'Dad's no longer there and Mum is not either. This is life.'
Some of the most poignant objects I found in my mother's house when we were clearing it after she moved to a care home because of her dementia were two small platters made by Royal Doulton. They were in the bottom of one of the drawers where she kept her plates and bowls. These small oval-shaped platters – which dated to around 1910 – were decorated in dark, inky blue and bright green, with flower patterns done in fine lines using a delicate sepia brown, all against a creamy-white background. On the back of the platters it said 'Matsumai', along with the Royal Doulton mark. Both platters still had Gift Aid tags attached to them, suggesting that my mother had bought them from a charity shop and never used them.
I brought the platters home, along with various boxes of papers and bowls and books and other keepsakes to pass on to her friends and relatives. These platters were too distinctive and special to give away to a charity shop, even if this was where they had come from in the first place. But they didn't feel like something to give her friends because they had no real personal association with her. She had never served anything on them or even got around to removing the tags and washing them.
For a long time, I forgot about the platters. It was only when we were distributing my mother's stuff after her death in 2022 that I looked at them again. My sister did not want them, so I washed and dried them carefully and put them on a shelf with my other serving dishes, and started using them to serve some of my mother's favourite salads. I realised I was trying to make food to please a dead person, which felt a little crazy.
My mother was a brilliant Shakespeare scholar who devoted decades of her life to understanding his sonnets. All she ever wanted was to be in the right, and to be loved. Often, especially after her divorce from my father, she seemed to feel that she was neither. When I served and ate food from the Matsumai platters, I wanted to bring her back so I could tell her that she was right to buy them and that I loved her.
When I was talking in this vein over dinner one night, my oldest son said, 'You've forgotten how difficult you found Grandma,' and it was true. She was kind to her bones but was also a deeply anxious person. When some tiny detail went wrong – and in the normal run of life, tiny details are always going wrong – she would loudly exclaim, 'Oh no!', as if the thing simply could not be borne. She repressed many of her feelings (because her parents had taught her to do so) and made me feel that I must repress mine, too. It was only after she developed dementia and some of her inhibitions had fallen away that she was able to tell me and my sister directly that she loved us. When I hold the Matsumai platters, I yearn to have her back – all of her, even the parts that drove me mad.
Most of all, the platters make me feel how fleeting and sad life is. You buy these small treasures, hoping they will come in handy. You save them for something special. And then you die before the special event happens and they never get used.
But things can have a second life (and a third and fourth), even if people can't. Roopa Gulati spoke of giving her family's Braemar dinner service another chance of living. I did the same with my mother's unused platters. The more I celebrated them and arranged food on them, the more I could stop them from being junk, even if she would never know.
When I finally decided to use the heart-shaped tin to bake another cake for my 50th birthday to share with my children, the tin was so much smaller than I remembered. In my memory, because of its emotional weight, it was vast enough to make a cake for dozens of people. But as I held it in my hand to scrub off the rust and bake with it, it didn't look so very large.
It was a relief to be able to look at the tin again without wincing. As with Roopa and her dinner service, I was happy that this object had the chance of a second chapter and new associations. What's more, I was managing to look back at my own past more kindly. In the early days of separation, all the years of my marriage became polluted in my mind. If our relationship could end like this, it must never have been good. But now I could see that the love and hope I felt when I bought that shiny tin were also true.
The magic of things is that they can live more than once, passing faithfully through many pairs of hands, gaining different meanings each time. Our most significant kitchen objects can keep us connected with the dead and the absent, so it's no wonder we sometimes act as if they were charmed.
I had a second celebration with some friends, old and new, a few months after my 50th birthday. I realised that my mother's presence, far more than my ex-husband's, was the one that hung over my kitchen. He had chosen to go, whereas she had left unwillingly.
A young Syrian chef called Faraj Alnasser, a friend, came to cook a feast of Syrian food, including vegetarian kibbeh filled with oyster mushrooms and served on a warm yoghurt sauce with dried Iranian mint. Faraj had been telling me about his own most precious kitchen objects: two long metal vegetable corers which kept him connected with his mother and grandmother although they lived several thousand miles away in Cairo. These corers took Faraj back to the scents and memories of a peaceful Aleppo that no longer existed.
Faraj made a feast of Syrian food, including the most incredible cheese scones seasoned with dill and za'atar, peach salad with tahini and lime, and a cucumber salad with fine strands of Syrian cheese and herbs.
We were looking for plates for the cucumber salad when I showed Faraj the Matsumai platters. 'Yes!' he said. 'These are perfect.' Cucumber was my mother's favourite vegetable and she would have been so cheered to see the green of the cucumber against the blue-black of the plate.
At the crematorium nearly two years earlier, I had watched her poor little coffin taken away. Fear No More the Heat of the Sun from Shakespeare's Cymbeline was one of the songs at her funeral. 'Fear no more the lightning flash, / Nor the all-dreaded thunder stone.' She would never again feel the warmth of the sun on her face but she was also free at last from the distress of dementia, which had made her so frightened.
Yet looking down at the pale cucumber on the dark ceramic, I had the strangest feeling that she hadn't really left after all. She was still vividly there in the pattern of that old plate, which had once caught and pleased her eye as it now pleased mine. Even in our supposedly rational age, this is the power of objects; they keep those we miss in the room with us. A plate or a tin may not be much but it can be something to hold when hands are gone.
Adapted from The Heart-Shaped Tin: Love, Loss and Kitchen Objects, published by Fourth Estate on 8 May. To support the Guardian, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply
Listen to our podcasts here and sign up to the long read weekly email here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michael Sheen opens up on financial struggles as he admits to 'juggling debt'
Michael Sheen opens up on financial struggles as he admits to 'juggling debt'

Wales Online

time7 hours ago

  • Wales Online

Michael Sheen opens up on financial struggles as he admits to 'juggling debt'

Michael Sheen opens up on financial struggles as he admits to 'juggling debt' Michael Sheen set the record straight about what he insists is a huge misconception about his finances, as he opened up about the true reality of his earnings Michael Sheen has confessed that he is 'juggling debt' (Image: PA ) Renowned actor Michael Sheen has opened up about his financial struggles, as he confesses he is currently "juggling debt". Boasting a huge array of film and TV roles down the years, the Newport-born actor is widely regarded as one of the most accomplished the country has ever produced. ‌ With a number of accolades to his name, the 56-year-old took one his first steps into the world of professional acting in a stage adaptation of the William Shakespeare play, Romeo and Juliet. ‌ After his early forays into acting had earned him resounding critical acclaim, it wasn't long before his TV and film career began to take off. Michael's acting career began on stage, performing in various Shakespeare adaptations (Image: Getty Images ) However, while his career, which has included rubbing shoulders with some of Hollywood's biggest stars, Michael insists there's a huge misconception when it comes to his earnings. Article continues below During a recent interview with The Times, the Damned United star shared: "It's interesting when people talk about me as a multimillionaire. "Because no — I don't have that much money. I mean, I have money compared to lots of people, but this is about juggling debt." Michael used some of his own money to help fund Homeless World Cup in 2019 (Image: Getty Images ) ‌ Shedding light on one particular debt, he said: "I'm still paying off the Homeless World Cup. It's not like I have all this spare cash. And there are times I can put money into things and times when I can't." Founded by Mel Young and Harald Schmied in 2001, the Homeless World Cup was set up in a bid to tackle homelessness around the world. The tournament has travelled all around the globe over the years, and for the first time in 2019, it made it's way to Cardiff, Wales. ‌ In an announcement at the time, it was revealed that Michael would be playing a significant role in it's organisation. The actor has also recently written a book to help educate children about homelessness (Image: Getty Images ) However, after funding for the £2m project collapsed, the actor decided to fund the event out of his own pocket. ‌ Speaking to the Big Issue in 2021 about the financial sacrifice, he said: "I had a house in America and a house here and I put those up and just did whatever it took. "It was scary and incredibly stressful. I'll be paying for it for a long time." In another move to help try and combat homelessness, Michael recently released, A Home for Spark the Dragon, a children's book aimed at raising awareness and helping children to understand about homelessness. Article continues below A portion of the money raised through the sale of the book will go to the charity, Shelter, that campaigns for housing justice in England and Scotland.

I was ringside for Michael Jackson's abuse trial…from secret injury to 110mph chase, I KNOW what put him in early grave
I was ringside for Michael Jackson's abuse trial…from secret injury to 110mph chase, I KNOW what put him in early grave

Scottish Sun

timea day ago

  • Scottish Sun

I was ringside for Michael Jackson's abuse trial…from secret injury to 110mph chase, I KNOW what put him in early grave

IT'S the child abuse trial which rocked the showbiz world and saw a pop legend hauled up in court on a slew of heinous charges. Now, 20 years on, we can reveal the drama behind the headlines which saw Michael Jackson rushed to hospital with horrific injuries and convinced he would be MURDERED in prison. 17 It is 20 years since Michael Jackson faced child abuse charges brought against him in a bombshell trial Credit: 2005 Getty Images 17 His lawyer Brian Oxman thinks the trial contributed to his early death Credit: JDMC 17 Many of the abuse claims leveled at Michael were based at his Neverland Ranch Credit: Rex Features 17 Michael died in 2009 at just 50 years old Credit: Getty - Pool The frail star, who faced charges of abuse against teenager Gavin Arvizo, famously turned up to his trial in pyjamas - before being acquitted of all 14 charges on June 13, 2005. Over four months Michael, then 46, watched 15-year-old Gavin accuse him of sexual abuse, supported by claims from brother Star and mum Janet that his family was held captive at Michael's Neverland Ranch - famed for its funfair and zoo. In the decades since the trial, further claims have been made regarding Jackson's alleged horrific abuse at the estate, notably by Wade Robson and James Safechuck in the 2019 documentary Leaving Neverland. The singer's lawyer, Brian Oxman, believes the torment of the 2005 trial led to MJ's death four years later from a drug overdose - and reveals the late night calls from the terrified Thriller star. 'Michael rang at all hours of the night, dozens of times,' Brian tells The Sun. 'He kept asking 'Why? I treated them so well - and they make up these lies'. 'He could never fathom it until the day he died.' He adds: 'We would talk about it for long hours about 'the evil' that went on to destroy him. He did not understand. 'No matter what I did, he could not understand and my firm belief is that this prosecution destroyed him.' He also reveals Michael felt 'betrayed' by shamed BBC star Martin Bashir for painting him as a paedophile in a controversial documentary which 'started a stampede' towards abuse allegations. Leaving Neverland documentary clip from Channel 4 And he believes the King of Pop knew he would have died in prison if he had been convicted. 'If Michael went to jail, he would probably have died. He knew that,' he says. 'Child molestation is the worst of all crimes in our jail system. Those people are looked down on and abused by their fellow inmates. 'They are beaten, hurt and treated horribly.' Horror hospital dash 17 The pop star was pictured attending court in his pyjamas Credit: Alamy 17 Gavin Arvizo was one of the people who made allegations of child abuse against Michael Jackson Credit: Granada Television 17 It was alleged that the abuse took place at the star's California mansion Credit: Alamy At the height of the trial, in March 2005, the iconic photo of the star sporting baggy pyjama bottoms, a white T-shirt and a giant suit jacket made headlines around the world and became Time Magazine's Photo of The Year. It also cemented the reputation for eccentric behaviour which saw him dubbed 'Wacko Jacko". But the truth behind the bizarre look was a frantic dash from the hospital where he'd been admitted hours before with suspected broken ribs after a shower fall at his Neverland home. The singer's court absence prompted Judge Ronald L Whyte to fear the defendant had absconded - forfeiting a $3m bail. Despite lawyers' assurances, the judge ordered the star to be back in court within an hour or be sent to jail until the trial's end for a bail breach. He'd plead guilty to assassinating Abraham Lincoln Brian Oxman, Lawyer The order sent Brian and long term pal Joe - Michael's dad and manager of the Jackson 5 - into a panic. 'The prosecution was elated because they knew that if he forfeited his bail, he was going to jail, and he would never, never be able to live in jail," says Brian. 'The prosecutors knew he'd plead to anything to get out of jail. 'He'd plead guilty to assassinating Abraham Lincoln. 'They knew he'd do anything to limit or stop his incarceration.' Defence attorneys frantically called Michael's security, warning of the jail threat, which led to a desperate dash up the 101 freeway towards Santa Maria - pursued by dozens of fans. 'They were doing 110 miles an hour and the fans followed,' says Brian. 'That freeway had a dirt centre divider, which had potholes and was horribly dangerous. All someone had to do was to hit one of those potholes and it would have flipped and somebody would have been killed.' Arriving an hour and 10 minutes later, the star had his bail forfeited but escaped jail. Father-son bond 17 Throughout the trial, Michael was supported by his dad Joe Credit: Getty - Pool 17 Katherine Jackson was also at the trial to support her son against the allegations of abuse Credit: Getty Father Joe - who Michael famously accused of child abuse and bullying - was vital in convincing the sickly star to leave the hospital. 'Joe said, 'Michael, I'm your father. You listen to me - you have got to get to court, no excuses.'' Brian insists Michael 'loved' and 'respected' Joe dearly despite the claims of a feud. 'In the car MJ said, 'I can't walk in just with my pyjamas' so a huge bodyguard named Keith handed over his black jacket. 'It is Time Magazine's picture of the year - if not picture of the decade. 'And who's right next to him in that picture? His dad, Joe, who saved his life.' Brian insists Michael was not faking his injury or looking for sympathy as the lawyer saw a 'huge welt' on the right side of his body. 'He showed me on his chest this huge welt and says 'Brian did I break a bone?' 'And I felt his chest and I said 'I can't tell for sure'. 'I felt a terrible lump but there was a huge injury there.' Abuse accusations 17 Jordan Chandler accused Michael of child abuse in 1993 and received a pay off Credit: News UK Ltd 17 Michael was said to be deeply uncomfortable when Gavin leaned on him in the Bashir interview Credit: Granada Television 17 Wade Robson also claimed he was abused by Michael as a child Credit: NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Michael was first accused of child abuse by Jordan Chandler in 1993, but the case was settled out of court, with the star paying his accuser $15m. But in December 2003, Michael was charged with 14 offences in relation to Gavin Arvizo, including four counts of molesting a child, four counts of getting a child drunk so that he could molest him, one count of trying to molest a child, and one count of secretly planning (conspiring) to hold the boy and his family captive. Brian, an early member of the trial defence team, helped pull together over one and a half million pages of documents and 120 subpoenas. He sent a 15-page dossier with 700 exhibits of evidence to devastated MJ showing the strength of their case in late 2004. 'He called me from the ranch and there was no voice. (I said) 'Michael is that you?' 'He couldn't catch his breath,' says Brian. 'He said, 'Why, Brian? Why are they doing this to me?'" Despite numerous allegations that have surfaced since the star's death, Brian insists there was no evidence for the criminal charges, citing that Michael was not at Neverland on days when Gavin claimed he was abused at the estate. Dashed documentary hopes 17 Michael thought a documentary about his life would aid his comeback Credit: AFP 17 He hoped to one day perform with his children but that never happened Credit: Rex Features Michael's mental health was also rocked by 'the betrayal' of TV interviewer Martin Bashir, with whom he'd plotted a comeback through a documentary about his life, in 2003. But the Living With Michael Jackson series prompted worldwide controversy after he openly boasted about sleeping with children in his bed at Neverland. Cameras caught cancer survivor Gavin leaning his head on MJ's shoulder, discussing their close bond. Brian claims the BBC journalist - who was later found to have falsified documents to persuade Princess Diana to agree to an interview - manipulated Michael and set up the disturbing scenes. Brian raged: 'Bashir used the fact Princess Diana trusted him for the Panorama interview to get in with Michael - who at that time had no idea that he had deceived Diana. 'Gavin wasn't in Michael's life when he filmed, but Bashir and his team asked to meet one of the kids he had helped. 'Bashir talked to Arvizo before the interview and then during the recording he rested his head on Michael's shoulder and held his hand. They knew he'd do anything to limit or stop his incarceration Brian Oxman, Lawyer 'Michael said afterwards: 'That never happened before and I didn't know what to do. I don't know him. And I haven't seen him for a year and almost a half. Why was he acting like my bosom buddy?' 'Michael believed that Bashir may have told Arvizo to do that but no-one knew what really happened. 'Bashir told Michael he wanted to show the real man in a fair way, but when asked about sleeping with children he was so rattled. 'It was a shambles. Why his managers didn't stop it I will never know. 'That show set a stampede in motion which led to the trial. It was the beginning of the end for him.' Bashir later took the stand as the first prosecution witness and Brian says after the verdict, the reporter strolled over and apologised, saying: 'Nothing personal Michael.' 'Michael could not believe it, because inside he was fuming,' he says. 'Michael simply stared back, said nothing and turned away.' Destroyed reputation 17 Lawyer Brian claims the stigma of the allegations against Michael devastated the star Credit: EPA 17 Brian was by Michael's side throughout the abuse trial in 2005 Credit: JDMC Despite the acquittal, many people believe the star behaved inappropriately with young boys. In the summer of 2005 a Gallup Poll reported that 80 per cent of the US public believed Michael was guilty of abuse. 'It damaged Michael beyond repair,' says Brian. 'He was utterly numb. He was mentally, emotionally exhausted. 'Michael said: 'I'm an entertainer. I depend upon the people, 80 per cent of them think I'm guilty?'' MJ fled to Bahrain as a guest of Sheikh Abdulla Bin Hamad Bin Isa Al-Khalifa, the king's son, with the promise of a comeback concert and album. That plan fell apart within a year, leading him into a semi-nomadic life with his three kids, Prince, now 31, Paris, 29 and Bigi, 24. Drowning in debt, he committed to a London O2 residency This Is It. But, in constant pain after a serious back injury he sustained when a stage collapsed at a Munich gig in 1999, he was already hooked on painkillers and anaesthetic Propofol. He died in LA on June 25 2009 - days before the sellout comeback - after suffering a cardiac arrest from a Propofol and benzodiazepines overdose. Fresh allegations have since emerged. In 2019 documentary, Leaving Neverland, Wade Robson and James Safechuck accused the star of sexually abusing them for years, from when they were respectively seven and 10 years old. But Brian says it was the 2005 trial that pushed him over the edge. 'That was the start of the end,' says Brian. 'He was in pain, depression and constantly harassed with accusations. 'Think about it. 'Wacko Jacko, crazy, child molester.' How much can one human being take? 'It was too much for him. I told him he would come through and his mettle would be stronger because of the fire. And in certain ways, that was true, but in other ways, it started this spiral down. It meant the end for Michael.'

Jeremy Renner tells of moment he died - 'just one thing exists'
Jeremy Renner tells of moment he died - 'just one thing exists'

Daily Mirror

timea day ago

  • Daily Mirror

Jeremy Renner tells of moment he died - 'just one thing exists'

The Hawkeye star died momentarily when he was crushed under a snowplough - and he says he did not want to return When Haweye star Jeremy Renner was crushed by massive snowplough the experience changed his life. The actor was left with 38 broken bones, a collapsed lung and even his eyeball exploded out of the socket. But as he fought to breathe he momentarily died at the scene - leaving him with an overwhelming feeling of what happens in the afterlife. Speaking on Lorraine on Friday he explained there was just one thing - "love". ‌ He told the show his near death experience was "difficult to quantify". And he said he has realised recently: "The devil doesn't exist when you are dead. That came to me last night. ‌ "The devil - hatred - have to be the same. Hatred dies out, suffocates itself on the coattails of love. That's the only thing you take with you when you die. It's the most beautiful place." And the actor said when he "came back" he hadn't wanted to return. Laughing he told viewers: "Can you imagine? It was like there's my eye, that's sitting on the ice. My twisted legs." The Mayor Kingstown star was injured in the "incident" - he refuses to call it an accident - which happened on New Year's Day in 2023. He was helping a family member get a stuck vehicle out of the estimated three feet of snowfall from the night before when he was run over by a 14,300-lb. snowplow. The Marvel actor was told at the time he was told he would never walk again but has gone on to heal - but has previously said his recovery will be a "forever" process. He has written about his experience and journey to recovery in a book, My Next Breath named after the moment he knew he had to keep on breathing or he would pass out and die. Lorraine viewers were told how the incident left hims with a heart rate so low he was clinically dead, his legs were twisted and his eyeball was out of its socket. ‌ He said: "By the time the paramedics got there I'd already passed and came back. They got there 10 minutes later. My heart rate was pretty low and I was hypothermic at this point. I was more at risk to die permanently from the hypothermia "It's interesting to be able to see your left eye with your right eye. It came out of my head." ‌ He told how when he was 12 he had gone to a Lamaze breathing class with his mum who was pregnant at the time and he had used this later in life such as when doing auditions so he didn't "forget to breathe". It was this which also helped him as he lay in the snow. Trapped under the snowplough he realised he needed to make a conscious effort to breathe or he would die. He said: "I didn't know exactly why but I knew I wasn't breathing and I wasn't going to breathe unless I forced air in. "I was struggling, I was suffocating. My ribcage and my lung was popped and all these other things were happening. I didn't know that at the time but I thought maybe it was a cramp or some other workout. I couldn't get air. It was essential otherwise you pass out, your organs fail and you are dead." ‌ He also told how the experience had changed his life and the way he dealt with fame. Writing in his book he said he often lived as a hermit, eating sandwiches in toilets at airports, waiting until the last second to get out and get on the plane. He said: "There has been a road or a pathway between myself and the public being famous for the man that I am and not the role that I played. It's very different. Sure I can be known as Hawkeye or this person or that person, whatever, but I'm also known for just being the man that I am and being treated as the man that I am, not as a product on the shelf that you deserve a selfie with. "It's become much more intimate and beautiful. He said people would say "meaningful" things such as "glad you are with us". He said people now gave "really encouraging, loving things to say" rather than in the past when it would be 'hey, let's get a selfie together". He said: "It's much more about there is a road paved that makes it very human and I get very wonderful human exchanges now."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store