The Rise and Fall of Terrorgram
They call themselves Terrorgram — a group of "militant accelerationists" who use extreme violence to bring down governments and create new white "ethnostates".
They came together on social media apps like Telegram and created a transnational network resulting in a spree of deadly terror attacks across the globe.
A year long investigation by PBS and ProPublica unmasks the ringleaders and how they operated.
And it uncovers the failings of authorities to stop them.
"The Rise and Fall of Terrorgram" shows the consequences of unfettered free speech — having influencers advocate mass murder.
It asks the chilling question: are the arrests of the leaders the end of the terrorgram or just the beginning?
"The Rise and Fall of Terrorgram", a PBS Frontline and ProPublica Production, goes to air on Monday May 19 at 8.30pm on ABC TV and ABC iview.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Elon Musk lashes out as he digests his ‘betrayal' at the hands of Donald Trump's circle
Amid a flurry of furious tweets from Elon Musk, denouncing the current centrepiece of Donald Trump's agenda, came one with particularly telling language. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' Mr Musk posted, referring to the congressional elections of 2026. Betrayed. There's a loaded word. One that says more about Mr Musk's sorely bruised ego, I suspect, than the American government's long-complacent tax and spending policies. The man is neither talking nor acting like someone offended, on an intellectual level, by the betrayal of faceless voters he doesn't know. Rather he sounds like someone who feels he has been betrayed on a personal level. And you know what? For good reason. As perverse as it feels to offer sympathy for a guy who's never had a jot of it to spare for anyone else, you must concede that Elon's sense of grievance here is understandable. Trump gladly took hundreds of millions of dollars from Elon last year. Gave him a few shoutouts on stage. Threw him a token job in the government. Shoved him out the door after less than five months. And is now spitting on everything he was trying, however clumsily, to achieve in that job. You don't need to be a ten-year-old trapped in the ketamine-addled body of a 53-year-old tech billionaire to empathise with his frustration. At issue here is a piece of legislation called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Yes, that is its real, formal name. And yes, adults with long and, in some cases, even quite serious careers in politics signed off on it. The Trump family's branding instincts remain as subtle as ever. The moniker is at least two-thirds fitting though, because this thing is huge and near all-encompassing. The third element, beauty, remains in the eye of the beholder. It runs to more than a thousand pages, some of which some members of Congress did actually bother to read before passing it through the House of Representatives. It still needs to survive the Republican-controlled Senate before it can be sent to Mr Trump's desk for a final signature which, presumably, shall not be affixed via autopen. What of the contents? There are many. At the topline level: an extension of the sweeping tax cuts from Mr Trump's first term; big cuts to initiatives like Medicaid, the government program that funds health insurance for low-income Americans; and a humungous chunk of funding for immigration enforcement initiatives, like the border wall Mr Trump has been promising to build, quickly, since 2015. Some of us are old enough to remember when Mexico was going to pay for the thing, which would negate the need for any US government funding. Ah well. Empty promises. Elon is not the only person becoming acquainted with them. I digress. The problem with Mr Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, Mr Musk argues, is the effect on America's already drowning federal budget. According to newly released costings from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office – the equivalent of our Parliamentary Budget Office in Australia – the legislation as written will add nearly $US2.5 trillion to the country's debt over the next decade. Not million. Not billion. Trillion. It blows a gaping hole in the nation's budget, which already looked a bit like off Swiss cheese. Another cost, which admittedly concerns Mr Musk far less, is an estimated 10.9 million people being left without health insurance. Not exactly something to celebrate in a country where common injuries and ailments often bankrupt entire families. Now, as you would expect of a mature government, the White House and senior Republicans have offered a thoughtful response to the CBO's analysis: 'Nuh-uh.' They claim the CBO is biased against them, you see, like every other institution in the country. Hence, the assertions we are hearing, from those Republicans that this bill actually won't add a single dollar to America's deficit. Not one! Not a dime. The argument is that Mr Trump's extended tax cuts will spur a sudden, miraculous explosion of economic growth that wipes out any lost revenue. And that, when said growth is combined with the money raised by Mr Trump's on again, off again, on again, off again, on again (but at a lower rate), off again, on again tariffs, the budget will be fine. In politispeak, we might call this position tenuous. In real world speak, we call it obvious, utter crap. The Trump administration is building its tax and spending plans atop a house of cards, atop another house of cards, atop a house of tissue paper, all of it underpinned by assumptions that insult the Trump officials' own intelligence, never mind ours. Which means the Trump administration is, essentially, just continuing business as usual in Washington. Talk a humungous game about the importance of fiscal rectitude while out of office. Wag a finger at the profligate left. Then, once you've gained power yourself, run the nation's finances even more recklessly. It's a proud Republican tradition at this point. Deficit spending on a social safety net? Grossly irresponsible. Ballooning the deficit to provide lower taxes for the wealthy? Something something good economic management. No wonder someone like Elon Musk, the living embodiment of 'move fast and break things', is so frustrated. The poor guy believed he was part of something revolutionary. When Mr Trump tapped him to head the Department of Government Efficiency, he thought he was there to actually achieve something. Putting aside the chaos and stupidity of DOGE's methods – firing people only to rehire them in a scramble, repeatedly revising its savings down after being caught using false numbers, etc – Mr Musk's commitment to the vision, the ultimate end goal of a more fiscally balanced federal government, was at least genuine. Then he showed up for work in the White House, and swiftly learned none of the other acolytes hanging around the place cared about it. On one level, he was preposterously naive. Donald Trump ranted about the federal deficit during his first run for president almost a decade ago, and repeatedly claimed he would fix it easily. He went on to run massive deficits throughout his first term. How on earth did Mr Musk come to believe that guy would actually commit to balancing the budget? His own social media platform's juiced algorithm may have been a contributor. But the rest of Washington must have shocked Mr Musk as well. Consider: even the more principled members of the Republican caucus, the fiscal hawks, the libertarian small government types, are hardly standing athwart history shouting 'no' here. 'While I oppose increasing the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, I enthusiastically support making the tax cuts permanent and could vote for the Big not-yet-Beautiful Bill if the debt ceiling were voted on separately,' Senator Rand Paul, a quasi-libertarian, said today. A position as substantive as one's stool after a night of booze and curry. He's opposed to swelling the debt too much at some point in the future. Think of the carte blanche you might give the Democrats, if the ceiling of potential debt is raised! But at the same time, he's just fine with the tax cuts that are forecast to supersize said debt by trillions right now. Mr Paul probably would have been part of a Senate majority without any intervention, in last year's campaign, from Mr Musk. But you can mount a plausible argument that none of the jokers currently running America's executive branch would have attained this level of power without Elon Musk's money, or his cultural influence, or his platform. And what did he get for it? Barely four months inside the administration, running an ineffective quasi-department, whose work has been undone by a single bill. The implicit mockery of people who pretended to think he was a genius when it suited them, only to consciously uncouple at the first opportunity. So much time was spent, in these early months of the Trump administration, worrying about Mr Musk using the White House to further his own business interests. Not without reason. It turns out the Trump team was using him all along.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
What we know about Trump's newly ordered probe into Biden's alleged use of 'autopen'
US President Donald Trump has ordered his administration to investigate former president Joe Biden's actions, targeting his aides, including an autopen. The order could lay the groundwork for arguments by Republicans that a range of Mr Biden's actions as president were invalid. The president has claimed that Mr Biden's aides concealed his "cognitive decline" and abused presidential authority. What is happening, and why has Trump made such a big deal out of it? Let's break it down. Mr Trump has mandated two investigations through the memorandum he signed on June 4. The investigations aim to assess Mr Biden's capabilities as a president and the executive actions he has signed. The first investigation will examine whether anyone conspired to "deceive the public about Biden's mental state" and "unconstitutionally exercise" his authorities and responsibilities. The second one will probe Mr Biden's executive actions executed during his final years in office, for example, policy documents signed with an autopen and who authorised its use. This January, Mr Biden pardoned his siblings and their spouses in the final minutes of his presidency, saying his family had been "subjected to unrelenting attacks and threats, motivated solely by a desire to hurt me". He also pardoned Anthony Fauci, the former US chief medical adviser and retired General Mark Milley and members of the House committee that investigated the January 6 attack on the Capitol. "Biden's cognitive issues and apparent mental decline during his presidency were even 'worse' in private, and those closest to him 'tried to hide it' from the public," he said. Mr Trump said that the nation was governed through presidential signatures, adding that the president of the US "holds tremendous power and responsibility through his signature". "The vast majority of Biden's executive actions were signed using a mechanical signature pen, often called an autopen, as opposed to Biden's own hand," he claimed. "This was especially true of actions taken during the second half of his presidency, when his cognitive decline had apparently become even more clear to those working most closely with him." The president has questioned whether Mr Biden's aides were usurping presidential authority, as he said he believed his predecessor lacked the capacity to exercise his presidential authority. For decades, US presidents — including Trump — have used autopens, which is a device that mechanically replicates a person's signature, to sign documents and correspondence. Barack Obama was the first president to use one to sign a law in May 2011, when he signed an extension to the Patriot Act. Mr Obama was in France on official business and, with time running out before the law expired, he authorised the use of the autopen. On the same day, House Oversight Chairman James Comer of Kentucky, a Republican, announced he would expand the investigation into the alleged "cover-up of Biden's mental decline". Mr Comer reiterated his call for Mr Biden's physician, Kevin O'Connor, and former senior White House aides Annie Tomasini, Anthony Bernal, Ashley Williams and Neera Tanden to appear for transcribed interviews. "The American people deserve full transparency and the House Oversight Committee is conducting a thorough investigation to provide answers and accountability," the chairman said. He warned subpoenas would be issued this week if they refuse to schedule voluntary interviews. "I think that people will start coming in the next two weeks," Mr Comer told reporters. He added that the committee would release a report with its findings, saying "and we'll release the transcribed interviews, so it'll be very transparent." Here are the roles of Biden's five senior advisers: Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House counsel David Warrington have been ordered to handle the investigation. It's unclear how far Mr Trump will push this effort, which would face certain legal challenges. Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries has not released any statements in response to Mr Trump's order. ABC/wires
ABC News
8 hours ago
- ABC News
US court drops charge against conspiracy theorist Donald Day Jr linked to Wieambilla attack
A US judge has dismissed one of the charges against a conspiracy theorist linked to the deadly Wieambilla terror attack. Donald Day Jr was facing five federal charges in the US — three relating to alleged threats, and two counts of violating firearms laws. US judge the Honourable John J. Tuchi has now dismissed one count of an interstate threat charge, which alleged Mr Day threatened the director of the World Health Organization. Mr Tuchi granted the motion from US government prosecutors for the count to be dropped this week after the government said it was "made in good faith and is not contrary to the public interest". The defendant's counsel did not object to the dismissal of the charge, labelled "count 2" in court documents. It was alleged in February 2023, Mr Day threatened to injure WHO director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, commenting on a BitChute video: "It is time to kill these monsters, and any who serve them. Where are my kind? Where are you? Am I the only one? F**kin' hell!" The video Mr Day commented on was of the WHO director discussing the discovery of a new virus in Equatorial Guinea called Marburg, which he said was similar to Ebola and had no approved vaccines. Mr Day was active on BitChute, under the username "WEAREALLDEADASF**K", and had previously posted on the platform that he was "an x-con, who's armed to the teeth." He also communicated with Gareth and Stacey Train on YouTube under the username "Geronimo's Bones". The Train couple, along with Gareth's brother Nathaniel, fired a hail of bullets at police at their Queensland property in 2022. Constables Rachel McCrow and Matthew Arnold, and a neighbour, Alan Dare, were all killed in the shooting. After the murder of the officers, Gareth and Stacey appeared to address Mr Day in a video posted on YouTube called "Don't Be Afraid". "[T]hey came to kill us, and we killed them. If you don't defend yourself against these devils and demons, you're a coward. We'll see you when we get home," Gareth said. "We'll see you at home, Don. Love you," Stacey added. Mr Day commented on the video soon after, that he wished he could be with the Trains "to do what I do best", according to court documents. "I hate it, that I am unable to. What can I do? I tell you, family, that those b**tards will regret that they ever f**ked with us," he said. Mr Day told officers in a police interview filed to a US court in April, that he was emotional after seeing the video. He said that if he had known what was going to happen, he would have told the Trains not to kill the officers as he wanted them to come to the United States. Mr Day admitted that he felt responsible for what happened to the Trains and for telling them he would have killed the "devils" and "demons" if they had come to his home. "I totally felt responsible for that … because I didn't want to see my friends get killed like that," he told police. The trial is scheduled to take place on September 15.
