Should school lunch be free for all Utah K-12 students — even if they can pay?
Senate Minorty Leader Luz Escamilla knows the first question that she will likely be asked when she presents her recently introduced bill calling for free school meals for all students enrolled in Utah's public schools — regardless of financial need:
'Why should the state help pay for meals that many students can afford?'
It's a fair query, the Democrat's ranking leader in the Utah Senate told the Deseret News.
But the state's primary concern, she added, should not be which kids can pay for meals and which kids cannot. Instead, it should be ensuring that every Utah child is ready to learn because their bellies are full.
Providing universal free school meals, she said, accomplishes that goal.
First, 'let's have all the kids be ready to eat,' said Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City. 'And then anyone who wants to can opt out of that process — either because they can pay or because they're sending their kids with meals (from home).
'But (free school meals) should be an 'Opt-out' — not an 'Opt-in' choice.'
Escamilla's SB173 establishes the creation of the 'Universal School Meals Program.' If it passes, funding would come via a restricted account of legislative appropriations, federal grants, private contributions and other sources. All families would be automatically enrolled in the program, but would still have the option to pay for meals if they choose, offsetting program costs.
'We should have a more honest and transparent conversation about what it costs to have the quality of life that we want for all children, and not exclude some. And I think breakfast and lunch at school, as part of their education journey, should be one of those costs.'
Senate Minority Leader Luz Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City
The Universal School Meals Program would be administered by the Utah State School Board, coordinating with individual schools to maximize federal funding.
A fiscal note has not yet been attached to Escamilla's bill, but on Tuesday she estimated the fiscal note to be approximately $100 million.
During her 16-plus years as a state lawmaker, Escamilla has focused much of her attention on the needs of Utah's kids, including food security issues.
She's learned that it's difficult to accurately determine how many Utah families are facing food insecurity.
No two Utah families are the same, she added. Food insecurity 'can impact any family at any time.'
So simply determining which child might be best-served by a free or reduced-cost school meal cannot always be easily measured by, say, family pay stubs or tax returns.
And even families not traditionally classified as 'economically vulnerable' might not consistently have reliable access to food.
'Feeding America and other national (hunger relief) organizations tell us that in Utah, 1 in every 6 kiddos do not know where their meal is going to come in the evenings after school,' she said.
Absenteeism, poor reading skills and other educational challenges facing many Utah school children are often directly connected to hunger, added Escamilla. 'We can't expect our children to learn adequately when they are hungry.'
And then there are the emotional costs exacted on kids — the embarrassment or shame — after being classified as a 'free school lunch' kid.
A universal school meal program, she said, would prevent a Utah child from ever being 'placed in a box to label a child. This will keep the labels out because everyone will be treated the same.'
Escamilla believes in the goodwill of her Utah neighbors. She's confident that families who are financially able will voluntarily opt out of the automatic universal school meal program.
'I trust that the families in Utah understand how valuable our taxpayers are — and that if they can pay, they will pay for their kiddos meal.
'But I don't want to ever put the burden on the child. … A child should never have to make those decisions or feel embarrassed or worried that their parents may not support them having breakfast or lunch at school.'
SB173 is not the only school meal-related bill in front of the Legislature this session. HB100 focuses on providing free breakfast and lunch to 'eligible' students, while prohibiting schools from publicly identifying free meal recipients and causing embarrassment.
'But the right thing to do is to make (free school meals) comprehensive and truly a part of the education piece for all children in our state,' said Escamilla.
The senator said her bill reflects Utah's Senate Democrats who are committed to asking how many Utah families are not enjoying the economic prosperities experienced by others in the state.
'We should have a more honest and transparent conversation about what it costs to have the quality of life that we want for all children, and not exclude some,' she said. 'And I think breakfast and lunch at school, as part of their education journey, should be one of those costs.'
Escamilla said there are numerous federal programs that make it permissible to draw-down federal dollars — but they first require state participation. 'This bill will fully put the state at full participation that will allow us to explore all of those programs, and we want to do that.
'And it also opens up a restricted account where anyone can contribute towards this fund, which I think is critical. It matches the culture in our state of giving.'
Ratifying the universal school meals program into a law would come with a high price tag. But it's worth the cost, said Escamilla.
'We recognize how valuable it is to have children not experiencing hunger,' she said. 'We don't want any Utah children to feel insecure and hungry. We can take care of that as part of their education.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Senate GOP unveil long-awaited SNAP proposals for Trump bill
Senate Republicans on Wednesday rolled out a suite of proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as a key component of President Trump's 'big beautiful bill' – but it dials back some of the proposals sought by the House that drew intraparty concerns. The new legislative text from the Senate would require states to cover some of the cost of SNAP benefits, which are currently completely funded by the federal government, if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028, while allowing states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent. It also proposes states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see its share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent to 15 percent. The House, by contrast, called for all states to cover 5 percent of the cost of allotments in its agricultural proposal passed as part of a broader plan to advance Trump's tax agenda last month, with states that had higher payment error rates having to pay anywhere between 15 to 25 percent. The softened proposal comes as Senate Republicans expressed concerns about how the House pitch would have impacted states. 'This bill takes a commonsense approach to reforming SNAP-cutting waste, increasing state accountability, and helping recipients transition to self-sufficiency through work and training,' Senate Agriculture Chairman John Boozman (R-Ariz.) said in a statement on Wednesday. 'It's about being good stewards of taxpayer dollars while giving folks the tools to succeed.' 'At the same time, our farmers and ranchers are facing real challenges,' he said. 'This legislation delivers the risk management tools and updated farm bill safety net they need to keep producing the safest, most abundant and affordable food, fuel, and fiber in the world. It's an investment in rural America and the future of agriculture.' Like the House bill, the Senate bill would also decrease the administrative cost the federal government is required to pay to help cover program operations in the states by 25 percent, but beginning in fiscal year 2027. The proposals in both chambers also seek to limit the federal government's ability to increase monthly benefits in the future and beef up work requirements, as well as farm provisions that GOP leaders have argued will make it easier to craft a bipartisan farm bill in the months ahead – although Democrats have said otherwise. Republicans on the Senate Agriculture Committee estimated the recent legislation would generate $144 billion in net savings in the years ahead as the party looks to ramp up cost-cutting measures in Trump's plan amid concerns about the overall deficit impact of his tax priorities. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary
A House Ways and Means Committee hearing took an unexpected turn Wednesday when Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) accused Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of interrupting her because of her gender—prompting audible groans from the room. The exchange occurred during a tense five-minute questioning session, where Sanchez challenged Bessent on the impact of tariffs enacted under President Trump's administration. "Prices are rising on many everyday goods," Sanchez said, citing increases in clothing, shoes, canned food, toys, and household tools. She added, "On average, Trump's tariffs are estimated to cost households $3,000 more for the same goods than they would have last year," though she did not cite the source of the figure when pressed. Trump Says 'Total Reset Negotiated' With China During Tariff Talks In Geneva When Bessent attempted to interject, Sanchez quickly cut him off: "Please don't interrupt me… I know I'm a woman, but please try to limit yourself to answering my questions." That remark prompted groans from the hearing room, with one attendee audibly reacting, "Oh, come on." Sanchez responded: "No, I'm sorry, but we get talked over all the time, and I don't want that to happen at this hearing." Read On The Fox News App Bessent, who is openly gay, did not address the accusation and instead focused on defending the administration's trade policies. When Sanchez challenged him on pricing impacts and China's trade behavior, Bessent responded, "That's incorrect," and said, "They met their agreements under President Trump in 2020, and President Biden did not enforce them." Wh Slams Dems' 'Partisan Games' After Trump-foe Schiff Calls For Insider Trading Investigation Over Tariffs Sanchez repeatedly claimed that American consumers are paying more due to tariffs and described recent negotiations with China as rushed and lacking transparency. "A poorly negotiated trade deal with China is probably not worth the paper that it is written on," she said. "I was alarmed to hear this morning that Trump said the U.S.–China deal was done after just two days of talks in London." Bessent defended the agreement as an initial step. "The deal struck was for a specific goal, and it will be a much longer process," he said, adding, "China has proven an unreliable partner." The clash between Sanchez and Bessent was repeatedly moderated by Chairman Adrian Smith (R-NE), who reminded members of time limits and decorum throughout the article source: Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Food Bank of Iowa warns about SNAP implications in President Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
DES MOINES, Iowa — The Food Bank of Iowa is sounding the alarm while the fate of the President's 'big, beautiful bill' sits in the United States Senate. The concerns outlined by the organization are food insecurity and limited resources that food banks already have. 'We're gravely concerned about the one big, beautiful bill act as written,' said Annette Hacker, Vice President of Strategy and Communications for the Food Bank of Iowa. 'It stands to slash $267 billion with a 'b' from SNAP over ten years. And it takes 9.5 billion meals a year off of the table for people facing hunger.' New law helps clear the way for birthing centers in Iowa The bill has states pay for these federal benefits, in part, through a cost sharing method. Hacker said that this would be roughly $40 million a year the state would have to account for, which to her doesn't feel possible. The legislation also raises the age of SNAP work requirements to 65-years-old, extending those requirements to parents without children younger than 7-years-old. 'The crushing need this would create is not possible for the charitable food system, that's us, to absorb. If you look at every Feeding America food bank in this country, of which Food Bank of Iowa is one of 200 and all the partners and pantries we stock across the entire country, that's 6 billion meals a year distributed. This would be 9.5 billion more meals, a gap that would have to be filled. And the math just doesn't work,' said Hacker. U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley said that the goal is for the chamber to take it up on the Senate floor in the last week of June. To volunteer or donate, visit the Food Bank of Iowa's website. Iowa News: Food Bank of Iowa warns about SNAP implications in President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' Winner named in Coolest Thing Made in Iowa contest New law helps clear the way for birthing centers in Iowa Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline Third case of measles in Iowa this year reported by HHS Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.